Is celiac disease a lifelong disorder?

Jacques Schmitz, MD

Clin Invest Med 1996; 19 (5): 352-6.

[résumé]


Dr. Schmitz is professor of pediatrics with the Department of Pediatrics, Hôpital des Enfants Malades, Paris.

Paper reprints may be obtained from: Dr. Jacques Schmitz, Department of Paediatrics, Hôpital des Enfants Malades, 149 rue de Sèvres, 75743 Paris Cedex 15, France.


See also:
  • Celiac disease is a lifelong disorder

    Contents


    Abstract

    That celiac disease is a lifelong disorder was suggested by clinical case records and was considered to have been demonstrated through the widespread use of intestinal biopsies by the end of the 1950s. It was clear that the mucosal lesions observed in children and adults were identical and responded similarly to gluten withdrawal. In fact, in 1970 the European Society for Paediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition instituted the practice of a challenge after diagnosis. A relapse of clinical symptoms and of the intestinal lesions after gluten was reintroduced into the diet demonstrated the "permanent" nature of sensitivity to gluten in children with celiac disease. Twenty-five years later, the permanence of the sensitivity of the intestinal mucosa to gluten is again a matter of debate. Several lines of evidence, gathered during recent years, show that celiac disease is not always a lifelong condition. First, the long-term follow-up of children with proven celiac disease shows that 10% to 20% of them become "tolerant" (defined on clinical, biological and histologic grounds) to gluten during adolescence. Second, it has also been shown, in individual cases, that the mucosal lesions typical of the disease may appear during adulthood. Our increasing knowledge of the long-term evolution of the disease suggests that celiac disease develops and, in some cases, fades in a predisposed group of people with intestinal sensitivity to gluten, which is probably a common condition. The factors leading to the appearance or disappearance of the disease, however, are still unknown.


    Résumé

    La perception du caractère permanent de la maladie coeliaque provient d'observations cliniques et de sa démonstration par l'emploi répandu des biopsies intestinales à la fin des années 50. Il n'y avait pas de doute que les lésions muqueuses étaient identiques tant chez l'enfant que chez l'adulte et qu'elles répondaient bien au retrait du gluten. En 1970, la Société européenne de gastroentérologie pédiatrique et de nutrition recommanda une épreuve de réintroduction du gluten après le diagnostic. Ainsi, une récidive des symptômes cliniques et des lésions intestinales après réintroduction du gluten dans la diète démontrait le caractère «permanent» de la sensibilité au gluten chez les enfants atteints de maladie coeliaque. Vingt-cinq ans plus tard, la permanence de la sensibilité de la muqueuse intestinale au gluten fait à nouveau l'objet d'une controverse. Plusieurs éléments nouveaux démontrent que la maladie coeliaque n'est pas toujours permanente. Le suivi à long terme d'enfants avec maladie coeliaque démontre qu'une tolérance (définie par un des critères cliniques, biologiques et histologiques) survient chez 10 % à 20 % d'entre eux à l'adolescence. De plus, l'apparition de lésions muqueuses caractéristiques de la maladie a été démontrée chez certains adultes. Les connaissances nouvelles quant à l'évolution à long terme suggèrent que la maladie coeliaque survient ou même disparait chez les sujets avec une sensibilité intestinale au gluten, celle-ci étant vraisemblablement un problème fréquent. Les facteurs conduisant à l'apparition ou à la résolution de la maladie demeurent inconnus.

    [Table of contents]


    Introduction

    The permanence of celiac disease has recently become a matter of debate once again. By the end of the 1950s, the lifelong nature of the condition appeared to have been established. In 1970, the European Society for Paediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition (ESPGAN) instituted a challenge to differentiate celiac disease from transient, food-induced gastrointestinal disease.[1] This challenge involved withdrawing gluten from the diet of people in whom celiac disease was suspected and then reintroducing gluten. A relapse of clinical symptoms and intestinal lesions after this reintroduction was considered confirmation of the diagnosis and a demonstration of the "permanent" nature of gluten sensitivity in children with celiac disease. However, several lines of evidence that have arisen in recent years put this assumption in doubt.

