National Climate Change Adaptation Survey
Research Report

Prepared for: Natural Resources Canada

Contract Number: 23483-181152/001/CY
Contract Award Date: January 15, 2018
Date of Delivery: June 12, 2018

Contact Information: nrcan.por-rop.rncan@canada.ca

Ce rapport est aussi disponible en français.

Table of Contents

Executive Summary

Earnscliffe Strategy Group (Earnscliffe) is pleased to present this report to the Department of Natural Resources Canada (NRCan) summarizing the results of the qualitative and quantitative research study regarding climate change adaptation.

In 2009, a National Climate Change Adaptation Benchmark Survey was conducted to establish a benchmark to be used to evaluate progress on adapting to climate change and the impact of the Government of Canada adaptation programming. The survey targeted government and business decision-makers and gathered information about their awareness and understanding of the potential impacts of climate change; whether and how their organizations are currently adapting; and barriers to action. This past research was also used to inform federal program design.

NRCan required updated research to assess Canada's progress in addressing adaptation and the impact of federal investments in adaptation to climate change. This research contributes to an assessment of Canada's progress in addressing adaptation and the impact of federal investments in adaptation to climate change in Canada and will be used to measure change in awareness and actions on adaptation in communities and businesses; assess decision-making information and tools; and identify barriers to action. Results will support public reporting of progress on adaptation under the Charter on Effective Action on Climate Change, and the Horizontal Management Framework on Clean Growth and Climate Change.

The total cost to conduct this research was $109,249.81 including HST.

Earnscliffe conducted a two-part research program, with both a quantitative and qualitative phase.

For the quantitative phase, we conducted a telephone survey in collaboration with our quantitative sub-contractor, Léger. The survey was conducted via telephone from Léger's centralized call centre using state of the art Computer Aided Telephone Interviewing (CATI) system. The total sample was 350 individuals, including 100 who occupy Chief, Manager or Director of Planning positions in municipalities across Canada and 250 individuals occupying Head of Operations or Chief Risk Officer positions in natural resource industries across Canada. The survey was conducted between February 5 and March 14, 2018. The average length of each interview was 15 minutes.

For both the municipal and business samples, stratified random sampling was used. In the case of municipalities, the final sample was fairly consistent with the known distribution of small, medium and large municipalities and as a result, the results have not been weighted. The aggregate municipal results can be considered accurate to within +/-9.8% at the 95% confidence level.

In the case of the business sample, the distribution of small, medium and large businesses within each sector was similar enough to the known distribution that it was decided that no weight would be applied based upon size. However, since the relative sizes of the sectors in the stratified quota structure was not reflective of reality, a weight was applied by sector so that the aggregate results of the business sample would be representative of the universe being studied. The aggregate business results can be considered accurate to within +/-6.2% at the 95% confidence level.

The qualitative phase consisted of 13 in-depth interviews with representatives from the associations representing small businesses and commerce, companies in the oil and gas, mining, forestry and utilities industries, an association representing municipalities, as well as some individuals from municipalities in coastal regions. The purpose of the qualitative research was to gather some deeper insights from specific perspectives that may not have been explored in-depth in the survey. The interviews were conducted between February 27 and March 21, 2018.

For the purposes of this report, wherever findings from the in-depth interviews are presented, it is important to note that qualitative research is a form of scientific, social, policy and public opinion research. Qualitative research is designed to elicit the full range of ideas, attitudes, experiences and opinions of a selected sample of participants on a defined topic. Because of the small numbers involved, the participants are not representative in a statistical sense of the larger population from which they are drawn and findings cannot reliably be generalized beyond their number.

The key findings from the research are presented separately for each of the two samples—business and municipal.

Business Findings

Awareness and Impressions of Climate Change Relevance

Climate Change Adaptation

Incorporating Climate Change Considerations in Decision-Making

Municipal Findings

Awareness and Impressions of Climate Change Relevance

Climate Change Adaptation

Incorporating Climate Change Considerations in Decision-Making

Research Firm: Earnscliffe Strategy Group Inc. (Earnscliffe)
Contract Number: 23483-181152/001/CY
Contract award date: January 15, 2018

I hereby certify as a Representative of Earnscliffe Strategy Group that the final deliverables fully comply with the Government of Canada political neutrality requirements outlined in the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada and Procedures for Planning and Contracting Public Opinion Research. Specifically, the deliverables do not include information on electoral voting intentions, political party preferences, standings with the electorate or ratings of the performance of a political party or its leaders.

Signed: Doug Anderson

Date: March 29, 2018

Doug Anderson
Principal, Earnscliffe

Introduction

Earnscliffe Strategy Group (Earnscliffe) is pleased to present this report to Natural Resources Canada (NRCan) summarizing the results of the qualitative and quantitative research study regarding climate change adaptation.

In 2009, a National Climate Change Adaptation Benchmark Survey was conducted to establish a benchmark to be used to evaluate progress on adapting to climate change and the impact of the Government of Canada adaptation programming. The survey targeted government and business decision-makers and gathered information about their awareness and understanding of the potential impacts of climate change; whether and how their organizations are currently adapting; and barriers to action. This past research was also used to inform federal program design.

Objectives:

NRCan required updated research to assess Canada's progress in addressing adaptation and the impact of federal investments in adaptation to climate change. This research contributes to an assessment of Canada's progress in addressing adaptation and the impact of federal investments in adaptation to climate change in Canada and will be used to measure change in awareness and actions on adaptation in communities and businesses; assess decision-making information and tools; and identify barriers to action. Results will support public reporting of progress on adaptation under the Charter on Effective Action on Climate Change, and the Horizontal Management Framework on Clean Growth and Climate Change.

To meet these objectives, Earnscliffe conducted a two-part research program, which included both a quantitative telephone survey and a series of in-depth interviews.

For the quantitative phase, a telephone survey was conducted. The telephone survey questionnaire was developed in consultation with NRCan, drawing on the 2009 National Climate Change Adaptation Benchmark Survey as appropriate. The survey was designed to reach a broad group of municipalities and companies operating in a variety of sectors, as outlined below. The quantitative findings are divided into 3 sections:

Data was collected by one of Earnscliffe's quantitative sub-contractors, Léger. The survey was conducted via telephone from Léger's centralized call centre using state of the art Computer Aided Telephone Interviewing (CATI) system. The total sample was 350 individuals, including 100 who occupy Chief, Manager or Director of Planning positions in municipalities across Canada and 250 individuals occupying Head of Operations or Chief Risk Officer positions in natural resource industries across Canada. The survey was conducted between February 5 and March 14, 2018. The average length of each interview was 15 minutes.

For both the municipal and business samples, stratified random sampling was used. In the case of municipalities, the final sample was fairly consistent with the known distribution of small, medium and large municipalities and as a result, the results have not been weighted. The aggregate municipal results can be considered accurate to within +/-9.8% at the 95% confidence level.

In the case of the business sample, the distribution of small, medium and large businesses within each sector was similar enough to the known distribution that it was decided that no weight would be applied based upon size. However, since the relative sizes of the sectors in the stratified quota structure was not reflective of reality, a weight was applied by sector so that the aggregate results of the business sample would be representative of the universe being studied. The aggregate business results can be considered accurate to within +/-6.2% at the 95% confidence level.

The qualitative phase consisted of 13 in-depth interviews with representatives from the associations representing small businesses and commerce, companies in the oil and gas, mining, forestry and utilities industries, an association representing municipalities, as well as some individuals from municipalities in coastal regions. The purpose of the qualitative research was to gather some deeper insights from specific perspectives that may not have been explored in-depth in the survey. The interviews were conducted between February 27 and March 21, 2018.

The following sampling approach was used for the telephone survey to ensure the research included perspectives from small, medium and large municipalities, as well as businesses in a variety of industries and of various sizes.

The target populations were:

As per common practice of Statistics Canada, small businesses were classified as those with fewer than 100 employees, medium-sized businesses were those with 100–499 employees, and large businesses were those with 500 or more employees. Small municipalities were those with a population of 1,000 to 29,999, medium municipalities were those with a population of 30,000 to 99,999, and large municipalities were those with a population of 100,000 or more. For the municipal sample, quotas were set to ensure representation of small, medium and large municipalities and the data are unweighted. For the business sample, quotas were set for size within each sector and results were weighted by industry size.

