Contract # 23483 181064/001/CY
Contract Date: 2017-12-21
Final Report
CONSUMER ATTITUDES TOWARDS ELECTRIC VEHICLES
Prepared for
Natural Resources Canada
nrcan.por-rop.rncan@canada.ca
March 29, 2018
Prepared by
The Strategic Counsel
21 St. Clair Ave E., Ste. 800
Toronto, Ontario M4T 1L9
Tel: (416) 975 4465 Fax: (416) 975 1883
Email: info@thestrategiccounsel.com
Website: www.thestrategiccounsel.com
Ce rapport est aussi disponible en français sur demande.
I.Executive Summary...........................................................
A.Background...............................................................
B.Objectives................................................................
C.Methodology..............................................................
1.Quantitative Component.....................................................
2.Qualitative Component.....................................................
3.Fieldwork..............................................................
D.Note to the Reader..........................................................
E.Key Findings..............................................................
1.Key Findings from the Quantitative Survey..........................................
2.Key Findings from the In-Depth Interviews with Electric Vehicle Owners........................
F.Conclusions and Recommendations...............................................
II.Findings from the Online Survey..................................................
A. Vehicle Purchase: Past and Future Intent............................................
1.Vehicle Purchases: Last 2 Years and Next Year....................................
2.Size of Vehicle Purchased or Intend to Purchase.......................................
3.Recent and Planned Electric Vehicle Purchases.......................................
B.Current Household Vehicle Ownership and Driving Patterns...............................
1.Number of Vehicles in the Household.............................................
2.Current Electric Vehicle Ownership..............................................
3.Frequency of Vehicle Use....................................................
C.Vehicle Purchase Considerations.................................................
D.Familiarity with Electric Vehicles.................................................
1.Exposure to Electric Vehicles..................................................
2.Familiarity with Various Aspects of Electric Vehicles.....................................
E.Views on Electric Vehicles.....................................................
1.Benefits and Drawbacks Associated with Owning an Electric Vehicle...........................
2.Rating of Aspects of Electric Vehicles.............................................
F.Interest in and Likelihood to Purchase an Electric Vehicle................................
G.Motivators and Barriers to Purchasing an Electric Vehicle................................
1.Perceived Motivators.......................................................
2.Perceived Barriers.........................................................
H.Driving Range Requirements...................................................
I.Sources of Information about Electric Vehicles........................................
J.Attitudinal Profile of Respondents................................................
K.Key Drivers of Intent to Purchase an Electric Vehicle....................................
III.Findings from One-on-One Interviews with Electric Vehicle Owners........................
A.Use of Electric Vehicles and Distances Driven........................................
B.Motivators for Purchase and Key Considerations......................................
C.Research and Trusted Sources of Information........................................
D.Comparison to Gasoline and Diesel-Powered Vehicles...................................
E.Charging.................................................................
F.Misperceptions and Concerns among Non-Electric Vehicle Owners..........................
G.Questions from Non-Electric Vehicle owners.........................................
H.The Future of Electric Vehicles: Encouraging Greater Uptake..............................
I.Role of the Government of Canada...............................................
IV.Appendix: Research Instruments..................................................
A.Questionnaire.............................................................
B.Interview Guide............................................................
With a wide range of models and price points, buying an electric vehicle has never been easier. In 2017, there were over 30 battery-electric vehicles (BEVs) and plug-in hybrid electric (PHEV) models available in Canada[1]. To date, 41,695 electric vehicles have been sold in Canada.[2]
Although recent sales data for electric vehicles (EVs) shows a record-setting total of 11,000 electric vehicles were sold in 2016—up 56% over 2015—electric vehicle sales overall remain a tale of three provinces: 95% of sales in 2016 were in British Columbia, Quebec and Ontario.
The Government of Canada is committed to developing a national strategy by 2018 to increase the number of zero emission vehicles on Canadian roads. Advanced technology vehicles are the most energy-efficient and lowest emission choices available today and include plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEVs), battery-electric vehicles (BEVs), and fuel cell vehicles. PHEVs and BEVs use electricity from a battery that is charged using an external electricity source. There are two types of electric vehicles on the market—BEVs and PHEVs—and each has its benefits:
A multi-stakeholder Advanced Technology Vehicle awareness group is working with the Government of Canada to develop a Zero Emission Vehicle (ZEV) Strategy to encourage uptake of low carbon emission vehicles by Canadian consumers.
This research study explored consumer awareness and knowledge of PHEVs and BEVs, including familiarity with the technology, attitudes and perceptions as these relate to electric vehicles, to help inform the work of the ZEV Strategy Committee and future educational outreach activities.
This research study has been designed to explore Canadian consumers’ awareness, knowledge, and experience, as well as their attitudes towards and perceptions of electric vehicles. Specifically, the survey captures measures of:
Results of this research will inform recommendations made to the ZEV Strategy Committee and future educational outreach activities.
The study was undertaken as a hybrid, quantitative-qualitative research program.
A survey was undertaken online, via a panel of Canadians, targeting n = 1500 completions among those who had purchased a new vehicle (i.e., not a resale vehicle) in the past two years or were planning to purchase a new vehicle within the next year. The survey was approximately 15 minutes in length. The quantitative research component aimed to assess levels of awareness of and interest in electric vehicles, including examining attitudes, perceptions, and motivators/barriers to purchase.
The survey was designed to target Canadians, via an online panel, aged 18 years and older who had purchased or plan to purchase a new vehicle (past purchase having taken place within the last two years; future purchase likely to occur within the next year).
The sample was designed to be proportionate across the regions. Beyond this, quotas were set for gender (an approximate 50/50 male/female split) and by age groups (proportionate to population) to ensure that the final sample is generally reflective of the Canadian population relative to these two demographic variables.
Beyond this, no additional hard or soft quotas were set. The respondent profile for income and education in terms of the final sample was permitted to fall out naturally and, as such, reflects the income and education characteristics for new car buyers in Canada rather than the general population as a whole.
The survey was designed in close consultation with Natural Resources Canada (NRCan). It was pre-tested among a minimum of n = 30 panelists (15 in English and 15 in French) prior to running live in order to obtain feedback with respect to length, ease of completion, and comprehension. No changes were made following the pre-test.
A total of 30 one-on-one interviews were completed with electric vehicle owners. Interviews ranged in length from 40 to 45 minutes. All participants who completed an interview were offered a $90 incentive.
Interview subjects were drawn from survey respondents who had identified themselves as owning or leasing a PHEV or EV in the survey and who then gave their consent to participate in a follow-up interview. Given the low incidence of electric vehicle ownership across Canada, survey completions did not generate a sufficient number of prospective interviews in order to complete the interviews in the required timeframe. As a result, electric vehicle owners were identified from another Canadian online panel provider. These individuals were subsequently screened to request their participation in an in-depth, one-on-one interview.
Profile of Interview Participants: Distribution by Region, Gender, and Age
The distribution of interviewees by region, gender, and age is shown below. To the extent possible, attempts were made to ensure reasonable regional coverage. Notwithstanding this, the majority of the interviews were completed with individuals residing in Ontario, Quebec and British Columbia, which mirrors the provinces with the highest sales of electric vehicles in Canada. Of the 30 interviews that were completed, the distribution by region is as follows: Quebec (12), Ontario (10), British Columbia (5), Manitoba (2), and Newfoundland (1). A total of 20 interviews were completed in English and 10 in French.
Distribution of Interviews by Region
Province/Territory |
City/Town in which Interviewee Resides |
Number of Interviews Conducted |
Total |
Quebec |
Greenfield Park Lévis Longueuil Montréal Pierrefonds Québec City Ste-Julienne Ste-Marcelline-de-Kildare Terrebonne |
1 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 2 |
12 |
Ontario |
Alexandria Ingersoll Kitchener London Mississauga Ottawa Pickering Toronto Woodbridge |
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 |
10 |
British Columbia |
Fort St. John Kelowna Langley Vancouver Victoria |
1 1 1 1 1 |
5 |
Manitoba |
Winnipeg |
2 |
2 |
Newfoundland |
St. John’s |
1 |
1 |
Total |
30 |
Most of those interviewed were men aged 35 and older.
Distribution by Gender and Age
|
18–34 |
35–54 |
55+ |
Total |
Men |
0 |
11 |
14 |
25 |
Women |
1 |
2 |
2 |
5 |
Total |
2 |
12 |
16 |
30 |
Make and Model of Electric Vehicle
The types of electric vehicles owned by those interviewed closely reflect the popularity of various makes and models according to the latest sales data. The largest share of electric vehicle owners interviewed drive a Chevrolet Volt/Bolt or a Nissan Leaf. As the chart below indicates, interviews were completed with a cross-section of those owning low- to mid range electric vehicles (priced under $50K) as well as those driving high-end luxury electric vehicles (priced over $75K), such as the Tesla Model S/X and Cadillac CT6. The motivations and considerations of electric vehicle owners in terms of purchase decisions do vary to some extent according to vehicle type; these are noted as relevant in the detailed report which follows.
Distribution by Make and Model of Electric Vehicles
Make and Model |
Number of Participants |
Chevrolet Volt |
9 |
Nissan Leaf |
6 |
Chevrolet Bolt |
3 |
Audi A3 E-tron |
2 |
Kia Soul |
2 |
Cadillac CT6 |
2 |
Ford C-Max |
1 |
Ford Focus |
1 |
Hyundai Ioniq |
1 |
Smart Fortwo |
1 |
Tesla Model X |
1 |
Tesla Model S |
1 |
Half of those who participated in an interview drive a plug-in hybrid vehicle (PHEV) while the other half drive a fully battery electric vehicle (BEV). It is important to take this into consideration when reviewing the detailed findings that follow, as responses differ to some degree between these two groups of drivers, specifically around range anxiety.
Distribution by Type of Electric Vehicle
Plug in hybrid vehicle (PHEV) |
15 |
Battery electric vehicle (BEV) |
15 |
While a few respondents were very early adopters, having purchased their electric vehicle 6 to 8 years ago (i.e., 2010−2012), the majority of owners made their purchase more recently, within the last 3 years (19 out of 30 purchased in 2015 or later).
The majority of respondents purchased their electric vehicle new. Very few electric vehicle owners mentioned that they purchased their vehicle used. Again, this is relevant to perceptions of the resale market for electric vehicles and is elaborated on later in this report.
The online survey ran in field from February 5 to 13, 2018. One-on-one interviews were conducted from February 27 to March 16, 2018.
Throughout this report, we refer to the following terms:
PHEVs—Plug-in Hybrid Electric vehicles, which are partially electric vehicles
BEVs—Battery Electric vehicles, which are 100% electric
HEVs—Hybrid Electric vehicles, which are not plugged into the electric grid
In the survey, these terms were explained to respondents: both BEVs and PHEVs require charging by plugging into the electrical grid system, whereas HEVs charge while running and do not require plugging in.
In the report, we frequently use the term “electric vehicles” generically to encompass both plug-in hybrid electric and battery electric vehicles.
As this is not a survey of the general population, the reader will note that reference is made to “respondents” or to “consumers” rather than to the general population, the public or Canadians. Given that the survey targeted new vehicle buyers (those who have purchased a vehicle in the past 2 years and/or who plan to purchase within the next year), inferences from these results cannot be made to the broader Canadian population at large. Readers should keep in mind that these findings reflect the views of recent new car buyers across Canada only and/or those who have indicated they intend to purchase a new vehicle within the next 12 months.
The following provides a high level overview of key findings from both the survey and the in-depth interviews with electric vehicle owners.
The early adopters of electric vehicles are real enthusiasts, motivated mainly by their interest in electric vehicle technology as well as by their desire to lower their impact on the environment and live more sustainably. Many have undertaken a very thorough cost-benefit analysis and say that, on top of having a positive environmental impact, they are reaping demonstrable yearly savings (which they expect to become more evident over the life of the vehicle), notwithstanding the generally higher price point for these vehicles.
For the most part, electric vehicle owners are satisfied with their purchase and were able to find the type of vehicle, in terms of size and features (including luxury details), that they were seeking. However, a specific downside that was mentioned related to the low inventory of electric vehicles in stock. While many purchased their vehicles and then had to wait weeks, if not months, to receive them, a number elected to purchase a vehicle other than the one they had originally intended to buy because it was available immediately at another dealer. At the same time, a certain degree of brand loyalty factors into the purchase decision as many electric vehicle owners are simply now rolling over their gasoline- or diesel-powered vehicle, purchased at the same dealership, to an electric vehicle (e.g., [M1]previous Chevrolet or Cadillac owners have purchased the EV version now available on the market).
Some degree of range anxiety exists among BEV owners in particular, although they seem to have adapted through better trip planning and awareness of the locations of charging stations and timing required for charging. Ultimately, this is not a huge barrier for current owners, although they do see charging infrastructure as a significant barrier suppressing broader uptake of electric vehicles in the future. Additionally, many electric vehicle owners indicated some disappointment with the battery technology in that the redirection of significant power in cold, winter conditions to heat their vehicles results in a significant reduction in driving range.
Electric vehicle owners have undertaken fairly extensive research, having closely followed the development of the technology over the last decade or more. Many have a background in or at least a high comfort level with the technology and the technical side of vehicle manufacturing. As such, they are generally at ease adapting to the slightly different driving experience electric vehicles offer and, in fact, are effusive about the overall performance of these vehicles (with the exception of winter driving as noted above). They draw principally from online, unbiased sources of information, relying heavily on consumer reports, auto magazines, blogs, podcasts, and advocacy and user groups.
With respect to federal government initiatives and activities to promote higher uptake of electric vehicles, multiple suggestions were put forward by current electric vehicle owners. Improving the charging infrastructure is at the top of their list. Other recommendations included additional incentives beyond those offered by some provinces to purchase electric vehicles and/or disincentives to purchasing gasoline- or diesel-powered vehicles (i.e., gas tax, tax on these types of vehicles). More education and awareness-raising on the economic benefits of electric vehicles (rather than just the environmental effects) combined with opportunities to test-drive were also underscored.
Although there is interest in electric vehicles, it could be described as “soft.” It is clear that purchase price, charging infrastructure, range anxiety, and to some extent the hesitancy to be among the first to adopt a new technology are holding back some consumers from making the leap to an electric vehicle. Getting information out to consumers about incentives (where available), operating costs, battery function, life, and range is required to both entice and reassure potential buyers.
Interestingly, vehicle dealerships and salespeople are seen as key information sources, although electric vehicle owners interviewed as part of this study were disappointed in dealers’ lack of overall knowledge of electric vehicles and/or their interest in making a sale to a highly interested buyer.
Opportunities to acquaint prospective buyers with the electric vehicle features and the overall driving experience will likely have a positive impact. Interested buyers need more opportunities to test drive electric vehicles and/or to take part in demonstrations (e.g., the Electric Vehicle Discovery Centre in Toronto, Ontario) in order to be able to discover both the economic and environmental benefits of electric transportation and get answers to their questions from electric vehicle experts, specialists and owners.
Electric vehicle owners themselves are potential ambassadors—they could be quite persuasive in touting the benefits of a quieter drive in addition to the very practical cost savings in terms of operation and maintenance. Although recommendations from friends and family are not identified as a top information source, they are at least somewhat important as a factor or consideration in the vehicle purchase decision.