    [Table of contents]

    Fading of celiac disease during adolescence

    It is well established that, on the whole, tolerance to gluten increases among children with celiac disease as they grow older. This lesson was first drawn from the widespread use of gluten challenge. Whereas the clinical picture of active celiac disease in toddlers is generally the same, the features of the relapse induced by a gluten challenge in children with celiac disease 3 to 12 years of age is already variable. Furthermore, in only a small proportion of these children (20% to 40%)[2­4] do clinical symptoms, such loss of appetite, decreased activity, abdominal pain, bloating, diarrhea, weight loss or, sometimes, only reduced speed of growth, recur. These symptoms are more severe the earlier in life they occur. In these children with recurring symptoms, signs of malabsorption, i.e., steatorrhea, sideropenic anemia and low blood folate levels, also recur. In some children, there is only biological malabsorption, but it does not cause any symptoms. In most patients, however, gluten reintroduction has neither clinical nor biological consequences (except, in some instances, for low plasma folate levels). In this group, which constitutes some 50% to 70% of all patients with a relapse, the relapse is only histologic, characterized by the reappearance of mucosal damage. Assessment of this damage is based on intestinal biopsy performed after 1 or 2 years of a gluten-containing diet. In most of such patients (85% in our experience), the damage is severe, and in some it is moderate.[2­4] Later, during adolescence, many of these patients tolerate a normal diet well, according to several follow-up studies.[5,6] All 102 teenaged patients in a cohort followed in England were well and had biochemical levels and height within normal limits, although only 56% of the patients had followed a strict, gluten-free diet and although 17 out of the 44 patients who agreed to have a jejunal biopsy had grossly abnormal villi (height less than 200 mm).[5] Of the 17 patients in whom a biopsy was performed, 5 followed a gluten-free diet strictly, 7 less strictly and 5 not at all. A similar experience was recently reported in Italy.[6] Among a large group of 47 young adults who did not adhere to a gluten-free diet, 42 had severe histologic abnormalities and 34 had biochemical abnormalities (including IgA antibody to gliadin), yet only 25 had symptoms.[6]

    Finally, we prospectively followed a cohort of children with celiac disease since the late 1960s. Our experience confirms that these children tend to have a greater tolerance to gluten as times passes. We used the following protocol for these children. The diagnosis was made according to early ESPGAN criteria; the children then adhered to a gluten-free diet for 2 to 4 years, and then underwent a gluten challenge at between 4 and 6 years of age. In the children who experienced a clinical or biological relapse, the exclusion diet was resumed; in the ones who had only a histologic relapse (half of the children, in our experience) a normal diet was allowed. The prolonged observation (for up to 25 years) of this cohort shows that, in the subgroup of children in whom relapse was purely histologic, gluten was only slightly deleterious or not deleterious at all.[7,8] Although, in these children, puberty may have been delayed for less than 1 year, the final height they attained was at least that which could be predicted from their parents' height. In 21 young, postpubertal adults still followed in our outpatient clinic, who attained their adult height and had eaten a normal diet for 6 to 19 (median 15) years, their final height was greater (164 ± 7 cm in 16 girls and 175.5 ± 3 cm in 5 boys) than that predicted (160 ± 5, p < 0.01, Wilcoxon test) according to a standard formula.[9] Indeed, in series of patients seen as young adults by gastroenterologists, most (more than 90%) had a normal height.[5,10,11]

    Moreover, in the same cohort of patients who continued to eat a diet containing gluten, the degree of mucosal damage varied widely over time. In a survey conducted in 1989, out of 50 such children followed from 5 to more than 20 years, in whom more than one biopsy was performed,[35] (70%) continued to have a flat mucosa. In 15 (30%), however, intestinal lesions improved: mucosal architecture returned to normal in 4 (8%); mucosal atrophy became moderate, with a villus-to-crypt ratio above 2, in 6 (12%), or partial, with a villus-to-crypt ratio of 1, in 5 (10%). In the latter cases, improvement or normalization of intestinal lesions may indicate either "transient celiac disease"[12] or the development of complete or partial tolerance to gluten.