The sampling frame for businesses was as follows:
BUSINESSES Actual (N) Sample (n)
Small Med Lrg Total Small Med Lrg Total
Oil & Gas (NAICS: 211, 237120, 4861, 4862, 4869, 324110, 324190) 3,329 167 45 3,541 70 8 2 80
Mining 689 344 64 1,097 14 5 3 22
(NAICS: 2121, 212210, 212220, 212231, 212232, 212233, 212299, 212392, 212393, 212395, 212396, 212397, 212398) 240 71 38 346 12 4 2 18
(NAICS: 331) 449 104 26 579 2 1 1 4
Forestry (NAICS: 1131, 1132, 1133, 3221, 3222) 4,783 194 9 4,986 72 10 1 83
Power (NAICS: 221111, 221112, 221113, 221119, 221121, 221122, 237130) 1,276 143 38 1457 56 7 2 65
TOTAL         212 30 8 250
The sampling frame for municipalities was as follows:
MUNICIPALITIES Actual (N) Sample (n)
Small 1,944 50
Medium 95 30
Large 54 20
TOTAL   100

The tables below provide the demographic profile of the sample.

SAMPLE PROFILE: DISTRIBUTIONS
Businesses Sample size Percentage
Oil & Gas (NAICS: 211, 237120, 4861, 4862, 4869, 324110, 324190) 77 31%
Mining (NAICS: 2121, 212210, 212220, 212231, 212232, 212233, 212299, 212392, 212393, 212395, 212396, 212397, 212398) 25 10%
Forestry (NAICS: 1131, 1132, 1133, 3221, 3222) 83 33%
Power (NAICS: 221111, 221112, 221113, 221119, 221121, 221122, 237130) 65 26%
SAMPLE PROFILE: DISTRIBUTIONS
Businesses Sample size Percentage
Atlantic 27 11%
Quebec 53 21%
Ontario 78 31%
Prairies 71 28%
British Columbia 21 8%
SAMPLE PROFILE: DISTRIBUTIONS
Businesses Sample size Percentage
Large (500+ employees) 8 3%
Medium (100–499 employees) 30 12%
Small (< 100 employees) 212 85%
SAMPLE PROFILE: DISTRIBUTIONS
Municipalities Sample size Percentage
Small 76 76%
Medium 13 13%
Large 11 11%
SAMPLE PROFILE: DISTRIBUTIONS
Municipalities Sample size Percentage
Atlantic 11 11%
Quebec 24 24%
Ontario 28 28%
Prairies 23 23%
British Columbia 14 14%

The detailed findings from this research are presented in subsequent sections of this report. Additional details about the survey design, methodology, and sampling approach of the survey may be found in the Survey Methodology Report at Appendix A; also appended to this report are the interview guide and survey instruments (English and French) and detailed tabular results (presented under a separate cover).

Detailed Findings: Business Respondents

This section describes the findings from the 250 interviews conducted among business respondents.

Awareness and Impressions of Climate Change Relevance

Among business respondents, the plurality associates the term "climate change" with warmer temperatures and warmer weather. Respondents acknowledge that "climate change" also means more extreme and unpredictable weather events. Those in the power industry were most likely to cite extreme and unpredictable weather events (31%), while those in oil and gas were the least likely (12%).

The vast majority of business respondents agree that climate change is happening right now (70%). Those who work in oil and gas and forestry were slightly less likely than other business respondents to agree climate change is happening right now (69% and 67% respectively), while those who work in the power industry were the most likely to agree (82%). A larger proportion of large business respondents agree (88%) compared to small businesses (69%), though the sample size of large businesses is too small to draw any conclusions (n = 7).

Exhibit A1 – Q8: What do you first think of when you hear the term "climate change"? What's the next thing that comes to mind related to climate change? [OPEN-END WITH PRECODED LIST, DO NOT READ LIST]

Climate Change – Top of Mind Ideas
  Business
(n = 250)
Warmer temperatures/warmer weather 37%
Weather events more extreme/unpredictable 19%
Colder temperatures/colder weather 10%
Water levels are higher 6%
More air pollution/lower air quality 7%
Climate changes (unspecified) 5%
More flooding/more severe flooding 4%
More storms 2%
Melting ice caps 4%
Stronger winds 1%
Need to adapt 3%
Less ice/snow 2%
Less rain/drought 1%
More ice/snow 1%
More rain 1%
More forest fires 0%
Other (SPECIFY) 5%
Don't know/Prefer not to say/No answer 7%

Exhibit A2 – Q9: Which of these best describes what is happening in terms of climate change in the regions of Canada in which your organization operates?

Climate Change in Your Region/Community
  Business
(n = 250)
Climate change is happening right now 70%
Climate change is not happening right now, but it will happen in the foreseeable future 17%
Climate change is not happening right now and will not happen in the foreseeable future 11%
Don't know/Prefer not to say/No answer 2%

Exhibit A3 – Which of these best describes what is happening in terms of climate change in the regions of Canada in which your organization operates?

Climate Change in Your Region/Community
  Business
(n = 250)
Oil & Gas
(n = 77)
Mining
(n = 25)
Forestry
(n = 83)
Power
(n = 65)
Climate change is happening right now 70% 69% 75% 67% 82%
Climate change is not happening right now, but will happen in the foreseeable future 17% 14% 16% 20% 14%
Climate change is not happening right now and will not happen in the foreseeable future 11% 12% 9% 12% 3%
DN/NR 2% 5% - - 2%
Qualitative Insight

One-on-one interviews echoed what was found in the survey, with unanimous consensus that climate change is occurring and all participants able to cite multiple sources of evidence for this view. Virtually all pointed to the increased frequency and severity of extreme weather events as one sort of evidence. In addition, those in industry associations tended to cite issues like increased incidence of forest fires, unprecedented permafrost conditions, and invasive species migrating into regions where there were previously unseen.

Business respondents alike mentioned more frequent and severe weather events/storms as the most or second most serious impact of a changing climate. After severe weather events, economic effects—including loss of productivity and negative trade impacts—are top of mind for business respondents (9% name it as the most serious impact, 10% say it is the second most serious). Changing sea and lake levels, as well as erosion, are not far behind with 17% naming them as the first or second most serious consequence of climate change.

Exhibit A4. – Q10. [IF Q9 = 1, 2 or 9] Thinking about the regions of Canada in which your organization operates, what do you think will be the most serious impact of a changing climate over the next 20 years? What do you think will be the next-most serious impact? [DO NOT READ]

Most Serious Impact of Climate Change – Business (n = 250)
  Most serious Next most serious
More frequent or more severe weather events/storms 18% 13%
Economic effects (loss of productivity, negative trade impacts, increased trade opportunities) 9% 10%
Changing sea/lake levels/coastal erosion 10% 7%
Flooding 4% 6%
Droughts 4% 6%
Effects on wildlife (changing migration patterns, species loss, invasive species, loss of habitat) 4% 5%
Heat waves/higher temperatures/warmer winters 2% 3%
Impacts on water supply 6% 4%
Effects on agriculture (growing season changes, crop failures) 2% 5%
Permafrost change (melting, thawing, instability) 3% 3%
Forest (or wildland) fires 2% 4%
Human health impacts 3% 2%
Pollution 1% 2%
Changes in lifestyle 0% 3%
Melting of the polar ice cap 1% 0%
Effects on infrastructure 1% 0%
All of the above 1% 0%
Other 5% 5%
No one most serious impact 5% 6%
Don't know/Prefer not to say/No answer 8% 11%

Overall, 19% of businesses respondents say that climate change will have a major impact on their region, while 43% say it will have a moderate impact. Those in the oil and gas sector are the least likely among businesses to report that climate change will have a major impact on their region (15%), though another 47% say it will have a moderate impact. In contrast, 22% in the mining sector expect climate change will have a major impact on their region, while 31% say it will have a moderate impact.

Exhibit A5 – Q11. [IF Q9 = 1, 2 or 9] How MUCH of an impact will a changing climate will have on the regions of Canada in which your organization operates, in the next 20 years? Would you say it will have a…?

Climate Change Impacts Your Organization
  Business
(n = 227)
Oil & Gas
(n = 68)
Mining
(n = 23)
Forestry
(n = 73)
Power
(n = 63)
Major impact 19% 15% 22% 21% 22%
Moderate impact 43% 47% 31% 42% 46%
Minor impact 26% 24% 49% 23% 25%
No impact at all 11% 13% - 14% 5%
Depends - - - - 2%
DK/NR - 1% - - -

One quarter of business respondents agree that climate change is having an impact on their organization, while 46% expect climate change will have an impact on their organization. However, opinion varies among the industries surveyed. Those in the mining and power sectors are more likely than those in the forestry and oil and gas sectors to report that climate change is impacting or will have an impact on their organization. For example, over one third of those in the mining industry (34%) report climate change is having an impact, compared to 19% of those in the forestry industry and 26% in the oil and gas industry.

Exhibit A6 – Q12. Thinking about how your organization may or may not be impacted, is climate change something that is already having an impact on your organization in any way, is not having an impact on the organization, but it may have an impact on the organization in the future, or is climate change something that will not have an impact on your organization?