Currently, electric vehicles remain somewhat of a curiosity. Many non-electric vehicle owners have questions principally around driving range and charging. While it is difficult to accurately forecast the sales trajectory for electric vehicles in the coming years, this research suggests that reaching a critical mass or wider diffusion of this technology could occur quite rapidly with more models coming on the market each year, assuming a number of the other key barriers are addressed. As electric vehicles become more common on Canadian roads and highways and consumers begin to see more widespread charging infrastructure, non-electric vehicle owners will come to see these types of vehicles as mainstream.
The Government of Canada is viewed as having a key role to play in promoting this technology, specifically by:
MORE INFORMATION
Supplier Name:The Strategic Counsel
PWGSC Contract Number:23483 181064/001/CY
Contract Award Date:2017-12-21
Contract Budget:$79,975.75
To obtain more information on this study, please e-mail nrcan.por-rop.rncan@canada.ca.
Statement of Political Neutrality
I hereby certify as Senior Officer of The Strategic Counsel that the deliverables fully comply with the Government of Canada political neutrality requirements outlined in the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada and Procedures for Planning and Contracting Public Opinion Research. Specifically, the deliverables do not include information on electoral voting intentions, political party preferences, standings with the electorate or ratings of the performance of a political party or its leaders.
Signed:___________________________________
Donna Nixon, Partner
In order to better understand the considerations, motivators, and barriers to purchasing an electric vehicle, this survey was designed to target those who purchased a brandnew vehicle (i.e., not a resale or previously owned vehicle) within the past two years and/or who intend to purchase a brand new vehicle within the next 12 months. As such, all respondents who did not meet these criteria were screened out.
The majority of respondents participating in the survey comprised those who had purchased or leased a brand new vehicle within the last two years (63%); however, a significant albeit slightly lower percentage (57%) also indicated they plan to do so within the next year.
HAVE PURCHASED/LEASED A NEW VEHICLE WITHIN THE LAST 2 YEARS
Q4. Have you purchased or leased a brand new vehicle (i.e., not a previously owned or resale vehicle) for your personal use within the last two years?
|
TOTAL |
GENDER |
AGE |
REGION |
||||||||
M |
F |
18–34 |
35–44 |
45–54 |
55+ |
ATL |
QC |
ON |
PR |
BC |
||
n = |
1500 |
749 |
750 |
404 |
249 |
263 |
584 |
120 |
361 |
549 |
275 |
195 |
|
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
Yes |
63 |
62 |
65 |
59 |
64 |
68 |
63 |
60 |
69 |
62 |
66 |
55 |
No |
37 |
38 |
35 |
41 |
36 |
32 |
37 |
40 |
31 |
38 |
34 |
45 |
PLAN TO PURCHASE/LEASE A NEW VEHICLE WITHIN THE NEXT YEAR
Q7. Do you plan to purchase or lease a brand new vehicle (i.e., not a previously owned or resale vehicle) for your personal use within the next year?
|
TOTAL |
GENDER |
AGE |
REGION |
||||||||
M |
F |
18–34 |
35–44 |
45–54 |
55+ |
ATL |
QC |
ON |
PR |
BC |
||
n = |
1500 |
749 |
750 |
404 |
249 |
263 |
584 |
120 |
361 |
549 |
275 |
195 |
|
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
Yes |
57 |
63 |
52 |
69 |
58 |
54 |
51 |
54 |
50 |
63 |
54 |
63 |
No |
43 |
37 |
48 |
31 |
42 |
46 |
49 |
46 |
50 |
37 |
46 |
37 |
Not unexpectedly, respondents who had purchased or leased a new vehicle in the past two years were somewhat less inclined to say they would be purchasing another new vehicle in the coming year.
Past purchase behaviour and future purchase intention also vary by gender, age, and income level:
Of those who purchased a vehicle within the last two years, the majority (50%) purchased a car. In terms of size, the largest proportion purchased a mid size car (31%) rather than a small (14%) or large car (5%). SUVs were quite popular, with about two in five (41%) respondents having purchased one in the last two years, the largest proportion having purchased a mid size utility vehicle (24%) while fewer purchased a small (11%) or large (6%) utility vehicle. Very few respondents indicated having purchased a pick-up truck (9%).
SIZE OF VEHICLE PURCHASED/LEASED WITHIN THE LAST 2 YEARS
Q5. What size of vehicle did you purchase/lease?
|
TOTAL |
GENDER |
AGE |
REGION |
||||||||
M |
F |
18–34 |
35–44 |
45–54 |
55+ |
ATL |
QC |
ON |
PR |
BC |
||
n = |
948 |
462 |
486 |
239 |
160 |
180 |
369 |
72 |
248 |
339 |
181 |
108 |
|
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
CAR |
50 |
46 |
54 |
69 |
46 |
39 |
45 |
40 |
61 |
53 |
32 |
51 |
Small car |
14 |
13 |
16 |
21 |
11 |
13 |
12 |
14 |
18 |
13 |
12 |
13 |
Mid size car |
31 |
26 |
35 |
41 |
31 |
22 |
28 |
22 |
37 |
34 |
18 |
33 |
Large car |
5 |
7 |
3 |
7 |
4 |
4 |
5 |
4 |
6 |
6 |
3 |
5 |
UTILITY |
41 |
43 |
39 |
26 |
43 |
46 |
48 |
43 |
37 |
39 |
53 |
35 |
Small utility |
11 |
9 |
14 |
7 |
14 |
13 |
12 |
8 |
10 |
13 |
14 |
6 |
Mid size utility |
24 |
26 |
22 |
15 |
23 |
26 |
29 |
31 |
22 |
19 |
34 |
22 |
Large utility |
6 |
8 |
4 |
4 |
6 |
7 |
6 |
4 |
4 |
7 |
5 |
6 |
Pick-up truck |
9 |
11 |
7 |
5 |
12 |
16 |
8 |
17 |
2 |
8 |
15 |
14 |
Future vehicle purchase intentions follow a similar pattern as that noted among those who have recently purchased a new vehicle, in that the plurality (49%) intend to purchase a car. Slightly fewer (43%) indicate an intention to purchase an SUV. Again, relative to other types of vehicles on the market, very few (8%) intend to purchase a pick-up truck.
SIZE OF VEHICLE PLAN TO PURCHASE/LEASE WITHIN THE NEXT YEAR
Q8. What size of vehicle will you purchase/lease?
|
TOTAL |
GENDER |
AGE |
REGION |
||||||||
M |
F |
18–34 |
35–44 |
45–54 |
55+ |
ATL |
QC |
ON |
PR |
BC |
||
n = |
861 |
472 |
388 |
279 |
144 |
143 |
295 |
65 |
179 |
346 |
148 |
123 |
|
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
CAR |
49 |
49 |
49 |
60 |
51 |
44 |
41 |
35 |
54 |
55 |
38 |
49 |
Small car |
14 |
12 |
16 |
18 |
16 |
12 |
10 |
14 |
12 |
17 |
7 |
16 |
Mid size car |
29 |
29 |
28 |
35 |
26 |
26 |
26 |
18 |
34 |
31 |
24 |
28 |
Large car |
7 |
8 |
5 |
7 |
9 |
6 |
5 |
3 |
7 |
7 |
7 |
5 |
UTILITY |
43 |
41 |
45 |
34 |
42 |
48 |
50 |
54 |
43 |
40 |
49 |
38 |
Small utility |
13 |
9 |
18 |
8 |
15 |
13 |
17 |
15 |
11 |
11 |
14 |
18 |
Mid size utility |
26 |
27 |
25 |
23 |
19 |
31 |
31 |
34 |
28 |
25 |
32 |
17 |
Large utility |
4 |
5 |
2 |
4 |
7 |
4 |
2 |
5 |
3 |
4 |
3 |
3 |
Pick-up truck |
8 |
10 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
11 |
3 |
5 |
13 |
13 |
There are some notable variations across demographic groups on past purchase behaviour and future purchase intentions:
Across the regions:
The vast majority of respondents either purchased or leased a gasoline- or diesel-powered vehicle in the last two years (92%) or plan to purchase this type of vehicle within the next year (84%).
Among those responding to the survey, a very small proportion (6%) purchased or leased a plug-in hybrid electric vehicle (3%) or a battery electric vehicle (3%) both of which require charging by plugging into the electrical grid system. Another three percent (3%) purchased a hybrid electric vehicle that cannot be plugged in.
TYPE OF VEHICLE PURCHASED/LEASED IN THE LAST 2 YEARS
Q6. What type of vehicle did you purchase/lease? [Multi-mention]
|
TOTAL |
GENDER |
AGE |
REGION |
||||||||
M |
F |
18–34 |
35–44 |
45–54 |
55+ |
ATL |
QC |
ON |
PR |
BC |
||
n = |
948 |
462 |
486 |
239 |
160 |
180 |
369 |
72 |
248 |
339 |
181 |
108 |
|
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
Gasoline- or diesel powered vehicle |
92 |
89 |
94 |
92 |
91 |
93 |
92 |
99 |
88 |
92 |
99 |
83 |
Hybrid electric vehicle (HEV) that cannot be plugged in |
3 |
4 |
1 |
3 |
3 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
4 |
2 |
1 |
5 |
Plug-in hybrid (PHEV) |
3 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
2 |
3 |
3 |
- |
6 |
2 |
1 |
7 |
Battery electric vehicle (BEV) which is a 100% electric vehicle (EV) |
3 |
4 |
2 |
2 |
4 |
2 |
3 |
- |
2 |
4 |
- |
5 |
NET ELECTRIC VEHICLE |
6 |
7 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
5 |
6 |
- |
8 |
6 |
1 |
12 |
By contrast, future intent indicates considerable potential uptake for electric vehicles within the next year as a significant proportion of vehicle buyers are looking at either a PHEV (31%) or a BEV (27%).
TYPE OF VEHICLE LIKELY TO PURCHASE/LEASE WITHIN THE NEXT YEAR
Q9. Please indicate how likely you are to purchase the following types of vehicles?
% Very/Somewhat Likely |
TOTAL |
GENDER |
AGE |
REGION |
||||||||
M |
F |
18–34 |
35–44 |
45–54 |
55+ |
ATL |
QC |
ON |
PR |
BC |
||
n = |
861 |
472 |
388 |
279 |
144 |
143 |
295 |
65 |
179 |
346 |
148 |
123 |
|
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
Gasoline- or diesel powered vehicle |
84 |
84 |
85 |
84 |
85 |
84 |
85 |
94 |
74 |
85 |
97 |
79 |
Hybrid electric vehicle (HEV) that cannot be plugged in |
33 |
34 |
32 |
41 |
37 |
31 |
26 |
28 |
28 |
35 |
28 |
46 |
Plug-in hybrid (PHEV) |
31 |
34 |
28 |
34 |
36 |
39 |
23 |
20 |
36 |
35 |
19 |
35 |
Battery electric vehicle (BEV) which is a 100% electric vehicle (EV) |
27 |
29 |
25 |
31 |
36 |
27 |
18 |
23 |
31 |
29 |
16 |
28 |
NET ELECTRIC VEHICLE |
39 |
41 |
35 |
42 |
44 |
45 |
29 |
28 |
42 |
43 |
23 |
46 |
Slightly more men (7%) than women (4%) recently purchased or leased an electric vehicle. In addition, a higher proportion of men intend to purchase/lease a PHEV (34%) or a BEV (29%) compared to women (28% and 25% respectively). A higher proportion of households with higher incomes ($150,000 or more) indicate plans to purchase a plug-in hybrid electric vehicle (PHEV) within the next year (36%). Interest is also higher among this group for BEVs (30% among those with household incomes of $100,000 or more compared to 24% for those with household incomes under $100,000).
Results also vary across regions:
Most of those planning to purchase either a PHEV or a BEV indicate that it would be used as their primary vehicle (78%) with slightly less than one quarter (22%) saying it would be a secondary vehicle.
HOW ELECTRIC VEHICLE WOULD BE USED: PRIMARY OR SECONDARY VEHICLE
Q10. Which of the following best reflects how you plan to use the plug-in hybrid or battery electric vehicle you purchase or lease?
|
TOTAL |
GENDER |
AGE |
REGION |
||||||||
M |
F |
18–34 |
35–44 |
45–54 |
55+ |
ATL |
QC |
ON |
PR |
BC |
||
n = |
332 |
194 |
137 |
118 |
64 |
65 |
85 |
18 |
76 |
148 |
34 |
56 |
|
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
Plug-in hybrid or battery electric vehicle would mostly be used as a primary vehicle |
78 |
80 |
75 |
75 |
83 |
82 |
75 |
78 |
86 |
74 |
65 |
86 |
Plug-in hybrid or battery electric vehicle would mostly be used as a secondary vehicle |
22 |
20 |
25 |
25 |
17 |
18 |
25 |
22 |
14 |
26 |
35 |
14 |
Intention to the use the electric vehicle as a primary vehicle is higher among those aged 35 to 54. It is also higher among residents of British Columbia and Quebec (86% in each province).
A short series of questions were included in the survey to obtain a better understanding of the total number of vehicles in each household as well as the nature of the driving undertaken by respondents.
Given the focus of this survey, virtually all respondents (97%) own a vehicle. The overwhelming majority (82%) have just one (39%) or two (43%) vehicles at most registered to their household. A relatively small percentage (15%) have three or more vehicles registered.
NUMBER OF VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
Q11. How many vehicles does your household currently have registered, not including recreational vehicles?
|
TOTAL |
GENDER |
AGE |
REGION |
||||||||
M |
F |
18–34 |
35–44 |
45–54 |
55+ |
ATL |
QC |
ON |
PR |
BC |
||
n = |
1500 |
749 |
750 |
404 |
249 |
263 |
584 |
120 |
361 |
549 |
275 |
195 |
|
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
0 |
3 |
4 |
2 |
6 |
4 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
3 |
1 |
5 |
1 |
39 |
37 |
41 |
41 |
39 |
31 |
41 |
34 |
46 |
37 |
35 |
40 |
2 |
43 |
44 |
43 |
40 |
50 |
41 |
44 |
54 |
39 |
43 |
45 |
45 |
3 or more |
15 |
15 |
14 |
12 |
7 |
27 |
14 |
10 |
12 |
17 |
19 |
10 |
By age:
Across the regions:
When respondents were asked in a multi-mention question about the types of vehicles they currently own or lease, not surprisingly, most (97%) reported owning a gasoline- or diesel-powered vehicle. As expected, a relatively small number of respondents (5%) own either a BEV (3%) or a PHEV (2%).