    Similar findings have been made by others. In a group of 91 patients who underwent a planned challenge or a spontaneous diet interruption of up to 15 years, full relapse with a flat mucosa was observed in 71; intermediate lesions were found in 11 subjects, who did not present with any clinical or biological signs of malabsorption; and a normal mucosa was seen in 6 patients who had eaten a normal diet for more than 2 years and in 3 who had eaten a normal diet for less than 2 years. Thus, in 20% of the patients (17 out of 88) there was either a partial relapse or no relapse at all after more than 2 years.[13] Interestingly, the latter two groups of patients were older at the time of challenge (median age 14.8 for those with a partial relapse and 10 years for those with no relapse) than those who had a full relapse (median age 5.8 years),[13] suggesting that some degree of tolerance had developed with time. However, only 16 patients had had an initial challenge many years before the study was performed; therefore, it was impossible to know whether the patients who did not have a relapse had either transient gluten intolerance[14] or "transient celiac disease."[12]

    In another study conducted in Finland, 38 adolescents underwent a late gluten challenge (for many of them, the second challenge) after undergoing a biopsy.[14] In nine (24%), an altered mucosa (from slight villous changes to a flat mucosa) indicated poor adherence to a gluten-free diet. Out of the remaining 29, 24 had a relapse after a mean challenge of 7 months; in an additional patient there was a dubious relapse (slight alteration in villous height). In these 25 patients the mucosa was flat on 18 occasions or showed severe (on 2 occasions) or moderate (on 5 occasions) architectural disturbances. In the remaining four patients, the intestinal mucosa remained normal after more than 2 years' exposure to gluten. Twenty of these patients, including 4 with a normal mucosa, had an earlier positive result of a challenge. Thus, 11 out of 38 patients (29%) showed improvement or complete normalization of their mucosal architecture;[15] these data are very similar to ours.[8,16]

    A more recent study involving 123 Italian teenagers with celiac disease, grouped according to their degree of compliance with a gluten-free diet, showed that, although symptoms occurred more frequently in patients eating a diet containing gluten, symptom rates were far from constant.[17] Indeed, 34% of those following a normal diet were symptom free. Symptoms were no more frequent among adolescents eating a semi-strict diet (0.06 to 2.00 g of gluten per day) than among those eating a strict (no-gluten) diet. In 36 patients who underwent a jejunal biopsy (6 of whom were on the gluten-free diet, 14 on the semi-strict diet and 13 on the normal diet), morphometric analysis of the mucosa showed a normal mucosa in, respectively, 3 out of the 6, 3 out of the 14, and 1 out of the 13, as well as considerable villous shortening in, respectively, 3 out of 6, 7 out of 14, and 2 out of 13 and a flat mucosa in 0 out of the 6, 4 out of the 14, and 10 out of the 13. Once again, it appears that in a sizeable proportion of adolescents not following the gluten-free diet not only clinical symptoms but also severe histologic lesions are inconstant.

    The evolution of the intestinal mucosa of children with proven celiac disease is thus rather variable from the time of the diagnostic challenge to adolescence and adulthood, with a general trend toward greater tolerance of gluten. This developing tolerance is first revealed by less frequent clinical symptoms as time passes. This decrease in clinical severity may be related to a reduction in the length of intestine affected by the immunologic conflict,[18] although this relation has never been demonstrated in children, in whom intestinal biopsies are never taken more distally than the duodenojejunal flexure. In adolescence, an even greater tolerance seems to develop in a subgroup of patients whose mucosa is no longer, or only moderately, sensitive to gluten.

    The hypothesis that tolerance to gluten may develop in a proportion of children with celiac disease was strengthened by immunohistochemical results obtained for our cohort of patients eating a normal diet. Although a significant increase in the number of T cell receptor (TcR) gd+ intraepithelial lymphocytes (IELs) was observed in their gut epithelium, and this increase was not correlated with the presence of gluten in the diet or the grade of villous atrophy, the number of intestinal TcR ab+ IELs varied with the stage of the disease. The number of TcR ab+ IELs was high in the epithelium of patients with a flat mucosa but significantly lower in patients whose mucosa had returned to normal or nearly normal in spite of a normal diet. Furthermore, immunohistochemical markers of intestinal mononuclear cell activation (the appearance of CD25+ mononuclear cells and the increased expression of HLA-DR antigens by enterocytes) were either weakly positive or absent in the patients with a normal or nearly normal mucosa.[16] These observations suggest that TcR ab+ but not TcR gd+ IELs are sensitized to gluten in celiac disease and that immunologic tolerance to gluten may be acquired in a subgroup of patients, although for an unknown period. Additional evidence that such a subgroup exists has been brought by the recent immunohistochemical observation that patients in the latter subgroup (those with "abortive celiac disease") have significantly more large granular lymphocytes and natural killer cells (11.93 ± 6.2 cells/mm2, a number in the normal range) than those with permanent celiac disease (0.41 ± 0.61 cells/mm2).[19]