Climate Change Impacts Your Organization
  Business
(n = 250)
Oil & Gas
(n = 77)
Mining
(n = 25)
Forestry
(n = 83)
Power
(n = 65)
It is having an impact on the organization 25% 26% 34% 19% 38%
It is not having an impact on the organization but it is possible 46% 46% 49% 47% 43%
It will not have an impact on the organization 28% 27% 17% 34% 17%
DK/NR 1% 1% - - 2%
Qualitative Insight

Participants in the qualitative research were in agreement that there are already changing climatic patterns to which they are having to adapt. Almost all were comfortable describing this as a changing climate, but one did emphasize that while the recent changes are more dramatic than their industry had witnessed previously, a changing climate has always meant that industry is constantly adapting practices and thus, the recent kinds of changes are only about magnitude rather than a new realization of a need to adjust operations or assumptions to suit a new climate. That said, in terms of the expectations going forward, the tendency was to temper the sense of the future impact based upon the sense that actions are already being taken or plans being made that will sufficiently mitigate the impact of a changing climate.

Roughly similar proportions of the business respondents who expect climate change will impact their organization in the future believe it will happen in the next 1–5 years. Just over one quarter overall (26%) agree, compared to 26% of those in oil and gas, 33% of those in mining, and 29% in both forestry and power. That said, there is some variation in the proportion who believe climate change won't impact their organization for the next 20 years or more—25% of both those in the mining and power samples expect this is the case.

Exhibit A7 – Q13: [IF Q12 = 2] How many years from now do you believe your organization will start to see impacts from a changing climate?

Years Until Climate Changes Impacts Your Organization
  Business
(n = 113)
Oil & Gas
(n = 35)
Mining
(n = 12)
Forestry
(n = 38)
Power
(n = 28)
1–5 years 29% 26% 35% 29% 28%
6–10 years 26% 37% 0% 24% 28%
11–19 years 18% 12% 39% 18% 14%
20 years or more in the future 17% 12% 26% 17% 25%
Don't know/Prefer not to say/No answer 11% 14% 0% 12% 4%

Well over half of business respondents (61%) expect climate change will have a mainly negative impact. There is some variation between sectors. Those in the mining sector are the least likely to report it will have a mainly negative impact (44%) while those in the forestry sector are the most likely to do so (70%). Individuals in the power sector are the most likely to say climate change will have a mainly positive impact (30%). Those who expect the impacts of climate change will be mainly positive for their organization primarily say it will bring new business opportunities (66%), extend their operating season (23%) and result in warmer winter, thus lower energy costs (18%) and lower snow removal costs (18%). Another 18% also anticipate less seasonal unemployment and/or new employment opportunities. Those who report it will have a negative impact expect climate change will result in economic losses for their business (46%), increase infrastructure costs (29%), and mean more heat waves, leading to high cooling bills (24%), among other concerns.

Exhibit A8 – Q14. [IF Q12 = 1, 2 or 9] Overall, will changing climate have a mainly negative or mainly positive impact on your organization?

Net Impact of Climate Change in Your Organization
  Business
(n = 186)
Oil & Gas
(n = 56)
Mining
(n = 21)
Forestry
(n = 55)
Power
(n = 54)
Mainly positive impact 18% 18% 23% 11% 30%
Both positive and negative impacts 10% 11% 23% 6% 7%
Neutral or no impact 6% 7% - 8% -
Mainly negative impact 61% 55% 44% 70% 61%
DK/NR 6% 9% 10% 4% 2%

Exhibit A9 – Q15: [IF Q14 = 1] What, specifically, are some of the positive impacts or opportunities for your organization resulting from a changing climate? PROBE: Any others?

Positive Impacts of Climate Change
  Business
(n = 38)
New business opportunities 66%
Reduced winter snow clearing costs 18%
Earlier/longer operating season 23%
Warmer winters/lower energy costs 18%
Increased active transportation (walking/cycling) 16%
Less seasonal unemployment/new employment opportunities 18%
Increased crop yields 11%
Better conditions for livestock/wildlife 12%
Increased water supply 14%
Increased tourism/longer tourism season 11%
Other (SPECIFY) 8%
Don't know/Prefer not to say/No answer 5%

Exhibit A10 – Q16: [IF Q14 = 2] What, specifically, are some of the negative impacts or risks for your organization resulting from a changing climate? PROBE: Any others?

Negative Impacts of Climate Change
  Business
(n = 111)
Economic losses 46%
Infrastructure impacts/costs 29%
More floods 22%
Change in water levels/water supply 22%
More drought 20%
Increased heat waves/cooling costs 24%
Increase in forest/wildland fire 23%
More storm surges/damage from sea level rise 19%
More pests/diseases 18%
Shorter winter tourism season 9%
More smog 9%
Effects on agriculture/crops 1%
Supply (electricity, logs) 6%
Transport cost 3%
Other (SPECIFY) 7%
Don't know/Prefer not to say/No answer 7%

The majority of all businesses and sectors surveyed, save for mining, report that climate change does not present a significant challenge to their organization. That said, 45% overall say climate change is either one of the most significant challenges or a significant challenge. This proportion is slightly lower in the oil and gas sector. Of the 7 large business respondents, 41% say climate change is one of their most significant challenges, compared to 16% of medium-sized business respondents and 7% of small business respondents.

Exhibit A11 – Q17. Which of the following best describes your ORGANIZATION'S view regarding climate change? Is it that…

Challenges of Climate Change in Your Organization
  Business
(n = 250)
Oil & Gas
(n = 77)
Mining
(n = 25)
Forestry
(n = 83)
Power
(n = 65)
Climate change is one of the most significant challenges your organization faces 8% 5% 9% 10% 7%
Climate change is a significant challenge, but not as serious as others your organization faces 37% 39% 43% 33% 40%
Climate change does not present a significant challenge to your organization 52% 50% 44% 56% 52%
Climate change is not happening 1% 3% 4% - -
DK/NR 2% 4% - 1% -
Qualitative Insight

In the qualitative interviews, there was an expressed assumption that a changing climate brought drawbacks, although when probed, a small number were able to name something that may, at least theoretically, be a benefit. However, the consensus among the industry participants was that a changing climate is only being considered in terms of how to reduce its adverse effects and discussions about benefits were clearly somewhat alien. Each sector cited some unique impacts, typically affecting productivity and/or investment requirements. For example, energy participants mentioned construction and maintenance practices having to be revised in order to withstand new conditions, expanding production to meet increased demand directly resulting from a changing climate and repairs due to extreme weather events. Mining mentioned road construction and accessibility issues due to changing patterns of permafrost and ice road sustainability.

Exhibit A12 – Q18: What about your clients or stakeholders? Would you say that they are generally very concerned, somewhat concerned, not very concerned or not at all concerned about climate change?

Client & Stakeholder Perspectives
  Business
(n = 250)
Oil & Gas
(n = 77)
Mining
(n = 25)
Forestry
(n = 83)
Power
(n = 65)
Very concerned 10% 8% 13% 8% 17%
Somewhat concerned 42% 51% 47% 34% 40%
Not very concerned 19% 7% 26% 27% 15%
Not at all concerned 22% 25% 8% 26% 16%
DK/NR 7% 9% 6% 4% 13%

Climate Change Adaptation

Across each of the four sectors, the majority of businesses surveyed say they are not currently taking action to adapt to climate change. Overall, 32% of business respondents report they are taking action and 24% claim they will take action in the future. Almost half (46%) say they are either currently taking action and/or plan to in the future. Climate change adaptation activities are the least common in the forestry industry (27%), while 43% of those in the power industry report that their organization is taking action. Small business respondents are slightly less likely to currently be doing anything to adapt (30%), while almost half of medium-sized businesses (49%) and roughly three quarters of the large business respondents surveyed (74%) report that their organizations are taking action.

Exhibit A13 – Q19: Adapting to a changing climate means taking actions that reduce the risks or take advantage or opportunities from changes in climate (e.g. changes in precipitation, temperature, sea level, or storms). Is your organization currently doing anything to adapt to the risks and opportunities resulting from a changing climate?

Have Current Adaptation Activities
  Business
(n = 250)
Oil & Gas
(n = 77)
Mining
(n = 25)
Forestry
(n = 83)
Power
(n = 65)
Yes 32% 34% 34% 27% 43%
No 66% 63% 66% 70% 57%
DK/NR 2% 3% - 3% -

Exhibit A14 – Q21: Does your organization have any specific plans for FUTURE actions designed to ADAPT to the risks and opportunities provided by a changing climate?

