Consumer Health Products Survey

Contract # HT372-152592/001/CY (POR 043-15)
Produced by TNS Canada
Contract Award Date: March 8, 2016
Report Date: July 18, 2016
Ce rapport est aussi disponible en français sur demande:
communications@hc-sc.gc.ca

Table of Contents

1. Executive Summary

1.1. Research Purpose and Objectives

The overall objective of this research is to better understand Canadian consumers’ knowledge, attitudes awareness and behaviours as they relate to consumer health products.

More specifically, this research seeks:

The findings will be used by Health Canada:

Health Canada will continue to engage with Canadians as the approach moves forward and evolves.

1.2. Summary of Findings

Canadians’ Knowledge and Understanding of Consumer Health Products

Canadians have low perceived knowledge of the safety and effectiveness of consumer health products.  Canadians generally consider themselves more knowledgeable about non-prescription drugs (35%) than cosmetics (25%) or natural health products (19%). They consistently rate their knowledge of the safety and effectiveness of consumer health products higher for non-prescription drugs than natural health products or cosmetics.  Canadians also generally feel uninformed when purchasing consumer health products (33-58%).  Again, to a lesser extent with non-prescription drugs (33%) than natural health products (58%) or cosmetics (45%).

Women, older Canadians (55+), those with at least a college education and those who use consumer health products more frequently all report higher levels of knowledge regarding the safety and effectiveness of consumer health products in all categories and generally feel more well informed about these products.

Canadians do not categorize consumer health products in the same way Health Canada does. For the most part, Canadians tend to categorize products based on their use rather than the particular ingredients in a product.  As such, Canadians tend to categorize products like dandruff shampoo and lip balm with sunscreen into cosmetics rather than non-prescription drugs.   Interestingly, perceived level of knowledge and frequency of use do not change the way in which Canadians categorize products.  They continue to categorize them based on use rather than ingredients like Health Canada currently classifies and regulates these products.

Awareness and knowledge of homeopathic medicine, Ayurveda and SPF varies substantially.  Unprompted, most Canadians (95%) are unable to correctly or even partially define homeopathic medicine.  When prompted with a variety of responses, less than half of Canadians (42%) were able to correctly define Ayurveda.  Canadians were unable to provide a consistent unprompted definition for SPF 15 however, most (75%) could associate it with “sun protection factor 15”.

Awareness of product identifiers also varies with more than half of Canadians being aware of DINs but much fewer aware of NPNs (15%) or DIN-HMs (10%).

Canadians have a general understanding of Health Canada’s responsibilities but a large portion do not understand the details of exactly what these responsibilities entail.  More specifically, around two thirds of Canadians understand Health Canada is responsible for many tasks when it comes to product safety of consumer health products such as making sure products are safe before they hit the shelf, setting safety standards for companies to follow, making sure products contain the ingredients they claim to, etc.  There is however, some confusion on what this specifically means. For example, half or more of Canadians believe Health Canada reviews and approves all types of product labels before they hit the shelves and/or test products in the laboratory for all consumer health products. Generally speaking Canadians that perceive themselves to be better informed and have higher perceptions of safety and trust are more likely to believe that Health Canada is responsible for most/all of the tasks presented related to non-prescription drugs and cosmetics.  This is not the case for natural health products where only increased trust (not safety) is associated with increased perceptions of Health Canada’s responsibilities.

Attitudes and Perceptions towards Consumer Health Products

Canadians’ attitudes and perceptions about consumer health products are in line with their perceived knowledge and understanding.  For the most part, Canadians believe non-prescription drugs are safe (70%), but as seen throughout the research, they are less confident in the safety of cosmetics (60%) and even less so with natural health products (51%).  This reflects the finding that Canadians believe more strongly that Health Canada is responsible for ensuring the safety of non-prescription drugs(74%) and less so for cosmetics (65%) and natural health products (67%).  More Canadians believe that the government (Health Canada) is primarily responsible for ensuring safety rather than the manufacturers of consumer health products (78% vs 61%).

Attitudes toward claims on labels are another point of interest. Canadians do not trust the claims made on the labels of consumer health products (only 18-36% trusts them).  However, even though Canadians claim to be wary of these claims, they also believe these claims are supported by science (66%) and proof from manufacturers (66%).  Clearly there is a disconnect with these findings and it is unclear why Canadians lack trust in claims when they also feel they are supported by science and proof from manufacturers.

Perceptions about product identification numbers (DIN, DIN-HM and NPN) tend to be in line with Canadians’ attitudes towards the product categories.  These numbers are most associated with product safety and to a lesser extent, being without contamination (there is little association with effectiveness of a product).

Again we see that women, older Canadians (55+), those who use consumer health products and those who feel they are more informed display similar attitudes towards consumer health products.  For instance, they are all more likely to believe all consumer health products are safe, more likely to trust the claims on all consumer health product labels and more likely to believe it is Health Canada’s responsibility to ensure a product is safe and claims are supported by science.

Selection and Use of Consumer Health Products

Consumer health product usage varies greatly by category and type of product.  Cosmetics are the most frequently used consumer health products, particularly products for hair (79% uses at least once per week) and skin (70% use at least once per week).  Natural health products such as vitamins and minerals are also frequently used by a majority (56% uses at least once a week) of Canadians. Seasonal products and specific types of medicines are used by the majority of Canadians (88-92%), however on a less frequent basis.  The same is true for sunscreen, antacids and allergy relievers – all used by most Canadians (58-89%), but infrequently.  The majority of Canadians never use traditional natural health products (70%) (such as traditional Chinese medicines, or Ayurveda) or homeopathic products (66%).

Incidence and frequency of reading product labels is fairly consistent between the three categories of products. Consistently for each category, dosage and directions are two of the most frequently read portions of the label, while the least commonly read elements are where the product was made and endorsements.  The most noticeable difference between categories is that frequency of reading labels is universally higher for non-prescription drugs (23-67%) – all elements are more likely to be viewed at every purchase or at every use, compared to natural health products (23-58%) and particularly cosmetics (20-49%).  Brand name is the only product element viewed more frequently on cosmetics than the other two categories.

With regard to information desired to make a purchase decision, directions, ingredients and product warnings are the most important to Canadians.  For all three product categories, a strong majority of Canadians want to have directions on how to use the product (70-77%), ingredients (66-72%), warnings (66-75%) and dosage (71-78%) (with the exception of cosmetics) directly on the product to help them to decide what to buy.  Brand name is more important to have on non-prescription drugs and cosmetics than it is on natural health products, while the origin of the product is of higher importance on natural health products.  Package inserts and endorsements are the least important package features in the product purchase decision, regardless of category.

Product use plays a role in how much information Canadians’ want for purchase decisions. Frequent users of natural health products such as homeopathic products want more information than infrequent or non-users while frequent users of traditional natural health products want less information than infrequent or non-users.  With regard to non-prescription drugs, generally speaking frequent users tend to require less information than infrequent or non-users. Cosmetics users such as hair and skincare products tend to want more information to support their purchase decisions.  Furthermore, Canadians who consider themselves informed about non-prescription drugs and Cosmetics also require more information to make purchase decisions.

When it comes to determining the safety and effectiveness of consumer health products, Canadians look to several sources.  For natural health products, there are clearly three top sources of information that Canadians look to – asking a health professional or practitioner, researching the product online and reading labels or product inserts.  That being said, none of these sources are used by a majority (44-48%).  Non-prescription drugs have two sources of information that stand out above the rest – asking a health professional or practitioner and reading labels or product inserts, though only a very slight majority(53-57%) use these sources.  For cosmetics, relying on brand name (44-45%) and reading labels or product inserts (43%) are the main sources of information.  It is also worth noting that a sizeable portion of the population simply doesn’t think about safety or effectiveness (10-20% and 10-9% respectively); however more think about it for non-prescription drugs (89-90%) than natural health products (86-88%) and cosmetics (79-80%).

Canadians also use a variety of sources to look for product-specific information in each category.  While there are no information sources that are used by a strong majority of Canadians, search engines (41-43%) and product labels (43-51%) are two of the most commonly used sources for all three categories.  Health care professionals (such as a doctor or a nurse) (53%) are an important source for looking up information on non-prescription drugs.  While general internet searches using a search engine are common, specific health-related websites (such as manufacturers’ website, Health Canada’s website, consumer group websites, etc.) are not commonly used by Canadians to look up product information.

As seen with knowledge and attitudes towards consumer health products, selection and usage of these products is predominantly affected by gender and age.  Again, women and older Canadians (55+) both display similar tendencies: they are more likely to frequently use most types of products, search for product information about both safety and effectiveness and read several different parts of the labels on product packaging.

1.3. Methodology

An online panel survey was conducted among 2,502 Canadians age 18 years and older.  A pre-test consisting of 10 completed English interviews and 10 completed French interviews, was completed before fielding the survey on April 15th, 2016.  The survey was in field from April 18th to April 26th, 2016. Respondents for this survey were selected from among those who have registered to participate in the TNS online surveys. The results of such surveys cannot be described as statistically projectable to the target population. The data have been weighted to reflect the demographic composition of the Canadian population 18 years and older. As this was a panel survey, margin of error does not apply.  Surveying was conducted in the respondent’s official language of choice and took an average of 21 minutes to complete.   A detailed methodology can be found in Chapter 4.

1.4. Contract Value

The total contract value for this project was $44,547.82 including HST.

1.5. Statement of Political Neutrality

I hereby certify as Vice President, Ottawa Regional Office & Public Sector Practice Lead of TNS Canada Ltd. that the deliverables fully comply with the Government of Canada political neutrality requirements outlined in the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada and Procedures for Planning and Contracting Public Opinion Research. Specifically, the deliverables do not include information on electoral voting intentions, political party preferences and standings with the electorate or ratings of the performance of a political party or its leaders.

David Ang
TNS Canada Ltd.
Vice President, Ottawa Regional Office & Public Sector Practice Lead

2. Foreword

2.1. Background

Canadians play an active role in managing their own health and using consumer health products responsibly. It is relatively easy for Canadians to do so since they have access to an unlimited amount of health resources and products, many without a prescription or involvement of a health care practitioner. Self-care plays a key role in disease prevention and maintaining public health, as it helps to make the Canadian health care system more sustainable.

Consumer health products can be categorized into three main groups – non-prescription drugs, natural health products and cosmetics. They can range from sunscreens to pain medications, vitamins to homeopathic remedies and toothpastes to skin moisturizing cosmetics. Canadians can easily access these health products in places such as grocery, convenience and department stores, pharmacies, natural health food stores and online.

It is important that Health Canada understand Canadians’ views on consumer health products since it is the federal department responsible for helping Canadians maintain and improve their health.  Additionally, it is not always obvious to consumers which category the consumer health product belongs to which can cause consumers to think products are in one category but in fact are in another.

2.2. Research Objectives

The overall objective of this research is to better understand Canadian consumers’ knowledge, awareness, attitudes and behaviours as they relate to consumer health products.  This information will be used to support the development of policies relating to these products.

More specifically, this research seeks:

The findings will be used by Health Canada:

2.3. Methodological Overview

An online panel survey was conducted among 2,502 Canadians age 18 years and older.  A pre-test consisting of 10 completed English interviews and 10 completed French interviews, was completed before fielding the survey on April 15th, 2016.  The survey was in field from April 18th to April 26th, 2016. Respondents for this survey were selected from the TNS online panel. The results of panel surveys cannot be described as statistically projectable to the Canadian population. The data have been weighted to reflect the demographic composition of the Canadian population 18 years and older using age, gender and region. As this was a panel survey, margin of error does not apply.  Surveying was conducted in the respondent’s official language of choice and took an average of 21 minutes to complete.   A detailed methodology can be found in Chapter 4.

Please note: Analysis was undertaken to establish the extent of the relationship among variables such as age, region, level of education attained, income, differences among caregivers of children and seniors, pregnant and breastfeeding women and those with severe allergies or chronic conditions.  Only differences significant at the 95% confidence level are presented in this report.  Any differences that are statistically significant between subgroups are highlighted in green in tables throughout the report.  As this was a non-probability sample, conclusions from these tests cannot be generalized to any population.

The numbers presented throughout this report are rounded to the closest full number. Due to this rounding, in some cases it may appear that ratings collapsed together are different by a percentage point from when they are presented individually and totals may not add up to 100%. As well, respondents were required to respond to all questions in the survey.  Many of the charts in this report present only the top three and bottom three responses on a scale of 7. In instances where the charts do not add to 100% the remaining responses belong to the neutral category or don’t know.

3. Detailed Findings

3.1. Canadians’ Knowledge and Understanding of Consumer Health Products

3.1.1. Perceived Knowledge of Safety of Consumer Health Products

Canadians have low perceived knowledge of the safety of consumer health products.

Before being given any additional information, respondents from across Canada who were recruited from TNS’s online panel (hereinafter referred to as “Canadians”) were asked to rate themselves on their knowledge of consumer health products.  Only one third of Canadians (or less) rated themselves as ‘knowledgeable’ (score of 5, 6, or 7 on a 7-point scale) about the safety of the three categories of consumer health products.  Canadians are slightly more confident in their knowledge of non-prescription drugs safety (33%), compared to the safety of cosmetics (25%) and natural health products (19%).  In fact, at least half of Canadians consider themselves to have poor knowledge (a score of 1, 2, or 3 on a 7-point scale) about the safety of cosmetics (50%) and natural health products (56%).

Exhibit 3.1.1.a: Perceived Knowledge of Safety

Exhibit 3.1.1.a: Perceived Knowledge of Safety

Q3. In general, how would you rate your knowledge about the safety of:  
On a scale of 1 to 7, where 1 is no knowledge at all and 7 is extremely knowledgeable. 
Base: Total Respondents (n=2502)

Frequency of product use plays a role in Canadians’ self-rated knowledge about the safety of consumer health products.  More specifically, frequent users of natural health products such as traditional natural health products, natural health products and homeopathic products are more confident in their knowledge about the safety of natural health products than infrequent or non-users.  This is also the case for frequent users of non-prescription drugs such as allergy relievers and decongestants, antacids, sunscreens and pain relievers and for cosmetics such as skincare products.  Complete details can be found in the table below.