    [Table of contents]

    Late appearance of celiac disease

    On the other side of the coin, it has recently been shown that the mucosal lesions typical of the disease can appear in people who eat a normal diet and have had a normal intestinal mucosa on a biopsy performed several years earlier. Such sequences have been observed twice in monozygotic twins. In both cases, celiac disease was diagnosed in one twin, and a biopsy was performed in the other. Seven years after the first biopsy, which had normal results, a second biopsy revealed an intestinal mucosa with typical villous atrophy and crypt hyperplasia.[20,21] A normal mucosa has been observed on biopsy years before an initial diagnosis of celiac disease in several cases in children and adults; in these cases, the first biopsy was performed 2 to 9 years before the diagnosis of celiac disease was made because of suspected malabsorption, a family history[22] or insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus.[23] In one such adult case, there was a high number of TcR gd+ IELs in the apparently normal mucosa obtained by the first biopsy.[24] These patients have been classified as having latent celiac disease.[22,25]

    [Table of contents]

    Conclusions

    Both of these lines of observation provide strong evidence against the received wisdom that, in celiac disease, the sensitivity of the intestinal mucosa to gluten continues throughout life. Instead, our increasing experience with the long-term evolution of the disease suggests that silent or clinically apparent celiac disease develops and, in some cases, fades in a predisposed group of people with intestinal sensitivity to gluten (latent celiac disease), a condition that may be more common than previously thought. However, the factors leading to the appearance or disappearance of the disease remain unknown. It has been proposed that genetic factors could determine the patient's age at the onset of the disease[26] or the severity of the disease.[27] It is difficult, however, to understand how the same factors could explain the development of tolerance as well as of sensitization in a given patient who continues to eat the same diet. This variability also implies that gluten cannot be the sole factor that induces villous effacement.[25,28]

    [Table of contents]

    Acknowledgements

    The publication of this article was supported in part by a grant from the Fonds de la recherche en santé du Québec. We would like to thank the Canadian Celiac Association for its sponsorship of the invited speakers' program.

    [Table of contents]