Plans for Future Adaptation Activities
  Business
(n = 250)
Oil & Gas
(n = 77)
Mining
(n = 25)
Forestry
(n = 83)
Power
(n = 65)
Yes 24% 24% 25% 22% 24%
No 72% 67% 75% 77% 64%
DK/NR 4% 9% - 2% 2%

Exhibit A15 – Q19/Q21: % Who are either taking actions now or planning to in the future?

Taking Action Now or in the Future
  Business
(n = 250)
Oil & Gas
(n = 77)
Mining
(n = 25)
Forestry
(n = 83)
Power
(n = 65)
  46% 44% 44% 42% 52%

Just over one quarter of business respondents (27%) report installing green infrastructure. Twenty-two percent mention broadly implementing their plan, and another 22% report changing the operation or maintenance of their infrastructure.

Exhibit A16 – Q20: [IF Q19 = 1] What, specifically, is your organization currently doing to ADAPT to a changing climate? [DO NOT READ] PROBE: Anything else?

Current Climate Change Adaptation Activities
  Business
(n = 89)
Implementing actions/measures in our plan 24%
Assess the costs to the organization 23%
Education/awareness building activities 23%
Emergency response/disaster planning 22%
Incorporate adaptation actions in long-term planning/other corporate plans (e.g. risk management) 22%
Assess the risks from climate change on the organization 21%
Preparing a climate change adaptation plan 20%
Creating guidelines or policies 19%
Changes to energy distribution system 17%
Install natural or green infrastructure 15%
Change design or location of infrastructure 14%
Other (respondent to specify) 14%
Drought management actions/reducing water use 13%
Summer heat alert system/build awareness of risks from heat waves 13%
Change operation/maintenance of infrastructure 12%
Habitat protection 12%
Flood management activities – flood mapping, land-use restrictions, downspout disconnection 10%
Reducing carbon/CO2 footprint 9%
Build retaining walls to protect from storm surges 5%
Have an adaptation plan -
Don't know/Prefer not to say/No answer %

Business respondents' top three future planned activities are all related to planning, whether that be implementing plans already developed (24%), incorporating climate change adaptation into long-term planning (22%) or emergency response/disaster planning (22%). They also report aiming to assess the costs to their organization (23%) and engage in education/awareness initiatives (23%).

Exhibit A17 – Q22: [IF Q21 = 1] What actions are specifically planned? [DO NOT READ] PROBE: Anything else

Planned Climate Change Adaptation Activities
  Business
(n = 67)
Implementing actions/measures in our plan 24%
Education/awareness building activities 23%
Assess the costs to the organization 23%
Emergency response/disaster planning 22%
Incorporate adaptation actions in long-term planning/other corporate plans (e.g. risk management) 22%
Assess the risks from climate change on the organization 21%
Preparing/prepared a climate change adaptation plan 20%
Creating guidelines or policies 19%
Changes to energy distribution system 17%
Install natural or green infrastructure 15%
Change design or location of infrastructure 14%
Drought management actions/reducing water use 13%
Summer heat alert system/build awareness of risks from heat waves 13%
Change operation/maintenance of infrastructure 12%
Habitat protection 12%
Flood management activities—flood mapping, land-use restrictions, downspout disconnection 10%
Reducing footprint/waste 9%
Build retaining walls to protect from storm surges 5%
Other (respondent to specify) 14%
Don't know/Prefer not to say/No answer 5%

Of all the industries surveyed, those in oil and gas report they have been considering climate change in their decision-making for the longest time: 19% report it has been a consideration for 6–10 years, and 18% say they have been accounting for it for over 10 years. One quarter of those in the power industry also indicate they have considered climate change in their planning for 6–10 years, while an additional 14% say it's been going on for 10 or more years.

Exhibit A18 – Q23. [IF Q19 = 1] For how long has your organization been considering a changing climate in its decision-making?

Climate Change in Decision-Making-Business
  Business
(n = 89)
Oil & Gas
(n = 27)
Mining
(n = 9)
Forestry
(n = 25)
Power
(n = 28)
Less than one year 8% 12% - 10% 4%
1–2 years 14% 12% 32% 16% 4%
3–5 years 34% 29% 50% 29% 46%
6–10 years 18% 19% - 19% 25%
11 or more years 14% 18% 12% 12% 14%
DK/NR 11% 11% 6% 15% 7%

Incorporating Climate Change Considerations in Decision-Making

The primary source of information about climate change for businesses (56%) is the media, followed by internet searches (20%) and scientific journals and magazines (15%).

Exhibit A19 – Q24: What are your organization's sources of information regarding climate change? PROBE: Any other sources? [DO NOT READ]

Source of Information About Climate Change
  Business
(n = 250)
The media 56%
Internet searches 20%
Scientific journals/magazines 15%
Internal/our own information/data 6%
Industry associations/municipal associations 6%
Non-governmental organizations 5%
Universities and researchers 4%
No information at organizational level 4%
Government sources 2%
Conferences/workshops/seminars 2%
Environment Canada 2%
Government (unspecified) 2%
Provincial government -
Other (SPECIFY) 5%
Don't know/Prefer not to say/No answer 8%

For business respondents, the cost of adapting to climate change is the largest barrier to taking climate change into account in decision-making (30% say it is significant) followed by the complexity of the policy change process (28%) and lack of experience (23%). Over half do not feel that they lack the capacity to apply tools and information, or feel they need to wait for other departments and/or organizations to act first before they can. The cost of adapting appears less of a concern to large businesses—just 12% of those surveyed say it is a significant barrier. Oil and gas, as well as mining respondents find the complexity of the policy change process more challenging (34% and 39% say it is a significant barrier, respectively) compared to those in the forestry and power sectors.

Exhibit A20 – Q25. To what extent does each of the following represent a barrier to your organization better taking climate change into account in its decision-making?

Barriers to Climate Change in Businesses (n = 250)
  Significant barrier Minor barrier Not a barrier DK/NA
The cost of adapting to the impacts of a changing climate 30% 32% 35% 4%
The complexity of policy change processes 28% 32% 36% 4%
Lack of experience 23% 30% 45% 3%
The need to have other departments/organizations act first, before we act 20% 26% 52% 3%
Lack of information about climate change and its impacts 20% 32% 46% 2%
Making a business case for implementing actions 15% 35% 48% 2%
Competing organizational priorities 16% 29% 48% 6%
Lack of capacity to apply tools and information 12% 34% 51% 3%

Over two thirds of business respondents (72%) agree they have the information they need to make decisions about climate change adaptation. However, among those who do feel they are missing information, the most common needs among businesses are projections of future climate conditions (34%), economic information (33%) and regional impact information (33%).

Exhibit A21 – Q27: Do you have access to the information and tools you need to make adaptation-related decisions?

Access to Climate Change Information
  Business (n = 250)
Yes 72%
No 24%
Don't know/Prefer not to say/No answer 4%

Exhibit A22 – Q28: [IF Q25f = 1] Specifically, what types of information do you lack?

Missing Information About Climate Change
  Business
(n = 106)
Projections of future climate conditions/climate data 34%
Information on impacts specific to region 33%
Economic information (costs/benefits of action) 33%
Relevant case studies/examples of what other organizations like ours are doing 30%
Best practices information 27%
Technology and design alternatives for infrastructure 26%
Other (SPECIFY) 6%
Don't know/Prefer not to say/No answer 30%

Finally, businesses report that tools and resources such as climate data (31%), regulations (31%), cost/benefit analysis (31%), risk assessment methods (30%) as well as codes/standards (30%) would assist them in adapting to climate change.

Exhibit A23 – Q29: Are there any decision-making tools or technical resources that would assist your organization in addressing the impacts of climate change? PROBE: Any other types?

Resources Needed to Address Impacts of Climate Change
  Business
(n = 250)
Climate Data 31%
Regulations 31%
Cost/benefit analysis 31%
(Adaptation) Planning guidance 30%
Codes or standards 30%
Risk assessment methods 30%
Other data 28%
None 10%
Do not have/use such resources 4%
Qualitative Insight

In the one-on-one interviews, industry associations were, for the most part, already being proactive in terms of ensuring members are aware of the specific aspects of climate change that businesses will have to consider in adapting to new environmental conditions. While cost is a significant issue for all, the degree to which it was a barrier was not consistent. For those where cost was regarded as less of a barrier to taking action to adapt to a changing climate, the reasons tended to be either that these kinds of actions are already a key part of their long-term planning (including financial planning) or the changes they feel are most necessary do not necessarily require a large investment.

Several associations specifically commended NRCan for programs and collaborations that have helped advance their industry's understanding and planning on adapting to a changing climate, but some suggested that further sharing of information (particularly, changing data or science on weather modelling) would be impactful. Some associations also offered unique additional requests specifically relating to what governments can do, including helping develop materials to bring CEOs more understanding of the relevance of a changing climate to their operations and bottom line and helping address regulatory requirements that are becoming newly problematic, given changing operational and investment needs that are directly due to the changing climate.

