muslim women
BETWEEN CONCEALMENT AND PROMISCUITY

by
DAR AL-IFTA
___________________________________________________
PREAMBLE.
It is a position taken up by the uninformed western mind as
a matter of convenience and confirmation bias, that Islam
does not concern itself, grapple with modernism, in particular,
the manner in which Muslim women are expected to comport themselves
in respect to dress codes, dating and sexuality. The article
below is intended for local consumption but its perhaps unintended
larger reach is to disabuse the West of its set-in-stone presumptions
about Islam, the Quran and what constitutes, as a work in
progress, proper conduct between the sexes. Ed.
Helen (of
Troy) is guilty finally
not because of anything she's done
but because of who she is,
how she appears, what she looks like;
because of the effect she has, hormonally/emotionally,
on men who are ready to kill & die over
what they're made to feel.
David Foster Wallace
The Muslim
woman has been the subject of severe debate among the extremist
thinkers both Muslims and non-Muslims. The rigorous understanding
and the rigid mentality of Muslim extremists imagine women in
and of themselves as the source of evil and temptation which should
be contained and confined in its home to limit its poisonous nature
from seducing men who can’t help but fall prey to every
woman who walks down the street. This kind of mentality led to
the belief that women should be fully covered from head to toe
including her face and hands and should be donned in black drapes
in a desperate attempt not to grab attention. Women should consequently
be segregated from men in all fields of work as being in a mixed
environment opens all doers of evil. Walking down the street alone
without a male guardian is unquestionable as it is seen as an
inviting gesture to lonely wolves out there.
This
humiliating look at women as a potential sexual object which should
be concealed from all eyes and confined in home detention is very
similar to another bleak look at women by non- Muslim extremists
who think that women should be liberated from all social norms
and unleashed from the fear of becoming sexual object and thus
her body becomes totally lawful to be exposed, manipulated, plastered
and
exploited. This extreme idea of liberating the woman’s body
from the confinement of thick clothes led to the dangerous idea
of thinking of women with little or no clothes. They failed to
look at women as human beings who enjoy intellectual abilities
and can reach out to their full potentials in different fields
of life. They rather turned women to be part of the world of ‘matters,’
a “soulless object” which can be plastered for product
advertisement to guarantee the success of top- edge marketing
plans, posing either nude or in revealing clothes for magazines
to assure higher circulation, become an actress in movies which
displays sensual hot sex- scenes to gain higher ratings and make
block-busters. Not to mention the top professional fashion designers,
who are mostly men, and who are eager to reveal the woman’s
body by designing low cut tops, miniskirts and hot shorts.
This
obsession with the woman’s sexuality and this mania of total
concealment or extreme promiscuity represents a distorted understanding
and degrading evaluation of the woman as a human being who is
a lot more than only her assumed ‘sexuality.’ The
consistent effort and relentless persistence of combating the
potential sexual hazard of every female led to the establishment
of unhealthy environment where the two integral parts of the society
are totally segregated in a fashion which is in total opposition
to the natural composition of societies. By the same token, thinking
of the woman’s body as an object which can be lawfully manipulated
and legally exposed is no less humiliating to women. Such way
of dealing with the woman’s body strips her of her basic
right of becoming more than just a beautiful body or a cheap means
of promoting lustful desires.
THE BALANCED
APPROACH OF ISLAM TOWARDS HUMAN SEXUALITY
Islam
took a balanced approach which assured the woman’s right
as a full human being who enjoys a dignified social status, equal
religious obligation and same contribution to the development
of the world both on the intellectual and functional levels. At
the same time Islam acknowledges the created sexuality of both
men and women and did not call for suppressing such sexual drive
but rather guided us to lawful ways of handling our human sexuality
without feeling ashamed of our sexual zeal and at the same time
protected humans from falling prey to sexual obsession which strips
human of their dignified status of intellectual beings to the
degraded status of sexually-driven animals.
