Citizenship and Immigration Canada Canada wordmark

Forging Our Legacy: Canadian Citizenship and Immigration, 1900-1977

Chapter 6 (continued)
Trail-Blazing Initiatives


top of page  Provincial interest in immigration

A provision in the 1976 Immigration Act that authorizes the minister to enter into agreements with the provinces to facilitate the drawing up and implementation of immigration policies helped to inspire the negotiation of several federal­provincial immigration agreements in the 1970s. The most far-reaching of these--and the one that attracted the most press coverage--was the agreement concluded in 1978 with Quebec, the Cullen­Couture Agreement.

In the first decades after the Second World War, Quebeckers and their politicians took little interest in the positive role that immigration could play in the economic and cultural development of the province. This attitude began to change during the Quiet Revolution of the 1960s when the Jean Lesage Liberal government announced the creation of a Quebec immigration service in 1965. Essentially an exercise on paper, this initiative was eclipsed in 1968 by the Union Nationale government's establishment of an immigration department to promote the integration of immigrants into Quebec's Francophone society. That same year, the Quebec government signed an agreement with Ottawa to place Quebec officials in federal immigration offices abroad to assist in the selection of suitable immigrants for Quebec. This was followed seven years later by the Entente Bienvenue­Andras, which authorized Quebec to interview prospective immigrants and to make recommendations to federal visa officers.

When the Parti Québécois came to power under René Lévesque in 1976, it assigned top billing to immigration. In fact, immigration was one of the first issues that the new government raised with Ottawa, with Quebec pushing for a full range of powers in this field. Two years later the Cullen­Couture Agreement was concluded. This milestone agreement declared that immigration to Quebec must contribute to the province's cultural and social development and provided the province with a say in the selection of independent-class immigrants (skilled workers and businessmen with their dependents) and refugees abroad. In addition, the agreement allowed the province to determine financial and other criteria for family-class and assisted-relative sponsorship.

 
top of page  Multiculturalism

Multiculturalism was another immigration-related issue that surfaced during the 1970s. The concept was thrust into the political limelight on 8 October 1971, when Pierre Trudeau announced in the House of Commons that his government would adopt a policy of multiculturalism within a bilingual framework.

When he made this warmly received announcement, Trudeau failed to explain why his government was officially adopting such a concept. He carefully refrained from mentioning that multiculturalism was intended to persuade non-English and non-French Canadians to accept official bilingualism, the federal policy that had been instituted in 1969 with the passage of the Official Languages Act. Designed to promote the equality of French and English in all federal government operations, official bilingualism had been urged by the Royal Commission on Bilingualism and Biculturalism (the B&B Commission), which had been established in 1963 to inquire into the use of French and the status of French Canadians in Canada. To its sponsors, the policy of bilingualism seemed to be a logical response to the tumultuous nationalism that shook Quebec in the 1960s. Nevertheless, it never received widespread support.

From its inception, official bilingualism stirred up opposition across the country. Nowhere, however, did it attract more hostility than in the West. Westerners of Ukrainian, German, or other non-English or non-French backgrounds demanded to know why the federal government assigned less importance to their culture than to that of the much smaller French-speaking minorities in Western Canada.

The Trudeau government responded to the increasing assertiveness of the so-called "third force" in Canadian society by adopting recommendations made by the B&B Commission that would safeguard the contributions of other "ethnic" groups (excluding the Native peoples) to Canada's cultural enrichment. These recommendations called for a policy of multiculturalism within a bilingual framework. Multiculturalism itself was not new. It was merely an old activity given a new name. But no matter what its guise, those who espoused it sought to promote equality and respect among Canada's different ethnic or cultural groups.

To implement its new policy, the government appointed a Minister Responsible for Multiculturalism in 1972 and in 1973 set up a Canadian Multiculturalism Council and the Multiculturalism Directorate within the Department of the Secretary of State. Like official bilingualism, however, multiculturalism would invite opposition, much of which would develop during the turbulent eighties, when Canada faced some of the most challenging immigration issues ever to confront policy-makers and try the souls of policy-enforcers.

Wilder Penfield:
Medical Pioneer and Author

The neurosurgeon and scientist Wilder Penfield (1891­1976) certainly stands out among the American immigrants who have made outstanding contributions to Canada. Dr. Penfield's remarkable achievements in medicine won him high praise both in Canada and abroad and brought increased recognition to the Montréal medical community.

Born in Spokane, Washington, in 1891, Wilder Penfield obtained a BLitt from Princeton University in 1913. He then attended Merton College, Oxford, where he was influenced by two great medical teachers, the celebrated Canadian physician Sir William Osler, who became his lifelong hero, and the prominent neurophysiologist Charles Sherrington. After obtaining an MD from Johns Hopkins University in 1918, the young doctor served as surgeon at the Presbyterian Hospital (affiliated with Columbia University) in New York and at the New York Neurological Institute, 1921­28.

In 1928, Penfield became professor of neurology and neurosurgery at McGill University in Montréal. There, pursuing the puzzle of epilepsy, he undertook a systematic mapping of the human brain and, with associates, produced scientific papers, handbooks, and monographs that became standard reference works on the function of the brain.

When the Montréal Neurological Institute opened in 1934, Wilder Penfield became the inaugural director of the first institution in the world to be devoted exclusively to the treatment of nerve disease. Its formal opening on 27 September of that year climaxed several years of planning in which the surgeon and teacher had played a leading role. In his new capacity, Dr. Penfield presided over an institute whose task, as he so aptly defined it, was "the achievement of a greater understanding of the ills to which the nervous system is heir, to the end that we may come to the bedside with healing in our hands."

Although Wilder Penfield retired in 1960, he continued to lead a very active life, becoming the first director of the Vanier Institute of the Family, a supporter of university education, and the author of several books. His writings from the last 15 years of his life include The Mystery of the Mind (1975), which summarizes his views on the mind­ brain problem; and No Man Alone (1977), an autobiography of his early years, 1891­1934. Earlier works include two historical novels--No Other Gods (1954) and The Torch (1960)--which found a wide readership.

Wilder Penfield's most lasting legacy is undoubtedly his work with the internationally renowned Montréal Neurological Institute. The hospital, which has been integrated with a brain-research complex, is recognized to this day as a centre for the study of the human brain. It also serves as a model for similar units around the world.

 
top of page  What does the future hold?

The immigration patterns that have figured so prominently in altering the face of present-day Canada's largest cities were well under way when Trudeau announced his government's multiculturalism policy in 1971. Just as these patterns were the direct result of the government's decision in the 1960s to reject Canada's racist immigration policy, so too was the rapid colonization and development of the Prairie provinces a direct consequence of the government's decision to promote the immigration of "stalwart peasants in sheepskin coats." It is progressive decisions like these that have opened the country's doors to successive waves of immigrants, each with a contribution to make. These timely political decisions have helped to create the vibrant Canada that we know today, a Canada whose growing confidence was expressed in the Canadian Citizenship Act of 1947 and its successor, the Citizenship Act of 1977. What decisions, one must wonder, will govern immigration policy in the years ahead and how will the resulting immigration shape the Canada of the future?

Top of pageTable of contentsPreviousNext