Wireless Code Public Opinion Research 2015 - Summary

Quantitative Research Report Prepared for the Canadian Radio-Television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC)

POR #: POR 044-14
Contract Number: 82082-150018/001/CY
Contract Award Date: February 4, 2015
Report Date: March 31, 2015

Ce rapport est aussi disponible en français sur demande.

communications@crtc.gc.ca


Proprietary Warning

Any material or information provided by the CRTC and all data collected by Harris/Decima will be treated as confidential by Harris/Decima and will be stored securely while on Harris/Decima's premise (adhering to industry standards and applicable laws).

OTTAWA
1800-160 Elgin St.
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada  K2P 2P7
Tel: (613) 230-2200   Fax: (613) 230-3793

MONTRÉAL
400-1080 Beaver Hall Hill
Montréal, Québec, Canada  H2Z 1S8
Tel: (514) 288-0037   Fax: (514) 288-0138

TORONTO
405-2345 Yonge St.
Toronto, Ontario, Canada  M4P 2E5
Tel: (416) 962-2013   Fax: (416) 962-0505


Executive Summary

Harris/Decima is pleased to present this report to the Canadian Radio-Television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC) highlighting the findings from the second annual “Wireless Code” research study.

The Commission established the Wireless Code, a mandatory code of conduct for wireless service providers, in The Wireless Code, Telecom Regulatory Policy CRTC 2013-271, June 3, 2013 (the Wireless Code Decision). The Wireless Code applies to all retail mobile wireless voice and data services (wireless services) provided to individual and small business consumers in Canada.

In the Wireless Code Decision, the Commission indicated that it will develop an evaluation plan to evaluate the effectiveness of the Wireless Code; the results of this evaluation will form part of a formal review of the Wireless Code following its implementation; and it intends to initiate a formal review of the Wireless Code within three years of its implementation.

To ensure the effectiveness of the formal review, the Commission needed reliable data on how consumers’ understanding of their wireless service contracts and related rights is changing between the implementation of the Wireless Code and the formal review. The review of the Wireless Code over time assesses whether it is meeting its objective: empowering consumers to make informed decisions about wireless services.

In order to measure this, telephone surveys were conducted with Canadian cell phone users in each of the last two years. The sample included both landline interviews and cell phone interviews. We aimed to complete at least 35% of the interviews by calling cell phone numbers in order to ensure that those people who primarily use their cell-phone (or live in a cell phone only household) were included in the sample pool. The final 2015 sample of 1,005 Canadian adults is made up of 35% cell phone interviews and 65% landline interviews.

To properly track this data over time and be able to compare trends, the same approach and questions were used as for the Wireless Code research study conducted in 2014, with three additional questions this year.

Surveys were conducted between February 23rd and March 11th, 2015 (in English and French) and took an average of 9 minutes to complete. The sample was a probability sample and as such can be extrapolated to the Canadian population with a margin of error of +/-3.1%, 19 times out of 20.

The key findings based on the survey results are presented below.

Service Agreements
Wireless Services - Complaints
Wireless Contracts
The Wireless Code

Research Firm: Harris/Decima Inc.
Contract Number: 82082-150018/001/CY
Contract Award Date: February 4, 2015
Contract Value: $49,892.99 (Incl. HST)

I hereby certify as Senior Officer of Harris/Decima Inc that the deliverables fully comply with the Government of Canada political neutrality requirements outlined in the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada and Procedures for Planning and Contracting Public Opinion Research. Specifically, the deliverables do not include information on electoral voting intentions, political party preferences, standings with the electorate or ratings of the performance of apolitical party or its leaders.

Signature of Danielle Armengaud

Danielle Armengaud, Research Director

Harris/Decima Inc.