Table 3.1.1.a: Perceived knowledge of safety by frequency of product use
Knowledgeable
(score of 5, 6, or 7)
Total Frequency of use
Frequent Infrequent Never
Base=actual (2,502)
%
(n=varies)
%
(n=varies)
%
(n=varies)
%
*Represents significant difference at the 95% confidence level.
Natural health products
Traditional natural health product 19 37* 27* 14
Natural health product 24* 17* 10
Homeopathic 39 27 14
Non-prescription drugs
Allergy 33 40 34 28
Cough and cold 41* 33* 28
Sunscreen 36* 32 27
Antacids 41* 37 26
Pain relief 42* 31* 23
Cosmetics
Hair care 25 26 24 22
Skin care 29* 18* 10

Gender, region and education also play a role in Canadians’ self-rated knowledge about the safety of consumer health products.  To this point, women are more confident than men in their knowledge about safety of natural health products (22% vs. 17%), non-prescription drugs (35% vs. 30%) and cosmetics (34% vs. 16%).

Regionally speaking, those residing in British Columbia are significantly more likely than the rest of Canada to rate themselves as ‘knowledgeable’ about the safety of natural health products (24% vs. 16%-20%), while Quebecers are more likely to rate their knowledge higher for non-prescription drugs (36% vs. 29%-34%) and cosmetics (28% vs. 23%-25%).

With regard to education, Canadians with at least a university degree are significantly more likely than those with a high school or less to consider themselves ‘knowledgeable’ about the safety of natural health products (20% vs. 15%), non-prescription drugs (34% vs. 29%) and cosmetics (27% vs. 21%).

Table 3.1.1.b: Perceived knowledge of safety by gender, region and education
Knowledgeable (score of 5, 6, or 7) Total Gender Region Education
Male Female Atlantic Quebec Ontario Prairies B.C. High school or less College/
CGEP
University Degree
Base=actual (2,502)
%
(1,164)
%
(1,337)
%
(251)
%
(600)
%
(900)
%
(351)
%
(400)
%
(496)
%
(894)
%
(1,062)
%
*Represents significant difference at the 95% confidence level.
Natural health products 19 17 22* 16 17 20 17 24* 15 20* 20*
Non-prescription drugs 33 30 35* 29 36* 34 29 32 29 34* 34*
Cosmetics 25 16 34* 24 28* 25 23 24 21 27* 27*

3.1.2. Perceived Knowledge of Effectiveness of Consumer Health Products

Canadians have low perceived knowledge of consumer health product effectiveness.

While slightly higher than perceived knowledge of safety, Canadians perceived knowledge of effectiveness is also low.  Less than two in five Canadians consider themselves ‘knowledgeable’ (a score of 5, 6, or 7 on a 7-point scale) about the effectiveness of consumer health products.  Again, Canadians are slightly more confident about their knowledge of the effectiveness of non-prescription drugs (39%), compared to cosmetics (27%) and natural health products (21%).  Around half of Canadians rated themselves as having ‘poor knowledge’ (a score of 1, 2, or 3 on a 7-point scale) about the effectiveness of cosmetics (46%) and natural health products (54%).

Exhibit 3.1.2.a: Perceived Knowledge of Effectiveness

Exhibit 3.1.2.a: Perceived Knowledge of Effectiveness

Q4. In general, how would you rate your knowledge about the effectiveness(how well they work) of: On a scale of 1 to 7, where 1 is no knowledge at all and 7 is extremely knowledgeable. 
Base: Total Respondents (n=2502)

Similar to perceived knowledge, frequency of product use plays a role in Canadians’ self-rated knowledge about the effectiveness of consumer health products.  More specifically, frequent users of natural health products such as traditional natural health products, natural health products and homeopathic products report higher levels of  knowledge about the effectiveness of natural health products than infrequent or non-users.  This is also the case for frequent users of non-prescription drugs such as allergy relievers and decongestants, antacids, sunscreen and pain relievers and for cosmetics such as skin and hair care products.  Complete details can be found in the table below.

Table 3.1.2.a: Perceived knowledge of effectiveness by frequency of product use
Knowledgeable
(score of 5, 6, or 7)
Total Frequency of Use
Frequent Infrequent Never
Base=actual (2,502)
%
(n=varies)
%
(n=varies)
%
(n=varies)
%
*Represents significant difference at the 95% confidence level.
Natural Health Products
Traditional natural health product 21 40* 29* 16
Natural health product 26* 19* 11
Homeopathic 41* 30* 15
Non-Prescription Drugs
Allergy 39 46* 40* 34
Cough and cold 44* 39* 33
Sunscreen 43* 38 34
Antacids 47* 43* 32
Pain relief 48* 37* 26
Cosmetics
Hair care 27 29* 23 20
Skin care   32* 20* 10

Similar to perceived knowledge about safety, women are significantly more likely than men to consider themselves ‘knowledgeable’ about the effectiveness of natural health products (23% vs. 19%), non-prescription drugs (41% vs. 37%) and especially cosmetics (36% vs. 18%).

Table 3.1.2.b: Perceived knowledge of effectiveness by gender
Knowledgeable
(score of 5, 6, or 7)
Total Gender
Male Female
Base=actual (2,502)
%
(1,164)
%
(1,337)
%
*Represents significant difference at the 95% confidence level.
Natural health products 21 19 23*
Non-prescription drugs 39 37 41*
Cosmetics 27 18 36*

3.1.3. Categorizing Consumer Health Products

Canadians do not categorize consumer health products in the same way Health Canada does.

Participants were shown images of ten products chosen based on availability in French and English that represent a range of product types and categories of natural health products, non-prescription drugs and cosmetics.

These included:

Nearly all Canadians (94%-98%) were able to identify that Tylenol, Reactine and Pepto-Bismol are non-prescription drugs.  A strong majority were also able to identify Pantene Pro-V Shampoo as a cosmetic (91%) and Black Radish as a natural health product (85%).  These are the products that fit most with Canadians’ definitions of these categories.

That being said, Canadians did not categorize several other products presented in the same fashion as Health Canada.  The products that Canadians categorized differently tend to be products that are used in a particular way but based on particular ingredients, do not actually belong to the category as defined by Health Canada. For example, dandruff shampoo is used for cleaning one’s hair and is identified as a cosmetic by most Canadians however due to particular ingredients; Health Canada defines it as a non-prescription drug.

Nivea Lip Balm and Neutrogena Sun Screen were also identified as cosmetics by nearly all Canadians (87%-88%).  Only a very small proportion correctly categorized them in the same fashion as Health Canada - as a non-prescription drug (6% each), while a similar proportion were equally likely to think they were natural health product (6%-7%).

Natural health products such as Centrum Select and Sedatil were only categorized as an natural health product by one third of Canadians (30%-39%), while the majority (61-68%) identified them as non-prescription drugs.  These findings suggest that Canadians do not always categorize products in the same way that Health Canada does.

Exhibit 3.1.3.a: Perceived Product Category

Exhibit 3.1.3.a: Perceived Product Category

Q1. Please drag each product into the category box you think they most belong.
Base: Total Respondents (n=2502)

Interestingly, Canadians’ perceived level of knowledge (how informed they consider themselves to be) and frequency of product use generally do not improve their ability to correctly categorize consumer health products.  The exception being Centrum Select, those who considered themselves more informed and those who use traditional natural health products, natural health products and homeopathic products were more likely to identify Centrum Select as a natural health product.

Table 3.1.3.a: Categorizing natural health products by frequency of use
Natural Health Products Total Frequency of Use
Traditional NHP NHP Homeopathic
Knowledgeable (score of 5, 6, or 7) Freq-uent Infre-quent Never Freq-uent Infre-quent Never Freq-uent Infre-quent Never
Base=actual (2,502)
%
(202)
%
(584)
%
(1,767)
%
(1,428)
%
(635)
%
(534)
%
(210)
%
(679)
%
(1,668)
%
*Represents significant difference at the 95% confidence level.
Black Radish 85 81 80 86* 85 84 83 80 85* 85*
Centrum Select 39 55* 43* 35 42* 38* 31 56* 39 37
Sedatil 30 26 29 31 30 30 30 30 31 30

 

Table 3.1.3.b: Categorizing non-prescription drugs by frequency of use
Non-Prescription Drugs Total Frequency of Use
Allergy Cough and Cold Sunscreen
Knowledgeable (score of 5, 6, or 7) Freq-uent Infre-quent Never Freq-uent Infre-quent Never Freq-uent Infre-quent Never
Base=actual (2,502)
%
(362)
%
(1,376)
%
(839)
%
(81)
%
(2,132)
%
(323)
%
(812)
%
(1,528)
%
(281)
%
*Represents significant difference at the 95% confidence level.
Reactine 97 94 97* 98* 81 98* 96* 96 98* 95
Nivea 6 7 6 7 10 6 8 7 6 7
Neutrogena - Ultrasheer 6 6 6 5 12* 6 7 6 6 7
Pepto-Bismal 94 91 94* 94* 76 94* 93* 94 94 91
Tylenol – Extra Strength 98 96 98* 99* 85 99* 97* 99* 98* 95
Head and Shoulders 6 6 6 6 13* 5 8 6 6 6

 

Non-Prescription Drugs Total Frequency of Use
Antacids Pain Relief
Knowledgeable (score of 5, 6, or 7) Freq-uent Infre-quent Never Freq-uent Infre-quent Never
Base=actual (2,502)
%
(347)
%
(1,224)
%
(1,022)
%
(667)
%
(1,823)
%
(194)
%
*Represents significant difference at the 95% confidence level.
Reactine 97 95 98* 98* 97 97* 95
 Nivea 6 6 6 6 7 6 7
Neutrogena - Ultrasheer 6 9* 6 5 7 6 6
Pepto-Bismal 94 92 94 94 92 94 91
Tylenol – Extra Strength 98 97 98* 99* 98 98 97
Head and Shoulders 6 6 6 5 7* 5 10*

 

Table 3.1.3.c: Categorizing cosmetics by frequency of use
Cosmetics Total Frequency of Use
Skin care Hair care
Knowledgeable (score of 5, 6, or 7) Frequ-ent Infreq-uent Never Frequ-ent Infreq-uent Never
Base=actual (2,502)
%
(1,780)
%
(585)
%
(262)
%
(1,969)
%
(508)
%
(266)
%
*Represents significant difference at the 95% confidence level.
Pantene 91 92* 87 84 91* 85 87

 

Table 3.1.3.d: Categorizing Consumer Health Products by perceived level of knowledge
Knowledgeable
(score of 5, 6, or 7)
Total Perceived Level of Knowledge
NHP NPD Cosmetics
Well
In-formed
Not well
In-formed
Well
In-formed
Not well
In-formed
Well
In-formed
Not well
In-formed
Base=actual (2,502)
%
(465)
%
(1,483)
%
(937)
%
(808)
%
(701)
%
(1,155)
%
*Represents significant difference at the 95% confidence level.
Natural Health Products
Black Radish 85 82 84 - - - -
Centrum Select 39 44* 35 - - - -
Sedatil 30 31 29 - - - -
Non-Prescription Drugs
Reactine 97 - - 98* 96 - -
Nivea 6 - - 6 8 - -
Neutrogena - Ultrasheer 6 - - 6 7 - -
Pepto-Bismal 94 - - 94 92 - -
Tylenol – Extra Strength 98 - - 98 97 - -
Head and Shoulders 6 - - 7 7 - -
Cosmetics
Pantene 91 - - - - 93* 89

3.1.4. How Informed are Canadians when Purchasing Consumer Health Products?

Canadians do not feel well informed when purchasing consumer health products.

Canadians do not consider themselves ‘well informed’ when purchasing consumer health products.  This is not surprising given how poorly Canadians rated their knowledge of consumer health product safety and effectiveness of these same products.  To this point, Canadians rated themselves very poorly in terms of how ‘well informed’ (a score of 5, 6, or 7 on a 7-point scale) they feel when purchasing non-prescription drugs (37% consider themselves ‘informed’), cosmetics (29%) and even less so when purchasing natural health products (19%).

These results, coupled with the low levels of perceived knowledge on safety and effectiveness suggest that Canadians are not well informed consumers.

Exhibit 3.1.4.a: How Informed when Purchasing Products

Exhibit 3.1.4.a: How Informed when Purchasing Products

Q8. In general, how informed do you feel when you buy products in the following categories?  On a scale of 1 to 7, where 1 is not well informed at all and 7 is extremely well informed. 
Base: Total Respondents (n=2502)

Text Description - Exhibit 3.1.4.a: How Informed when Purchasing Products

Frequency of product use plays a role in Canadians’ perceived level of knowledge about consumer health products.  Specifically, frequent users of natural health products such as traditional natural health products, natural health products and homeopathic products report feeling more well informed than infrequent or non-users.  This is also the case for frequent users of non-prescription drug such as allergy relievers and decongestants, cough cold and flu, antacids, sunscreen and pain relievers and for cosmetics such as skin and hair care products and sunscreen.  Complete details can be found in the table below.

Table 3.1.4.a: Perceived level of knowledge by frequency of product use
Perceived level of knowledge (score of 5, 6, or 7) Total Frequency of Use
Frequent Infrequent Never
Base=actual (2,502)
%
(n=varies)
%
(n=varies)
%
(n=varies)
%
*Represents significant difference at the 95% confidence level.
Natural health products
Traditional natural health product 19 37* 25* 14
Natural health product 23* 16* 9
Homeopathic 39* 25* 14
Non-prescription drugs
Allergy 37 48* 38* 31
Cough and cold 47* 38 33
Sunscreen 42* 36* 31
Antacids 46* 41* 31
Pain relief 46* 36* 25
Cosmetics
Skin care 29 33* 19 15
Hair care   30* 23 24

Gender and education play the biggest role in whether Canadians feel informed when purchasing consumer health products.  A consistent theme throughout this research is that women are significantly more likely than men to consider themselves ‘well informed’ when purchasing natural health products (21% vs. 17%), non-prescription drugs (40% vs. 35%) and particularly cosmetics (37% vs. 20%).