TYPE OF VEHICLES OWNED
Q12. Which of the following types of vehicles does your household currently own or lease? [Multi-mention]
|
TOTAL |
GENDER |
AGE |
REGION |
||||||||
M |
F |
18–34 |
35–44 |
45–54 |
55+ |
ATL |
QC |
ON |
PR |
BC |
||
n = |
1457 |
719 |
737 |
379 |
239 |
261 |
578 |
118 |
351 |
531 |
271 |
186 |
|
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
Gasoline- or diesel powered vehicle |
97 |
96 |
98 |
96 |
97 |
98 |
97 |
99 |
95 |
96 |
100 |
95 |
Hybrid electric vehicle (HEV) that cannot be plugged in |
4 |
5 |
2 |
3 |
3 |
6 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
4 |
1 |
6 |
Battery electric vehicle (BEV) which is a 100% electric vehicle (EV) |
3 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
4 |
2 |
3 |
- |
3 |
4 |
< 1 |
5 |
Plug-in hybrid (PHEV) |
2 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
< 1 |
4 |
2 |
1 |
4 |
2 |
< 1 |
2 |
NET ELECTRIC VEHICLE |
5 |
5 |
4 |
3 |
5 |
6 |
5 |
1 |
7 |
5 |
1 |
7 |
Electric vehicle ownership is higher among those aged 35 and older, particularly among the 45 to 54 age group (6%), and much lower among those aged 18 to 34 (3%).
Ownership is also a factor of income—those with household incomes of $150,000 or higher (7%) are most likely to own an electric vehicle compared to those with household incomes between $40,000 and $100,000 (4%) and those with household incomes under $40,000 (2%).
Regionally:
The small percentage of respondents who currently own an electric vehicle (either a PHEV or a BEV) were asked to provide more details on the make and model of their vehicle. Results shown in the two tables below indicate the popularity of the Chevrolet Volt, Tesla and the Nissan Leaf.
MAKE OF VEHICLE
Q13. Please provide the make and model of your BEV(s) and/or PHEV(s). [Open-Ended]
|
TOTAL |
GENDER |
AGE |
REGION |
||||||||
M |
F |
18–34 |
35–44 |
45–54 |
55+ |
ATL |
QC |
ON |
PR |
BC |
||
n = |
67 |
37 |
30 |
12 |
11 |
16 |
28 |
1 |
23 |
28 |
2 |
13 |
|
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
Chevrolet |
30 |
30 |
30 |
25 |
18 |
38 |
32 |
- |
39 |
21 |
50 |
31 |
Tesla |
15 |
19 |
10 |
17 |
18 |
13 |
14 |
- |
4 |
25 |
|
15 |
Nissan |
10 |
8 |
13 |
- |
27 |
13 |
7 |
- |
4 |
11 |
|
23 |
Audi |
6 |
- |
13 |
- |
- |
- |
14 |
- |
9 |
- |
50 |
8 |
Ford |
6 |
5 |
7 |
- |
- |
13 |
7 |
- |
13 |
4 |
|
|
BMW |
4 |
5 |
3 |
17 |
- |
- |
4 |
- |
- |
7 |
- |
8 |
Cadillac |
3 |
5 |
- |
- |
- |
13 |
- |
- |
- |
7 |
- |
- |
Honda |
3 |
- |
7 |
8 |
9 |
- |
- |
- |
4 |
- |
- |
8 |
Kia |
3 |
3 |
3 |
8 |
9 |
- |
- |
- |
4 |
4 |
- |
- |
Toyota |
3 |
- |
7 |
8 |
9 |
- |
- |
100 |
4 |
- |
- |
- |
Other |
16 |
27 |
3 |
17 |
9 |
19 |
18 |
- |
17 |
25 |
- |
- |
MODEL OF VEHICLE
|
TOTAL |
GENDER |
AGE |
REGION |
||||||||
M |
F |
18–34 |
35–44 |
45–54 |
55+ |
ATL |
QC |
ON |
PR |
BC |
||
n= |
67 |
37 |
30 |
12 |
11 |
16 |
28 |
1 |
23 |
28 |
2 |
13 |
|
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
Volt |
25 |
24 |
27 |
25 |
9 |
38 |
25 |
- |
35 |
18 |
50 |
23 |
Leaf |
10 |
8 |
13 |
- |
27 |
13 |
7 |
- |
4 |
11 |
- |
23 |
Bolt |
4 |
8 |
- |
- |
9 |
- |
7 |
- |
4 |
7 |
- |
- |
C-MAX |
4 |
3 |
7 |
- |
- |
13 |
4 |
- |
13 |
- |
- |
- |
i3 |
4 |
5 |
3 |
17 |
- |
- |
4 |
- |
- |
7 |
- |
8 |
X / Model X |
4 |
5 |
3 |
8 |
- |
- |
7 |
- |
4 |
- |
- |
15 |
A3 e-tron |
3 |
- |
7 |
- |
- |
- |
7 |
- |
9 |
- |
- |
- |
e-Golf |
3 |
5 |
- |
8 |
- |
- |
4 |
- |
4 |
4 |
- |
- |
Escalade |
3 |
5 |
- |
- |
- |
13 |
- |
- |
- |
7 |
- |
- |
P100D |
3 |
5 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
7 |
- |
- |
7 |
- |
- |
Cadillac |
1 |
- |
3 |
- |
- |
- |
4 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
8 |
Chevrolet |
1 |
3 |
- |
- |
- |
6 |
- |
- |
4 |
- |
- |
- |
Other |
31 |
30 |
33 |
42 |
55 |
25 |
21 |
100 |
22 |
43 |
50 |
15 |
The majority of PHEV (93%) and BEV (88%) owners report that their electric vehicle is used as the primary vehicle in their household.
HOW ELECTRIC VEHICLE IS USED: PRIMARY OR SECONDARY VEHICLE
Q14. Please check the appropriate box to indicate whether your battery electric or plug-in hybrid vehicle(s) is/are considered to be the primary or a secondary vehicle in your household.
PHEV |
TOTAL |
GENDER |
AGE |
REGION |
||||||||
M |
F |
18–34 |
35–44 |
45–54 |
55+ |
ATL |
QC |
ON |
PR |
BC |
||
n = |
28 |
14 |
14 |
7 |
1 |
11 |
9 |
1 |
14 |
9 |
1 |
3 |
|
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
Primary Vehicle |
93 |
86 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
91 |
89 |
100 |
100 |
78 |
100 |
100 |
Secondary Vehicle |
7 |
14 |
- |
- |
- |
9 |
11 |
- |
- |
22 |
- |
- |
BEV |
TOTAL |
GENDER |
AGE |
REGION |
||||||||
M |
F |
18–34 |
35–44 |
45–54 |
55+ |
ATL |
QC |
ON |
PR |
BC |
||
n = |
40 |
24 |
16 |
5 |
10 |
6 |
19 |
- |
9 |
20 |
1 |
10 |
|
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
Primary Vehicle |
88 |
83 |
94 |
100 |
90 |
100 |
79 |
- |
100 |
80 |
- |
100 |
Secondary Vehicle |
13 |
17 |
6 |
- |
10 |
- |
21 |
- |
- |
20 |
100 |
- |
Most vehicle owners report driving 50 to just under 250 km (60%) each week. Almost one in five respondents report driving between 250 and 449 km per week (18%), while another one in ten drive fewer than 50 km (13%) or in excess of 450 km (9%) weekly.
FREQUENCY OF VEHICLE USE
Q15. Approximately how many kilometres do you drive per week?
|
TOTAL |
GENDER |
AGE |
REGION |
||||||||
M |
F |
18–34 |
35–44 |
45–54 |
55+ |
ATL |
QC |
ON |
PR |
BC |
||
n= |
1457 |
719 |
737 |
379 |
239 |
261 |
578 |
118 |
351 |
531 |
271 |
186 |
|
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
Less than 50 km |
13 |
8 |
18 |
12 |
14 |
11 |
14 |
9 |
13 |
11 |
15 |
16 |
50–-99 km |
25 |
21 |
28 |
26 |
24 |
20 |
26 |
25 |
22 |
27 |
23 |
27 |
100–-249 km |
35 |
35 |
35 |
36 |
30 |
34 |
37 |
33 |
38 |
33 |
34 |
38 |
250–-449 km |
18 |
23 |
13 |
15 |
20 |
22 |
17 |
21 |
18 |
17 |
20 |
16 |
450 km or more |
9 |
12 |
6 |
11 |
13 |
12 |
5 |
11 |
9 |
12 |
8 |
3 |
A higher percentage of men say they drive longer distances in a week (35% over 250 km) compared to women (19% over 250 km).
Canadians in British Columbia report driving fewer kilometres on a weekly basis (43% fewer than 100 km).
As the table below clearly illustrates, consumers consider a wide range of issues and factors when thinking about purchasing a new vehicle. The most important of these centre on proven reliability (99% say this is a very/somewhat important consideration), comfort (98%), price (97%), fuel efficiency (95%), maintenance costs (95%), warranty (94%), vehicle safety rating (94%), size (94%), performance (92%), and the ability to test drive the vehicle (91%).
Style (86%), advanced technology features (83%), brand (82%), eco friendliness (80%), and resale value (78%) are also important. Recommendations from family (55%), friends (54%), and the dealership (46%) are much less important considerations.
VEHICLE PURCHASE CONSIDERATIONS
Q17. When purchasing a new vehicle, how important is each of the following factors or considerations?
% Very/Somewhat Important |
TOTAL |
GENDER |
AGE |
REGION |
||||||||
M |
F |
18–34 |
35–44 |
45–54 |
55+ |
ATL |
QC |
ON |
PR |
BC |
||
n = |
1500 |
749 |
750 |
404 |
249 |
263 |
584 |
120 |
361 |
549 |
275 |
195 |
|
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
Proven reliability |
99 |
98 |
99 |
98 |
97 |
100 |
99 |
99 |
98 |
99 |
100 |
96 |
Comfort |
98 |
96 |
99 |
95 |
97 |
98 |
99 |
98 |
97 |
97 |
99 |
95 |
Price |
97 |
95 |
99 |
97 |
96 |
99 |
96 |
98 |
97 |
97 |
97 |
95 |
Fuel efficiency |
95 |
93 |
97 |
94 |
96 |
97 |
95 |
98 |
91 |
96 |
96 |
97 |
Maintenance costs |
95 |
93 |
96 |
94 |
95 |
95 |
95 |
98 |
92 |
95 |
96 |
94 |
Warranty |
94 |
93 |
96 |
90 |
92 |
96 |
97 |
98 |
91 |
94 |
97 |
93 |
Vehicle safety rating |
94 |
91 |
97 |
91 |
94 |
95 |
96 |
96 |
91 |
94 |
98 |
94 |
Size |
94 |
91 |
96 |
90 |
94 |
94 |
96 |
96 |
92 |
93 |
96 |
94 |
Performance |
92 |
89 |
94 |
88 |
91 |
95 |
93 |
97 |
81 |
95 |
95 |
93 |
Ability to test drive the vehicle |
91 |
88 |
94 |
89 |
89 |
92 |
93 |
94 |
89 |
92 |
91 |
90 |
Style |
86 |
83 |
88 |
85 |
84 |
90 |
85 |
83 |
81 |
88 |
87 |
88 |
Advanced technology features |
83 |
82 |
84 |
83 |
83 |
89 |
80 |
79 |
81 |
84 |
85 |
83 |
Brand |
82 |
81 |
83 |
79 |
82 |
83 |
84 |
80 |
80 |
84 |
84 |
76 |
Eco friendliness |
80 |
73 |
86 |
77 |
77 |
81 |
83 |
88 |
74 |
80 |
81 |
84 |
Resale value |
78 |
77 |
79 |
75 |
78 |
76 |
80 |
80 |
77 |
75 |
79 |
83 |
Recommendations from family |
55 |
50 |
60 |
66 |
55 |
55 |
47 |
55 |
54 |
56 |
55 |
55 |
Recommendations from friends |
54 |
52 |
56 |
61 |
53 |
53 |
49 |
53 |
53 |
55 |
53 |
53 |
Dealership recommendations |
46 |
41 |
51 |
46 |
46 |
43 |
47 |
53 |
48 |
44 |
50 |
36 |
The extent to which each of the factors is a key consideration varies by gender and age, although reliability, comfort and price are vitally important regardless.
Regionally:
Just over one third of respondents (36%) say they have driven or ridden in a PHEV or BEV.
HAVE DRIVEN OR RIDDEN IN AN ELECTRIC VEHICLE
Q18. Have you ever driven or ridden in a plug-in hybrid or battery electric vehicle?
|
TOTAL |
GENDER |
AGE |
REGION |
||||||||
M |
F |
18–34 |
35–44 |
45–54 |
55+ |
ATL |
QC |
ON |
PR |
BC |
||
n = |
1433 |
712 |
720 |
392 |
238 |
247 |
556 |
119 |
338 |
521 |
273 |
182 |
|
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
Yes |
36 |
42 |
31 |
38 |
37 |
40 |
33 |
21 |
41 |
37 |
30 |
47 |
No |
62 |
57 |
67 |
61 |
61 |
59 |
65 |
78 |
59 |
61 |
67 |
51 |
Don’t know |
2 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
< 1 |
2 |
3 |
2 |
Men (42%) are much more likely than women (31%) to say they have driven or ridden in a PHEV or BEV. Similar to reported ownership of electric vehicles and interest patterns, those with above-average household incomes (44% of those earning $100K or more) are more likely to report having driven or ridden in an electric vehicle.
Across the regions:
Similar numbers (37%) report knowing someone else who owns a PHEV or BEV.
KNOW OTHERS WHO OWN AN ELECTRIC VEHICLE
Q19. Do you know anyone else who owns a plug-in hybrid or battery electric vehicle?
|
TOTAL |
GENDER |
AGE |
REGION |
||||||||
M |
F |
18–34 |
35–44 |
45–54 |
55+ |
ATL |
QC |
ON |
PR |
BC |
||
n = |
1500 |
749 |
750 |
404 |
249 |
263 |
584 |
120 |
361 |
549 |
275 |
195 |
|
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
Yes |
37 |
39 |
36 |
36 |
41 |
42 |
35 |
27 |
38 |
41 |
25 |
47 |
No |
59 |
58 |
60 |
61 |
56 |
55 |
61 |
70 |
60 |
54 |
70 |
50 |
Don’t know |
3 |
3 |
4 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
4 |
3 |
3 |
Those residing in British Columbia (47%), making an income of $100K or higher (44%), having a university education (42%) and between the ages of 45 and 54 (41%) are all more likely to say they know someone who owns a plug-in or battery electric vehicle.
There is a good deal of variability in the level of familiarity respondents have had with various aspects of electric vehicles. The average level of familiarity (those saying they are “somewhat” or “very” familiar) across all of the 12 features or aspects of electric vehicles examined is 33%; in other words, one third of respondents consider themselves at least “somewhat familiar” with the full range of features, issues or aspects of owning and driving an electric vehicle. The highest levels of familiarity relate to purchase price (49% reporting they are “somewhat” or “very” familiar therewith), availability of makes and models (45%), performance (43%) and battery range (40%).
Consumers demonstrate modest levels of familiarity with some of the issues that have been raised in regard to electric vehicles. Over 40% say they are at least somewhat familiar with availability of makes and models (45%), performance (43%) and battery range (40%), and another third report at least some familiarity with the estimated time to charge an electric vehicle (34%). One third or fewer say they are familiar with aspects that relate to the battery, including time required to charge (34%), battery charging equipment (30%) and battery life (30%). There is also less familiarity with reliability (34%). The lowest levels of familiarity are around costs of ownership, including cost to operate (32%), the warranty (23%), maintenance costs (23%) and the cost of insurance (17%).
