C.A.P. Profile
What's New
Affiliates/P.T.O.s
Programs and Issues
Native Web Site Links Database
Special Features
Congress of Aboriginal Peoples

Bill C-31: The Abocide Bill
- Introduction

  
by  
Harry W. Daniels   
Former President , Congress of Aboriginal Peoples  
(Note: Speaking notes related to this text are available at this link
)

  Table of Contents  
Introduction
Overview of Bill C-31 
Band Membership
Equality versus Continuity 
Culmination of Extermination
Conclusions/Footnotes

Introduction

The French have a saying: "Plus que ca change, plus que c'est la meme chose." The more things change, the more they remain the same. This adage aptly describes the changes that Bill C-3 1 brought about more than ten years ago. It is not that the changes Bill C-3 1 made were unimportant, even less that they were ineffective. The amendments Bill C-3 1 made to the Indian Act are without a doubt the most important that had ever been made to the Indian Act regime in its over 100 years of existence. They have affected and continue to affect the lives of Indian and Metis people everywhere in Canada.  

Since 1985, over 100,000 Indian people have acquired Indian Status as a direct result of Bill C-31. There can no question that the Bill has been effective: in fact, no piece of legislation has had a greater impact on the masses of Indian and Metis people in the last ten years than has Bill C-31.   

Yet the more we examine Bill C-3 1 and the effects it has had on the Aboriginal peoples of Canada, the more we are brought to realize how little things have changed after all. The Bill not only continues but will actually accelerate the extermination policies - the integration of Canada's Indian population into mainstream society - that have always been at the heart of the federal Indian Act regime. So serious are the Bill's implications in this regard that, within a few generations, there may no longer be any Status Indians left in Canada.  

The elders tell us that when faced with a confusing and difficult situation if a name can be put on the problem, then you can deal with it. There has never been a name for Bill C-3 1, and it strikes us that it needs one. For us, the Bill is the "Abocide Bill', which is not quite the same thing as genocide, but close. Like genocide, it refers to the extermination of a people; in this case, the extermination not of Indians per se, but of their status as Aboriginal people.  

Table 1
Distribution of Aboriginal Population by Group and Class
Canada, l991 Census
Total Abo. 
Pop.
Inuit 
Pop not Multiple Abo.
Abo. on Reserve Off- 
Reserve Status Indians
Metis without Indian Status Approx. 
Non-Status Indian Pop. Off-Reserve
Non-Stat us as % 
of Total 
Abo.
Canada
1,016,335
43,000
189,365
200,450
188,970
394,550
38.8
Nfld.
13,260
5,830
480
560
1,565
4,825
36.4
P.E.I.
1,910
75
345
170
175
1,145
59.9
N.S.
22,160
640
5,710
2,040
1,470
12,300
55.5
N.B.
13,210
320
2,845
1,855
860
7,330
55.5
Que.
139,510
8,065
21,455
14,845
17,110
78,035
55.9
Ont.
246,895
2,975
29,240
41,550
24,670
148,460
60.1
Man.
117,455
670
36,430
26,925
39,630
13,800
11.7
Sask.
97,675
330
30,300
27,035
28,570
11,440
11.7
Alta.
149,855
1,815
23,785
31,150
50,650
42,455
28.3
B.C.
172,470
1,325
38,220
40,930
20,455
71,540
41.5
Yukon
6,480
135
340
3,800
435
1,770
27.3
N.W.T.
35,465
20,825
215
9,590
3,390
1,445
4.1
Source: Statistics Canada catalogues 94-327and 94-325
  Table of Contents  
Introduction
Overview of Bill C-31 
Band Membership
Equality versus Continuity 
Culmination of Extermination
Conclusions/Footnotes
Contact InformationBack To TopHome

Copyright InformationCongress of Aboriginal Peoples