With regard to education, Canadians with at least a university degree are significantly more likely than those with a high school diploma to consider themselves ‘well informed’ when purchasing natural health products (20% vs. 15%), non-prescription drugs (39% vs. 34%) and cosmetics (30% vs. 24%).

Table 3.1.4.b: Perceived level of knowledge Canadians perceive themselves to be when purchasing consumer health products by gender and education
Perceived level of knowledge
(score of 5, 6, or 7)
Total Gender Education
Male Female High school or less College/
CGEP
University Degree
Base=actual (2,502)
%
(1,164)
%
(1,337)
%
(496)
%
(894)
%
(1,062)
%
*Represents significant difference at the 95% confidence level.
Natural health products 19 17 21* 15 20* 19*
Non-prescription drugs 37 35 40* 34 39* 38*
Cosmetics 29 20 37* 24 30* 30*

3.1.5. Perceived Meaning of Homeopathic Medicine

Few Canadians understand what homeopathic medicine is.

A mere five per cent of Canadians have even a partial understanding of what homeopathic medicine is and/or the tenants (or origin) behind it.  Specifically, the concept of enabling the body to heal itself (1%), like curing (1%), diluted solutions (1%) or low doses(1%) were identified by a very small proportion of Canadians.

Many Canadians (46%) confuse homeopathic medicine for herbal products indicating that it was a natural, plant based or herbal medicine. While others (10%) simply consider it an alternative to traditional medicine such as non-traditional treatment, unconventional medicine or home remedies.

Some Canadians (14%) define it as a medicine that is unproven or does not work while others (12%) consider it unregulated medicine (10%).

Exhibit 3.1.5.a: Meaning of Homeopathic Medicine (Unaided)

Exhibit 3.1.5.a: Meaning of Homeopathic Medicine (Unaided)

Q5. When you come across a product that says “homeopathic medicine” on the label, what does that mean to you? (OPEN ENDED RESPONSE)
Base: Total Respondents (n=2502)

Some groups are more likely to have at least a partial understanding of what homeopathic medicine is.  In particular:

Table 3.1.5.a: Perceived Meaning of Homeopathic Medicine by frequency of use
Understanding of Homeopathic Medicine Total Frequency of Use
Traditional NHP NHP Homeopathic
Freq-uent Infre-quent Never Freq-uent Infre-quent Never Freq-uent Infre-quent Never
Base=actual (2,502)
%
(202)
%
(584)
%
(1,767)
%
(1,428)
%
(635)
%
(534)
%
(210)
%
(679)
%
(1,668)
%
*Represents significant difference at the 95% confidence level.
Natural, plant based or herbal 46 39 48* 45 49* 47* 36 54* 58* 39
Unproven efficacy, does not work 14 8 8 16* 13 12 17 3 7* 17*
Alternative to traditional medicine 12 11 11 12 13* 9 10 11 13 11
Unregulated 10 9 10 10 10* 9 7 10 10 9
Partial understanding of homeopathy 5 9* 8* 4 6* 4 3 5 6* 5
No side effects/safer than pharmaceuticals 2 5* 4* 1 2* 1 1 5* 2* 1
Nothing/Don’t know/Refused 21 25 20 20 16 21 28 20 10 25

 

Table 3.1.5.b: Perceived Meaning of Homeopathic Medicine by education
Understanding of Homeopathic Medicine Total Education
High school or less College/
CGEP
University Degree
Base=actual (2,502)
%
(496)
%
(894)
%
(1,062)
%
Natural, plant based or herbal 46 49 51 41
Unproven efficacy, does not work 14 9 10 19
Alternative to traditional medicine 12 11 11 13
Unregulated 10 7 10 10
Partial understanding of homeopathy 5 1 5 7
No side effects/safer than pharmaceuticals 2 1 2 2
Nothing/Don’t know/Refused 21 25 19 18

3.1.6. Understanding of Ayurveda

Most Canadians don't understand what Ayurveda is.

When asked which description(s) Canadians would associate with a “product traditionally used in Ayurveda to aid digestion” the majority (58%) answered incorrectly (a drug that aids digestion or a digestive aid made in a place called Ayurveda) or don’t know.  Nearly four in ten Canadians were able to correctly associate it with either an herbal digestive aid (31%) and/or with a folk medicine from South Asia to aid digestion (17%)1.

It would appear that Canadians do not have a full understanding of Ayurveda.

Exhibit 3.1.6.a: Associated Ayurveda Terms

Exhibit 3.1.6.a: Associated Ayurveda Terms

Q6. Which of the following descriptions would you associate with a “product traditionally used in Ayurveda to aid digestion”? Select all that you think apply.
Base: Total Respondents (n=2502)

Frequent users of traditional natural health products were more likely to choose an incorrect answer compared to infrequent or non-users (drug: 26% vs 10-15%; place: 18% vs 10-13%).

However, frequent users of natural health products are more likely to understand what Ayurveda is compared to infrequent or non-users (digestive aid: 36% vs 30-19%; folk medicine: 19% vs 10-13%) as are those who consider themselves to be more well-informed about natural health products (digestive aid: 24% vs 14%; folk medicine: 41% vs 26%).

Demographically speaking, women, Canadians under the age of 55 and those with at least a college education are all more likely to understand what Ayurveda is – though still at relatively low levels.

Table 3.1.6.a: Ayurveda associations by gender, age and education
  Total Gender Age Education
Male Female 18-34 35-54 55+ High school or less College/
CGEP
University Degree
Base=actual (2,502)
%
(1,164)
%
(1,337)
%
(457)
%
(981)
%
(1,064)
%
(496)
%
(894)
%
(1,062)
%
*Represents significant difference at the 95% confidence level.
A folk medicine from South Asia to aid digestion 17 15 19* 21* 17* 14 10 14* 22*
An herbal digestive aid 31 26 36* 34* 33* 27 21 31* 36*
A medicine (drug) that aids digestion 12 14* 10 19* 9 9 11 11 13
A digestive aid made in a place called Ayurveda 11 12 11 18* 11* 6 10 10 13
Don’t know 43 47* 40 33 42* 53* 56* 46* 35

3.1.7. Understanding of SPF

Canadians associate the term “SPF 15” with sunscreen or protection from the sun.

While Canadian consumers did not come up with a consistent definition to the term “SPF 15”, a large majority (75%) correctly associate it with sunscreen or protection from the sun.  The terms “sun protection at lower dosage”, “sun protection factor 15” and “protects from the sun/UV rays” were the most common definitions.

Exhibit 3.1.7.a: Perceived Meaning of "SPF 15"

Exhibit 3.1.7.a: Perceived Meaning of 'SPF 15'

Q7. When you come across a product that says “SPF 15” on the label, what does that mean to you? (OPEN ENDED RESPONSE)
Base: Total Respondents (n=2502)

Text Description - Exhibit 3.1.7.a: Perceived Meaning of "SPF 15"

3.1.8. Awareness of Product Identifiers

A small majority of Canadians have heard of a Drug Identification Number.

Just over half (57%) of Canadians have heard of a Drug Identification Number (DIN). However, very few Canadians are aware of Natural Product Number (NPN) (15%) or Homeopathic Medicine Number (DIN-HM).

Exhibit 3.1.8.a: Awareness of Product Identifiers

Exhibit 3.1.8.a: Awareness of Product Identifiers

Q18. Have you ever heard of a:
Base: Total Respondents (n=2502)

Text Description - Exhibit 3.1.8.a: Awareness of Product Identifiers

Not unexpectedly, those who use these types of consumer health products are more likely to be aware of the identification numbers. Users of natural health products such as traditional natural health products and natural health products are more likely to be aware of NPNs (17-20% vs. 6%  and 11-12% vs 4% respectively) while users of homeopathic products are more likely to be aware of DIN-HMs (16-24% vs 6%).  Users of non-prescription drug such as allergy relievers and decongestants (59-61% vs. 52%), antacids (56-60% vs 52%), sunscreen (60-61% vs 51%) and pain relievers (57-62% vs 42%) are also more likely to be aware of DINs.

Furthermore, Canadians who consider themselves more well informed about natural health products have increased awareness of NPNs (28% vs 11%) and DIN-HMs(22% vs 5%) and those who consider themselves more well informed about non-prescription drugs have increased awareness about DINs(66% vs 47%).

Some demographic groups are more likely than others to have heard about DIN.  In particular:

Awareness of NPN and DIN-HM are not significantly affected by demographic differences.

Table 3.1.8.a: Awareness of DIN by gender, age and education
  Total Gender Age Education
Male Female 18-34 35-54 55+ High school or less College/
CGEP
University Degree
Base=actual (2,502)
%
(1,164)
%
(1,337)
%
(457)
%
(981)
%
(1,064)
%
(496)
%
(894)
%
(1,062)
%
*Represents significant difference at the 95% confidence level.
Awareness of DIN 57 53 61* 42 58* 68* 52 58* 59*

 

Table 3.1.8.b: Awareness of DIN by region
  Total Region
Atlantic Quebec Ontario Prairies B.C.
Base=actual (2,502)
%
(251)
%
(600)
%
(900)
%
(351)
%
(400)
%
*Represents significant difference at the 95% confidence level.
Awareness of DIN 57 47 52 60* 64* 55

3.1.9. Perceived Health Canada Responsibilities

Canadians have a general understanding of Health Canada’s responsibilities but a large portion does not understand the details of exactly what these responsibilities entail.

Regardless of category, Canadians understand Health Canada is responsible for many tasks when it comes to product safety.  In particular, at least two thirds of Canadians feel Health Canada is responsible for making sure products are safe before they hit the shelf and setting safety standards for companies to follow.

Even more so than with natural health products and cosmetics, Canadians feel Health Canada is responsible to ensure the safety of non-prescription drug products.  This category consistently rates higher on all tasks than the other two, suggesting that Canadians believe Health Canada is more involved with products in the non-prescription drug category as a whole.

While most Canadians believe Health Canada is responsible for a variety of tasks related to safety of consumer health products, more than half do not understand the exact nature of this responsibility.  For example, half or more believe Health Canada reviews and approves all types of product labels and/or tests products in laboratories for each category of consumer health product.

Exhibit 3.1.9.a: Perceived Tasks Health Canada is Responsible For

Exhibit 3.1.9.a: Perceived Tasks Health Canada is Responsible For

Q17. For each of the following categories, which tasks, if any, do you believe Health Canada is responsible for?
Base: Total Respondents (n=2502)

Generally speaking Canadians that perceive themselves as better informed and have higher perceptions of safety and higher trust in claims are more likely to believe that Health Canada is responsible for most/all of the tasks presented related to non-prescription drugs and cosmetics.  This is not the case for natural health products where only increased trust is associated with increased perceptions of Health Canada’s responsibilities.

Table 3.1.9.a: Perceived Health Canada responsibilities for natural health products by perceived level of knowledge and perceptions of safety and trust in claims.
Natural Health Products Total Perceived level of knowledge Perceived safety Trust in claims
Well
in-
formed
Not well
in-formed
Safe Not safe Trust Don’t trust
Base=actual (2,502)
%
(465)
%
(1,483)
%
(1,243)
%
(511)
%
(444)
%
(1,321)
%
*Represents significant difference at the 95% confidence level.
Making sure a product is safe 67 62 68* 69* 60 68 67
Setting safety standards for companies to follow 67 65 66 70* 61 68 65
Making sure products contain the ingredients they say they do 64 63 62 66* 59 67* 62
Pulling products that are not safe from the shelves 64 61 65* 67* 59 63 65
Ensuring products are not contaminated 60 58 60 62* 56 60 58
Reviewing the product 58 56 58 61* 53 57 57
Making sure a product does what it says it will 55 55 54 56 53 57 55
Approving labels before they hit the shelves 54 53 54 55 52 58 54
Testing products in a laboratory 53 50 53 54 53 52 53
None of these 9 7 10* 6 15 5 10*

 

Table 3.1.9.b: Perceived Health Canada responsibilities for non-prescription drugs by perceived level of knowledge and perceptions of safety and trust in claims.
Non-Prescription Drugs Total Perceived level of knowledge Perceived Safety Trust in Claims
Well
in-
formed
Not well
in-formed
Safe Not safe Trust Don’t trust
Base=actual (2,502)
%
(937)
%
(808)
%
(1,752)
%
(241)
%
(893)
%
(801)
%
*Represents significant difference at the 95% confidence level.
Making sure a product is safe 74 76* 68 78* 60 78* 69
Setting safety standards for companies to follow 74 80* 67 78* 57 81* 67
Pulling products that are not safe from the shelves 70 74* 64 74* 55 75* 66
Making sure products contain the ingredients they say they do 69 73* 63 72* 58 74* 64
Ensuring products are not contaminated 65 70* 58 69* 47 72* 59
Reviewing the product 64 68* 56 67* 52 70* 59
Making sure a product does what it says it will 62 66* 55 65* 57 66* 59
Testing products in a laboratory 61 65* 56 64* 50 65* 57
Approving labels before they hit the shelves 60 64* 55 63* 49 65* 56
None of these 6 4 10* 4 16* 3 8*

 

Table 3.1.9.c: Perceived Health Canada responsibilities for cosmetics by perceived level of knowledge and perceptions of safety and trust in claims.
Cosmetics Total Perceived Level of Knowledge Perceived Safety Trust in Claims
Well
in-
formed
Not well
in-formed
Safe Not safe Trust Don’t trust
Base=actual (2,502)
%
(701)
%
(1,155)
%
(1,489)
%
(365)
%
(523)
%
(1,250)
%
*Represents significant difference at the 95% confidence level.
Setting safety standards for companies to follow 66 71* 61 70* 57 69 66
Making sure a product is safe 65 64 62 67* 58 64 65
Pulling products that are not safe from the shelves 62 63* 59 66* 53 61 62
Making sure products contain the ingredients they say they do 60 62* 56 62* 55 62* 59
Ensuring products are not contaminated 57 61* 53 60* 50 59 57
Reviewing the product 53 55* 49 54* 48 57 53
Testing products in a laboratory 50 52 49 52 47 54 49
Approving labels before they hit the shelves 49 51* 47 51* 45 51 51
Making sure a product does what it says it will 47 49 46 49 49 51 47
None of these 9 8 12* 7 14* 7 10*

Gender and age also play a role with regard to perceived Health Canada responsibilities.   Women are more likely to believe Health Canada is responsible for all of the tasks related to natural health products, non-prescription drugs and cosmetics identified in the tables below.  The same is true of Canadians who are 55 year or older compared to their younger counterparts where they believe Health Canada is responsible for most tasks.