FAMILIARITY WITH ELECTRIC VEHICLES
Q20. In general, how familiar are you about each of the following aspects of plug-in hybrid or battery electric vehicles?
% Very/Somewhat Familiar |
TOTAL |
GENDER |
AGE |
REGION |
PURCHASE |
|||||||||
M |
F |
18–34 |
35–44 |
45–54 |
55+ |
ATL |
QC |
ON |
PR |
BC |
NET |
Not Likely |
||
n = |
1500 |
749 |
750 |
404 |
249 |
263 |
584 |
120 |
361 |
549 |
275 |
195 |
332 |
474 |
|
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
Purchase price |
49 |
58 |
41 |
54 |
48 |
52 |
45 |
44 |
52 |
52 |
39 |
53 |
68 |
45 |
Availability of makes and models |
45 |
56 |
34 |
49 |
44 |
48 |
41 |
34 |
52 |
47 |
33 |
48 |
67 |
41 |
Performance |
43 |
53 |
32 |
45 |
46 |
44 |
39 |
35 |
45 |
44 |
36 |
48 |
65 |
39 |
Battery range |
40 |
52 |
27 |
43 |
39 |
40 |
38 |
29 |
45 |
43 |
30 |
41 |
62 |
37 |
Time required to charge the battery |
34 |
44 |
24 |
38 |
37 |
33 |
31 |
26 |
41 |
35 |
26 |
36 |
56 |
32 |
Reliability |
34 |
39 |
29 |
38 |
37 |
33 |
30 |
26 |
38 |
36 |
25 |
37 |
56 |
30 |
Cost to operate |
32 |
39 |
24 |
37 |
31 |
32 |
28 |
23 |
35 |
34 |
24 |
34 |
54 |
26 |
Battery charging equipment |
30 |
36 |
23 |
35 |
30 |
28 |
26 |
21 |
33 |
32 |
25 |
30 |
46 |
27 |
Battery life |
30 |
38 |
21 |
36 |
30 |
29 |
25 |
24 |
29 |
34 |
23 |
32 |
48 |
27 |
Warranty |
23 |
31 |
16 |
25 |
24 |
27 |
20 |
15 |
29 |
24 |
15 |
27 |
41 |
20 |
Maintenance costs |
23 |
29 |
16 |
27 |
23 |
25 |
18 |
16 |
27 |
23 |
16 |
26 |
41 |
18 |
Cost of insurance |
17 |
20 |
14 |
22 |
17 |
19 |
13 |
12 |
21 |
17 |
10 |
24 |
32 |
14 |
Of note, those saying they are “very” or “somewhat” likely to purchase an electric vehicle, are in all cases much more likely to report greater familiarity with all aspects of electric vehicles. Typically, their level of familiarity is 20% higher than those who are not likely to purchase an electric vehicle.
Men are much more likely than women to report higher levels of familiarity with the various aspects of electric vehicles (an average across all measures of 41% vs. 25%).
Across the regions:
Respondents were asked to assess 18 specific features of electric vehicles, including aspects such as the availability of information about electric vehicles, to ascertain the extent to which each is seen as a relative benefit or advantage of owning an electric vehicle or, conversely, as a drawback or disadvantage.
The table below indicates that relatively few features (only 4 out of 18) are viewed as clear advantages, with half or more of respondents indicating that each was a “slight” or “significant” advantage of owning an electric vehicle. For the remainder, there are either questions (i.e., uncertainty) or negative perceptions associated with each. Among these, purchase price is viewed as a distinct barrier to ownership.
The most marked advantages are those associated with using electricity, instead of fuel (62%), subsidies (60%), the advanced technology (57%), and home charging availability (55%). Respondents are somewhat less certain when it comes to in-city charging availability (46%), environmentally friendly battery disposal (45%), reliability (43%), vehicle performance (41%), workplace charging (40%) and highway charging availability (39%), vehicle maintenance cost (38%), the quality and availability of consumer information (37%), resale value (35%), and driving range (32%). Under one third view the availability of makes and models of electric vehicles (30%), the time required to charge the battery (30%), purchase price (29%), and battery replacement costs (25%) as advantages to electric vehicle ownership.
ADVANTAGES OF OWNING AN ELECTRIC VEHICLE
Q21. Please indicate whether the following are advantages or disadvantages to owning a plug-in hybrid or battery electric vehicle.
% Significant/Slight Advantage |
TOTAL |
GENDER |
AGE |
REGION |
||||||||
M |
F |
18–34 |
35–44 |
45–54 |
55+ |
ATL |
QC |
ON |
PR |
BC |
||
n = |
1500 |
749 |
750 |
404 |
249 |
263 |
584 |
120 |
361 |
549 |
275 |
195 |
|
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
Using electricity instead of fuel to power the vehicle |
62 |
64 |
59 |
61 |
70 |
65 |
57 |
52 |
72 |
62 |
51 |
64 |
Subsidies for vehicle purchase |
60 |
64 |
55 |
60 |
66 |
63 |
55 |
44 |
75 |
62 |
44 |
55 |
Advanced technology |
57 |
61 |
52 |
58 |
63 |
60 |
51 |
49 |
65 |
57 |
51 |
53 |
Home charging availability |
55 |
59 |
52 |
57 |
58 |
59 |
51 |
48 |
75 |
51 |
43 |
51 |
In city charging availability |
46 |
46 |
46 |
50 |
49 |
48 |
41 |
43 |
68 |
39 |
32 |
45 |
Environmentally friendly battery disposal |
45 |
44 |
46 |
49 |
50 |
45 |
40 |
40 |
54 |
46 |
37 |
41 |
Reliability |
43 |
45 |
41 |
43 |
46 |
46 |
40 |
37 |
60 |
39 |
32 |
41 |
Vehicle performance |
41 |
44 |
37 |
40 |
42 |
47 |
38 |
38 |
51 |
40 |
31 |
39 |
Workplace charging availability |
40 |
41 |
40 |
45 |
47 |
44 |
33 |
29 |
65 |
34 |
29 |
38 |
Highway charging availability |
39 |
40 |
38 |
41 |
41 |
40 |
37 |
33 |
63 |
34 |
25 |
35 |
Vehicle maintenance costs |
38 |
44 |
33 |
36 |
44 |
40 |
37 |
32 |
52 |
37 |
28 |
38 |
Quality and availability of consumer information |
37 |
38 |
36 |
38 |
39 |
36 |
35 |
33 |
50 |
35 |
27 |
32 |
Resale value |
35 |
34 |
36 |
38 |
37 |
38 |
32 |
29 |
50 |
32 |
27 |
34 |
Driving range |
32 |
32 |
32 |
34 |
35 |
35 |
27 |
27 |
50 |
28 |
20 |
27 |
Availability of makes and models |
30 |
31 |
29 |
30 |
35 |
35 |
26 |
26 |
44 |
28 |
19 |
27 |
Time required to charge the battery |
30 |
31 |
29 |
29 |
33 |
32 |
28 |
28 |
46 |
26 |
17 |
29 |
Purchase price |
29 |
28 |
29 |
27 |
32 |
32 |
26 |
25 |
43 |
25 |
20 |
26 |
Battery replacement cost |
25 |
26 |
25 |
25 |
27 |
28 |
23 |
23 |
38 |
23 |
18 |
19 |
Notably, the top four items which are seen as advantages to electric vehicle ownership are viewed as advantages by both current electric vehicle owners and those who express a likelihood to purchase an electric vehicle (i.e., use of electricity, subsidies, advanced technology, and home charging availability).
By region, Quebec residents are more likely to identify each of the items listed as an advantage.
To further assess motivators and barriers to uptake of electric vehicles across Canada, respondents were asked to rate a similar set of 12 features that are relevant to vehicle ownership in general and/or electric vehicles in particular as either positive (very good/good) or negative (very poor/poor) aspects associated with PHEVs and/or BEVs. The results confirm that there is fairly broad recognition of the advantages of electric vehicles, particularly the cost to operate (79% rate this as very good/good), the warranty (78%), reliability (76%), performance (74%) and the cost of insurance (72%). But, again, we note that the purchase price is seen as a significant downside, with just over one third (39%) rating this a “very good/good” aspect of PHEVs or BEVs.
RATING OF ASPECTS OF ELECTRIC VEHICLES
Q22. Based upon what you know, how would you rate the following aspects of plug-in hybrid or battery electric vehicles?
% Very Good/Good |
TOTAL |
GENDER |
AGE |
REGION |
||||||||
M |
F |
18–34 |
35–44 |
45–54 |
55+ |
ATL |
QC |
ON |
PR |
BC |
||
n = |
1500 |
749 |
750 |
404 |
249 |
263 |
584 |
120 |
361 |
549 |
275 |
195 |
|
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
Cost to operate |
79 |
80 |
78 |
76 |
85 |
81 |
78 |
86 |
78 |
78 |
75 |
87 |
Warranty |
78 |
78 |
77 |
78 |
83 |
81 |
73 |
77 |
78 |
77 |
74 |
83 |
Reliability |
76 |
76 |
76 |
76 |
81 |
76 |
74 |
78 |
78 |
77 |
72 |
77 |
Performance |
74 |
74 |
74 |
75 |
77 |
72 |
72 |
78 |
70 |
77 |
69 |
76 |
Cost of insurance |
72 |
72 |
72 |
73 |
78 |
75 |
67 |
76 |
69 |
73 |
67 |
78 |
Maintenance costs |
65 |
67 |
62 |
63 |
67 |
65 |
64 |
67 |
68 |
63 |
59 |
68 |
Battery charging equipment |
59 |
60 |
58 |
63 |
67 |
64 |
51 |
60 |
66 |
55 |
54 |
64 |
Battery life |
57 |
57 |
58 |
62 |
62 |
62 |
50 |
58 |
62 |
55 |
55 |
58 |
Availability of makes and models |
50 |
48 |
51 |
54 |
53 |
49 |
46 |
43 |
64 |
45 |
44 |
50 |
Time required to charge the battery |
48 |
45 |
51 |
53 |
53 |
50 |
40 |
53 |
56 |
42 |
45 |
51 |
Battery range |
48 |
44 |
52 |
55 |
59 |
48 |
38 |
50 |
52 |
44 |
44 |
54 |
Purchase price |
39 |
36 |
43 |
43 |
42 |
43 |
35 |
41 |
47 |
38 |
33 |
37 |
Those who own an electric vehicle or express some likelihood to buy one are more likely to rate each of the above-noted aspects of electric vehicles as very good/good, and often by a considerable margin relative to the average across all respondents and non-electric vehicle owners in particular.
One in ten respondents who do not own an electric vehicle (12%) say they will “definitely” consider one when purchasing their next vehicle. The majority of those who currently do not own an electric vehicle express a moderate interest (57%) in considering an electric vehicle sometime in the future:
Additionally, one in five (18%) have no interest and one in ten (13%) say they don’t know enough about them.
INTEREST IN PURCHASING FIRST PLUG-IN HYBRID OR BATTERY ELECTRIC VEHICLE
Q23. Which one of the following statements best describes your interest in plug-in hybrid or battery electric vehicles?
|
TOTAL |
GENDER |
AGE |
REGION |
||||||||
M |
F |
18–34 |
35–44 |
45–54 |
55+ |
ATL |
QC |
ON |
PR |
BC |
||
n = |
1433 |
712 |
720 |
392 |
238 |
247 |
556 |
119 |
338 |
521 |
273 |
182 |
|
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
I have no interest in a plug-in hybrid or battery electric vehicle |
18 |
16 |
19 |
13 |
14 |
16 |
23 |
21 |
12 |
17 |
27 |
13 |
I have some interest in a plug-in hybrid or battery electric vehicle, but today’s plug-in hybrid or battery electric vehicles don’t meet my driving needs |
19 |
20 |
18 |
17 |
18 |
21 |
20 |
15 |
19 |
18 |
21 |
20 |
I have some interest in a plug-in hybrid or battery electric vehicle but find they are too expensive |
20 |
21 |
19 |
24 |
20 |
18 |
17 |
20 |
25 |
20 |
14 |
19 |
I have some interest in a plug-in hybrid or battery electric vehicle and would consider one when purchasing or leasing my next vehicle |
18 |
20 |
16 |
18 |
24 |
20 |
14 |
16 |
17 |
19 |
16 |
19 |
I am very interested in a plug-in hybrid or battery electric vehicle and will definitely consider one when purchasing my next vehicle |
12 |
14 |
10 |
19 |
13 |
13 |
7 |
7 |
17 |
12 |
5 |
16 |
I don’t know enough about plug-in hybrid or battery electric vehicles |
13 |
9 |
18 |
10 |
11 |
13 |
18 |
21 |
9 |
13 |
15 |
13 |
Firm interest in purchasing an electric vehicle is higher among:
Regionally, definitive interest is strongest among:
The small proportion of current electric vehicle owners (n = 67) were also asked about their interest in purchasing one. Encouragingly, most (78%) indicate that they are “very” interested and will “definitely” consider one when purchasing their next vehicle. A further 15% indicate that they have some interest and will consider one when purchasing their next vehicle.
INTEREST IN PURCHASING A PLUG-IN HYBRID OR BATTERY ELECTRIC VEHICLE
Q26. Which one of the following statements best describes your interest in plug-in hybrid or battery electric vehicles?
|
TOTAL |
GENDER |
AGE |
REGION |
||||||||
M |
F |
18–34 |
35–44 |
45–54 |
55+ |
ATL |
QC |
ON |
PR |
BC |
||
n = |
67 |
37 |
30 |
12 |
11 |
16 |
28 |
1 |
23 |
28 |
2 |
13 |
|
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
I have some interest in a plug-in hybrid or battery electric vehicle, but today’s plug-in hybrid or battery electric vehicles don’t meet my driving needs |
1 |
-- |
3 |
-- |
9 |
-- |
-- |
100 |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
I have some interest in a plug-in hybrid or battery electric vehicle but find they are too expensive |
5 |
5 |
3 |
-- |
9 |
-- |
7 |
-- |
-- |
7 |
50 |
-- |
I have some interest in a plug-in hybrid or battery electric vehicle and would consider one when purchasing or leasing my next vehicle |
15 |
19 |
10 |
25 |
-- |
25 |
11 |
-- |
9 |
21 |
-- |
15 |
I am very interested in a plug-in hybrid or battery electric vehicle and will definitely consider one when purchasing my next vehicle |
78 |
76 |
80 |
75 |
82 |
75 |
79 |
-- |
91 |
71 |
50 |
77 |
I don’t know enough about plug-in hybrid or battery electric vehicles |
1 |
-- |
3 |
-- |
-- |
-- |
4 |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
8 |
Respondents were asked to select from a list of 20 different attributes the top 3 that would make them more likely to consider purchasing or leasing an electric vehicle. Respondents could also enter their own open-ended response. By a wide margin, a lower purchase price (39%) was identified as the key attribute that would tip consumers towards purchasing an electric vehicle. About one quarter of respondents cited access to charging stations at home (26%), in public parking lots (25%), and along highways (23%). Fuel economy (25%), a 10 year battery warranty (23%), and lower cost overall (23%) are cited by about one quarter of respondents. Notably, very few indicated that being able to test drive an electric vehicle (5%) would make them more likely to purchase one, although it is rated as an important factor when consumers are actively considering a vehicle purchase (see general vehicle purchase considerations [Q. 17] on page 23). Relatively few are strongly motivated to purchase an electric vehicle knowing that doing so means they are doing their part to lower greenhouse gas emissions (11%).