    References

    1. Weijers HA, Lindquist B, Anderson CM, et al. Round table discussion. Diagnostic criteria in celiac disease. Acta Paediatr Scand 1970; 59: 461-3.
    2. Shmerling DH. An analysis of controlled relapses in gluten-induced celiac disease [abstract]. Acta Paediatr Scand 1969; 58: 311.
    3. Visakorpi JK, Kuitunen P, Savilahti E. Frequency and nature of relapses in children suffering from the malabsorption syndrome with gluten intolerance. Acta Paediatr Scand 1970; 59: 481-6.
    4. Bresson JL, Schmitz J, Rey J. Characteristics of the relapse in celiac disease [abstract]. Acta Paediatr Belg 1980; 33: 270.
    5. Kumar PJ, Walker-Smith J, Milla P, Harris G, Colyer J, Halliday R. The teenage coeliac: follow up study of 102 patients. Arch Dis Child 1988; 63: 916-20.
    6. Bardella MT, Molteni N, Prampolini L, Giunta AM, Baldassarri AR, Morganti D, et al. Need for follow up in coeliac disease. Arch Dis Child 1994; 70: 211-3.
    7. Schmitz J, Jos J, Rey J. La maladie coeliaque. In: Ribet A, Frexinos J, editors. Actualités en hépato-gastroentérologie. Paris: Masson, 1979: 95-109.
    8. Schmitz J, Arnaud-Battandier F, Jos J, Rey J. Long term follow-up of childhood coeliac disease (CD): Is there a "natural recovery"? [abstract]. Pediatr Res 1984; 18: 1052.
    9. Sizonenko P, Griscelli C. Précis de pédiatrie. Lausanne, Switzerland: Payot, 1996: 1646.
    10. Mortimer PE, Stewart JS, Norman AP, Booth CC. Follow-up study of coeliac disease. BMJ 1968; 2: 7-9.
    11. Sheldon W. Prognosis in early adult life of coeliac children treated with a gluten-free diet. BMJ 1969; 2: 401-4.
    12. Schmitz J, Jos J, Rey J. Transient mucosal atrophy in confirmed coeliac disease. In: McNicholl B, McCarthy CF, Fottrell PF, editors. Perspectives in Coeliac Disease. Lancaster: MTP Press, 1978: 259-66.
    13. Shmerling DH, Franckx J. Childhood coeliac disease: a long-term analysis of relapses in 91 patients. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 1986; 5: 565-9.
    14. Walker-Smith JA. Transient gluten intolerance. Arch Dis Child 1970; 45: 523-6.
    15. Maki M, Lahdeaho ML, Hallstrom O, Viander M, Visakorpi JK. Postpubertal gluten challenge in coeliac disease. Arch Dis Child 1989; 64: 1604-7.
    16. Kutlu T, Brousse N, Rambaud C, Le Deist F, Schmitz J, Cerf-Bensussan N. Numbers of T cell receptor (TCR) ab+ but not of TcR gd+ intraepithelial lymphocytes correlate with the grade of villous atrophy in coeliac patients on a long term normal diet. Gut 1993; 34: 208-14.
    17. Mayer M, Greco L, Troncone R, Auricchio S, Marsh MN. Compliance of adolescents with coeliac disease with a gluten free diet. Gut 1991; 32: 881-5.
    18. Stewart JS, Pollock DJ, Hoffbrand AV, Mollin DL, Booth CC. A study of proximal and distal intestinal structure and absorptive function in idiopathic steatorrhoea. Q J Med 1967; 36: 425-44.
    19. Hadziselimovic F, Emmons LR, Schaub U, Signer E, Burgin-Wolff AM, Krstic R. Occurrence of large granular lymphocytes and natural killer cells in the epithelium of the gut distinguishes two different c0eliac diseases. Gut 1992; 33: 767-72.
    20. Kamath KR, Dorney SFA. Is discordance for celiac disease in monozygotic twins permanent? [abstract]. Pediatr Res 1983; 17: 422.
    21. Salazar de Sousa J, Ramos de Almeida JM, Monteiro MV, Magalhaes Ramalho P. Late onset coeliac disease in the monozygotic twin of a coeliac child. Acta Paediatr Scand 1987; 76: 172-4.
    22. Maki M, Holm K, Koskimies S, Hallstrom O, Visakorpi JK. Normal small bowel biopsy followed by coeliac disease. Arch Dis Child 1990; 65: 1137-41.
    23. Catassi C, Natalini G, Ratsch IM, Gabrielli O, Coppa GV, Giorgi PL. Documented latent coeliac disease in a child with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Eur J Pediatr 1991; 150: 832-4.
    24. Mäki M, Holm K, Collin P, Savilahti E. Increase in g/d T cell receptor bearing lymphocytes in normal small bowel mucosa in latent coeliac disease. Gut 1991; 32: 1412-4.
    25. Ferguson A, Arranz E, O'Mahony S. Clinical and pathological spectrum of coeliac disease-active, silent, latent, potential. Gut 1993; 34: 150-1.
    26. Ellis A, Taylor CJ, Dillon-Remmy M, Woodrow JC, McConnell RB. HLA-DR typing in coeliac disease: evidence for genetic heterogeneity. BMJ (Clin Res Ed) 1984; 289: 1571-3.
    27. Demarchi M, Carbonara A, Ansaldi N, Santini B, Barbera C, Borelli P, et al. HLA-DR3 and DR7 in coeliac disease: immunogenetic and clinical aspects. Gut 1983; 24: 706-12.
    28. Polanco I, Mearin ML, Larrauri J, Biemond I, Wipkink-Bakker A, Pena AS. Effect of gluten supplementation in healthy siblings of children with coeliac disease. Gastroenterology 1987; 92: 678-81.

    [Table of contents]


    | CIM: October 1996 / MCE: octobre 1996 |
    CMA Webspinners / >