Table 3.1.9.d: Perceived Health Canada responsibilities for natural health products by gender and age
Natural Health Products Total Gender Age
Male Female 18-34 35-54 55+
Base=actual (2,502)
%
(1,164)
%
(1,337)
%
(457)
%
(981)
%
(1,064)
%
*Represents significant difference at the 95% confidence level.
Making sure a product is safe 67 63 71* 61 67* 72*
Setting safety standards for companies to follow 67 61 73* 62 64 74*
Making sure products contain the ingredients they say they do 64 57 69* 60 61 69*
Pulling products that are not safe from the shelves 64 60 69* 61 63 69*
Ensuring products are not contaminated 60 54 65* 55 58 64*
Reviewing the product 58 55 61* 59 55 60*
Making sure a product does what it says it will 55 52 58* 52 53 59*
Approving labels before they hit the shelves 54 50 58* 52 54 56
Testing products in a laboratory 53 50 56* 47 52* 59*
None of these 9 11* 7 10 10 8

 

Table 3.1.9.e: Perceived Health Canada responsibilities for non-prescription drugs by gender and age
Non-Prescription Drugs Total Gender Age
Male Female 18-34 35-54 55+
Base=actual (2,502)
%
(1,164)
%
(1,337)
%
(457)
%
(981)
%
(1,064)
%
*Represents significant difference at the 95% confidence level.
Making sure a product is safe 74 70 78* 68 72* 81*
Setting safety standards for companies to follow 74 67 80* 68 71 82*
Pulling products that are not safe from the shelves 70 66 74* 65 67 78*
Making sure products contain the ingredients they say they do 69 65 74* 65 66 77*
Ensuring products are not contaminated 65 58 71* 62 61 72*
Reviewing the product 64 61 66* 62 61 67*
Making sure a product does what it says it will 62 58 65* 60 58 68*
Testing products in a laboratory 61 57 64* 55 58 67*
Approving labels before they hit the shelves 60 56 65* 57 60 64*
None of these 6 7* 4 8* 6* 4

 

Table 3.1.9.f: Perceived Health Canada responsibilities for cosmetics by gender and age
Cosmetics Total Gender Age
Male Female 18-34 35-54 55+
Base=actual (2,502)
%
(1,164)
%
(1,337)
%
(457)
%
(981)
%
(1,064)
%
*Represents significant difference at the 95% confidence level.
Setting safety standards for companies to follow 66 61 71* 63 64 71*
Making sure a product is safe 65 61 68* 59 64 70*
Pulling products that are not safe from the shelves 62 58 65* 60 59 66*
Making sure products contain the ingredients they say they do 60 55 64* 57 56 65*
Ensuring products are not contaminated 57 50 63* 54 55 61*
Reviewing the product 53 51 55* 53 51 54
Testing products in a laboratory 50 48 53* 45 49 55*
Making sure a product does what it says it will 47 46 49 45 45 52*
Approving labels before they hit the shelves 49 47 51* 48 50 50
None of these 9 11* 8 10 9 9

3.2. Canadians’ Attitudes towards Consumer Health Products

3.2.1. Perceptions of Product Safety

For the most part Canadians believe non-prescription drugs are safe, but are not as confident in the safety of cosmetics and natural health products.

The majority of Canadians (70%) feel non-prescription drugs are ‘safe’ (a score of 5, 6, or 7 on a 7-point scale), however, there is less confidence in the safety of cosmetics (60%) and even less with natural health products (51%).  These scores reflect Canadians’ perceptions that Health Canada is responsible for ensuring the safety of non-prescription drugs and less so for cosmetics and natural health products.

Exhibit 3.2.1.a: Perceptions of Product Safety

Exhibit 3.2.1.a: Perceptions of Product Safety

Q9. How safe do you believe the following products sold in Canada are?
On a scale of 1 to 7, where 1 is not safe at all and 7 is extremely safe. 
Base: Total Respondents (n=2502)

Text Description - Exhibit 3.2.1.a: Perceptions of Product Safety

Product use plays a role in Canadians’ perceptions of safety. Users of natural health products such as traditional natural health products, natural health products and homeopathic products are more likely to think natural health products are safer.  Users of non-prescription drugs such as cough and cold, antacids, sunscreen and pain relievers are more likely to consider non-prescription drugs safer and users of cosmetics such as hair and skincare products are more likely to consider cosmetics safer.  Furthermore, Canadians who consider themselves informed are also more likely to consider consumer health products safe.  Complete details can be found in the table below.

Table 3.2.1.a: Perceived level of safety of consumer health products by product use and perceived level of knowledge
Perceived Level of Safety
(score of 5, 6, or 7)
Total Frequency of Use Perceived Level of Knowledge
Frequent Infrequ-ent Never Well
in-
formed
Not well
in-formed
Base=actual (2,502)
%
(n=varies)
%
(n=varies)
%
*Represents significant difference at the 95% confidence level.
Natural health products
Traditional natural health product 51 63* 62* 45 77* 36
Natural health product 56* 52* 36
Homeopathic 61* 61* 45
Non-prescription drugs
Allergy 70 71 71 68 87* 47
Cough and cold 67* 73* 52
Sunscreen 72* 72* 53
Antacids 74* 72* 67
Pain relief 74* 72* 52
Cosmetics
Hair care 60 62* 54 50 84* 40
Skin care 64* 54* 47

A couple of demographic differences exist in relation to perceived levels of safety for natural health products and cosmetics.  Canadians under 55 years old are significantly more likely to feel natural health products are ‘safe’ compared to older Canadians (55+). With regard to cosmetics, women are significantly more likely than men to feel they are ‘safe’ (64% vs. 56%).

Table 3.2.1.b: Perceived level of safety of consumer health products by gender and age
Safe
(score of 5, 6, or 7)
Total Gender Age
Male Female 18-34 35-54 55+
Base=actual (2,502)
%
(1,164)
%
(1,337)
%
(457)
%
(981)
%
(1,064)
%
*Represents significant difference at the 95% confidence level.
Natural health products 51 50 52 54* 53* 45
Non-prescription drugs 70 69 71 71 70 70
Cosmetics 60 56 64* 63 59 58

3.2.2. Attitudes towards Safety

Canadians are more likely to believe that responsibility for consumer health product safety lies with government than the manufacturer.

Consistent with findings throughout this report, a solid majority of Canadians (78%) believe (a score of 5, 6, or 7 on a 7-point scale) that Health Canada is responsible for ensuring safety of a consumer products.  While not as strongly, most Canadians (61%) also believe it is the responsibility of the manufacturer to ensure the safety of products.

Less than one quarter of Canadians (23%) believe that natural products are safer because they are made of natural ingredients.  In fact, more than half (54%) ‘do not believe’ (a score of 1, 2, or 3 on a 7-point scale) this notion.  This is consistent with the finding that Canadians have the least amount of trust in natural health products and are least likely to feel Health Canada is responsible for ensuring safety of natural health products.

Exhibit 3.2.2.a: Attitudes Towards Safety

Exhibit 3.2.2.a: Attitudes Towards Safety

Q11. How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
On a scale of 1 to 7, where 1 is completely disagree and 7 is completely agree. 
Base: Total Respondents (n=2502)

Text Description - Exhibit 3.2.2.a: Attitudes Towards Safety

Gender and age play a role in Canadians’ attitudes towards the perception of safety of consumer health products:

Table 3.2.2.a: Belief of safety statements towards consumer health products by gender and age
Believe
(score of 5, 6, or 7)
Total Gender Age
Male Female 18-34 35-54 55+
Base=actual (2,502)
%
(1,164)
%
(1,337)
%
(457)
%
(981)
%
(1,064)
%
*Represents significant difference at the 95% confidence level.
It is Health Canada’s responsibility to ensure a product is safe 78 75 81* 74 76 85*

 

Table 3.2.2.b: Disbelief of safety statements towards consumer health products by age
Do not believe
(score of 1, 2, or 3)
Total Age
18-34 35-54 55+
Base=actual (2,502)
%
(457)
%
(981)
%
(1,064)
%
*Represents significant difference at the 95% confidence level.
A natural product is safer because it is made of natural ingredients 54 49 51 60*

3.2.3. Trust in Claims

Canadians are generally sceptical about the claims made on the labels of consumer health products.

The claims that are made on labels of consumer health products are not considered to be trustworthy by the majority of Canadians (64-82% do not explicitly trust them).  Only about one third of Canadians (36%) say they ‘trust’ (a score of 5, 6, or 7 on a 7-point scale) the claims made on the labels of non-prescription drugs, while even fewer trust the claims made on cosmetic (22%) and natural health products labels (18%).

These results are in line with the perceived levels of knowledge about effectiveness associated with the same consumer health products (see section 3.1.2).

Exhibit 3.2.3.a: Trust in Claims on Labels

Exhibit 3.2.3.a: Trust in Claims on Labels

Q10. How much do you trust the claims made on the labels of?
On a scale of 1 to 7, where 1 is do not trust at all and 7 is trust completely. 
Base: Total Respondents (n=2502)

Text Description - Exhibit 3.2.3.a: Trust in Claims on Labels

Product use plays a role in how much Canadians’ trust claims on labels. Users of natural health products such as traditional natural health products, natural health products and homeopathic products are more likely to trust claims on labels of natural health products.  Users of non-prescription drugs such as cough and cold, antacids, and pain relievers are more likely to trust the claims made on the labels of non-prescription drugs while users of cosmetics such as hair and skincare products are more likely to trust the claims made on the labels of cosmetics.  Complete details can be found in the table below. Furthermore, Canadians who consider themselves informed about natural health products, non-prescription drugs and Cosmetics are also more likely to trust the claims on their respective labels (48% vs 6%, 61% vs 12%, 47% vs 6% respectively), as are Canadians that consider consumer health products safe: natural health products and Cosmetics (32%vs 2%) and non-prescription drugs (48% vs 4%).

Gender and age affect Canadians’ level of trust in claims made on the labels of consumer health products.  As such, women and younger Canadians are more trusting of label claims on natural health products and cosmetics.  No demographic differences exist for non-prescription drugs.

Table 3.2.3.a: Trust in label claims by product use
Trust in Claims
(score of 5, 6, or 7)
Total Frequency of Use
Frequent Infrequent Never
Base=actual (2,502)
%
(n=varies)
*Represents significant difference at the 95% confidence level.
Natural health products
Traditional natural health product 18 34* 26* 14
Natural health product 20* 20* 12
Homeopathic 33* 26* 14
Non-prescription drugs
Allergy 36 42* 37* 30
Cough and cold 33* 38* 22
Sunscreen 37* 37* 26
Antacids 41* 36 34
Pain relief 39* 35* 27
Cosmetics
Hair care 22 22* 22* 15
Skin care 24* 17 14

 

Table 3.2.3.b: Trust in label claims by gender and age
Trust
(score of 5, 6, or 7)
Total Gender Age
Male Female 18-34 35-54 55+
Base=actual (2,502)
%
(1,164)
%
(1,337)
%
(457)
%
(981)
%
(1,064)
%
*Represents significant difference at the 95% confidence level.
Non-prescription drugs 36 37 35 36 36 36
Natural health products 18 17 20* 21* 19* 15
Cosmetics 22 19 23* 24* 23* 19

3.2.4. Attitudes towards Claims

Canadians believe that scientific support and proof from manufacturers back up the claims on labels.

Two thirds (66%) of Canadians believe (a score of 5, 6, or 7 on a 7-point scale) that claims made on the labels of products must be supported by science, as well as all products claiming to do the same thing need the same level of proof from the manufacturer to support their claim.  A small majority (52%) also believe that product claims must be true if they are written on the label.  On the contrary, nearly half (54%) of Canadians ‘do not believe’ (a score of 1, 2, or 3 on a 7-point scale) that products with similar claims will do the same thing.

Exhibit 3.2.4.a: Attitudes Towards Claims

Exhibit 3.2.4.a: Attitudes Towards Claims

Q11. How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
On a scale of 1 to 7, where 1 is completely disagree and 7 is completely agree. 
Base: Total Respondents (n=2502)

Text Description - Exhibit 3.2.4.a: Attitudes Towards Claims

Canadians’ attitudes towards claims are influenced by their perceived level of knowledge (how informed), perceptions of safety and trust in claims.  Those who consider themselves more knowledgeable, have higher perceptions of product safety and more trust in label claims are more likely to believe claims are supported by science, manufacturers require similar levels of supporting evidence, product claims must be true and that similar claims will do similar things.

