Arts & Opinion.com
  Arts Culture Analysis  
Vol. 3, No. 5, 2004
 

     
  Current Issue  
  Back Issues  
  About  
 
 
  Submissions  
  Subscribe  
  Comments  
  Letters  
  Contact  
  Jobs  
  Ads  
  Links  
 
 
  Editor
Robert J. Lewis
 
  Contributing Editors
Mark Goldfarb
Phil Nixon
Bernard Dubé
Robert Rotondo
 
  Music Editor
Emanuel Pordes
 
  Arts Editor
Marissa Consiglieri de Chackal
 
  Graphics
Mady Bourdage
 
  Webmaster
Emanuel Pordes
 
 
 
  Past Contributors
 
  Noam Chomsky
Robert Fisk
Michael Moore
Pico Iyer
Edward Said
Mark Kingwell
Arundhati Roy
Naomi Klein
Jean Baudrillard
John Lavery
David Solway
Tariq Ali
Michael Albert
Rochelle Gurstein
 
     

TOXINS AND YOUR GOOD HEALTH

by Dr. Joe Schwarcz

Dr. Joe SchwarczDr. Joe Schwarcz is Director of McGill University’s Office for Science and Society. He hosts The Dr. Joe Show on Montreal's CJAD and has appeared hundreds of times on The Discovery Channel, CTV, CBC, TV Ontario and Global Television. Dr. Schwarcz also writes a newspaper column entitled The Right Chemistry and has authored four best-sellers, Radar, Hula Hoops and Playful Pigs, The Genie in the Bottle, That's The way The Cookie Crumbles, and Dr. Joe And What You Didn’t Know..

______________________

Oh, I remember it well. The Olympics, Squaw Valley, 1960. The final game of the hockey tournament featured the U.S against Czechoslovakia. Incredibly, the Americans had knocked off the favored Canadians and the Russians and now only the Czechs stood between them and a gold medal. But going into the third period, the group of unheralded college players trailed the skilled Czechs by a score of 4-3. That’s when Nikolai Sologubov, the Russians’ superb defenseman waltzed into the American dressing room and suggested that the players fortify themselves by inhaling some extra oxygen from tanks. His motive? If the Americans won, the Russians would end up with the bronze medal, if they lost, they would be going home empty-handed. Amazingly, the Americans scored six times in the third period for their first “miracle on ice!” Was the extra oxygen responsible?

As I recall, the next day the newspapers were filled with stories about the ingenuity of the oxygen boost. Nobody suggested that this was in any way unfair. Performance enhancement by means other than training was not yet a big issue, even though “doping” in all likelihood had tainted the Olympics since 1936. Just a year earlier German scientists had isolated the male sex hormone testosterone and had shown that it increased muscle mass and aggression. There is little doubt that German athletes used it in the 1936 Berlin Olympics along with amphetamines, stimulants which had been shown to ward off fatigue. By 1955 various analogues of testosterone, collectively referred to as “anabolic steroids,” had been synthesized and found their way into the bodies of athletes clamouring for glory. It is hard to know how extensive such doping was back in those days because urine tests for steroids were not introduced until 1973. Only in 1975 did the world’s governing sport bodies officially ban the use of anabolic steroids. That of course didn’t mean these drugs were not being used. Detection techniques were relatively primitive and as long as athletes didn’t use steroids just prior to competition, they got away with it.

I remember during the Montreal Olympics of 1976 marveling at the physique of East German swimmer Kornelia Ender who took home an unprecedented four gold medals. She was built more like a man and even had an unusually deep voice. Steroids? Probably. Then in 1988 the lid was blown off when Ben Johnson was caught cheating with stanozolol, an anabolic steroid, in the 100 meters, one of the Olympics’ prime events. Since then we have looked warily on the Olympic motto of “Citius, Altius, Fortius,” or “faster, higher, stronger” and have asked the question “with what?” It seems we have come a very long way since those American boys inhaled some extra oxygen. Now we ask if athletes have used growth hormone to bulk up, insulin to boost the body’s supply of the crucial muscle fuel, glycogen, or have injected themselves with erythropoietin (EPO) to increase their production of oxygen-carrying red blood cells.

Why the need for EPO? Why not just inhale some extra oxygen? Simple. It doesn’t work! The romanticized story of the American victory at Squaw Valley notwithstanding, red blood cells are already saturated with oxygen and inhaling extra gas will be on no help. This was clearly shown in a landmark paper in the Journal of the American Medical Association in 1989. Researchers studied professional soccer players who breathed either room air or pure oxygen in a double blind fashion before a period of exercise. There was no difference in performance and the subjects were unable to identify which gas they had inhaled.

To increase the oxygen carrying capacity of the blood, the number of red blood cells needs to be increased. There are several ways to do this. Training at high altitude, where the air contains less oxygen, stimulates the body to produce more red blood cells. Living in dorms where nitrogen-rich air is pumped in to simulate the oxygen concentration of air at high altitude also works. Then there are the short cuts. Like “blood doping.” Athletes withdraw a couple of pints of blood and reinfuse this months later before a major competition to increase their red blood cell count. Such blood doping is illegal and is detectible. Which is why athletes began to use EPO, a hormone synthesized by the kidneys that sends a signal to the bone marrow to produce red blood cells. EPO can be made via recombinant DNA technology and is widely used to treat anemia stemming from kidney disease, chemotherapy or blood loss. It didn’t take long for athletes to figure out that they could also avail themselves of this technology to boost performance. Neither did it take long for problems to crop up. Too many red blood cells increase the density of the blood, which in turn can lead to heart attacks or strokes. When the deaths of over a dozen cyclists were associated with the use of EPO in the early 1990s, the Olympic Committee banned the drug. The problem though was that injected EPO was difficult to detect and only recently have reliable tests become available.

But some athletes may already be a step ahead. Pharmaceutical companies are working on a way to treat kidney patients by introducing the gene that codes for the production of EPO. Animal experiments are already underway. And I’m quite sure that there are athletes out there quite willing to become human guinea pigs. By the way, about those six American goals against the Czechs in the third period back in 1960? None of the four players who did the scoring had inhaled any extra oxygen! Natural adrenalin was the chemical at work.


E-Tango: Web Design and lowest rates for web hosting
Care + Net Computer Services
ColbaNet
Available Ad Space
Donations
madyart.com
MCC Marchande d'Art at: www.marissaconsiglieri.com
Armand Vaillancourt: sculptor
Valid HTML 4.01!
Privacy Statement Contact Info
Copyright 2002 Robert J. Lewis