As examples:

  • regulations requiring the same species of tree be planted to replace those harvested, but fail to appreciate that a changing climate means that species will no longer have the same chance of survival as it had when the regulations were written;
  • regulations stipulating the specific times of year when branches can and cannot be cut are no longer appropriate and present a barrier to taking emergency action; and
  • the need to invest in infrastructure in a sector where regulators establish rules on pricing can present difficulties for budgeting unanticipated major infrastructure investments.

Detailed Findings: Municipal Respondents

This section describes the findings from the 100 interviews conducted among municipal respondents.

Awareness and Impressions of Climate Change Relevance

Among municipal respondents, the plurality associates the term "climate change" with warmer temperatures and warmer weather. Respondents acknowledge that "climate change" also means more extreme and unpredictable weather events. Those from Atlantic Canada were most concerned about extreme and unpredictable weather (55%), though the sample size was small (n = 11). Of note, the third most frequently mentioned topic is cold temperatures and colder weather. Taken together, the results suggest that discussion around climate change for these stakeholders includes how it will affect their communities beyond simply warmer temperatures and weather.

The vast majority agree that climate change is happening right now (82%). Across the municipalities, all of those surveyed from large municipalities agreed that climate change is happening right now, followed by 85% of those who work with medium-sized municipalities, and 79% of those who work with small municipalities.

Exhibit B1 – Q8: What do you first think of when you hear the term "climate change"? What's the next thing that comes to mind related to climate change? [OPEN-END WITH PRECODED LIST, DO NOT READ LIST]

Climate Change – Top of Mind Ideas
  Municipal
(n = 100)
Warmer temperatures/warmer weather 32%
Weather events more extreme/unpredictable 28%
Colder temperatures/colder weather 12%
More storms 11%
More flooding/more severe flooding 10%
Stronger winds 9%
Climate changes (unspecified) 8%
Need to adapt 8%
Water levels are higher 7%
More ice/snow 5%
More rain 5%
More air pollution/lower air quality 3%
More forest fires 3%
Less rain/drought 2%
Melting ice caps 1%
Less ice/snow 1%
Other (SPECIFY) 5%
Don't know/Prefer not to say/No answer 3%

Exhibit B2 – Q9: Which of these best describes what is happening in terms of climate change in your region?

Climate Change in Your Region
  Municipal
(n = 100)
Climate change is happening right now 82%
Climate change is not happening right now, but it will happen in the foreseeable future 11%
Climate change is not happening right now and will not happen in the foreseeable future 4%
Don't know/Prefer not to say/No answer 3%

Exhibit B3 – Which of these best describes what is happening in terms of climate change in your region?

Climate Change in Your Region
  Municipal
(n = 100)
Large
(n = 11)
Medium
(n = 13)
Small
(n = 76)
Climate change is happening right now 82% 100% 85% 79%
Climate change is not happening right now, but will happen in the foreseeable future 11% - 15% 12%
Climate change is not happening right now and will not happen in the foreseeable future 4% - - 5%
DN/NR 3% - - 4%
Qualitative Insight

One-on-one interviews echoed what was found in the survey, with unanimous consensus that climate change is occurring and all participants able to cite multiple sources of evidence for this view. Virtually all pointed to the increased frequency and severity of extreme weather events as one sort of evidence. Those in coastal municipalities also cited evidence such as increased flooding and the emergence of new flood plains.

Municipal respondents mentioned more frequent and severe weather events/storms and flooding as the most, or second most serious impacts of a changing climate. Effects on agriculture, changing water levels and impacts on water supplies are also of concern to municipalities.

Exhibit B4. – Q10. [IF Q9 = 1, 2 or 9] Thinking about your community, what do you think will be the most serious impact of a changing climate over the next 20 years? What do you think will be the next-most serious impact? [DO NOT READ]

Most Serious Impact of Climate Change – Municipalities (n = 100)
  Most serious Next most serious
More frequent or more severe weather events/storms 23% 15%
Flooding 23% 9%
Effects on agriculture (growing season changes, crop failures) 8% 10%
Changing sea/lake levels/coastal erosion 6% 9%
Impacts on water supply 10% 4%
Economic effects (loss of productivity, negative trade impacts, increased trade opportunities) 2% 10%
Forest (or wildland) fires 4% 6%
Droughts 4% 5%
Human health impacts 2% 5%
Permafrost change (melting, thawing, instability) 3% 1%
Effects on wildlife (changing migration patterns, species loss, invasive species, loss of habitat) 0% 4%
Heat waves/higher temperatures/warmer winters 2% 2%
Effects on tourism related to poorer weather 1% 2%
Changes in lifestyle 0% 2%
Effects on infrastructure 1% 0%
Other 6% 1%
No one most serious impact 0% 0%
Don't know/Prefer not to say/No answer 2% -

Among municipal respondents, 11% feel climate change will have a major impact on their community, while 57% say it will have a moderate impact. Almost all of the large (82%) and medium sized (85%) municipality respondents expect climate change will have a major or moderate impact on their community, while fewer of the small municipality respondents say the same (64%).

Exhibit B5 – Q11. [IF Q9 = 1, 2 or 9] How MUCH of an impact will a changing climate will have on your community in the next 20 years? Would you say it will have a…?

Climate Change Impacts Your Organization
  Municipal
(n = 96)
Large
(n = 11)
Medium
(n = 13)
Small
(n = 72)
Major impact 11% 27% 23% 7%
Moderate impact 57% 55% 62% 57%
Minor impact 27% 18% 15% 31%
No impact at all 1% - - 1%
Depends 2% - - 3%
DK/NR 1% - - 1%

Agreement that climate change is having an impact on their community is fairly consistent across municipalities. Overall, 51% agree, and an additional 43% expect climate change will have an impact. The percentage who say climate change is currently having an impact is highest among medium-sized municipalities (62%) and lowest among small municipalities (49%).

Exhibit B6 – Q12. Thinking about how your organization may or may not be impacted, is climate change something that is already having an impact on your organization in any way, is not having an impact on the organization, but it may have an impact on the organization in the future, or is climate change something that will not have an impact on your organization?

Climate Change Impacts Your Organization
  Municipal
(n = 100)
Large
(n = 11)
Medium
(n = 13)
Small
(n = 76)
It is having an impact on the organization 51% 55% 62% 49%
It is not having an impact on the organization but it is possible 43% 45% 38% 43%
It will not have an impact on the organization 6% - - 8%
DK/NR - - - -
Qualitative Insight

Participants in the qualitative research were in agreement that there are already changing climatic patterns to which they are having to adapt.

Exhibit B7 – Q13: [IF Q12 = 2] How many years from now do you believe your organization will start to see impacts from a changing climate?

Years Until Climate Changes Impacts Your Organization
  Municipal (n = 43) Large (n = 5) Medium (n = 5) Small (n = 33)
1–5 years 35% 60% 60% 27%
6–10 years 30% 40% 20% 33%
11–19 years 9% - 20% 9%
20 years or more in the future 14% - - 15%
Don't know/Prefer not to say/No answer 12% -   1%

Overall, 35% of municipal respondents believe climate change will impact their community in the next 1–5 years, though this opinion varies widely between the sizes of municipality. Sixty percent of both large and medium-sized municipal respondents believe their community will feel the effects of climate change in 1–5 years, but among the small municipalities, just 27% agree. It is worth noting that the sample sizes for both large and medium-sized municipalities are small (n = 5 each), as only those who answered Q12 with "It is not having an impact on the organization, but it is possible" were asked Q13.

Among municipal respondents, those in medium-sized municipalities are most likely to say climate change will have a negative impact (77%), while 70% of small and 64% of large municipalities offer this perspective. Among the few who expect their community will experience positive impacts from climate change, the majority (60%) mentioned some other positive impact, but due to the small sample size, this is really three individual responses that did not fit any pre-coded category. Forty percent report it will reduce snow-clearing costs, and an equal percentage say it will result in more active transportation, such as walking and cycling. Among those who anticipate negative impacts, flooding and infrastructure costs are the top concern (55%), followed closely by economic losses (52%). Over one third (36%) also expect that changing water levels will negatively impact their community. Other weather events and consequences, including droughts (33%), forest fires (24%), storm surge damage (24%) and heat waves (24%), are also worrisome. Respondents from Atlantic Canada are particularly concerned about flooding (88%), and respondents in BC are worried most about forest fires (67%).

Exhibit B8 – Q14. [IF Q12 = 1, 2 or 9] Overall, will changing climate have a mainly negative or mainly positive impact on your organization?