Table 3.2.4.a: Attitudes toward claims for natural health products by how informed, perceptions of safety and trust in claims
Natural Health Products
(score of 5, 6, or 7)
Total Perceived Level of Knowledge Perceived Safety Trust in Claims
Well
in-
formed
Not well
in-formed
Safe Not safe Trust Don’t trust
Base=actual (2,502)
%
(465)
%
(1,483)
%
(1,243)
%
(511)
%
(444)
%
(1,321)
%
*Represents significant difference at the 95% confidence level.
It is Health Canada’s responsibility to ensure a product is safe 78 85* 77 81* 76 88* 76
Claims made on the labels of products must be supported by science 66 75* 63 69* 64 75* 64
All products claiming they do the same thing must have the same level of proof provided by the manufacturer to support their claim 66 75* 62 70* 61 81* 62
It is the product manufacturer’s responsibility to ensure a product is safe 61 73* 56 67* 51 79* 53
Product claims must be true if they are written on the label 52 58* 49 55* 50 67* 49
A natural product is safer because it is made of natural ingredients 23 42* 14 37* 6 61* 9
Products with similar claims will do the same thing 20 35* 14 28* 12 43* 14

 

Table 3.2.4.b: Attitudes toward claims for non-prescription drugs by perceived level of knowledge, perceptions of safety and trust in claims
Non-prescription drugs
(score of 5, 6, or 7)
Total Perceived Level of Knowledge Perceived Safety Trust in Claims
Well
in-
formed
Not well
in-formed
Safe Not safe Trust Don’t trust
Base=actual (2,502)
%
(937)
%
(808)
%
(1,752)
%
(241)
%
(893)
%
(801)
%
*Represents significant difference at the 95% confidence level.
It is Health Canada’s responsibility to ensure a product is safe 78 88* 69 83* 63 91* 66
Claims made on the labels of products must be supported by science 66 77* 55 71* 52 79* 52
All products claiming they do the same thing must have the same level of proof provided by the manufacturer to support their claim 66 77* 57 70* 51 80* 53
It is the product manufacturer’s responsibility to ensure a product is safe 61 73* 51 66* 45 75* 48
Product claims must be true if they are written on the label 52 60* 45 56* 39 64* 38
A natural product is safer because it is made of natural ingredients 23 29* 17 24* 17 29* 16
Products with similar claims will do the same thing 20 29* 12 24* 12 30* 12

 

Table 3.2.4.c: Attitudes toward claims for cosmetics by perceived level of knowledge, perceptions of safety and trust in claims
Cosmetics
(score of 5, 6, or 7)
Total Perceived Level of Knowledge Perceived Safety Trust in Claims
Well
in-
formed
Not well
in-formed
Safe Not safe Trust Don’t trust
Base=actual (2,502)
%
(701)
%
(1,155)
%
(1,489)
%
(365)
%
(523)
%
(1,250)
%
*Represents significant difference at the 95% confidence level.
It is Health Canada’s responsibility to ensure a product is safe 78 88* 74 83* 70 89* 75
Claims made on the labels of products must be supported by science 66 77* 61 71* 59 78* 62
All products claiming they do the same thing must have the same level of proof provided by the manufacturer to support their claim 66 76* 61 71* 58 81* 61
It is the product manufacturer’s responsibility to ensure a product is safe 61 73* 54 67* 48 79* 53
Product claims must be true if they are written on the label 52 62* 48 55* 45 69* 46
A natural product is safer because it is made of natural ingredients 23 34* 17 26* 17 41* 16
Products with similar claims will do the same thing 20 29* 14 25* 11 40* 12

Canadians’ attitudes towards claims are significantly affected by age.  Canadians over 55 years old are significantly more likely than younger Canadians to believe the following:

These same Canadians (55+) are significantly more likely than younger Canadians to not believe the following:

Table 3.2.4.d: Belief of claims by age
Believe
(score of 5, 6, or 7)
Total Age
18-34 35-54 55+
Base=actual (2,502)
%
(457)
%
(981)
%
(1,064)
%
*Represents significant difference at the 95% confidence level.
Claims made on the labels of products must be supported by science 66 65 63 70*
All products claiming they do the same thing must have the same level of proof provided by the manufacturer to support their claim 66 63 63 71*

 

Table 3.2.4.c: Disbelief of claims by age
Do not believe
(score of 1, 2, or 3)
Total Age
18-34 35-54 55+
Base=actual (2,502)
%
(457)
%
(981)
%
(1,064)
%
*Represents significant difference at the 95% confidence level.
Product claims must be true if they are written on the label 35 27 35 41*
Products with similar claims will do the same thing 54 46 54 59*

3.2.5. Product Identifier Perceptions

Product identification numbers are most associated with safety.

After being provided a description for each, the majority of Canadians (52-70%) would consider products with identification numbers to be safe and without contamination, particularly products with a DIN.  A small majority of Canadians (55%) would also consider products with a DIN to be effective.  That being said, less than half would consider products with a DIN-HM (42%) or NPN (39%) to be effective.

Consistent with other responses, there appears to be increased confidence in non-prescription drugs for safety and effectiveness.

Exhibit 3.2.5.a: Product Perceptions

Exhibit 3.2.5.a: Product Perceptions

Q19. If a product has a (DIN, DIN-HM or NPN) would you consider it to be:
Base: Total Respondents (n=2502)

Gender and age play a role in whether Canadians think products with DIN, DIN-HM or NPN are “safe”, “without contamination”, or “effective”.  To this point, women and Canadians over 55 years old are significantly more likely than men and Canadians under 55, respectively, to consider products with DIN, DIN-HM and NPN as safe and without contamination.

Table 3.2.5.a: DIN perceptions by age and gender
DIN Total Gender Age
Male Female 18-34 35-54 55+
Base=actual (2,502)
%
(1,164)
%
(1,337)
%
(457)
%
(981)
%
(1,064)
%
*Represents significant difference at the 95% confidence level.
Safe 70 68 73* 66 67 77*
Without contamination 63 61 65* 57 59 71*
Effective 55 54 56 49 54* 62*

 

Table 3.2.5.b: DIN-HM perceptions by age and gender
DIN-HM Total Gender Age
Male Female 18-34 35-54 55+
Base=actual (2,502)
%
(1,164)
%
(1,337)
%
(457)
%
(981)
%
(1,064)
%
*Represents significant difference at the 95% confidence level.
Safe 60 58 62* 55 61* 63*
Without contamination 55 52 57* 50 52 61*
Effective 42 42 42 35 42* 46*

 

Table 3.2.5.c: NPN perceptions by age and gender
NPN Total Gender Age
Male Female 18-34 35-54 55+
Base=actual (2,502)
%
(1,164)
%
(1,337)
%
(457)
%
(981)
%
(1,064)
%
*Represents significant difference at the 95% confidence level.
Safe 59 57 62* 57 59 62*
Without contamination 52 49 55* 48 50 57*
Effective 39 39 39 37 39 41*

3.3. Selection and Use of Consumer Health Products

3.3.1. Frequency of Use

Cosmetics are the most frequently used consumer health products.

Most Canadians frequently (at least once per week) use cosmetic products for their hair (79%) and for their skin (70%).  Natural health products such as vitamins and minerals are frequently used by over half of Canadians (56%), while about one fifth of Canadians are infrequent users (a few times per month or less) or non-users (never use them).

Seasonal products and specific types of medicines are used by majority of Canadians (68-92%), however, on a less frequent basis.  Specific medicines such as cough, cold and flu medicine, as well as pain relievers are used by nearly all Canadians, although presumably on an “as needed” basis, so it is not surprising that they are used infrequently.  The same is true for sunscreen, antacids and allergy relievers – all used by most Canadians, but infrequently.

Finally, the majority of Canadians do not use either traditional natural health products (70%) (such as traditional Chinese medicines, or Ayurveda) or homeopathic products (66%).

Exhibit 3.3.1.a: Frequency of Product Use

Exhibit 3.3.1.a: Frequency of Product Use

Q2. On average, how frequently do you use each of the following products? 
Base: Total Respondents (n=2502)

Text Description - Exhibit 3.3.1.a: Frequency of Product Use

Gender, age and education all play a role in the frequency of consumer health product use:

Table 3.3.1.a: Frequent users by gender, age and education
Frequent Users (at least weekly) Total Gender Age Education
Male Female 18-34 35-54 55+ High school or less College/
CGEP
University Degree
Base=actual (2,502)
%
(1,164)
%
(1,337)
%
(457)
%
(981)
%
(1,064)
%
(496)
%
(894)
%
(1,062)
%
*Represents significant difference at the 95% confidence level.
Hair care products 79 75 83* 82* 77 79 77 79 81
Skin care products 71 53 88* 73* 72* 68 66 71* 72*
Natural health products 56 50 61* 47 54* 64* 54 54 58
Sunscreen products 32 22 42* 32 34* 30 27 32* 35*
Pain relievers 25 22 28* 19 26* 30* 33* 27* 21
Allergy relievers and decongestants 14 14 15 14 16 13 14 14 15
Antacids and laxatives 13 14 13 10 14* 15* 17* 12 13
Homeopathic products 9 8 9 10* 9* 7 7 8 10*
Traditional natural health products 9 9 9 12* 9* 6 7 7 11*
Cough, cold and flu medicines 3 4 3 4* 4* 2 3 2 5*

3.3.2. Incidence and Frequency of Label Reading

3.3.2.1. Natural Health Products

Dosage and directions are the most frequently looked at elements of natural health product labels and packaging.

Dosage and directions on how to use the product are the packaging elements that Canadians are most likely to read every time they use or purchase a natural health product.   While still read by most Canadians at some point, elements such as, warnings, brand name, ingredients and package inserts are more commonly read at point of purchase, rather than every use.  

The least commonly looked at packaging elements are where the product was made and endorsements.  Over one third of Canadians never or are unsure if they read these parts of the labels.

Exhibit 3.3.2.1.a: Incidence and Frequency of Reading Labelling or Packaging – Natural Health Products

Exhibit 3.3.2.1.a: Incidence and Frequency of Reading Labelling or Packaging – Natural Health Products

Q12. Thinking about ( insert product category ) , which part(s) of the labelling or packaging do you read and how frequently do you read them? 
Base: Total Respondents (n=2502)

Text Description - Exhibit 3.3.2.1.a: Incidence and Frequency of Reading Labelling or Packaging – Natural Health Products

3.3.2.2. Non-Prescription Drugs

Dosage and directions are the most frequently looked at parts of non-prescription drug packaging.

Roughly two thirds of Canadians read the dosage and directions on how to use the product every time they use or purchase a non-prescription drug, highest among the three categories.   Brand name is the element most commonly viewed during every purchase, with about half of Canadians doing so.  Elements such as warnings about the product, ingredients and package inserts are viewed less frequently and are more commonly looked at during purchase, rather than every use.

As with natural health products and cosmetics, the least commonly looked at packaging elements are where the product was made and endorsements.  Over one third of Canadians never or are unsure if they read these parts of labels.

Exhibit 3.3.2.2.a: Incidence and Frequency of Reading Labelling or Packaging – Non-Prescription Drugs

Exhibit 3.3.2.2.a: Incidence and Frequency of Reading Labelling or Packaging – Non-Prescription Drugs

Q12. Thinking about ( insert product category ) , which part(s) of the labelling or packaging do you read and how frequently do you read them? 
Base: Total Respondents (n=2502)

Text Description - Exhibit 3.3.2.2.a: Incidence and Frequency of Reading Labelling or Packaging – Non-Prescription Drugs

3.3.2.3. Cosmetics

Canadians look at the brand name of cosmetics most frequently.

The brand of cosmetics is most commonly looked at every purchase occasion, however only a small majority (54%) look at this at every purchase or every time they use the product.   Dosage, directions on how to use the product and product warnings are the next most frequently looked at packaging elements on cosmetics. However, only a minority of Canadians (39-49%) do so at every purchase or during every use.

Elements such as where the product was made, package inserts or leaflets, ingredients and endorsements are not frequently viewed on cosmetics packaging.  Roughly one quarter or less of Canadians looks at these parts of the package at every use or every purchase.

Exhibit 3.3.2.3.a: Incidence and Frequency of Reading Labelling or Packaging – Cosmetics

Exhibit 3.3.2.3.a: Incidence and Frequency of Reading Labelling or Packaging – Cosmetics

Q12. Thinking about ( insert product category ) , which part(s) of the labelling or packaging do you read and how frequently do you read them? 
Base: Total Respondents (n=2502)

Text Description - Exhibit 3.3.2.3.a: Incidence and Frequency of Reading Labelling or Packaging – Cosmetics

3.3.3. Desired Product Information to Make Purchase Decision

Directions, ingredients and product warnings are the most desired product information to make a purchase decision.

For all three categories, a strong majority of Canadians(66-77%) want to have directions on how to use the product, ingredients, warnings about the product and dosage (with the exception of cosmetics) directly on the product to help them to decide what to buy.  Slightly less important, six-in-ten Canadians would also like to see product features on natural health products, non-prescription drugs and cosmetics.

According to Canadians, brand name is more important to have on non-prescription drugs and cosmetics than it is on natural health products, while the origin of the product is of higher importance on natural health products.  Package inserts and endorsements are the least important features in the product purchase decision: less than half of Canadians want to have package inserts or leaflets and only about one quarter wants endorsements on the product to help them make a purchase decision, regardless of category.

Exhibit 3.3.3.a: Product Information Needed to Make Purchase Decision

Exhibit 3.3.3.a: Product Information Needed to Make Purchase Decision

Q13. Which of the following pieces of information do you want to have on a product to help decide what to buy?
Base: Total Respondents (n=2502)

Product use plays a role in how much information Canadians’ need for purchase decisions of various consumer health products.  Generally speaking the type and rank of information remains the same regardless of use.  For example, directions and ingredients remain the top two pieces of information desired by Canadians regardless of use.  However, the degree to which Canadians want such information tends to vary based on use.  Frequent users of natural health products such as and homeopathic products want more information than infrequent or non-users while frequent users of traditional natural health products want less information than infrequent or non-users.  With regard to non-prescription drugs, generally speaking frequent users tend to require less information than infrequent or non-users. Cosmetics users such as hair and skincare products tend to want more information to support their purchase decisions.  Complete details can be found in the table below.

Furthermore, Canadians who consider themselves informed about non-prescription drugs and cosmetics also require more information to make purchase decisions however the type and rank remain the same.  The level of information required to make purchase decisions about natural health products however is similar regardless of the level of perceived knowledge Canadians consider themselves to have in this area. Details can also be found in the table below.