The relative positioning of “lower purchase price” (#1 of 20 attributes) and “low maintenance costs” (#9) suggests that while many are price conscious, they may not be fully aware of the overall cost-benefit equation in favour of electric vehicles.
MOTIVATORS TO PURCHASING AN ELECTRIC VEHICLE
Q24. From the list below, please indicate which are the top 3 attributes that would make you more likely to consider purchasing or leasing a plug-in hybrid or battery electric vehicle?
|
TOTAL |
GENDER |
AGE |
REGION |
|||||||||
M |
F |
18–34 |
35–44 |
45–54 |
55+ |
ATL |
QC |
ON |
PR |
BC |
|||
n = |
1433 |
712 |
720 |
392 |
238 |
247 |
556 |
119 |
338 |
521 |
273 |
182 |
|
|
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
|
Lower purchase price |
39 |
39 |
39 |
41 |
40 |
36 |
38 |
40 |
43 |
37 |
34 |
45 |
|
Having access to a charging station at home |
26 |
25 |
27 |
27 |
26 |
23 |
26 |
30 |
26 |
27 |
23 |
24 |
|
Seeing more charging stations in public parking lots and shopping destinations |
25 |
24 |
26 |
23 |
25 |
24 |
27 |
26 |
22 |
27 |
25 |
25 |
|
Fuel economy |
25 |
26 |
24 |
28 |
31 |
30 |
18 |
19 |
38 |
19 |
23 |
23 |
|
10 year battery warranty |
23 |
26 |
19 |
20 |
22 |
22 |
26 |
19 |
24 |
26 |
21 |
17 |
|
Seeing more charging stations along highways |
23 |
24 |
22 |
19 |
18 |
23 |
27 |
34 |
16 |
24 |
25 |
21 |
|
Lower cost |
23 |
23 |
23 |
26 |
27 |
21 |
20 |
18 |
22 |
24 |
24 |
21 |
|
Proven reliability |
20 |
21 |
18 |
17 |
18 |
20 |
22 |
19 |
16 |
19 |
23 |
23 |
|
Low maintenance costs |
17 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
20 |
14 |
16 |
17 |
19 |
15 |
19 |
|
Greater selection of makes and models |
13 |
15 |
11 |
12 |
12 |
16 |
12 |
10 |
14 |
12 |
11 |
16 |
|
Knowing I am doing my part to lower greenhouse gas emissions |
11 |
9 |
13 |
13 |
12 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
11 |
11 |
9 |
14 |
|
Having access to charging stations at my workplace |
9 |
8 |
9 |
11 |
12 |
11 |
4 |
10 |
7 |
9 |
9 |
8 |
|
Ability to test drive the vehicle |
5 |
6 |
4 |
5 |
4 |
6 |
5 |
4 |
4 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
|
Knowing the vehicle possesses the latest technological advances |
5 |
5 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
5 |
4 |
5 |
4 |
5 |
4 |
7 |
|
Realizing batteries can be repurposed/recycled |
4 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
5 |
2 |
3 |
5 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
|
Increased battery range/Longer driving range |
3 |
4 |
2 |
1 |
3 |
4 |
4 |
2 |
2 |
4 |
2 |
3 |
|
Other |
2 |
2 |
2 |
3 |
2 |
3 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
4 |
1 |
|
None of these |
7 |
5 |
9 |
4 |
3 |
6 |
12 |
8 |
6 |
6 |
11 |
5 |
|
Among the small proportion of respondents who currently own an electric vehicle, the top motivators to make them more likely to consider purchasing another are more charging stations in public parking lots and shopping destinations (36%) and along highways (31%). Next most likely to be selected, by at least one quarter of current electric vehicle owners, are: lower purchase price (28%), greater selection of makes and models (27%), fuel economy (27%), and knowing they are doing their part to lower greenhouse gases (25%). Notably, current electric vehicle owners are more likely than non-owners to cite reduction of GHGs as a key motivator (25% vs. 11%).
MOTIVATORS TO PURCHASING ANOTHER ELECTRIC VEHICLE
Q27. From the list below, please indicate which are the top 3 attributes that would make you more likely to consider purchasing or leasing another plug-in hybrid or battery electric vehicle?
|
TOTAL |
GENDER |
AGE |
REGION |
||||||||
M |
F |
18–34 |
35–44 |
45–54 |
55+ |
ATL |
QC |
ON |
PR |
BC |
||
n = |
67 |
37 |
30 |
12 |
11 |
16 |
28 |
1 |
23 |
28 |
2 |
13 |
|
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
Seeing more charging stations in public parking lots and shopping destinations |
36 |
35 |
37 |
33 |
45 |
25 |
39 |
- |
35 |
43 |
- |
31 |
Seeing more charging stations along highways |
31 |
35 |
27 |
25 |
55 |
44 |
18 |
- |
30 |
39 |
- |
23 |
Lower purchase price |
28 |
30 |
27 |
17 |
36 |
31 |
29 |
100 |
22 |
25 |
50 |
38 |
Greater selection of makes and models |
27 |
30 |
23 |
33 |
18 |
25 |
29 |
- |
17 |
25 |
100 |
38 |
Fuel economy |
27 |
24 |
30 |
33 |
36 |
25 |
21 |
100 |
48 |
11 |
- |
23 |
Knowing I am doing my part to lower greenhouse gas emissions |
25 |
22 |
30 |
17 |
- |
38 |
32 |
- |
26 |
21 |
- |
38 |
Low maintenance costs |
19 |
22 |
17 |
17 |
9 |
19 |
25 |
- |
22 |
11 |
50 |
31 |
Having access to a charging station at home |
16 |
16 |
17 |
25 |
18 |
- |
21 |
- |
4 |
21 |
100 |
15 |
10 year battery warranty |
15 |
19 |
10 |
8 |
27 |
25 |
7 |
- |
9 |
25 |
- |
8 |
Proven reliability |
15 |
14 |
17 |
8 |
- |
19 |
21 |
- |
4 |
11 |
- |
46 |
Knowing the vehicle possesses the latest technological advances |
12 |
11 |
13 |
- |
- |
19 |
18 |
- |
17 |
11 |
- |
8 |
Having access to charging stations at my workplace |
10 |
5 |
17 |
17 |
36 |
6 |
- |
100 |
13 |
11 |
- |
- |
Ability to test drive the vehicle |
10 |
14 |
7 |
17 |
9 |
- |
14 |
- |
9 |
18 |
- |
- |
Realizing batteries can be repurposed/recycled |
6 |
5 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
- |
7 |
- |
4 |
11 |
- |
- |
Increased battery range/Longer driving range |
4 |
8 |
- |
8 |
- |
13 |
- |
- |
13 |
- |
- |
- |
Lower cost |
1 |
- |
3 |
- |
- |
6 |
- |
- |
- |
4 |
- |
- |
Other |
1 |
3 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
4 |
- |
- |
4 |
- |
- |
Both closed-ended and open-ended questions were included to assess, in detail, potential barriers to electric vehicle ownership. Overall, the biggest barriers relate to cost, availability of charging stations, and range anxiety.
Respondents were asked their level of agreement with 15 different agree/disagree statements covering a range of potential barriers to uptake of electric vehicles, the results of which are shown in the table below. About three quarters of respondents agree that there are too few public charging stations (75%), that electric vehicles are too expensive (71%) and that these vehicles can’t travel far enough on a full charge (71%).
AGREEMENT WITH STATEMENTS ABOUT ELECTRIC VEHICLES
Q30. Please indicate whether you agree or disagree with each of the following statements about plug-in hybrid or battery electric vehicles?
% Strongly/Somewhat Agree |
TOTAL |
GENDER |
AGE |
REGION |
||||||||
M |
F |
18–34 |
35–44 |
45–54 |
55+ |
ATL |
QC |
ON |
PR |
BC |
||
n = |
1500 |
749 |
750 |
404 |
249 |
263 |
584 |
120 |
361 |
549 |
275 |
195 |
|
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
There are too few, if any, public charging stations where I travel |
75 |
75 |
74 |
72 |
79 |
73 |
75 |
82 |
67 |
79 |
77 |
69 |
Plug-in hybrid or battery electric vehicles are too expensive |
71 |
73 |
69 |
71 |
73 |
70 |
71 |
70 |
75 |
70 |
71 |
71 |
Plug-in hybrid or battery electric vehicles can’t travel far enough on a full charge |
71 |
72 |
70 |
65 |
71 |
70 |
75 |
72 |
68 |
71 |
74 |
68 |
I can’t charge a plug-in hybrid or battery electric vehicle at my home or workplace |
57 |
51 |
63 |
61 |
60 |
50 |
55 |
66 |
48 |
58 |
61 |
55 |
I am worried that charging a plug-in hybrid or battery electric vehicle will significantly increase my monthly electricity bill |
56 |
48 |
64 |
57 |
60 |
53 |
55 |
62 |
42 |
60 |
67 |
52 |
The repair and maintenance costs for a plug-in hybrid or battery electric vehicle could be higher than for a gasoline car |
47 |
46 |
48 |
52 |
49 |
46 |
41 |
41 |
39 |
50 |
54 |
45 |
Plug-in hybrid or battery electric vehicle technology is too new to risk buying one |
42 |
39 |
46 |
40 |
39 |
38 |
47 |
48 |
39 |
41 |
52 |
34 |
The style of vehicle I prefer isn’t available as a plug-in hybrid or battery electric vehicle |
42 |
44 |
40 |
43 |
45 |
43 |
40 |
42 |
41 |
41 |
43 |
46 |
Disposing of plug-in hybrid or battery electric batteries is an environmental hazard |
41 |
41 |
41 |
41 |
43 |
40 |
41 |
41 |
41 |
42 |
43 |
37 |
Plug-in hybrid and battery electric vehicles don’t perform as well as gasoline powered vehicles |
40 |
40 |
40 |
39 |
45 |
42 |
37 |
36 |
42 |
40 |
40 |
37 |
It is difficult to find credible sources of information about plug-in hybrid or battery electric vehicles |
39 |
38 |
40 |
38 |
39 |
36 |
42 |
43 |
35 |
37 |
46 |
39 |
A plug-in hybrid or battery electric vehicle wouldn’t save me any money |
32 |
33 |
32 |
32 |
33 |
33 |
32 |
32 |
33 |
31 |
40 |
26 |
If too many people purchase plug-in hybrid or battery electric vehicles, it will put too much pressure on the electric grid |
32 |
28 |
36 |
32 |
32 |
33 |
32 |
30 |
20 |
36 |
39 |
36 |
Plug-in hybrid or battery electric vehicles have a poor resale value |
26 |
26 |
26 |
32 |
27 |
19 |
26 |
24 |
26 |
26 |
29 |
25 |
Plug-in hybrid and battery electric vehicles won’t contribute significantly to a reduction of greenhouse gas emissions compared to fuel powered vehicles |
26 |
27 |
24 |
27 |
27 |
25 |
24 |
25 |
25 |
23 |
35 |
21 |
Across key demographic groups, differences are notable by gender and age.
Women are more likely than men to agree that:
By age:
Across regions, some differences are notable:
Asked on an open-ended basis to share their main concerns about owning an electric vehicle, the top mentions are cost (22%), lack of charging stations (22%) and driving range (18%). A secondary concern relates to battery life and/or disposal (10%).
CONCERNS ABOUT OWNING AN ELECTRIC VEHICLE
Q31. What, if any, are your main concerns about owning a plug-in hybrid or battery electric vehicle? [Open-Ended]
Mentions of 3% or higher are shown |
TOTAL |
GENDER |
AGE |
REGION |
||||||||
M |
F |
18–34 |
35–44 |
45–54 |
55+ |
ATL |
QC |
ON |
PR |
BC |
||
n = |
1500 |
749 |
750 |
404 |
249 |
263 |
584 |
120 |
361 |
549 |
275 |
195 |
|
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
Cost/Price/Expensive |
22 |
22 |
23 |
22 |
24 |
20 |
23 |
25 |
24 |
21 |
24 |
18 |
Charging/Not enough charging stations/Lack of charging stations in rural area |
22 |
21 |
24 |
21 |
20 |
20 |
25 |
30 |
11 |
25 |
26 |
25 |
Driving range/Short mileage/Travel distance |
18 |
23 |
14 |
16 |
18 |
21 |
19 |
18 |
16 |
20 |
18 |
19 |
Battery/Battery life/Battery range/Replacing or disposing of battery |
10 |
12 |
8 |
12 |
9 |
10 |
9 |
12 |
10 |
10 |
8 |
11 |
Reliability/Too much on the electric grid/Not reliable for such an invention |
5 |
5 |
4 |
3 |
6 |
5 |
5 |
7 |
4 |
5 |
4 |
4 |
Repair/Maintenance is costly/Warranties |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
6 |
4 |
5 |
2 |
5 |
6 |
4 |
Time/How long to recharge/Speed of charging |
3 |
4 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
4 |
Weather/Winter driving/Cold weather/Weather elements damage battery |
3 |
4 |
2 |
3 |
3 |
5 |
2 |
3 |
2 |
3 |
5 |
1 |
Lack of choice/Not many models out there/Lack of options |
3 |
2 |
3 |
1 |
4 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
4 |
2 |
1 |
3 |
Other |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
|
None |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
I don’t have any concerns about owning a plug-in hybrid or battery electric vehicle |
39 |
38 |
40 |
48 |
39 |
37 |
33 |
34 |
41 |
39 |
36 |
41 |
Again, we note some differences by gender, age, and region:
The survey included several questions designed to assess expectations with respect to the driving range of battery electric vehicles (BEVs).
Overall, most of those who do not currently own an electric vehicle would expect a significant driving range before they would consider purchasing a BEV. Provided with 5 range options, two in five (39%) respondents selected a driving range of 450 km or more is needed in order for them to consider purchasing a BEV. Another one third (35%) selected a driving range between 250 and 449 km, and just one quarter (26%) indicated that a driving range of less than 250 km would suffice.
DRIVING RANGE NEEDED TO CONSIDER PURCHASING A BATTERY ELECTRIC VEHICLE
Q25. What driving range do you feel is needed on a fully charged battery in order for you to consider purchasing a battery electric vehicle?
|
TOTAL |
GENDER |
AGE |
REGION |
||||||||
M |
F |
18–34 |
35–44 |
45–54 |
55+ |
ATL |
QC |
ON |
PR |
BC |
||
n = |
1460 |
725 |
734 |
399 |
239 |
257 |
565 |
120 |
352 |
529 |
274 |
185 |
|
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
Less than 50 km |
2 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
4 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
4 |
50–-99 km |
5 |
3 |
6 |
8 |
6 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
6 |
6 |
3 |
5 |
100–-249 km |
19 |
16 |
22 |
23 |
16 |
16 |
18 |
20 |
20 |
16 |
18 |
26 |
250–-449 km |
35 |
35 |
34 |
30 |
38 |
35 |
36 |
40 |
35 |
33 |
36 |
34 |
450 km or more |
39 |
44 |
35 |
35 |
36 |
43 |
42 |
34 |
36 |
44 |
42 |
31 |
Men are more likely than women to want a range of 450 km or more (44% vs. 35%, respectively). By age, those 45 and older (42–43%) are more likely than those under 45 (35–36%) to want a range of at least 450 km.