Net Impact of Climate Change in Your Organization
  Municipal
(n = 94)
Large
(n = 11)
Medium
(n = 13)
Small
(n = 70)

Mainly positive impact

5% 9% - 6%

Both positive and negative impacts

11% 18% 8% 10%

Neutral or no impact

4% 9% - 4%

Mainly negative impact

70% 64% 77% 70%

DK/NR

10% - 15% 10%

Exhibit B9 – Q15: [IF Q14 = 1] What, specifically, are some of the positive impacts or opportunities for your organization resulting from a changing climate? PROBE: Any others?

Positive Impacts of Climate Change
  Municipal
(n = 5)
Reduced winter snow clearing costs 40%
Increased active transportation (walking/cycling) 40%
New business opportunities 20%
Earlier/longer operating season 20%
Increased crop yields 20%
Warmer winters/lower energy costs -
Less seasonal unemployment/new employment opportunities -
Better conditions for livestock/wildlife -
Increased water supply -
Increased tourism/longer tourism season -
Other (SPECIFY) 60%
Don't know/Prefer not to say/No answer -

Exhibit B10 – Q16: [IF Q14 = 2] What, specifically, are some of the negative impacts or risks for your organization resulting from a changing climate? PROBE: Any others?

Negative Impacts of Climate Change
  Municipal
(n = 66)
Infrastructure impacts/costs 55%
More floods 55%
Economic losses 52%
Change in water levels/water supply 36%
More drought 33%
Increase in forest/wildland fire 24%
More storm surges/damage from sea level rise 24%
Increased heat waves/cooling costs 23%
More pests/diseases 21%
Shorter winter tourism season 17%
More smog 12%
Effects on agriculture/crops 6%
Transport cost 3%
Supply (electricity, logs) -
Other (SPECIFY) %
Don't know/Prefer not to say/No answer %

For municipalities, climate change, while not the greatest issue they face, is still a significant challenge. Over half across all municipality sizes hold this view. This proportion is notably higher in Atlantic Canada, where 91% of respondents report that climate change is a significant, though not their greatest, challenge.

Exhibit B11 – Q17. Which of the following best describes your ORGANIZATION'S view regarding climate change? Is it that…

Challenges of Climate Change in Your Organization
  Municipal
(n = 100)
Large
(n = 11)
Medium
(n = 13)
Small
(n = 76)
Climate change is one of the most significant challenges your organization faces 11% 18% 23% 8%
Climate change is a significant challenge, but not as serious as others your organization faces 59% 73% 62% 57%
Climate change does not present a significant challenge to your organization 26% 9% 15% 30%
Climate change is not happening 1% - - 1%
DK/NR 3% - - 4%

Roughly half of municipalities (57%) describe their stakeholders as being at least somewhat concerned about climate change. This number is lower among larger municipalities (36%).

Qualitative Insight

In the qualitative interviews, there was an expressed assumption that a changing climate brought drawbacks, although when probed, a small number were able to name something that may, at least theoretically, be a benefit. However, the consensus among the municipal respondents, was that a changing climate is only being considered in terms of how to reduce its adverse effects and discussions about benefits were clearly somewhat alien. Coastal municipalities were rather focused on water—increased frequency and severity of flooding, changing flow patterns, expanding/emerging flood plains, rising sea levels—largely in terms of the impact on infrastructure and for establishing responsible engineering specifications for developers.

Exhibit B12 – Q18: What about your clients or stakeholders? Would you say that they are generally very concerned, somewhat concerned, not very concerned or not at all concerned about climate change?

Client & Stakeholder Perspectives
  Municipal
(n = 100)
Large
(n = 11)
Medium
(n = 13)
Small
(n = 76)
Very concerned 9% 18% 15% 7%
Somewhat concerned 49% 18% 46% 54%
Not very concerned 27% 55% 31% 22%
Not at all concerned 10% - 8% 12%
DK/NR 5% 9% - 5%

Climate Change Adaptation

Across all sizes of municipalities, over 50% report that they are taking action to adapt to climate change, while 42% of all municipal respondents have plans to take action in the future. Combined together, 72% of municipal respondents claim they are either already taking action or will in the future. Larger municipalities, as well as those in Atlantic Canada and BC are more likely to report currently taking action.

Exhibit B13 – Q19: Adapting to a changing climate means taking actions that reduce the risks or take advantage or opportunities from changes in climate (e.g. changes in precipitation, temperature, sea level, or storms). Is your organization currently doing anything to adapt to the risks and opportunities resulting from a changing climate?

Doing Anything
  Municipal
(n = 100)
Large
(n = 11)
Medium
(n = 13)
Small
(n = 76)
Yes 57% 64% 54% 57%
No 42% 36% 46% 42%
DK/NR 1% - - 1%

Exhibit B14 – Q21: Does your organization have any specific plans for FUTURE actions designed to ADAPT to the risks and opportunities provided by a changing climate?

Future Plans
  Municipal
(n = 100)
Large
(n = 11)
Medium
(n = 13)
Small
(n = 76)
Yes 42% 55% 54% 38%
No 56% 45% 38% 61%
DK/NR 2% - 8% 1%

Exhibit B15 – Q19/Q21: % Who are either taking actions now or planning to in the future?

Taking Action Now or in the Future
  Municipal Large Medium Small
  72% 82% 69% 71%

Municipal respondents report that their top activities are predominantly related to preparing for emergencies and/or natural disasters. For example, over half who are taking action report their activities include emergency response/disaster planning (51%) and 44% say they are engaging in flood management activities. In addition, 33% say they are both incorporating adaptation into long-term planning and preparing a climate change adaptation plan. Just over one quarter (28%) also report that they are engaging in drought management activities.

Exhibit B16 – Q20: [IF Q19 = 1] What, specifically, is your organization currently doing to ADAPT to a changing climate? [DO NOT READ] PROBE: Anything else?

Current Climate Change Adaptation Activities
  Municipal
(n = 57)
Emergency response/disaster planning 51%
Flood management activities – flood mapping, land-use restrictions, downspout disconnection 44%
Preparing a climate change adaptation plan 33%
Incorporate adaptation actions in long-term planning/other corporate plans (e.g. risk management) 33%
Assess the risks from climate change on the organization 30%
Implementing actions/measures in our plan 28%
Change operation/maintenance of infrastructure 28%
Drought management actions/reducing water use 28%
Change design or location of infrastructure 26%
Creating guidelines or policies 25%
Habitat protection 23%
Have an adaptation plan 21%
Install natural or green infrastructure 19%
Changes to energy distribution system 18%
Assess the costs to the organization 18%
Education/awareness building activities 14%
Summer heat alert system/build awareness of risks from heat waves 14%
Build retaining walls to protect from storm surges 5%
Reducing carbon/CO2 footprint 4%
Other (respondent to specify) 7%
Don't know/Prefer not to say/No answer 2%

Municipal respondents' future activities underline their concern about flooding—36% report planning flood management activities. Almost one third (31%) report they will prepare a climate change adaptation plan, and the same proportion say they will engage in disaster planning.

Exhibit B17 – Q22: [IF Q21 = 1] What actions are specifically planned? [DO NOT READ] PROBE: Anything else?

Planned Climate Change Adaptation Activities
  Municipal
(n = 42)
Flood management activities – flood mapping, land-use restrictions, downspout disconnection 36%
Emergency response/disaster planning 31%
Preparing/prepared a climate change adaptation plan 31%
Education/awareness building activities 29%
Implementing actions/measures in our plan 26%
Incorporate adaptation actions in long term planning/other corporate plans (e.g. risk management) 26%
Assess the risks from climate change on the organization 26%
Change operation/maintenance of infrastructure 24%
Creating guidelines or policies 21%
Assess the costs to the organization 19%
Drought management actions/reducing water use 19%
Install natural or green infrastructure 17%
Change design or location of infrastructure 17%
Summer heat alert system/build awareness of risks from heat waves 17%
Habitat protection 17%
Changes to energy distribution system 12%
Build retaining walls to protect from storm surges 5%
Reducing footprint/waste -
Other (respondent to specify) 7%
Don't know/Prefer not to say/No answer 17%

Among municipal respondents, almost two thirds report that they have been considering climate change in decision making for five years or less, while 18% say it has been part of planning for 6–10 years, and 12% say 11 years or more.

Exhibit B18 – Q23. [IF Q19 = 1] For how long has your community been considering a changing climate in its decision-making?