Table 3.3.3.a: Product information needed for natural health products by frequency of use
Product information needed for Natural Health Products Total Frequency of Use
Traditional NHP NHP Homeopathic
Frequ-ent Infre-quent Never Frequ-ent Infreq-uent Never Frequent Infreq-uent Never
Base=actual (2,502)
%
(202)
%
(584)
%
(1,767)
%
(1,428)
%
(635)
%
(534)
%
(210)
%
(679)
%
(1,668)
%
*Represents significant difference at the 95% confidence level.
Directions on how to use the product 72 54 65* 75* 77* 67 62 59 73* 72*
Ingredients in the product 72 55 69* 75* 77* 69* 62 62 71* 73*
Dosage 71 51 66* 75* 76* 68 63 59 72* 72*
Warnings about the product 70 52 67* 73* 75* 66* 61 59 70* 71*
Product features 60 53 57 61* 62* 60* 53 50 60* 60*
Brand or product name 53 44 49 56* 58* 48 47 48 50 55*
Where the product was made 51 47 51 51 57* 46* 40 48 54* 49
Package insert or leaflet 44 40 41 45 50* 39 36 43 47 43
Endorsements 26 28 29* 25 30* 25* 20 28 28 25

 

Table 3.3.3.b: Product information needed for non-prescription drugs by frequency of use
Product information needed for Non-Prescription Drugs Total Frequency of Use
Allergy Cough and Cold Sunscreen
Frequ-ent Infreq-uent Never Frequ-ent Infreq-uent Never Frequent Infrequent Never
Base=actual (2,502)
%
(362)
%
(1,376)
%
(839)
%
(81)
%
(2,132)
%
(323)
%
(812)
%
(1,528)
%
(281)
%
*Represents significant difference at the 95% confidence level.
Dosage 78 72 78* 79* 44 79* 77* 78 78 75
Directions on how to use the product 77 71 76* 77 39 78* 73* 75* 77* 72
Warnings about the product 75 69 74* 76 41 75* 74* 74* 75* 71
Ingredients in the product 70 63 70* 71* 42 70* 75* 73* 69* 64
Brand or product name 63 61 63* 61 50 63* 61* 62* 64* 54
Product features 60 54 62 58 36 61* 59* 59 62 48
Package insert or leaflet 49 52 48 47 36 49 47 52 47 42
Where the product was made 46 44 46 45 30 45* 51* 50 44 42
Endorsements 25 27 25 25 27 26 23 24 27 20

 

Table 3.3.3.b: Product information needed for non-prescription drugs by frequency of use…cont’d
Product information needed for Non-Prescription Drugs Total Frequency of Use
Antacids Pain Relief
Frequ-ent Infreq-uent Never Frequ-ent Infreq-uent Never
Base=actual (2,502)
%
(347)
%
(1,224)
%
(1,022)
%
(667)
%
(1,823)
%
(194)
%
*Represents significant difference at the 95% confidence level.
Dosage 78 75 80* 76 76 79* 69
Directions on how to use the product 77 74 78* 75 76* 77* 62
Warnings about the product 75 72 76* 73 72 75* 69
Ingredients in the product 70 66 72* 69 67 71* 57
Brand or product name 63 63 63 61 60 63* 56
Product features 60 57 60 61 54 61 57
Package insert or leaflet 49 51 52* 44 49 48 41
Where the product was made 46 43 49* 42 42 46* 46
Endorsements 25 24 27 23 24 26 25

 

Table 3.3.3.c: Product information needed for cosmetics by frequency of use
Product information needed for Cosmetics Total Frequency of Use
Skin care Hair care
Frequ-ent Infreq-uent Never Frequ-ent Infreq-uent Never
Base=actual (2,502
%
(1,780) % (585)
%
(262)
%
(1,969)
%
(508)
%
(266)
%
*Represents significant difference at the 95% confidence level.
Directions on how to use the product 70 72* 61 61 72* 63 63*
Warnings about the product 66 68* 62 55 69* 57 61
Ingredients in the product 66 69* 58 57 68* 63 59
Brand or product name 63 66* 58 50 66* 54 60
Product features 61 63* 56 47 63* 53 57
Dosage 53 54* 52 45 55* 49 46
Where the product was made 43 46* 35 34 45 41 37
Package insert or leaflet 35 37* 28 31 37* 31 27
Endorsements 21 22* 20 20 22 21 18

 

Table 3.3.3.d: Product information needed for natural health products by perceived level of knowledge
Product information needed for Natural Health Products Total Perceived Level of Knowledge
Well
in-
formed
Not well
in-formed
Base=actual (2,502)
%
(465)
%
(1,483)
%
*Represents significant difference at the 95% confidence level.
Directions on how to use the product 72 69 72
Ingredients in the product 72 76* 71
Dosage 71 71 71
Warnings about the product 70 68 69
Product features 60 60 59
Brand or product name 53 54 53
Where the product was made 51 56* 47
Package insert or leaflet 44 48* 43
Endorsements 26 27 25

 

Table 3.3.3.e: Product information needed for non-prescription drugs by perceived level of knowledge
Product information needed for Non-Prescription Drugs Total Perceived Level of Knowledge
Well
in-
formed
Not well
in-formed
Base=actual (2,502)
%
(937)
%
(808)
%
*Represents significant difference at the 95% confidence level.
Dosage 78 83* 71
Directions on how to use the product 77 80* 70
Warnings about the product 75 78* 68
Ingredients in the product 70 75* 63
Brand or product name 63 68* 55
Product features 60 62* 56
Package insert or leaflet 49 54* 43
Where the product was made 46 49* 40
Endorsements 25 26 24

 

Table 3.3.3.f: Product information needed for cosmetics by perceived level of knowledge
Product information needed for Cosmetics Total Perceived Level of Knowledge
Well
in-
formed
Not well
in-formed
Base=actual (2,502)
%
(701)
%
(1,155)
%
*Represents significant difference at the 95% confidence level.
Directions on how to use the product 70 73* 66
Warnings about the product 66 70* 63
Ingredients in the product 66 71* 63
Brand or product name 63 72* 56
Product features 61 66* 57
Dosage 53 53 53
Where the product was made 43 48* 38
Package insert or leaflet 35 38* 31
Endorsements 21 26* 19

Gender and age both play a role with regard to desired product information in making a purchase decision.   Women consistently rate significantly higher than men a desire for all types of information (with the exception of endorsements) on all three categories.  This is likely tied to women’s higher perceived knowledge on these categories.  The same is true of Canadians who are 55 year or older, who also rate their desire for each type of information significantly higher on all three categories than their younger Canadian counterparts (again, with the exception of endorsements).

Table 3.3.3.g: Desired information to make purchase decision on natural health products by gender and age
Natural Health Products Total Gender Age
Male Female 18-34 35-54 55+
Base=actual (2,502)
%
(1,164)
%
(1,337)
%
(457)
%
(981)
%
(1,064)
%
*Represents significant difference at the 95% confidence level.
Directions on how to use the product 72 65 78* 65 68 81*
Ingredients in the product 72 67 78* 67 69 80*
Dosage 71 66 76* 64 68 81*
Warnings about the product 70 66 74* 63 67 79*
Product features 60 57 62* 60 59 61
Brand or product name 53 51 55* 50 53 57*
Where the product was made 51 47 54* 43 47 61*
Package insert or leaflet 44 36 52* 36 43 53*
Endorsements 26 26 27 26 26 26

 

Table 3.3.3.h: Desired information to make purchase decision on non-prescription drugs by gender and age
Non-Prescription Drugs Total Gender Age
Male Female 18-34 35-54 55+
Base=actual (2,502)
%
(1,164)
%
(1,337)
%
(457)
%
(981)
%
(1,064)
%
*Represents significant difference at the 95% confidence level.
Dosage 78 74 82* 69 75* 89*
Directions on how to use the product 77 72 81* 67 73* 88*
Warnings about the product 75 71 78* 65 72* 85*
Ingredients in the product 70 65 75* 62 67 80*
Brand or product name 63 59 66* 59 62 66*
Product features 60 57 63* 61 60 59*
Package insert or leaflet 49 41 56* 41 45 58*
Where the product was made 46 43 48* 37 42* 56*
Endorsements 25 25 25 27 23 26*

 

Table 3.3.3.i: Desired information to make purchase decision on cosmetics by gender and age
Cosmetics Total Gender Age
Male Female 18-34 35-54 55+
Base=actual (2,502)
%
(1,164)
%
(1,337)
%
(457)
%
(981)
%
(1,064)
%
*Represents significant difference at the 95% confidence level.
Directions on how to use the product 70 64 75* 62 65 80*
Ingredients in the product 66 60 72* 61 63 74*
Warnings about the product 66 64 68* 60 63 75*
Brand or product name 63 59 67* 62 62 66*
Product features 61 55 66* 63 59 61*
Dosage 53 55* 51 46 48 64*
Where the product was made 43 39 47* 34 40* 53*
Package insert or leaflet 35 29 40* 25 32* 45*
Endorsements 21 21 21 22 20 21

3.3.4. Determining Safety of Products

Canadians look to many different sources to determine the safety of a product.

For natural health products, there are clearly three top sources of safety information that Canadians look to: asking a health professional or practitioner (48%), researching the product online (47%) and reading labels or product inserts (46%).  That being said, none of these sources are used by a majority, suggesting Canadians use multiple sources to determine product safety.  About one third of Canadians look for Health Canada’s approval number for both natural health products and non-prescription drugs, dropping to one-quarter for cosmetics.

Non-prescription drugs have two sources of safety information that stand out above the rest – asking a health professional or practitioner (56%) and reading labels or product inserts (53%), though only a very slight majority use these sources.

For cosmetics, relying on brand name (45%) and reading labels or product inserts (43%) are the main sources of information.  Canadians are also more likely to “not really think about” the safety of cosmetics compared to natural health products and non-prescription drugs (20% vs. 10%-12%).

Exhibit 3.3.3.a: Determining Safety of Products

Exhibit 3.3.3.a: Determining Safety of Products

Q14. How do you determine if the products in these categories are safe?  Select all that apply.
Base: Total Respondents (n=2502)

Canadians who consider themselves knowledgeable about the safety of consumer health products, those who consider themselves well informed in general about consumer health products and those who have higher perceptions about the safety of consumer health products in Canada are more likely than their counterparts to use a variety of sources to help them determine if products are safe.

Table 3.3.4.a: Determining safety of natural health products by perceived knowledge of safety, safety of products and perceived level of knowledge
Determining Safety of Natural Health Products Total Perceived Knowledge of Safety Perceived Safety of Products Perceived Level of Knowledge
High Low Safe Not safe Well
in-
formed
Not well
in-formed
Base=actual (2,502)
%
(483)
%
(1,393)
%
(1,243)
%
(511)
%
(465)
%
(1,483)
%
*Represents significant difference at the 95% confidence level.
Ask health professional or practitioner 48 51* 45 50 47 50 45
Research product on the internet 47 57* 41 50* 44 56* 42
Read labels or product inserts 46 50* 41 49* 44 51* 42
Look for Health Canada approval number on the product 34 37* 30 36 32 39* 31
Rely on brand name/reputation 29 31 28 34 22 31* 27
Search advisory, warning or recall information 27 33* 23 28 28 32* 24
Ask family or friends 24 22 23 26* 20 25* 22
Assume all products for sale in Canada are safe 21 17 22* 26* 11 19 20
Don’t really think about it 12 8 15* 10 12 8 15*
News media 12 13 12 12 12 14* 11

 

Table 3.3.4.b: Determining safety of non-prescription drugs by perceived knowledge of safety, safety of products and perceived level of knowledge
Determining Safety of Non-Prescription Drugs Total Perceived Knowledge of Safety Perceived Safety of Products Perceived Level of Knowledge
High Low Safe Not safe Well
in-
formed
Not well
in-formed
Base=actual (2,502)
%
(832)
%
(814)
%
(1,752)
%
(241)
%
(937)
%
(808)
%
*Represents significant difference at the 95% confidence level.
Ask health professional or practitioner 56 55* 56 58* 46 62* 50
Read labels or product inserts 53 59* 51 56* 46 61* 44
Rely on brand name/reputation 43 40 46 48* 28 48* 37
Research product on the internet 40 45* 35 39 43 41* 34
Look for Health Canada approval number on the product 36 43* 32 39* 25 43* 27
Assume all products for sale in Canada are safe 28 24 32 32* 16 30* 26
Search advisory, warning or recall information 27 33* 24 27 29 30* 22
Ask family or friends 23 22 23 24* 19 24 22
News media 13 14 12 14 10 14* 11
Don’t really think about it 10 6 12* 9 7 8 13*

 

Table 3.3.4.c: Determining safety of cosmetics by perceived knowledge of safety, safety of products and perceived level of knowledge
Determining Safety of Cosmetics Total Perceived Knowledge of Safety Perceived Safety of Products Perceived Level of Knowledge
High Low Safe Not safe Well
in-
formed
Not well
in-formed
Base=actual (2,502)
%
(483)
%
(1,393)
%
(1,489)
%
(365)
%
(701)
%
(1,155)
%
*Represents significant difference at the 95% confidence level.
Rely on brand name/reputation 45 42* 45 51* 28 54* 36
Read labels or product inserts 43 50* 39 44* 38 51* 38
Research product on the internet 37 47* 31 38 36 43* 31
Assume all products for sale in Canada are safe 26 23 29 31* 17 29* 24
Ask health professional or practitioner 26 29 24 26 29 27 25
Look for Health Canada approval number on the product 25 28 22 26 24 24 24
Ask family or friends 24 21 23 26* 19 27* 20
Search advisory, warning or recall information 22 27* 18 22 21 23* 18
Don’t really think about it 20 12 25* 19 20 16 24*
News media 13 13* 13 14 12 16* 11

Gender and age both play a role in how Canadians determine safety of products.   Women and older Canadians (55+) are both more likely to search for safety information from various sources.  For each of natural health products, non-prescription drugs and cosmetics, women are significantly more likely than men to rely on name brand/reputation of a product, reading product labels or inserts and researching online.

For all three categories, Canadians who are 55 year or older are significantly more likely than their younger counterparts to ask a health professional or practitioner, read product labels or inserts, search advisory, warning or recall information and look for the Health Canada approval number on the product.