When a similar question was asked of current BEV owners (n = 40), most say they are satisfied with the range of their BEV (88% are satisfied and 43% are very satisfied).
SATISFACTION WITH DRIVING RANGE OF BEV
Q28. How satisfied are you with the driving range of your BEV (the distance you can drive before recharging)?
|
TOTAL |
GENDER |
AGE |
REGION |
||||||||
M |
F |
18–34 |
35–44 |
45–54 |
55+ |
ATL |
QC |
ON |
PR |
BC |
||
n = |
40 |
24 |
16 |
5 |
10 |
6 |
19 |
- |
9 |
20 |
1 |
10 |
|
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
NET – SATISFIED |
88 |
92 |
81 |
100 |
80 |
100 |
84 |
- |
89 |
90 |
100 |
80 |
Very satisfied |
43 |
54 |
25 |
60 |
30 |
33 |
47 |
- |
56 |
40 |
- |
40 |
Somewhat satisfied |
45 |
38 |
56 |
40 |
50 |
67 |
37 |
- |
33 |
50 |
100 |
40 |
Somewhat dissatisfied |
10 |
4 |
19 |
- |
10 |
- |
16 |
- |
11 |
5 |
- |
20 |
Very dissatisfied |
3 |
4 |
- |
- |
10 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
5 |
- |
- |
NET – DISSATISFIED |
13 |
8 |
19 |
- |
20 |
- |
16 |
- |
11 |
10 |
- |
20 |
The expectations of current electric vehicle owners are largely consistent with the expectations of non-owners. Almost three quarters feel that a range of 250–449 km (40%) or 450+ km (33%) is needed for them to consider purchasing another BEV.
DRIVING RANGE
Q29. What driving range do you feel is needed on a fully charged battery in order for you to consider purchasing another battery electric vehicle (BEV)?
|
TOTAL |
GENDER |
AGE |
REGION |
||||||||
M |
F |
18–34 |
35–44 |
45–54 |
55+ |
ATL |
QC |
ON |
PR |
BC |
||
n = |
40 |
24 |
16 |
5 |
10 |
6 |
19 |
- |
9 |
20 |
1 |
10 |
|
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
Less than 50 km |
3 |
4 |
- |
- |
- |
17 |
- |
- |
- |
5 |
- |
- |
100–-249 km |
25 |
13 |
44 |
40 |
30 |
- |
26 |
- |
44 |
15 |
- |
30 |
250–-449 km |
40 |
46 |
31 |
40 |
40 |
33 |
42 |
- |
56 |
40 |
- |
30 |
450 km or more |
33 |
38 |
25 |
20 |
30 |
50 |
32 |
- |
- |
40 |
100 |
40 |
The majority of respondents say they would rely on traditional media such as consumer reports (58%), vehicle dealerships or salespeople (43%), electric vehicle manufacturers (41%), and automotive magazines (39%) when looking for information on electric vehicles. About one quarter (23%) would look to the CAA as a key source. Government sources, both federal (20%) and provincial (13%), are mentioned by one in three respondents, combined. By contrast, online sources (9%) as well as recommendations from family and friends (1%) are not significant sources.
SOURCES OF INFORMATION ON ELECTRIC VEHICLES
Q32. If you were interested in finding out more about plug-in hybrid or battery electric vehicles, where would you go to get this information? [Multi-mention]
|
TOTAL |
GENDER |
AGE |
REGION |
||||||||
M |
F |
18–34 |
35–44 |
45–54 |
55+ |
ATL |
QC |
ON |
PR |
BC |
||
n = |
1500 |
749 |
750 |
404 |
249 |
263 |
584 |
120 |
361 |
549 |
275 |
195 |
|
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
Consumer reports |
58 |
56 |
61 |
49 |
59 |
55 |
67 |
54 |
50 |
60 |
62 |
67 |
Vehicle dealerships/salespeople |
43 |
37 |
48 |
42 |
43 |
43 |
42 |
53 |
36 |
44 |
40 |
47 |
Plug-in hybrid or battery electric vehicle manufacturers |
41 |
41 |
42 |
40 |
48 |
40 |
40 |
42 |
34 |
45 |
41 |
44 |
Automotive magazines |
39 |
44 |
33 |
36 |
45 |
37 |
38 |
29 |
48 |
35 |
36 |
41 |
The CAA |
23 |
23 |
23 |
19 |
15 |
22 |
30 |
16 |
28 |
23 |
25 |
18 |
Government of Canada |
20 |
22 |
17 |
22 |
18 |
19 |
19 |
18 |
18 |
22 |
19 |
18 |
Provincial or Territorial Government |
13 |
15 |
10 |
13 |
12 |
13 |
13 |
8 |
15 |
15 |
8 |
12 |
Google/Internet/Blogs/Internet forums |
9 |
9 |
9 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
8 |
10 |
6 |
11 |
7 |
11 |
Municipal Government |
5 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
5 |
3 |
5 |
4 |
4 |
6 |
5 |
5 |
Friends/Family/Someone who owns one or had one |
1 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
< 1 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
Plug’n Drive |
< 1 |
< 1 |
|
- |
1 |
- |
< 1 |
- |
- |
< 1 |
- |
1 |
Other |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
- |
1 |
- |
1 |
< 1 |
- |
1 |
None of the above |
5 |
5 |
5 |
6 |
5 |
6 |
5 |
5 |
4 |
7 |
5 |
4 |
By gender:
By age:
We also note some variations by educational attainment:
Regionally:
A series of attitudinal statements were included in the form of an agree/disagree battery as a means of capturing additional information which could be relevant to consumers’ predisposition to purchasing an electric vehicle. This section provides the results for these attitudinal statements.
Working in favour of electric vehicle technology, many respondents indicated a high degree of comfort with technology (86%) and concern for the environmental impact of the products they buy (77%).
At the same time, respondents to the survey generally agree that they want value for money (97%) and products with demonstrated or proven reliability (91%). These attitudes may mitigate against electric vehicles being considered when it comes time to purchase a new vehicle.
Three quarters (75%) say that the products they purchase are a reflection of who they are. This aligns with the importance placed on brand, reported on in an earlier section on vehicle purchase considerations in general. Although the number of makes and models of electric vehicles available on the market is increasing, consumers may not be aware of what is currently available from their preferred vehicle manufacturers and those automakers may not have a wide range of electric vehicles on offer. This is likely to change dramatically within the next few years.
A slim majority say they choose the product that costs less (54%)—somewhat more so among those aged 18 to 34 (64%) and 35 to 44 (61%). For consumers focused on economy and value, the purchase price of electrical vehicles is viewed as a significant barrier.
Almost two thirds describe themselves as conventional rather than experimental (64%), which would tend to work against trial of new vehicle technology. Consistent with this result, relatively few agree that they like to be the first to try new things (40%), although this tendency is stronger among younger consumers (47% agree among those aged 18 to 34 and 45% among those aged 35 to 44).
ATTITUDINAL PROFILE
Q16. Please indicate the extent to which you agree or disagree with each of the following statements.
% Strongly/Somewhat Agree |
TOTAL |
GENDER |
AGE |
REGION |
||||||||
M |
F |
18–34 |
35–44 |
45–54 |
55+ |
ATL |
QC |
ON |
PR |
BC |
||
n = |
1500 |
749 |
750 |
404 |
249 |
263 |
584 |
120 |
361 |
549 |
275 |
195 |
|
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
I like to know I am getting value for money |
97 |
97 |
97 |
94 |
99 |
98 |
98 |
97 |
96 |
98 |
98 |
95 |
I only buy products that are proven to be reliable |
91 |
90 |
91 |
86 |
90 |
94 |
92 |
91 |
88 |
92 |
93 |
88 |
I am very comfortable with technology |
86 |
89 |
83 |
89 |
91 |
90 |
81 |
82 |
84 |
89 |
86 |
86 |
I consider the environmental impact of the products I purchase |
77 |
73 |
80 |
73 |
76 |
78 |
79 |
75 |
73 |
77 |
78 |
79 |
Products I purchase are a reflection of who I am |
75 |
72 |
77 |
77 |
76 |
79 |
71 |
78 |
77 |
76 |
75 |
65 |
I am certainly more conventional than experimental |
64 |
61 |
67 |
59 |
63 |
60 |
70 |
72 |
60 |
60 |
77 |
59 |
When I have to choose between different products, I tend to choose the one that costs less |
54 |
53 |
55 |
64 |
61 |
51 |
46 |
63 |
53 |
56 |
48 |
53 |
I pride myself in being the first to try new things |
40 |
45 |
34 |
47 |
45 |
41 |
31 |
38 |
32 |
48 |
33 |
42 |
The survey contained a wide range of measures (approximately 65 in total) which assessed respondents’ general familiarity with and interest in electric vehicles in addition to their knowledge and perceptions of electric vehicles, including perceived advantages and disadvantaged associated with the technology. In addition, respondents answered a series of agree/disagree statements which were intended to gauge their general orientation towards technology and the environment, as well as to electric vehicle technology specifically.
The survey posed a very explicit question to non-electric vehicle owners to determine their level of interest in purchasing an electric vehicle in the future. The results of this question (Q.23) are covered in an earlier section of this report. While a majority (57%) demonstrate an “intent” to purchase an electric vehicle in the future, only a very small proportion (12%) express a high level of interest without any additional qualifiers such a purchase price (i.e., they say they will “definitely consider one when purchasing their next vehicle”). This question on its own sheds some light on the potential uptake of electric vehicles overall, by region and across key demographics, but it does not reveal what is driving respondents’ intention to purchase. While we are able to glean a great deal about the motivators and detractors to purchasing an electric vehicle by how respondents answered other questions about the importance of various purchase considerations and, specifically, the top 3 attributes they identified as those that would make them more likely to purchase a plug-in hybrid or battery electric vehicle (see Q.24), a “driver analysis” offers additional guidance.
To further understand the relative importance of various features, aspects and attributes associated with electric vehicles in terms of driving or influencing intent to purchase, a key driver analysis was conducted. Using intent to purchase (Q.23) as the dependent variable, we conducted a stepwise multiple regression which allows for all 65 items in the survey (noted above) to be included in the analysis as independent variables. By taking a stepwise approach, we start by including the full set of 65 variables and then eliminating those that are not statistically significant or do not meet a threshold for significance in a step-by-step process, resulting in a final model that narrows down the field to a more limited set of items (variables) which are ultimately deemed to be the strongest predictors of intention to purchase an electric vehicle.
The table below shows that the original 65 measures can ultimately be reduced to 10 key items that have a significant relationship with intent to purchase an electric vehicle (as denoted by the strength of the beta coefficients). The three strongest or most important influencers or “drivers” of interest in and/or intent to purchase an electric vehicle centre around the perceived advantage of using electricity versus gasoline to power vehicles in addition to familiarity with battery range and ratings of the performance of electric vehicles. This suggests that a key to increasing electric vehicle uptake is to raise familiarity and understanding with respect to electric vehicle performance and battery range in addition to promoting the benefits of vehicles powered by electricity.
A higher environmental consciousness is also strongly linked to intent to purchase an electric vehicle. This is not surprising, although it is interesting that more practical considerations outrank this issue as key drivers. Again, this suggests that an appeal to consumers’ sense of concern regarding the environmental impacts of their purchases continues to be an important factor in reaching and engaging the next tranche of prospective electric vehicle owners, but that it is only one of a series of key motivators and not necessarily the strongest argument for electric vehicles.
Greater understanding and comfort with driving range as well as familiarity with the cost of insurance and the time required to charge the battery round out the top 7 of 10 drivers of intent to purchase, suggesting that it is important to continue to get information out to consumers that will educate them about some of these uncertainties or unknowns regarding electric vehicles.
Conversely, concerns people have about the risks of buying an electric vehicle because the technology is too new, and therefore unproven, is one of the strongest barriers to purchase interest (it is shown as being inversely correlated with intention to purchase as the last item on the chart below).
Finally, a tendency to be more conventional than experimental and concerns that preferred car styles and designs are not available in electric vehicle models also exert a negative influence on interest in electric vehicle purchase.
The Top Ten Drivers of Electric Vehicle Purchase Intent/Interest
|
Strength of Relationship to Interest in Purchasing an Electric Vehicle (Q.23)* |
Q21_1 Using electricity instead of fuel to power the vehicle (Advantage vs. Disadvantage) |
0.205 |
Q20_7 Battery range (Familiarity with) |
0.154 |
Q22_3 Performance (Rating of) |
0.147 |
Q16_5 I consider the environmental impact of the products I purchase. (Agreement with) |
0.128 |
Q21_7 Driving range (Advantage vs. Disadvantage) |
0.097 |
Q20_12 Cost of insurance (Familiarity with) |
0.093 |
Q22_5 Time required to charge the battery (Rating of) |
0.081 |
Q16_1 I am certainly more conventional than experimental. (Agreement with) |
-0.077 |
Q30_7 The style of vehicle I prefer isn’t available as a plug-in hybrid or battery electric vehicle. (Agreement with) |
-0.077 |
Q30_8 Plug-in hybrid or battery electric vehicle technology is too new to risk buying one. (Agreement with) |
-0.141 |
*This column shows the beta coefficient, which is a measure of how much the dependent variable changes when the independent variable changes by 1 standard deviation. In simpler language, the coefficient reflects the strength of the independent variable (i.e., Q.21) in relation to the dependent variable (Q.23). Higher positive numbers mean that this factor or issue is a strong motivator of intention to purchase or interest in electric vehicles. Higher negative numbers mean the opposite—that this factor or issue is a strong detractor or barrier to intention to purchase or interest in electric vehicles.
Overall, the 10 items included in the final regression model are shown to explain about 40% of the variance in electric vehicle purchase intent (R2 = 0.423). This clearly indicates that the items covered in the survey and included in this analysis are strongly related with and are likely the most significant influencers over whether or not consumers are interested in purchasing an electric vehicle.
In a wide-ranging 40- to 45 minute in-depth interview, electric vehicle owners were asked a series of questions pertaining to the use of their electric vehicle as well as the considerations they took into account in making the purchase, their perceptions of the driving experience, and their views on the future of electric vehicles in Canada—specifically, what might be required to increase uptake. The following is a summary of the feedback provided by 30 electric vehicle owners. For more details on the profile of those interviewed, please see the “Methodology” section included in the Executive Summary.
Most participants only own one electric vehicle; however, many also own another vehicle that is gas- or diesel-powered. Among electric vehicle owners interviewed, the common practice is to utilize the electric vehicle as the primary vehicle within the household. While some mentioned that they had purchased the electric vehicle as a secondary vehicle, it quickly became the primary vehicle in their household.