Climate Change in Decision-Making
  Municipal
(n = 57)
Large
(n = 7)
Medium
(n = 7)
Small
(n = 43)
Less than one year 4% - - 5%
1–2 years 23% 29% 29% 21%
3–5 years 37% 43% 43% 35%
6–10 years 18% 14% 14% 19%
11 or more years 12% - 14% 14%
DK/NR 7% 14% - 7%

Incorporating Climate Change Considerations in Decision-Making

The most commonly cited primary source of information about climate change for municipalities is the media (26%). Perhaps unsurprisingly, municipal respondents also frequently mention government sources (20%) and provincial government (18%).

Exhibit B19 – Q24: What are your organization's sources of information regarding climate change? PROBE: Any other sources? [DO NOT READ]

Source of Information About Climate Change
  Municipal
(n = 100)
The media 26%
Government sources 20%
Internet searches 18%
Provincial government 18%
Environment Canada 11%
Internal/our own information/data 10%
Industry associations/Municipal associations 10%
Conferences/workshops/seminars 10%
Government (unspecified) 9%
Scientific journals/magazines 8%
Non-governmental organizations 8%
Universities and researchers 7%
No information at organizational level 2%
Other (SPECIFY) 8%
Don't know/Prefer not to say/No answer 9%

The cost of adapting stands out as the single most significant barrier for municipal respondents—almost three quarters report it is a significant barrier. A plurality also reports that lack of capacity (48%) and lack of experience (40%) are significant barriers. Respondents from Quebec (63%) and BC (64%) are more likely to cite a lack of capacity as a major obstacle. Lack of information and the need to make a business case are less concerning for municipal respondents.

Exhibit B20 – Q25. To what extent does each of the following represent a barrier to your organization better taking climate change into account in its decision-making?

Barriers to Climate Change Influenced Decision-Making – Municipalities (n = 100)
  Significant barrier Minor barrier Not a barrier DK/NA
The cost of adapting to the impacts of a changing climate 73% 16% 9% 2%
Lack of capacity to apply tools and information 48% 36% 15% 1%
Lack of experience 40% 39% 19% 2%
The complexity of policy change processes 38% 42% 14% 6%
Competing organizational priorities 38% 32% 27% 3%
The need to have other departments/organizations act first, before we act 36% 32% 30% 2%
Lack of information about climate change and its impacts 32% 40% 28% -
Making a business case for implementing actions 30% 45% 22% 3%

Two thirds (67%) of municipal respondents agree they have the information they need to make decisions about climate change adaptation. Municipal respondents would like more information on regional impacts (59%), as well as best practices (57%), economic information (50%) and projections of future conditions (46%).

Exhibit B21 – Q27: Do you have access to the information and tools you need to make adaptation-related decisions?

Access to Climate Change Information
  Municipal
(n = 100)
Yes 67%
No 30%
Don't know/Prefer not to say/No answer 3%

Exhibit B22 – Q28: [IF Q25f = 1] Specifically, what types of information do you lack?

Missing Information About Climate Change
  Municipal
(n = 56)
Information on impacts specific to region 59%
Economic information (costs/benefits of action) 50%
Projections of future climate conditions/climate data 46%
Relevant case studies/examples of what other organizations like ours are doing 54%
Best practices information 57%
Technology and design alternatives for infrastructure 38%
Other (SPECIFY) 2%
Don't know/Prefer not to say/No answer 14%

Finally, almost half of municipal respondents (45%) would like cost/benefit analysis, adaptation/planning guidance (44%), codes or standards and climate data (both 42%).

Exhibit B23 – Q29: Are there any decision-making tools or technical resources that would assist your organization in addressing the impacts of climate change? PROBE: Any other types?

Resources Needed to Address Impacts of Climate Change
  Municipal
(n = 100)
Climate Data 42%
Regulations 39%
(Adaptation) Planning guidance 44%
Cost/benefit analysis 45%
Codes or standards 42%
Risk assessment methods 38%
Other data 33%
None 17%
Do not have/use such resources 3%
Qualitative Insight

In the one-on-one interviews, municipal respondents were equally interested in greater access to climate modelling data, express a much greater need for assistance in funding/financing the necessary infrastructure improvements, and some pointed out their difficulties in reconciling contradictory requirements imposed by their provincial government and the federal government. Municipal respondents described a very difficult set of circumstances due not only to the scare resources available to cover the high cost of the work that needs to be done to be adequately prepared for a changing climate, but also due to the need to obtain support at a political level and by extension, the potential need to obtain buy-in among the constituency. A municipal government faces many short-term budgetary tests, do so with limited resources and it can often be the case that achieving buy-in for a dramatic investment in long-term infrastructure that yields no discernible improvement in the life of any resident or the success of any business can be extremely difficult.

Conclusions

The findings from both the qualitative and quantitative phases of the study, and both samples of respondents, clearly demonstrate there is widespread understanding within both Canadian municipalities and the business sectors surveyed that climate change is occurring, that it is evidenced by the increasing frequency and severity of extreme weather events and flooding and that it will certainly have an impact on their municipal or business planning and operations.

While a few do feel there may be some benefits to a changing climate, the overwhelming tendency is certainly to see the impacts of a changing climate as being predominantly negative. There is some variance on the magnitude of the impact a changing environment will have on their organization, but no matter the sector or the size of municipality, the majority tend to feel the impact will be at least moderate, if not major. The one-on-one interviews shed more light on the impressions of the magnitude of impact with some who feel that the impact will "only" be moderate feel that is because they anticipate being prepared and ready to adapt to the changing climate. Asked what the impact would be if they did not prepare, the response was always that the impact would be much more severe. Similarly, while the vast majority of respondents indicate being no more than "somewhat concerned," interviews suggested concern may be tempered by a level of confidence in the ability to adapt.

However, there is a notable difference between municipal respondents and business respondents when it comes to whether or not that are already taking or planning to take action in order to adapt to a changing climate. While the vast majority of municipal respondents say this is already the case, just under half of the business respondents surveyed offer the same response. The one-on-one interviews with trade associations offered some insight on this, suggesting that many of their member companies—and more particularly the smaller enterprises—may be in situations where action may be expected, but is not yet in the planning stage, perhaps as questions about the best course of action are more clearly answered. The data also indicate that compared to municipal respondents, business respondents are more confident they already have the information they need, less likely to identify any specific barrier as preventing them from taking action and are less likely to feel that any particular resource or tool would help enable them to take action.

Business respondents are about equally interested in any resource offered, with roughly one quarter to one third indicating any of the items offered would be of interest. Interviews with the industry associations included in this study suggested that helping develop communications directed at owners and operators in their sector may be helpful for accelerating the planning process and this may include the provision of compelling and scientific evidence of the impact on their respective operations, as well as assistance with aligning regulations and the policies of regulatory bodies with the imperative of taking action to adapt to a changing climate.

Municipal respondents, on the other hand, are clearer about there being a hierarchy of barriers with most describing cost as a significant barrier. Further, when asked what tools or resources would be helpful for taking action, access to information that is specific to their region and best practices stand out as the types of information most commonly needed.

Appendix A: Survey Methodology Report

Survey Methodology

Earnscliffe Strategy Group's overall approach for this study was to conduct a telephone survey of 350 individuals, including 100 who occupy Chief, Manager or Director of Planning positions in municipalities and 250 individuals occupying Head of Operations or Chief Risk Officer positions in natural resource industries across Canada, using Léger's centralized call centre using state of the art Computer Aided Telephone Interviewing (CATI) system. A detailed discussion of the approach used to complete this research is presented below.

Questionnaire Design

The questionnaire was designed in English in consultation with NRCan, drawing on the 2009 National Climate Change Adaptation Benchmark Survey as appropriate. The survey was then translated, and offered to respondents in both English and French and completed based on their preferences.

Sample Design and Selection

The total sample for the telephone survey was 350 individuals, which included:

As per common practice of Statistics Canada, small businesses were defined as those with fewer than 100 employees, medium-sized businesses as those with 100–499 employees, and large businesses as those with 500 or more employees. Small municipalities were defined as those with a population of 1,000 up to 29,999, medium were those with a population of 30,000–99,999, and large municipalities were those with a population of 100,000 or more.

Data Collection

Interviews were conducted via telephone from Léger's centralized call centre using state of the art Computer Aided Telephone Interviewing (CATI) system. The CATI system manages all the calling mechanics (e.g. random dialling, setting appointments, managing call backs) as well as the questionnaire management mechanics (e.g. skip patterns, auto-coding) thereby freeing up the live interviewer to develop a rapport with the respondent and complete the survey more efficiently and effectively. In addition, to help with response rates, all calls are routed through a local area code (rather than a 1–800 number) to encourage potential respondents with call displays to answer the telephone. Data collection occurred from February 5, 2018, to March 14, 2018.