Table 3.3.4.d: Sources used to determine safety of natural health products by gender and age
Natural Health Products Total Gender Age
Male Female 18-34 35-54 55+
Base=actual (2,502)
%
(1,164)
%
(1,337)
%
(457)
%
(981)
%
(1,064)
%
*Represents significant difference at the 95% confidence level.
Ask health professional or practitioner 48 46 51* 42 47* 55*
Research product on the Internet 47 45 50* 48 47 47
Read labels or product inserts 46 41 50* 37 43* 56*
Look for Health Canada approval number 34 33 34 25 33* 41*
Rely on brand name/reputation 29 26 32* 29 28 30
Search advisory, warning or recall information 27 26 28 28* 23 30*
Ask family or friends 24 22 26* 31* 23* 19
Assume all products for sale in Canada are safe 21 21 20 23 20 19
News media 12 11 13 12 11 12
Don’t really think about it 12 14* 11 17* 13* 8

 

Table 3.3.4.e: Sources used to determine safety of non-prescription drugs by gender and age
Non-Prescription Drugs Total Gender Age
Male Female 18-34 35-54 55+
Base=actual (2,502)
%
(1,164)
%
(1,337)
%
(457)
%
(981)
%
(1,064)
%
*Represents significant difference at the 95% confidence level.
Ask health professional or practitioner 56 53 59* 48 53* 65*
Read labels or product inserts 53 48 58* 44 51* 64*
Rely on brand name/reputation 43 40 46* 42 40 48*
Research product on the Internet 40 37 42* 44* 36 40*
Look for Health Canada approval number 36 36 36 29 33 44*
Assume all products for sale in Canada are safe 28 29 28 29 30* 26
Search advisory, warning or recall information 27 26 29 30* 25 28*
Ask family or friends 23 22 25 33* 22* 16
News media 13 13 13 15 12 12
Don’t really think about it 10 11* 9 14* 10* 6

 

Table 3.3.4.f: Sources used to determine safety of cosmetics by gender and age
Cosmetics Total Gender Age
Male Female 18-34 35-54 55+
Base=actual (2,502)
%
(1,164)
%
(1,337)
%
(457)
%
(981)
%
(1,064)
%
*Represents significant difference at the 95% confidence level.
Rely on brand name/reputation 45 37 52* 41 41 52*
Read labels or product inserts 43 39 48* 35 41* 53*
Research product on the Internet 37 34 41* 40* 37 36
Ask health professional or practitioner 26 29* 23 26 24 29*
Look for Health Canada approval number 25 27 24 16 23* 34*
Assume all products for sale in Canada are safe 26 26 26 29* 26 24
Ask family or friends 24 21 26* 31* 23* 18
Search advisory, warning or recall information 22 21 22 22 19 24*
News media 13 12 14 15 12 14
Don’t really think about it 20 22* 18 25* 21 15

3.3.5. Determining Effectiveness of Products

Canadians use similar sources to determine the effectiveness of a product as with safety.

Similar to when Canadians look for safety information, there are a few sources on effectiveness that stand out for each category.   For natural health products Canadians prefer to research the product on the internet (48%) or ask a health professional or practitioner (44%).  For non-prescription drugs, the majority of Canadians ask a health professional or practitioner (57%), while others rely on brand name or reputation (43%) or internet research (42%).  For cosmetics, relying on brand name (44%) and conducting internet research (41%) are the main sources of information.  As seen with determining safety of a product, a sizeable portion of the population does not think about effectiveness; however, more think of it for non-prescription drugs compared to natural health products and particularly cosmetics.

Exhibit 3.3.5.a: Determining Effectiveness of Products

Exhibit 3.3.5.a: Determining Effectiveness of Products

Q15. How do you determine if the products in these categories do what they say they will do? Select all that apply.
Base: Total Respondents (n=2502)

Canadians who consider themselves knowledgeable about the effectiveness of consumer health products, those who consider themselves well informed in general about consumer health products and those who have more trust in label claims are more likely than their counterparts to use a variety of sources to help them determine the effectiveness of the various health products.

Table 3.3.5.a: Determining effectiveness of natural health products by knowledge of effectiveness, trust in claims and perceived level of knowledge
Determining Effectiveness of Natural Health Products Total Knowledge of Effectiveness Trust in Claims Perceived Level of Knowledge
High Low Trust Don’t trust Well
in-
formed
Not well
in-formed
Base=actual (2,502)
%
(521)
%
(1,371)
%
(444)
%
(1,321)
%
(465)
%
(1,483)
%
*Represents significant difference at the 95% confidence level.
Research product on the internet 48 54* 43 54* 47 55* 43
Ask health professional or practitioner 44 46 44 49* 41 48* 42
Ask family or friends 28 26 26 35* 25 24 25
Rely on brand name/reputation 28 32* 25 41* 23 35* 24
Look for Health Canada approval number on the product 25 29* 22 27 24 28* 23
Search advisory, warning or recall information 21 25* 17 23 20 24* 18
Assume all products for sale in Canada must do what they say they will do 17 16 16 25* 14 17 16
Don’t really think about it 14 10 17* 11 15* 7 18*
News media 11 13* 9 11 10 13* 19

 

Table 3.3.5.b: Determining effectiveness of non-prescription drugs by knowledge of effectiveness, trust in claims and perceived level of knowledge
Determining Effectiveness of Products for Non-Prescription Drugs Total Knowledge of Effectiveness Trust in Claims Perceived Level of Knowledge
High Low Trust Don’t trust Well
in-
formed
Not well
in-formed
Base=actual (2,502)
%
(973)
%
(723)
%
(893)
%
(801)
%
(937)
%
(808)
%
*Represents significant difference at the 95% confidence level.
Ask health professional or practitioner 57 61* 52 62* 52 61* 49
Rely on brand name/reputation 43 49* 37 53* 35 50* 35
Research product on the internet 42 43* 39 42 42 44* 36
Ask family or friends 28 29 27 27 26 28 26
Look for Health Canada approval number on the product 28 34* 23 28 28 33* 23
Search advisory, warning or recall information 23 25* 20 23 23 26* 18
Assume all products for sale in Canada must do what they say they will do 21 21 22 26* 17 22 19
News media 11 12 12 13 11 13* 10
Don’t really think about it 10 9 11 10 9 9 12*

 

Table 3.3.5.c: Determining effectiveness of cosmetics by knowledge of effectiveness, trust in claims and perceived level of knowledge
Determining Effectiveness of Cosmetics Total Knowledge of Effectiveness Trust in Claims Perceived Level of Knowledge
High Low Trust Don’t trust Well
in-
formed
Not well
in-formed
Base=actual (2,502)
%
(671)
%
(1,174)
%
(529)
%
(1,250)
%
(701)
%
(1,155)
%
*Represents significant difference at the 95% confidence level.
Rely on brand name/reputation 44 49* 40 55* 40 53* 36
Research product on the internet 41 48* 34 43 43 48* 34
Ask family or friends 30 32* 26 32 28 32* 26
Ask health professional or practitioner 24 26 24 27 24 26 23
Don’t really think about it 19 17 22* 18 18 15 22*
Search advisory, warning or recall information 18 20* 16 19 18 18 16
Look for Health Canada approval number on the product 18 18 18 19 19 17 19
Assume all products for sale in Canada must do what they say they will do 17 20* 16 27* 14 20* 16
News media 12 14* 9 16* 11 15* 9

Gender, age and education all impact how Canadians determine the effectiveness of products.  For all three categories, women are significantly more likely than men to research online or to ask friends and family.  Men are significantly more likely to not really think about it or assume that all products for sale in Canada must do what they say they do.

Canadians who are 55 year or older are significantly more likely than those under 55 years old to ask a health professional or practitioner, rely on the brand name, search advisory, warning or recall information and look for the Health Canada approval number on the product.  Canadians 18-34 years old are significantly more likely to ask family or friends, research online, or to not really think about it.

Finally, with respect to education, Canadians with a university degree are significantly more likely than those with only a high school education to ask family or friends, as well as research the product on the internet.  Canadians with a high school education or less are significantly more likely than those with higher education to believe that all products for sale in Canada must do what they say they do.

Table 3.3.5.d: Sources used to determine effectiveness of natural health products by gender, age and education
Natural Health Products Total Gender Age Education
Male Female 18-34 35-54 55+ High school or less College/
CGEP
University Degree
Base=actual (2,502)
%
(1,164)
%
(1,337)
%
(457)
%
(981)
%
(1,064)
%
(496)
%
(894)
%
(1,062)
%
*Represents significant difference at the 95% confidence level.
Research product on the Internet 48 44 52* 51* 46 47 41 48* 51*
Ask health professional or practitioner 44 39 49* 35 42* 54* 45 48* 42
Ask family or friends 28 26 30* 34* 28* 22 24 26 30*
Rely on brand name/reputation 28 27 30* 27 26 32* 31 28 29
Look for Health Canada approval number 25 25 24 16 22* 34* 26 26 23
Search advisory, warning or recall information 21 20 21 18 19 25* 18 23* 20
Assume all products do what they say they will do 17 18* 15 16 17 17 20* 15 17
News media 11 11 11 10 10 12 8 13* 11
Don’t really think about it 14 16* 13 19* 13 11 16* 15 12

 

Table 3.3.5.e: Sources used to determine effectiveness of non-prescription drugs by gender, age and education
Non-Prescription Drugs Total Gender Age Education
Male Female 18-34 35-54 55+ High school or less College/
CGEP
University Degree
Base=actual (2,502)
%
(1,164)
%
(1,337)
%
(457)
%
(981)
%
(1,064)
%
(496)
%
(894)
%
(1,062)
%
*Represents significant difference at the 95% confidence level.
Ask health professional or practitioner 57 53 61* 49 53 67* 57 61* 54
Rely on brand name/reputation 43 42 44 38 42 48* 44 43 43
Research product on the Internet 42 40 44* 46* 39 42 38 41 45*
Ask family or friends 28 26 29* 37* 27* 21 26 26 30*
Look for Health Canada approval number 28 29 28 19 26* 38* 29 29 27
Search advisory, warning or recall information 23 23 23 22 21 26* 21 23 24
Assume all products do what they say they will do 21 22 19 18 22* 21 22 19 21
News media 11 11 12 13 11 10 10 11 12
Don’t really think about it 10 11* 9 14* 11* 6 10 10 9

 

Table 3.3.5.f: Sources used to determine effectiveness of cosmetics by gender, age and education
Cosmetics Total Gender Age Education
Male Female 18-34 35-54 55+ High school or less College/
CGEP
University Degree
Base=actual (2,502)
%
(1,164)
%
(1,337)
%
(457)
%
(981)
%
(1,064)
%
(496)
%
(894)
%
(1,062)
%
*Represents significant difference at the 95% confidence level.
Research product on the Internet 41 36 46* 46* 39 40 35 41* 45*
Ask health professional or practitioner 24 26* 22 21 22 29* 25 25 23
Ask family or friends 30 27 32* 37* 30* 24 25 30* 31*
Rely on brand name/reputation 44 39 50* 38 44* 50* 44 45 44
Look for Health Canada approval number 18 21* 15 12 16 25* 21* 18 16
Search advisory, warning or recall information 18 18 17 18 16 20* 14 19* 18
Assume all products do what they say they will do 17 20* 15 17 18 17 23* 15 17
News media 12 11 12 12 11 12 10 12 12
Don’t really think about it 19 21* 16 19 20 17 20 19 18

Where Canadians Look for Product Information

3.3.6. Canadians use a variety of sources to look for product information.

While there are no information sources that are used by a strong majority of Canadians, search engines and product labels are two of the most commonly used sources for all three categories.  Healthcare professionals (such as a doctor or a nurse) are the number one information source for Canadians when looking up information on non-prescription drugs (53%). Far fewer (21-39%) consult a healthcare professional when looking for information on natural health products or cosmetics.

While general internet searches using a search engine are common, specific health-related websites (such as manufacturers’ website, Health Canada’s website, consumer group websites, etc.) are not commonly used by Canadians to look up product information, as only one quarter of Canadians or fewer use any of these types of websites for any of the three categories.

Social media and blogs are not popular information sources and are only used by less than one-in-ten Canadians for all categories.

Exhibit 3.3.6.a: Product Information Sources

Exhibit 3.3.6.a: Product Information Sources

Q16. Where do you look for information about products in each of the following categories?  Select all that apply.
Base: Total Respondents (n=2502)

Gender, age and education all play a role in what sources Canadians use to look up product information.  For each category, women are significantly more likely than men to read the product label, ask family or friends, consult the manufacturer’s website and/or use a health magazine or journal.

Canadians who are 55 years or older are significantly more likely than those under 55 to read the product label and ask a health professional.  Younger Canadians (18-34 years) are significantly more likely to use internet based research using a search engine, government websites, social media and blogs. They are also significantly more likely to talk to family or friends than older Canadians.

Canadians with a university degree are significantly more likely than those with high school or less to use nearly all of the various sources of information.

Table 3.3.6.a: Product information sources for natural health products by gender, age and education
Natural Health Products Total Gender Age Education
Male Female 18-34 35-54 55+ High school or less College/
CGEP
University Degree
Base=actual (2,502)
%
(1,164)
%
(1,337)
%
(457)
%
(981)
%
(1,064)
%
(496)
%
(894)
%
(1,062)
%
*Represents significant difference at the 95% confidence level.
Search Engine 43 42 45* 45 43 42 36 44* 47*
Product label 43 40 46* 41 40 48* 44 42 42
Health care professional 39 36 41* 32 36 47* 40 41 37
Family or friends 29 27 31* 34 30 23 28 29 30
Manufacturers’ website 22 20 24* 18 24* 23* 21 25* 20
Health care practitioner 21 19 24* 17 22* 24* 21 24 20
Health Canada website 19 20 18 15 18 24* 19 20 18
Health professional website 18 17 19 18 17 19 15 18 20*
Health magazine, journal 17 14 19* 15 17 18 15 17 17
Consumer group website 13 13 13 13 14 12 9 12* 15*
GOC website 10 11* 9 10 8 12* 8 10 11
Social media 8 8 8 13* 7* 4 6 9* 8
Blogs 6 6 7 12* 6* 2 3 6* 9*
Other government website 5 6* 4 8* 5 4 4 5 7*

 

Table 3.3.6.b: Product information sources for non-prescription drugs by gender, age and education
Non-Prescription Drugs Total Gender Age Education
Male Female 18-34 35-54 55+ High school or less College/
CGEP
University Degree
Base=actual (2,502)
%
(1,164)
%
(1,337)
%
(457)
%
(981)
%
(1,064)
%
(496)
%
(894)
%
(1,062)
%
*Represents significant difference at the 95% confidence level.
Health care professional 53 48 58* 44 49 64* 55 57* 50
Product label 50 48 53* 45 48 57* 52 51 50
Search Engine 42 41 42 46* 40 40 33 41* 46*
Family or friends 28 26 30* 33* 28* 24 29 28 28
Manufacturers’ website 23 21 24* 18 24* 25* 22 24 22
Health Canada website 21 21 20 17 19 26* 19 23* 20
Health professional website 19 19 19 21 18 19 14 19* 21*
Health care practitioner 17 16 19 16 17 19 17 18 18
Health magazine, journal 13 11 15* 11 14 14 11 13 13
Consumer group website 13 14 11 13 13 12 9 12* 15*
GOC website 9 10 8 6 9 12* 9 10 9
Social media 6 6 7 11* 6* 3 6 7 6
Blogs 5 6* 4 10* 3* 2 2 4* 6*
Other government website 5 6 4 7* 4 5 5 4 6*

 

Table 3.3.6.c: Product information sources for cosmetics by gender, age and education
Cosmetics Total Gender Age Education
Male Female 18-34 35-54 55+ High school or less College/
CGEP
University Degree
Base=actual (2,502)
%
(1,164)
%
(1,337)
%
(457)
%
(981)
%
(1,064)
%
(496)
%
(894)
%
(1,062)
%
*Represents significant difference at the 95% confidence level.
Product label 51 45 56* 45 48 57* 52 51 50
Search Engine 41 39 43* 45* 41 38 34 41* 45*
Family or friends 34 30 37* 38* 34 30 34 34 34
Manufacturers’ website 24 20 27* 19 26* 26* 23 25 23
Health care professional 21 25* 16 18 17 27* 23 21 19
Health magazine, journal 18 12 23* 17 17 19 14 20* 18*
Consumer group website 16 15 17 17 16 14 11 16* 18*
Health Canada website 13 15* 11 11 13 15* 13 14 12
Health professional website 10 12* 8 10 10 11 8 10 12*
Health care practitioner 10 11 9 8 10 11 10 11 9
Social media 10 8 13* 20* 9* 4 9 10 11
Blogs 9 7 11* 18* 9* 3 5 8* 12*
GOC website 6 8* 5 5 6 8* 6 6 6
Other government website 4 5* 2 5 3 3* 3 2 5*

3.3.7. Product Preference

There is no strong preference for homeopathic or non-prescription drug for cough and cold products.