For those who own more than one vehicle, the secondary vehicle (typically a gasoline, diesel or hybrid vehicle) was used mainly for longer trips, for times when additional space was required, and in colder weather. These are areas where internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicles were seen to generally outperform electric vehicles and owners commented on some of these issues in more detail as the conversation progressed.
Most electric vehicle owners report driving, on average, between 150 and 350 km per week. Relatively few mentioned that they drive upwards of 500 km each week. In terms of the longest distance, the majority of owners report travelling 120 to 300 km round trip. There were a few exceptions: some mentioned they have taken longer trips—over 600 km—but these tended to be primarily by owners of plug-in hybrid vehicles (PHEVs).
Electric vehicle owners appear to be motivated by a range of factors to purchase an electric vehicle, including:
Two individuals interviewed work in areas that would have exposed them to this technology—one as a contractor for a GM dealership and another as an electrical contractor installing solar panels and as a distributor for electric vehicle car chargers.
In a number of cases, current electric vehicle owners were replacing a hybrid electric vehicle and chose, at that time, to move directly to a plug-in. Others indicated they have been interested in electric vehicles for some time and have been waiting for “proof of concept” around the technology and for the price of these types of vehicles to be more affordable.
As relatively early adopters of electric vehicle technology, many did not have strong or serious reservations about the technology, although a number of electric vehicle owners mentioned that they were initially concerned about range and battery life. For others, the issue of charging infrastructure initially held back the purchase decision. Some simply found that the dealers themselves were unable to adequately respond to their questions, leaving them to pour through technical manuals in order to learn more about the technology.
However, most of these concerns were readily addressed through research and obtaining more information, which these electric vehicle owners seemed quite prepared to undertake.
Also key to their decision to purchase an electric vehicle was the opportunity to test drive one. Virtually all electric vehicle owners interviewed say they really enjoy the driving experience and rave about the performance of the vehicle.
Many electric vehicle owners ultimately elected to purchase a plug-in hybrid electric vehicle (PHEV) over a battery electric vehicle (BEV) for highly practical reasons—range and winter driving. Some electric vehicle owners noted that the option to switch to gas as a back-up is helpful, if not in fact necessary, given the current state of charging infrastructure. In addition, winter temperatures can dramatically diminish the operating range of an electric vehicle on a full charge.
The timeline to purchase an electric vehicle, and therefore the time devoted to researching the technology, varied from one month to several months or even years. In some instances, electric vehicle owners had been tracking advancements in electric vehicle technology for a period of years, watching the trends in purchase price and waiting until their current vehicle needed to be replaced or until they felt more confident that technology had matured/stabilized.
As noted above, reservations centred primarily on driving range and battery life, but electric vehicle owners typically undertook research to obtain answers to a number of other questions they had, including:
The types of sources that electric vehicle owners relied on as they were gathering information were varied. However, most frequently mentioned were (generally in order of the frequency with which they were cited):
Other sources included social media (i.e., YouTube videos), electric vehicle advocacy groups, technical studies, and auto sections of the newspaper. The Ontario Government’s green vehicle website was mentioned by one owner in Ontario.
While many went to dealers to see the models and test drive an electric vehicle, there was a general consensus that the dealerships were not necessarily a good or reliable source of information.
Owners were of the view that consumer reports offer the best, most unbiased information on electric vehicles given that they are not affiliated with any manufacturer, followed by electric vehicle owners themselves. Notably, the federal government is not identified as a key source of information on electric vehicles at this time, although owners generally feel that government has a high degree of credibility as a source of information.
Often, the decision to purchase a particular type of vehicle was made based on price, features, and availability, although as several electric vehicle owners indicated, there is “not much to choose from,” meaning that there is little choice in terms of makes and models of electric vehicles. Brand loyalty also plays a role in the selection process.
Many electric vehicle owners also remarked that, in general, dealerships do not carry much stock, so the waiting time can be long. This is a particular issue for those who had made the commitment and were ready to purchase—waiting for the vehicle to be delivered was an irritant, although not necessarily a barrier.
Without question, all electric vehicle owners said they would purchase or lease another. Some expressed interest in moving from a PHEV to a BEV as the logical next step. The environmental benefits, lower operating costs, and driving experience are all touted as positives to owning an electric vehicle.
For a small number of electric vehicle owners, leasing presented the better option, as it allowed them to take quicker advantage of any advancements in the technology.
Electric vehicle owners noted a number of key differences in the driving experience, although these features may vary across the range of makes and models:
Overall, most felt the driving experience was superior relative to an ICE vehicle, primarily due to general vehicle performance and the fact that the vehicle is very quiet when operating. Several described the experience as “fun.”
Some also felt that operating of an electric vehicle actually changed their driving habits. For example, owners quickly come to understand that repeated breaking, quick acceleration, and running at high speeds use more electricity, adversely impacting driving range. As such, they are more conscious of driving at the speed limit.
Few experienced any significant issues with the driving range of their vehicle, although a number commented that they do plan their trips quite carefully. If there was one drawback, it was related to driving during the winter months when colder temperatures draw more power from the battery, thereby lowering their driving range. Several owners did, however, comment that the issue of driving range in winter is not adequately addressed within the available information. When temperatures drop below -20 °C, the range may drop anywhere from 30% to 60%. This was clearly not as much of an issue for PHEV owners as it was for BEV owners, but was nevertheless cited as an issue.
Interviewees were asked how electric vehicles compare to gasoline- or diesel-powered vehicles in terms of purchase price, operating and maintenance costs as well as resale value. A summary of their comments is shown in the table below.
Purchase price |
|
Operating and maintenance costs |
|
Resale value |
|
Most electric vehicle owners charge their vehicles at home, at work or at charging stations located in public parking spaces, which are typically located adjacent to government offices or at shopping malls. A number of electric vehicle owners did comment that they are unable to charge at home because they reside in a multi-unit building that does not provide access to a charging station or the ability to install one. Those who can do so have typically purchased a Level 1 charging station (110 V) because it is significantly less expensive relative to a Level 2 (220 V) charging station.
In some instances, the owners themselves petitioned their workplace to install a charging station, and a key advantage at the moment is not having to pay when they charge either at work or at a public charging station.
Regardless of where and how electric vehicles owners are currently charging their vehicle, most were of the view that charging is fairly convenient. Some, however, did note that as electric vehicles are becoming more popular, charging at “free” public charging stations is more challenging and they expect it to be more difficult in the future. The number of these stations is quite limited. As such, timely access can be a problem. At the same time, some owners indicated that they use an app on their smart phones to tell them where public charging stations are, which chargers are currently in use and/or when they will become available. The app is also required to “unlock” these charging stations for use.
The time required to fully charge the vehicle varies depending on the type of charging infrastructure and seems to vary quite significantly. This may be a factor of the charging platform as well as the make/model and whether the vehicle requires full or partial charging. For example, those who use Level 1 charging stations require overnight (up to 14–15 hours, some even say up to 24–48 hours) charging to reach a full charge. Level 2 takes about 4 hours and Level 3 charging stations will fully charge the vehicles within 20 or 30 minutes.
When asked what could be done to make charging more convenient, the response was consistent: more charging stations, particularly along highways or routes outside of major urban centres, but also in public parking spaces, including park-and-ride stations, malls, hotels and rest stops. Several also recommended wireless charging as well as changing building codes to ensure that new homes (including multi-unit residential developments) pre-wire to accommodate an electric vehicle charger.
Ideally, electric vehicle owners would like to continue to have access to free charging. At the same time, they recognize this is not feasible in the long-term, but rather is an incentive aimed at encouraging initial uptake among the leading edge group of adopters.
Some electric vehicle owners expressed annoyance over those owners who leave their vehicles charging for the full day. They suggested that some type of monitoring may need to be implemented to ensure that vehicle owners unplug and move their cars once they are fully charged to allow others access.
Electric vehicle owners state that many non-owners have a variety of misperceptions about owning or driving electric vehicles including:
Range anxiety, or a fear that the battery will run out of power before reaching the destination, continues to be by far the most major misperception from many non-electric vehicle owners. However, those interviewed who are early adopters of the technology have had no significant range issues and suggest looking at driving/charging from a different perspective, in that it just requires a bit more planning and preparedness.
Although many electric vehicle owners do not experience any issues with range, they do acknowledge that the time to charge an electric vehicle takes longer than to fuel up a car. There was also a consensus from participants that increasing the number charging stations in the near term would help to reduce range anxiety.
A few participants also mentioned there is a lack of education about the overall environmental impact of manufacturing, driving, and decommissioning/recycling electric vehicles. It is their sense that a full life-cycle analysis would dispel concerns about battery production and the impact of plugging the car into the electrical grid. While many electric vehicle owners did not express concerns about pressure on the power grid, this seems to be somewhat of a concern to non-electric vehicle owners, especially as the vehicles begin to increase in numbers on the road.
Some non-electric vehicle owners have concerns around cold temperatures in the winter and primarily its effect on the battery life. Feedback from electric vehicle owners does suggest that the colder temperatures reduce the overall range due to the system needing to heat the battery itself. While owners felt this was somewhat of an irritant, they did not see it as a significant drawback to ownership of an electric vehicle. Many also suggested that this is also an issue for gasoline and diesel-powered vehicles, but is just somewhat less noticeable in terms of its impact on vehicle performance.
Electric vehicle owners are often asked a standard set of questions by non-owners that focus specifically around:
Non-electric vehicle owners are most concerned about charging as it relates to their misperceptions on range anxiety. The most common questions asked of electric vehicle owners are around the number and placement of charging stations. A few participants also mentioned that they regularly get asked about the length of time and the convenience of charging. One was asked specifically what type of charger they would need at their home. Clearly, there is significant interest in understanding more about the basics of the technology—how it works and what it costs.
The questions that most electric vehicle owners are asked around pricing are focused primarily on the decreased cost of using electricity versus fuel to run the vehicle, but also on the purchase price and rebates.
The main suggestions to encourage greater uptake of electric vehicles, to the point where they are as common on the road as gasoline or diesel-powered vehicles, centred primarily on charging:
The higher price point for electric vehicles is perceived as another barrier that needs to be addressed in order to move electric vehicles more into the mainstream market. Some also reiterated the need for dealers to provide more inventory—the wait times to order/receive an electric vehicle is viewed as a barrier.
Several owners also feel that interest in electric vehicles will reach a tipping point when they are more common on the roads. Currently, they are viewed as somewhat of an “oddity” and, as such, the vast majority of consumers remain more curious than committed to the technology. This will begin to change in the near future as vehicle manufacturers, like Volvo, make business decisions to move away from producing ICE vehicles to exclusively hybrids, PHEVs and BEVs.
Most feel that the Government of Canada could play a key role in the following areas:
Other miscellaneous suggestions were offered, including:
Some electric vehicle owners suggested that a more targeted strategy would be required in rural areas. Additionally, targeting older buildings and multi-unit residential development (i.e., apartment buildings and condominiums) was also put forward in order to upgrade electrical infrastructure, encourage installation of charging stations and provide easier access for residents.
As one electric vehicle owner put it: “Education alone is not enough to reduce the stigma around new technology. We need education plus experience—the opportunity to try it.” This same individual was also of the view that electric vehicles are just one aspect of a larger evolution within the transportation sector, albeit an important step. The combination of smart grids, distributed energy, and further technological advancements in vehicles (including autonomous vehicles) present opportunities to significantly alter transportation, especially in urban environments, creating safer and more reliable highways and further electrification of transit options (i.e., electric scooters and bicycles).
CONSUMER ATTITUDES TOWARDS ELECTRIC VEHICLES
FINAL SURVEY — English
INTRODUCTION
Thanks for agreeing to participate in this survey. This survey is being conducted by Natural Resources Canada and covers a range of topics with a particular focus on vehicle ownership and use. It should take you about 15 minutes to complete. This survey is registered with the Marketing Research and Intelligence Association. Your participation is voluntary and completely confidential. Your answers will remain anonymous.
SECTION 1: SCREENING QUESTIONS AND QUOTA SET
These first few questions will help us to understand more about you and any recent vehicle purchases you have made or intend to make in the near future.
Under 18 [PN: THANK AND TERMINATE] |
|
18–34 |
|
35–44 |
|
45–54 |
|
55–64 |
|
65+ |
|
Prefer not to answer [PN: THANK AND TERMINATE] |
|
Male |
|
Female |
|
Non-binary |
|
Prefer not to answer [PN: THANK AND TERMINATE] |
|
Newfoundland |
|
Nova Scotia |
|
Prince Edward Island |
|
New Brunswick |
|
Quebec |
|
Ontario |
|
Manitoba |
|
Saskatchewan |
|
Alberta |
|
British Columbia |
|
Northwest Territories/Yukon/Nunavut |
|
Prefer not to answer [PN: THANK AND TERMINATE] |
|
3a.Please provide the first 3 characters of your postal code below.
_____ _____ _____
Yes |
|
No [SKIP TO Q.7] |
|
Prefer not to answer [PN: THANK AND TERMINATE] |
|
Small car |
|
Mid size car |
|
Large car |
|
Small utility |
|
Mid size utility |
|
Large utility |
|
Pick-up truck |
|
Gasoline- or diesel powered vehicle |
|
Hybrid electric vehicle (HEV) that cannot be plugged in |
|
Plug-in hybrid (PHEV) |
|
Battery electric vehicle (BEV) which is a 100% electric vehicle (EV) |
|
Note: Battery electric vehicles (BEVs) and plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEVs) both require charging by plugging into the electrical grid system.
Yes |
|
CONTINUE |
No |
|
AND “NO” at Q.4 – TERMINATE |
Prefer not to answer |
|
THANK AND TERMINATE |
Small car |
|
Mid size car |
|
Large car |
|
Small utility |
|
Mid size utility |
|
Large utility |
|
Pick-up truck |
|
[RANDOMIZE ITEMS A-D] |
Very likely |
Somewhat likely |
Somewhat unlikely |
Very unlikely |
Don’t know |
a. Gasoline- or diesel powered vehicle |
|
|
|
|
|
b. Hybrid electric vehicle (HEV) that cannot be plugged in |
|
|
|
|
|
c. Plug-in hybrid (PHEV) |
|
|
|
|
|
d. Battery electric vehicle (BEV) which is a 100% electric vehicle (EV) |
|
|
|
|
|
Note: Battery electric vehicles (BEVs) and plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEVs) both require charging by plugging into the electrical grid system.
Plug-in hybrid or battery electric vehicle would mostly be used as a primary vehicle |
|
Plug-in hybrid or battery electric vehicle would mostly be used as a secondary vehicle |
|
SECTION 2: VEHICLE OWNERSHIP AND USE
The next few questions ask about current vehicle ownership and use within your household.
0 |
|
1 |
|
2 |
|
3 or more |
|
[PN: IF “0” AT Q.11, SKIP TO Q.16]
Gasoline- or diesel powered vehicle |
|
Hybrid electric vehicle (HEV) that cannot be plugged in |
|
Plug-in hybrid (PHEV) |
|
Battery electric vehicle (BEV) which is a 100% electric vehicle (EV) |
|
Note: Battery electric vehicles (BEVs) and plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEVs) both require charging by plugging into the electrical grid system.