Therefore,
Muslim men are obliged not to think of women as potential sexual
objects who are designed to give momentary sexual gratification
and therefore are prohibited from looking at women seductively
or stare at their body parts; an act which is both offensive and
humiliating to woman as an equal partner in humanity. From this
dignified understanding for women comes the prohibition of having
sex outside wedlock because Islam does not look at the relationship
between men and women as a one night stand which aims at sexual
satisfaction but rather emphasizes the establishment of long term
relationships based on love, respect and mutual goals for building
a warm and healthy family. Men are also asked to respect their
bodies and not to reveal their sexuality through wearing tight-fitting
clothes or certain clothes -- fashion which leads to the incitement
of sexual desires.
By the
same token women are asked not to reveal their sexuality and to
prevent others from thinking of them in terms of sexual objectification.
Therefore adult Muslim women are asked to cover their hair and
body except for her face and hands. The reason for revealing the
face and hands in public is to ensure the woman’s full ability
to interact and to reach the maximum level of communication with
people and production at work without feeling any hindrance. This
way she is assured to be an active participant in society while
keeping her dignity intact.
There
are claims that one of the benefits of total exposure of women’s
body and free sexuality is the guarantee of the safety of women
from any sexual harassment as men are not teased to look behind
the covered body, but these claims lack authenticity. Checking
facts revealed by the United Nations Entity for Gender Equality
and Empowerment of Women states that between 40 and 50 percent
of women in European Union countries experience unwanted sexual
advances, physical contact or other forms of sexual harassment
at work. Across Asia, studies in Japan, Malaysia, the Philippines
and South Korea show that 30 to 40 percent of women suffer workplace
sexual harassment. In the United States, 83 percent of girls aged
12 to 16 experienced some form of sexual harassment in public
schools.
By the
same token, places where women are thought of as a potential sexual
danger and should have limited or no access to public life result
in creating an degraded environment of illicit sexual acts as
a reaction to the abnormal notion of women’s potential sexual
promiscuity.
These
two extremist views of women represent a deviant understanding
of the Islamic teachings and goes directly against the numerous
Prophetic traditions which state that “Women are the twin
halves of men” and this statement establishes the law of
equity between men and women in terms of the appointed legal responsibilities
and religious obligations and the legal rights they enjoy and
the religious rewards they receive. Differences in some Juristic
rulings and social responsibilities between men and women are
directly related to their differing natural characteristics such
as motherhood for women and hard labour for men. The relationship
between men and women are not based on severe competition where
survival is for the fittest but it is rather built on a shared
responsibility and complementarity of each other’s social
roles.
WOMEN
AND THE CONCEPT OF FITNA
Some
people developed a false understanding of women to be some source
of fitna or temptation in and of itself and thus should be treated
with utmost caution and be under constant surveillance. This warped
logic goes against the merciful teachings of Islam which granted
women equal rights and dignified their status through granting
them a share in inheritance, the right of financial independency,
right to vote and to hold political, scientific and social leading
positions. Islam encouraged women’s civic engagement and
praised its role as an active part of the civil society. The misinterpreted
hadith of Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) in which he says,
“I did not leave after me a more dangerous temptation on
men than women,” is taken by extremists as a slogan for
thinking of women as a serpent who seduces men at every corner.
Having a closer look at the hadith, we would discover that the
problem does not lie in women in and of themselves but it lies
in men’s thinking of women as a potential temptation which
might lead them to commit erroneous acts. Therefore the hadith
revolves around men and how, according to their natural inclination,
may view women and thus has nothing to do with women as equal
human beings with full potentials. The concept of fitna is not
only about men who can be tempted by women to commit erroneous
acts but actually the lexical meaning of the verb “f t n”
means to overwhelmingly capture the attention and it has another
meaning of testing and examining.