Targets

Quotas were set to ensure participation from industries across provinces and regions. Quotas were established on business size, sector and municipality size as follows:

SAMPLING PLAN
BUSINESSES Actual (N) Sample (n)
Small Med Lrg Total Small Med Lrg Total
Oil & Gas (NAICS: 211, 237120, 4861, 4862, 4869, 324110, 324190) 3329 167 45 3,541 70 8 2 80
Mining 689 344 64 1,097 14 5 3 22
(NAICS: 2121, 212210, 212220, 212231, 212232, 212233, 212299, 212392, 212393, 212395, 212396, 212397, 212398) 240 71 38 346 12 4 2 18
(NAICS: 331) 449 104 26 579 2 1 1 4
Forestry (NAICS: 1131, 1132, 1133, 3221, 3222) 4,783 194 9 4,986 72 10 1 83
Power (NAICS: 221111, 221112, 221113, 221119, 221121, 221122, 237130) 1,276 143 38 1,457 56 7 2 65
TOTAL         212 30 8 250
SAMPLING PLAN
MUNICIPALITIES Actual (N) Sample (n)
Small 1,944 50
Medium 95 30
Large 54 20
TOTAL   100

In the case of municipalities, the final sample was fairly consistent with the known distribution of small, medium and large municipalities and as a result, the results have not been weighted. The aggregate municipal results can be considered accurate to within +/-9.8% at the 95% confidence level.

In the case of the business sample, the distribution of small, medium and large businesses within each sector was similar enough to the known distribution that it was decided that no weight would be applied based upon size. However, since the relative sizes of the sectors in the stratified quota structure was not reflective of reality, a weight was applied by sector so that the aggregate results of the business sample would be representative of the universe being studied. The aggregate business results can be considered accurate to within +/-6.2% at the 95% confidence level.

Quality Controls

Prior to launching the full survey, Earnscliffe and Léger conducted 77 probing pre-tests. In addition to the questions in the survey, respondents were asked if they found any aspect of the survey difficult to understand, if the language was clear and if they found any of the terms confusing.

Results

FINAL DISPOSITIONS

The telephone survey achieved a response rate of 5.71%.

FINAL DISPOSITIONS
Total Numbers Attempted 7178
Invalid 15
NIS, fax/modem, business/non-res. 545
Unresolved (U) 3008
Busy 49
No answer, answering machine 2959
In-scope - Non-responding (IS) 3232
Household refusal 876
Respondent refusal
Language problem 14
Illness, incapable 17
Selected respondent not available 655
Qualified respondent break-off 1670
In-scope - Responding units (R) 378
Language disqualify 28
No one 18+
Other disqualify
Completed interviews 350
Response Rate = R/(U+IS+R) 5.71%
SAMPLE PROFILE: DISTRIBUTIONS
Businesses Sample size Percentage
Oil & Gas (NAICS: 211, 237120, 4861, 4862, 4869, 324110, 324190) 77 31%
Mining (NAICS: 2121, 212210, 212220, 212231, 212232, 212233, 212299, 212392, 212393, 212395, 212396, 212397, 212398) 25 10%
Forestry (NAICS: 1131, 1132, 1133, 3221, 3222) 83 33%
Power (NAICS: 221111, 221112, 221113, 221119, 221121, 221122, 237130) 65 26%
SAMPLE PROFILE: DISTRIBUTIONS
Businesses Sample size Percentage
Atlantic 27 11%
Quebec 53 21%
Ontario 78 31%
Prairies 71 28%
British Columbia 21 8%
SAMPLE PROFILE: DISTRIBUTIONS
Businesses Sample size Percentage
Large (500+ employees) 7 3%
Medium (100–499 employees) 27 11%
Small (< 100 employees) 214 86%
SAMPLE PROFILE: DISTRIBUTIONS
Municipalities Sample size Percentage
Small 76 76%
Medium 13 13%
Large 11 11%
SAMPLE PROFILE: DISTRIBUTIONS
Municipalities Sample size Percentage
Atlantic 11 11%
Quebec 24 24%
Ontario 28 28%
Prairies 23 23%
British-Columbia 14 14%

SURVEY DURATION

The average survey duration was 15 minutes.

Appendix B: Questionnaire

Objectives

This research will provide NRCan with the data and analysis required to examine the extent to which municipal governments and natural resource industries have made plans towards climate change adaptation. More specifically, this study is designed to:

Unless otherwise noted, answer categories were read out to respondents.

Survey Introduction

BUSINESS SAMPLE: IF CONTACT NAME IS AVAILABLE IN SAMPLE FILE:
Good morning/afternoon. May I please speak with CONTACT NAME?
IF PERSON IS NOT AVAILABLE, ARRANGE FOR CALL-BACK
IF PERSON IS NOT AVAILABLE OVER INTERVIEW PERIOD, ASK FOR ANOTHER DECISION-MAKER IN THE SAME AREA (I.E., WITH RESPONSIBILITY FOR POLICIES AND PLANNING).

BUSINESS SAMPLE: IF CONTACT NAME IS NOT AVAILABLE IN SAMPLE FILE:
Good morning/afternoon. My name is _______________ and I am calling from Earnscliffe on behalf of Natural Resources Canada. May I speak to someone in your group or organization who is responsible for risk management, planning and/or operations?
INTERVIEWER INSTRUCTION: THE APPROPRIATE RESPONDENT IS SOMEONE WHO IS A DECISION-MAKER (RATHER THAN A TECHNICIAN).

MUNICIPAL SAMPLE:
Good morning/afternoon. My name is _______________ and I am calling from Earnscliffe on behalf of Natural Resources Canada. I would like to speak to someone in the administrator's office who is responsible for planning for your municipality. Can you please direct me to the appropriate person?
INTERVIEWER INSTRUCTION: THE APPROPRIATE RESPONDENT IS SOMEONE WHO IS A DECISION-MAKER (RATHER THAN A TECHNICIAN).

We have been retained by Natural Resources Canada to conduct research on how organizations in the public and private sectors are considering the issue of a changing climate and how it may affect planning and operations over time.

WHEN RESPONDENT IS REACHED REINTRODUCE:

Hello/Bonjour. My name is _______ and I am calling from Earnscliffe, a professional research firm. We have been retained by Natural Resources Canada to conduct research on how organizations in the public and private sectors are considering the issue of a changing climate and how it may affect planning and operations over time.

Would you prefer that I continue in English or French? Préférez-vous continuer en français ou anglais?

Your participation in this survey is voluntary. Please be assured that your responses are confidential and will not be reported individually nor attributed to you personally. The survey will take about 12 minutes to complete. May I continue?

Yes
No

[INTERVIEWER NOTES IF NECESSARY:

And, just to confirm, have I reached you on a landline phone or a cell phone?

Landline
Cell phone
Don't know/Refused

For your safety, are you currently driving?

Yes – SCHEDULE CALLBACK
No
Don't know/Refused

Section 1: Screening

Thank you, let's begin the survey.

ENSURE THIS TEXT IS READ WHEN CORRECT PERSON IS ON THE LINE:

I want to assure you that all of information collected, used and/or disclosed will be used for research purposes only, will not deal with classified or confidential information, and will be administered as per the requirements of the Privacy Act. Your name or position will not be linked to the results. This survey is registered with the national survey registration system.

Section 2: Awareness & Impressions of Climate Change Relevance

Section 3: Climate Change Adaptation

Section 4: Barriers to Incorporating Climate Change Considerations in Decision-making

 

Appendix C: In-depth Interview Guide

Objectives

These interviews will gather some deeper insights from specific perspectives that may not be adequately included in the telephone survey. They are a series of fourteen (14) one-on-one interviews designed to take approximately 15 to 20 minutes to complete, with the sample distributed as follows:

Interview Introduction

Hello/Bonjour. My name is _______ and I am calling from Earnscliffe, a professional research firm. We have been retained by Natural Resources Canada to conduct research on how organizations in the public and private sectors are considering the issue of a changing climate and how it may affect planning and operations over time.

Your participation in this research is voluntary. Please be assured that your responses are confidential and will not be reported individually nor attributed to you personally or your organization. The interview will take about 15 to 20 minutes to complete. May I continue?

Yes
No

[INTERVIEWER NOTES IF NECESSARY:

Screening

I want to assure you that all of information collected, used and/or disclosed will be used for research purposes only, will not deal with classified or confidential information, and will be administered as per the requirements of the Privacy Act. Neither your name, position nor organization will be linked to the results.

Thank you, let’s begin the survey.

Climate Adaptation Questions

This completes the interview. On behalf of Natural Resources Canada, thank you very much for your time and cooperation.

IF RESPONDENT ASKS FOR INFORMATION: You can get more information about this research by contacting XXXXX at Natural Resources Canada. XXXX telephone number is (613) XXX-XXXX and XXXX e-mail address is XXXX@canada.ca