[PN: ITEMS CHECKED AT Q.12 SHOULD NOT EXCEED NUMBER OF VEHICLES CHECKED AT Q.11]
- IF Q.11 = 1 AND Q.12 = BEV or PHEV, include Vehicle 1
- IF Q.11 = 2 AND Q.12 = BEV or PHEV, include Vehicle 1
- IF Q.11 = 2 OR 3/MORE AND Q.12 = BEV and PHEV, include Vehicle 1 and 2. Also add instructions:
We have allowed for up to two vehicles to be recorded.
Vehicle 1: Make:____________________ Model: _____________________
Vehicle 2: Make:____________________ Model: _____________________
Note:
Make refers to the vehicle manufacturer, such as Chrysler, Chevrolet, BMW or Tesla.
Model refers to the vehicle name such as Pacifica, Volt, 330e, i3 or S3.
|
Primary Vehicle |
Secondary Vehicle |
Battery electric vehicle (BEV) is considered our |
|
|
Plug-in hybrid (PHEV) is considered our |
|
|
Less than 50 km |
|
50–99 km |
|
100–249 km |
|
250–449 km |
|
450 km or more |
|
SECTION 3: LIFESTYLE
This section includes a few questions about you and your lifestyle.
PN: RANDOMIZE ITEMS A-H |
Strongly agree |
Somewhat agree |
Somewhat disagree |
Strongly disagree |
Don’t know |
a. I am certainly more conventional than experimental. |
|
|
|
|
|
b. I like to know I am getting value for money. |
|
|
|
|
|
c. Products I purchase are a reflection of who I am. |
|
|
|
|
|
d. When I have to choose between different products, I tend to choose the one that costs less. |
|
|
|
|
|
e. I consider the environmental impact of the products I purchase. |
|
|
|
|
|
f. I am very comfortable with technology. |
|
|
|
|
|
g. I only buy products that are proven to be reliable. |
|
|
|
|
|
h. I pride myself in being the first to try new things. |
|
|
|
|
|
SECTION 4: VEHICLE PURCHASE CONSIDERATIONS
This next section focuses on purchasing a new vehicle.
PN: RANDOMIZE ITEMS A-R |
Very important |
Somewhat important |
Not that important |
Not important at all |
a. Brand |
|
|
|
|
b. Style |
|
|
|
|
c. Size |
|
|
|
|
d. Price |
|
|
|
|
e. Fuel efficiency |
|
|
|
|
f. Performance |
|
|
|
|
g. Eco friendliness |
|
|
|
|
h. Warranty |
|
|
|
|
i. Vehicle safety rating |
|
|
|
|
j. Advanced technology features |
|
|
|
|
k. Comfort |
|
|
|
|
l. Maintenance costs |
|
|
|
|
m. Proven reliability |
|
|
|
|
n. Recommendations from family |
|
|
|
|
o. Recommendations from friends |
|
|
|
|
p. Dealership recommendations |
|
|
|
|
q. Ability to test drive the vehicle |
|
|
|
|
r. Resale value |
|
|
|
|
SECTION 5: PLUG-IN HYBRID AND BATTERY ELECTRIC VEHICLE AWARENESS
Now, we have a few questions about plug-in hybrid (PHEV) and battery electric vehicles (BEV).
Yes |
|
No |
|
Don’t Know |
|
Yes |
|
No |
|
Don’t Know |
|
PN: RANDOMIZE ITEMS A-L |
Very familiar |
Somewhat familiar |
Not very familiar |
Not familiar at all |
a. Purchase price |
|
|
|
|
b. Cost to operate |
|
|
|
|
c. Performance |
|
|
|
|
d. Battery charging equipment |
|
|
|
|
e. Time required to charge the battery |
|
|
|
|
f. Battery life |
|
|
|
|
g. Battery range |
|
|
|
|
h. Reliability |
|
|
|
|
i. Maintenance costs |
|
|
|
|
j. Availability of makes and models |
|
|
|
|
k. Warranty |
|
|
|
|
l. Cost of insurance |
|
|
|
|
PN: RANDOMIZE ITEMS A-R |
Significant advantage |
Slight advantage |
Neither an advantage nor disadvantage |
Slight disadvantage |
Significant disadvantage |
Don’t know/Not applicable |
a. Using electricity instead of fuel to power the vehicle |
|
|
|
|
|
|
b. Availability of makes and models |
|
|
|
|
|
|
c. Vehicle maintenance costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
d. Purchase price |
|
|
|
|
|
|
e. Home charging availability |
|
|
|
|
|
|
f. Quality and availability of consumer information |
|
|
|
|
|
|
g. Driving range |
|
|
|
|
|
|
h. Workplace charging availability |
|
|
|
|
|
|
i. Vehicle performance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
j. Environmentally friendly battery disposal |
|
|
|
|
|
|
k. Battery replacement cost |
|
|
|
|
|
|
l. In city charging availability |
|
|
|
|
|
|
m. Highway charging availability |
|
|
|
|
|
|
n. Time required to charge the battery |
|
|
|
|
|
|
o. Resale value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
p. Subsidies for vehicle purchase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
q. Reliability |
|
|
|
|
|
|
r. Advanced technology |
|
|
|
|
|
|
PN: RANDOMIZE ITEMS |
Very good |
Good |
Poor |
Very Poor |
a. Purchase price |
|
|
|
|
b. Cost to operate |
|
|
|
|
c. Performance |
|
|
|
|
d. Battery charging equipment |
|
|
|
|
e. Time required to charge the battery |
|
|
|
|
f. Battery life |
|
|
|
|
g. Battery range |
|
|
|
|
h. Reliability |
|
|
|
|
i. Maintenance costs |
|
|
|
|
j. Availability of makes and models |
|
|
|
|
k. Warranty |
|
|
|
|
l. Cost of insurance |
|
|
|
|
SECTION 6: PLUG-IN HYBRID AND BATTERY ELECTRIC VEHICLE PURCHASE INTENTIONS
These next few questions ask about your views on and interest in plug-in hybrid (PHEV) and battery electric vehicles (BEV).
I am very interested in a plug-in hybrid or battery electric vehicle and will definitely consider one when purchasing my next vehicle |
|
I have some interest in a plug-in hybrid or battery electric vehicle and would consider one when purchasing or leasing my next vehicle |
|
I have some interest in a plug-in hybrid or battery electric vehicle but find they are too expensive |
|
I have some interest in a plug-in hybrid or battery electric vehicle, but today’s plug-in hybrid or battery electric vehicles don’t meet my driving needs |
|
I have no interest in a plug-in hybrid or battery electric vehicle |
|
I don’t know enough about plug-in hybrid or battery electric vehicles |
|
Lower purchase price |
|
Lower cost |
|
Greater selection of makes and models |
|
10 year battery warranty |
|
Having access to a charging station at home |
|
Having access to charging stations at my workplace |
|
Seeing more charging stations in public parking lots and shopping destinations |
|
Seeing more charging stations along highways |
|
Knowing I am doing my part to lower greenhouse gas emissions |
|
Realizing batteries can be repurposed/recycled |
|
Knowing the vehicle possesses the latest technological advances |
|
Fuel economy |
|
Low maintenance costs |
|
Ability to test drive the vehicle |
|
Proven reliability |
|
Other: Please specify |
|
None of these would make me more likely to consider purchasing or leasing a plug-in hybrid or battery electric vehicle [PN: EXCLUSIVE] |
|
Less than 50 km |
|
50–-99 km |
|
100–-249 km |
|
250–-449 km |
|
450 km or more |
|
I am very interested in a plug-in hybrid or battery electric vehicle and will definitely consider one when purchasing my next vehicle |
|
I have some interest in a plug-in hybrid or battery electric vehicle and would consider one when purchasing or leasing my next vehicle |
|
I have some interest in a plug-in hybrid or battery electric vehicle but find they are too expensive |
|
I have some interest in a plug-in hybrid or battery electric vehicle, but today’s plug-in hybrid or battery electric vehicles don’t meet my driving needs |
|
I have no interest in a plug-in hybrid or battery electric vehicle |
|
I don’t know enough about plug-in hybrid or battery electric vehicles |
|
Lower purchase price |
|
Lower cost |
|
Greater selection of makes and models |
|
10 year battery warranty |
|
Having access to a charging station at home |
|
Having access to charging stations at my workplace |
|
Seeing more charging stations in public parking lots and shopping destinations |
|
Seeing more charging stations along highways |
|
Knowing I am doing my part to lower greenhouse gas emissions |
|
Realizing batteries can be repurposed/recycled |
|
Knowing the vehicle possesses the latest technological advances |
|
Fuel economy |
|
Low maintenance costs |
|
Ability to test drive the vehicle |
|
Proven reliability |
|
Other: Please specify |
|
None of these would make me more likely to consider purchasing or leasing a plug-in hybrid or battery electric vehicle [PN: EXCLUSIVE] |
|
Very satisfied |
|
Somewhat satisfied |
|
Somewhat dissatisfied |
|
Very dissatisfied |
|
Less than 50 km |
|
50–-99 km |
|
100–-249 km |
|
250–-449 km |
|
450 km or more |
|
PN: RANDOMIZE ITEMS A-O |
Strongly agree |
Somewhat agree |
Neither agree nor disagree |
Somewhat disagree |
Strongly disagree |
a. There are too few, if any, public charging stations where I travel |
|
|
|
|
|
b. It is difficult to find credible sources of information about plug-in hybrid or battery electric vehicles |
|
|
|
|
|
c. Plug-in hybrid or battery electric vehicles are too expensive |
|
|
|
|
|
d. Plug-in hybrid or battery electric vehicles can’t travel far enough on a full charge |
|
|
|
|
|
e. The repair and maintenance costs for a plug-in hybrid or battery electric vehicle could be higher than for a gasoline car |
|
|
|
|
|
f. I can’t charge a plug-in hybrid or battery electric vehicle at my home or workplace |
|
|
|
|
|
g. The style of vehicle I prefer isn’t available as a plug-in hybrid or battery electric vehicle |
|
|
|
|
|
h. Plug-in hybrid or battery electric vehicle technology is too new to risk buying one |
|
|
|
|
|
i. Plug-in hybrid and battery electric vehicles don’t perform as well as gasoline powered vehicles |
|
|
|
|
|
j. A plug-in hybrid or battery electric vehicle wouldn’t save me any money |
|
|
|
|
|
k. Plug-in hybrid or battery electric vehicles have a poor resale value |
|
|
|
|
|
l. If too many people purchase plug-in hybrid or battery electric vehicles, it will put too much pressure on the electric grid |
|
|
|
|
|
m. Disposing of plug-in hybrid or battery electric batteries is an environmental hazard |
|
|
|
|
|
n. Plug-in hybrid and battery electric vehicles won’t contribute significantly to a reduction of greenhouse gas emissions compared to fuel powered vehicles |
|
|
|
|
|
o. I am worried that charging a plug-in hybrid or battery electric vehicle will significantly increase my monthly electricity bill |
|
|
|
|
|
I don’t have any concerns about owning a plug-in hybrid or battery electric vehicle. [PN: EXCLUSIVE]
Plug-in hybrid or battery electric vehicle manufacturers |
|
Vehicle dealerships/salespeople |
|
Consumer reports |
|
Automotive magazines |
|
The CAA |
|
Government of Canada |
|
Provincial or Territorial Government |
|
Municipal Government |
|
Other (specify) |
|
None of the above [PN: EXCLUSIVE] |
|
SECTION 7: Demographics
These final few questions are for statistical purposes only. Your responses will be aggregated with those of other respondents to the survey and will help us to analyze different sub-groups of the population.
Grade 8 or less |
|
Some high school |
|
High School Diploma or equivalent |
|
Registered Apprenticeship or other trades certificate or diploma |
|
College, CEGEP, or other non-university certificate or diploma |
|
University certificate or diploma below bachelor’s level |
|
Bachelor’s degree |
|
Post graduate degree above the bachelor’s level |
|
Under $20,000 |
|
$20,000 to just under $40,000 |
|
$40,000 to just under $60,000 |
|
$60,000 to just under $80,000 |
|
$80,000 to just under $100,000 |
|
$100,000 to just under $150,000 |
|
$150,000 and above |
|
Single, never married |
|
Married or domestic partnership |
|
Widowed |
|
Divorced or separated |
|
1 |
|
2 |
|
3 |
|
4 |
|
5 or more |
|
[PN: IF “1” AT Q.36, SKIP TO Q.38]
None |
|
1 |
|
2 |
|
3 |
|
4 or more |
|
[PN: RESPONSE AT Q.37 SHOULD NOT BE GREATER THAN RESPONSE AT Q.36]
Single, detached home |
|
Semi-detached |
|
Apartment or condo |
|
Other (please specify) |
|
Yes |
|
No |
|
Working full time, that is, 35 or more hours per week |
|
Working part time, that is, less than 35 hours per week |
|
Self-employed |
|
Unemployed, but looking for work |
|
A student attending school full time |
|
Retired |
|
Not in the workforce (full time homemaker, unemployed, not looking for work) |
|
Other (specify) |
|
Rural |
|
Urban |
|
Suburban |
|
[PN – IF “BEV” OR “PHEV” CHECKED AT Q.12 ASK Q.42]
Yes [Continue to Q.43] |
|
No [Thank and end] |
|
Name: ______________________________
Phone number: (____) _____ ______
PRETEST EVALUATION
We’d like your feedback on the experience of answering this survey.
RANDOMIZE STATEMENTS |
Strongly Agree |
Somewhat Agree |
Somewhat Disagree |
Strongly Disagree |
This survey was easy to complete. |
|
|
|
|
The questions asked were straightforward and easy to understand. |
|
|
|
|
The length of the survey was reasonable. |
|
|
|
|
The topic was interesting. |
|
|
|
|
One-on-One Qualitative Telephone Interviews with EV Owners
FINAL INTERVIEW GUIDE – Feb. 12, 2018
Pre-Coded Participant Data (if available)
Name of Participant:_________________
Date/Time of Interview:_________________
Gender:Male/Female
Age Range:18–34/35–54/55+
Province/Territory:_________________
City:_________________
Urban/Rural_________________
Make/Model of EV_________________
INTRODUCTION
Thank you for agreeing to participate in this interview. It should not take more than 40–45 minutes to complete. As we indicated when we called to schedule this interview, we are interested in your views on electric vehicles (EVs) and in understanding your experience as an EV owner.
I would like to record this interview if you are comfortable. Although everything you say is completely confidential and comments you make will not be attributed back to you by name in our report, the recording will allow us to review our conversation as we are writing our report. The report we produce is a summary of the findings from the 30 interviews we are conducting.
Do I have your permission to record this interview?
Yes [Record interview and continue]
No – I will need to take some notes then throughout our discussion [Take notes and continue]
ABOUT YOUR EV
First, I’d like to know a little more about your EV.
PURCHASING AN EV
The next few questions pertain to your decision to purchase an EV.
OWNING AN EV
Now we have a few questions about your experience as an owner/driver of an EV.
FUTURE OF EVS IN CANADA
These final couple of questions focus on the future of EVs in Canada.
These are all the questions I have for you. Thank you for your time.
Confidential 1
[1] Plug’n Drive, EVs Available in Canada
[2] FleetCarma, Electric Vehicle Sales in Canada, Q3 2017