According
to these two meanings, it would be easy to understand that the
concept of fitna could apply on many notions such as money for
example, it is a huge source for temptation as it is desired and
thus forms a test for human beings which they ought to pass through
being honest and not to steal, not to accept bribes etc.. This
explains the Quranic verse in which God the Almighty says, “And
know that your properties and your children are but a trial (fitna)
and that Allah has with Him a great reward.” (8:28)
Also
other elements which are seen as the sources of fitna or temptation
is revealed in the verse in which God says “Beautified for
people is the love of that which they desire -- of women and sons,
heaped-up sums of gold and silver, fine branded horses, and cattle
and tilled land. That is the enjoyment of worldly life, but Allah
has with Him the best return.” (3:14)
The
listed items in the verse such as women, children, wealth, food
and drinks, prestige and status are not sources of temptation
in and of themselves, but actually carries the potentiality of
becoming a source for misguidance if people failed the test of
using them wisely. The excessive zealotry and intense love of
these sources of happiness could very well be correspondent to
the Seven Deadly Sins in Christianity which warns against:
•
Lust – to have an intense desire or need
•
Gluttony – excess in eating and drinking.
•
Greed - excessive or reprehensible acquisitiveness
•
Laziness – disinclined to activity or exertion: not energetic
or vigorous
•
Wrath – strong vengeful anger or indignation
•
Envy – painful or resentful awareness of an advantage enjoyed
by another joined with a desire to possess the same advantage
•
Pride - quality or state of being proud
Therefore
waiving the card of fitna against women as a potential source
of evil is a flagrant attempt to degrade women and their noble
status in Islam.
ARE
WOMEN SEEN AS A BAD OMEN?
Another
famous Prophetic tradition which is widely misquoted is the narration
of Abu Hurairah in which he reports that Prophet Muhammad (peace
be upon him) said, “Bad omens do not exist except for three
things; women, houses and horses.” This hadith was collected
by al- Bukhari. In the luminary book of “’Umdat al-
Qary” for Sheikh Abu Muhammad Badr al- Din al- ‘Ayni,
he explained that this hadith is not complete and was only partially
heard by Abu Huraira. He reported through an authentic chain of
narration that when Lady ‘Aisha heard about Abu Huraira’s
narration, she was infuriated and said “By the one who revealed
the Quran on Muhammad, peace be upon him, the Prophet never said
that. The Prophet rather said, “The people at the time of
Jahiliyya (pre-Islam error) used to think of these three things
as ominous.” This means that Prophet Muhammad was only narrating
what the people of Jahiliyya used to think and not that the Prophet
believed in it. The narration of Lady ‘Aisha was authenticated
by Ibn ‘Abd al- Barr who received the narration from Abu
Hassan al- A’raj. Abu Hassan is authenticated by Yahya and
Ibn Hibban and a group of hadith collectors including al- Bukhari
who authenticated his narrations.
This
elucidation of the reported hadith corresponds with the Quranic
verses which states, Say, "Never will we be struck except
by what Allah has decreed for us; He is our protector." And
upon Allah let the believers rely.” (9:51)
And
another verse says,” No disaster strikes upon the earth
or among yourselves except that it is in a register before We
bring it into being - indeed that, for Allah , is easy –(57:22)
Also
this elucidation of the hadith corresponds to another Prophetic
tradition in which the Prophet emphatically negated the existence
of bad omens or the permissibility of believing in superstitious
omens.
In conclusion,
the extremist look at women as a potential source of seduction
which deserves total concealment is no less degrading than the
flagrant look at women as an ‘object’ in which her
body can be the subject of harassment, exploitation and abuse
under the false guise of freedom. The truth of the matter is that
women have the right to have a choice of concealing her body and
not to expose it to others except to the one whom she chooses
to share her life with. The woman has the right to be treated
as an intellectual human being and not as a sexual seductive object.
Islam raised the intellectual status of women and granted her
the full right to be a full human being without being condemned
as a serpent evil or exploited as a sex object due to her body
and sexuality.
This
article was originally published and copyrighted in Dar
Al-Ifta.
COMMENTS
user-submission@feedback.com
Informative -- and I like the idea of building bridges "together."
Arts
& Opinion, a bi-monthly, is archived in the
Library and Archives Canada.
ISSN 1718-2034