Participants were shown images of two products chosen based on availability in French and English that represent a non-prescription product and a homeopathic product indicated as “cough & cold”.  The homeopathic product was Real Relief cough & cold daytime formula (DIN-HM 8002246). The non-prescription product was Balminil Syrup indicated to relieve dry cough due to colds, antitussive (DIN 00436895).

When asked which product they would be more likely to use, Canadians did not display a strong preference for the homeopathic or non-prescription drug to relieve cough and cold.  To this point, roughly half (47%) claimed they would be equally likely to use either product, while about one quarter preferred product A (“Real Relief”, a homeopathic product) (25%) and another quarter preferred product B (“Balminil”, a non-prescription drug) (28%).

Exhibit 3.3.7.a: Product Preference

Exhibit 3.3.7.a: Product Preference

Q5A. Both of these products have been reviewed and approved by Health Canada. Would you be:
Base: Total Respondents (n=2502)

Frequent users of natural health products such as traditional natural health products (37% vs 31-22%), natural health products (29% vs 22-17%) and homeopathic products (29% vs 17-22%) were more likely to choose Real Relief.

There are a couple demographic differences when it comes to selecting these products:

Table 3.3.7.a: Product preference by gender, age, region and education
  Total Gender Age Education
Male Female 18-34 35-54 55+ High school or less College/
CGEP
University Degree
Base=actual (2,502)
%
(1,164)
%
(1,337)
%
(457)
%
(981)
%
(1,064)
%
(496)
%
(894)
%
(1,062)
%
*Represents significant difference at the 95% confidence level.
Equally likely to use Real Relief or Balminil to relieve cough and cold 47 48 45 44 45 50* 52* 48* 43
More likely to use Balminil to relieve cough and cold 28 30 27 33* 28* 25 21 25* 34*
More likely to use Real Relief to relieve cough and cold 25 22 28* 23 26 25 27* 27* 23

3.3.8. Reasons for Product Preference

There are many reasons for product preference.

The reasons why Canadians preferred Balminil (a non-prescription drug) or Real Relief (a homeopathic product) vary greatly.

Reasons Canadians selected Real Relief included the details or information on the package (16%), the natural ingredients (15%) and that it relieves or covers more symptoms (15%).

Canadians chose Balminil because it contains medical ingredients (10%), or because they are familiar with the product (10%).

For those who were equally likely to choose either product, the most common response was that they felt that the products were similar to each other (26%). The frequency of use of homeopathic products did not affect the responses on this question, which could mean that consumers are not able to easily identify homeopathic products from non-prescription drugs.

Based on these findings, it would seem Canadians are most likely to choose a brand based on packaging or which has more information on the ingredients or effectiveness of the product.

Exhibit 3.3.8.a: Unaided Reasons for Product Preference – Real Relief

Exhibit 3.3.8.a: Unaided Reasons for Product Preference – Real Relief

Q5B. Why would you be ( insert response from Q5A)? (OPEN ENDED RESPONSE)
Base: Respondent prefers Real Relief (n=635)
*Only responses with 5% or higher are included

Text Description - Exhibit 3.3.8.a: Unaided Reasons for Product Preference – Real Relief

Exhibit 3.3.8.b: Unaided Reasons for Product Preference – Balminil

Exhibit 3.3.8.b: Unaided Reasons for Product Preference – Balminil

Q5B. Why would you be ( insert response from Q5A)? (OPEN ENDED RESPONSE)
Base: Respondent prefers Real Relief (n=635)
*Only responses with 5% or higher are included

Text Description - Exhibit 3.3.8.b: Unaided Reasons for Product Preference – Balminil

Exhibit 3.3.8.c: Unaided Reasons for Product Preference – Equally Likely to Use Real Relief or Balminil

Exhibit 3.3.8.c: Unaided Reasons for Product Preference – Equally Likely to Use Real Relief or Balminil

Q5B. Why would you be ( insert response from Q5A)? (OPEN ENDED RESPONSE)
Base: Respondent prefers Real Relief (n=635)
*Only responses with 5% or higher are included

Text Description - Exhibit 3.3.8.c: Unaided Reasons for Product Preference – Equally Likely to Use Real Relief or Balminil

4. Survey Methodology

4.1. Methodological Overview

Questionnaire

Based on the objectives of the research and discussion with the Project Authority, TNS drafted the questionnaire.  The resulting survey was 28 questions that were primarily closed-ended.  TNS translated the survey into French.

Survey Pretest

A pre-test was undertaken on April 15th obtaining 10 English and 10 French completions, including probing questions.  The results were reviewed to ensure the survey was working as expected and that the questions were being interpreted as expected.  Based on the results of the pre-test, no changes were required for the survey and as such the results of the 20 completes were included in the final data set.

Sample Design and Selection

A regionally disproportionate sample of Canadians from the general population aged 18 years and older was drawn to achieve 2,500 completions.  The sample was regionally stratified to ensure regional quotas were met.

All sample was obtained from TNS’s proprietary online panel.

Survey Administration

An online survey was conducted using computer assisted web interviewing (CAWI) technology.  CAWI ensures the interview flows as it should with pre-programmed skip patterns.  It also controls responses to ensure appropriate ranges and data validity.  Sample is imported directly into the survey to ensure accurate recording of sample variables such as region.

Surveys were conducted in English or French as chosen by the respondent.  The survey was conducted from April 18th to April 26th, 2016.  In total 2,502 surveys were completed.  The average survey length was 21 minutes with the shortest being 5 minutes and the longest being 118 minutes (outliers removed).

All participants were informed of the general purpose of the research.  They were also informed of the sponsor and the supplier and that all of their responses would be confidential.  As well, the survey was registered with the Survey Registration System.

Margin of Errors

As mentioned previously, panel sample was used for this study and as such margin of error does not apply.

Weighting

Weighting adjustments were applied to the final edited, clean data to ensure that the data were representative of the 18+ population of Canada based on the 2011 Census.  The data were weighted by age within gender and within region to match the Canadian population using 2011 Census Data.   The following is the breakdown of actual and weighted completions.

Table 5.1a: Actual
Total Atlantic Quebec Ontario Prairies BC
2,502 251 600 900 351 400

 

Table 5.1b: Weighted
Total Atlantic Quebec Ontario Prairies BC
2,502 179 600 959 429 335

 

Table 5.1c: Actual
  Total Atlantic Quebec Ontario Prairies BC
M 18-34 187 12 38 82 28 27
M 35-54 493 20 117 208 75 73
M 55+ 485 58 127 153 72 75
F 18-34 270 27 54 99 36 54
F 35-54 488 46 134 160 71 77
F 55+ 579 88 130 198 69 94

 

Table 5.1d: Weighted
  Total Atlantic Quebec Ontario Prairies BC
M 18-34 348 22 81 132 68 45
M 35-54 455 32 108 176 80 59
M 55+ 409 32 102 153 64 58
F 18-34 349 22 81 134 67 45
F 35-54 470 34 108 186 79 63
F 55+ 471 37 120 178 71 65

Completion Rate

A total of 18,500 invitations were sent, of which n=2,502 completed the survey.  The overall completion rate achieved for the online study was 13.5%. The following table outlines the sample disposition and response rate as per the MRIA guidelines.

Table 5.1e: Completion rate
Total Invitations Sent 18,500
Completes 2,502
Break Offs 718
Non-Qualifiers 367
Completion Rate 13.5%
Incidence Rate 87.2%

Non-response Bias

To address the issue of response bias, data were weighted to be representative of the Canadian population.

5. Appendix A: Survey Instrument

Introduction

Thank you for coming to our site to complete this survey. Today we are conducting a study on behalf of the Government of Canada about the opinions and behaviours of Canadians. This survey will take approximately 15 minutes to complete and is registered with the National Survey Registration System. This survey is anonymous and confidential.

Screener

Do you or anyone in your household work in any of the following fields? (Select all that apply)

PN: Terminate if response is not none of the above

Consumer Use and Perceptions of Consumer Health Products

PN:  Assign random order for product category for each unique respondent but keep consistent throughout the survey.

1. Please drag each product into the category box you think they most belong.

Images: 10 images

Categories:

2. On average, how frequently do you use each of the following products?

Randomize list

Scale:

3. In general, how would you rate your knowledge about the safety of:

Categories:

Scale:

4. In general, how would you rate your knowledge about the effectiveness (how well they work) of products in these categories:

Categories:

Scale

5. When you come across a product that says “homeopathic medicine” on the label, what does that mean to you?

OPEN

5A. Both of these products have been reviewed and approved by Health Canada. Would you be:

[Two images – to be labelled Product A and Product B]

5B. Why would you be < insert response from Q5A>?

OPEN

6. Which of the following descriptions would you associate with a “product traditionally used in Ayurveda to aid digestion”? Select all that you think apply.

Randomize list

7. When you come across a product that says “SPF 15” on the label, what does that mean to you?

Free-text box (50 words maximum)

DISPLAY:

PN:  Use same order as random display selected at the beginning of the survey.

The following survey is about < natural health products, non-prescription drugs and cosmetics>.

Natural health products contain ingredients that originate in nature and include a variety of products such as vitamins and minerals, herbal remedies, homeopathic products, traditional products (such as traditional Chinese medicines), probiotics, and other products like amino acids and essential fatty acids.

Non-prescription drugs are everyday medicines and first-aid products that are available without a prescription, such as allergy and sinus/nasal congestion relievers; cough, cold and flu medicines; fever and pain relievers; eye and ear care drops; antacids and laxatives; children’s medicines; and antiseptic and wound cleansers.

Cosmetics are products used for cleansing, improving or altering the complexion, skin, hair or teeth, such as body wash, facial moisturizer, hair shampoo and conditioner, make-up, deodorant and perfume.

8. In general, how informed do you feel when you buy products in the following categories?

Categories:

Scale

9. How safe do you believe the following products sold in Canada are?

Categories:

Scale

DISPLAY:  A product claim is something that a manufacturer says their product will do.  The following are a few examples of product claims:

10. How much do you trust the claims made on the labels of?

Categories:

Scale

11. How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements?

Scale

Consumer Behaviours

12. Thinking about < insert product category>, which part(s) of the labelling or packaging do you read and how frequently do you read them?

Categories:

Randomize list

Scale

13. Which of the following pieces of information do you want to have on a product to help decide what to buy?

Categories:

PN: Anchor other to bottom of list

Randomize list

14. How do you determine if the products in these categories are safe?  Select all that apply.

Categories:

Randomize statements, anchor other

15. How do you determine if the products in these categories do what they say they will do? Select all that apply.

Categories:

Randomize statements, anchor other

16. Where do you look for information about products in each of the following categories?  Select all that apply.

Categories:

Randomize

Role of Health Canada

17. For each of the following categories, which tasks, if any, do you believe Health Canada is responsible for?

Categories:

Randomize statements

Product Identifiers

18. Have you ever heard of a:

DISPLAY

A Drug Identification Number (DIN) is an eight digit number assigned by Health Canada to non-prescription and prescription drugs prior to being sold in Canada. This number tells you that Health Canada has evaluated a product and authorized it for sale in Canada.

A Natural Product Number (NPN) or Homeopathic Medicine Number (DIN-HM) is an eight digit number assigned by Health Canada to natural health products or homeopathic medicines prior to the products being sold in Canada. This number tells you that Health Canada has evaluated a product and authorized it for sale in Canada.

PN: Ask for each item and randomize DIN, DIN-HM and NPN.  Leave discriptions displayed at all times.

19. If a product has a (DIN, DIN-HM or NPN) would you consider it to be:

Scale

Randomize statements

Demographics

Now, we just have a few questions to help us classify your answers.  Your responses to these and all other questions will be kept completely confidential.

20. In what year were you born?

21. What is your gender?

22. In which province or territory do you reside?

23. What is the highest level of formal education that you have completed?

24. Which of the following categories best describes your total household income? That is, the total income of all persons in your household combined, before taxes?

25. Are you a parent or caregiver for anyone that is? Select all that apply.

PN: ONLY ASK TO WOMEN

26. Are you currently?

Answer List:  Yes, No

27. Do you or anyone in your household have:

Should you wish to learn more about consumer health products, please visit the following websites.


1
Note: multiple response so numbers will not add to 100%.