CMAJ Readers' Forum

Checking random assignment with claims data

Online posting: March 11, 1997
Published in print: May. 1, 1997 (CMAJ 1997;156:1269)
Re: The review of randomization in the Canadian National Breast Screening Study: Is the debate over?, by Dr. Norman F. Boyd, CMAJ 1997;156:207-9 [full text / résumé].
Dr. Boyd refers to our analysis of health insurance data on the Manitoba women enrolled in the National Breast Screening Study (NBSS).[1] One of the objectives of our study, which was funded by the National Cancer Institute of Canada, was to determine whether there was independent evidence supporting criticism of the random assignment procedures used in the NBSS. In Manitoba, we could construct a medical history for each woman before her entry into the trial with the use of a database generated as part of that province's health insurance system. The database includes claims data from the billing cards sent to Manitoba Health by fee-for-service physicians. Each card must include the reason for the visit (diagnosis) for the claim to be accepted and the physician paid.

The NBSS provided identifying information for each of the 9477 women who attended the screening centre in Manitoba, which we then linked with each woman's claims data. We retrieved all procedures and diagnoses related to the breast in the 24 months before each woman's entry into the NBSS. As Boyd notes, we identified 9 women who had a claim for breast cancer during that period. Of these 9 women, 3 had no other breast-related claims, 2 were referred for a mammogram, 2 had a biopsy and 2 had both a mammogram and a biopsy. None had surgery or other form of cancer treatment during the 24 months before their enrolment. Only 1 of these women subsequently had breast cancer diagnosed and treated, several years after the closure of the NBSS centre. We verified this with files provided by the NBSS, which documented all cases with a cancer diagnosis during the trial or the follow-up period. We also determined that these women had continuous coverage under Manitoba Health from 1980 to 1995, suggesting that none of them had left the province or had been diagnosed or treated elsewhere.

Eight of the 9 women with a prior claim for breast cancer (4 of whom were in their 40s and 4 of whom were in their 50s) were randomly assigned to the mammography arm of the NBSS. We reported a probability value of 0.06 for this comparison, based on Fisher's exact test. Boyd reanalyzed the data and found a p value of 0.05, but he used the chi-square test. It should be recognized, when interpreting these results, that the study examined a large number of comparisons between women in the 2 arms of the trial. The finding of a p value close to 0.05 did not control for multiple comparisons and should be treated with caution.

In interpreting these results, one needs to be aware of the nature of the health insurance system in Manitoba. A tentative diagnosis may be entered on a claims card as the reason for the visit and any further diagnostic procedures. Even if the results are negative -- as was presumably the case for these 9 women -- the original claims card remains in the system. The physicians of these women probably wrote "query breast cancer" or "rule out breast cancer" on the claims cards.

Despite the limitations of the claims data, they were generated independently from the NBSS and provide a unique method of checking the randomization process used in this trial.

Marsha Cohen, MD
Clinical Epidemiology Unit
Sunnybrook Health Science Centre
North York, Ont.
Department of Community Health Sciences
University of Manitoba
Manitoba Centre for Health Policy and Evaluation
Winnipeg, Man.
Department of Health Administration
University of Toronto
Toronto, Ont.
mmcohen@ices.on.ca

Pat Kaufert, PhD
Department of Community Health Sciences
University of Manitoba
Winnipeg, Man.
Leonard MacWilliam, MNM, MSc
Manitoba Centre for Health Policy and Evaluation
Winnipeg, Man.

Robert Tate, MSc
Department of Community Health Sciences
University of Manitoba
Winnipeg, Man.

Reference

  1. Cohen MM, Kaufert PA, MacWilliam L, Tate RB. Using an alternative data source to examine randomization in the Canadian National Breast Screening Study. J Clin Epidemiol 1996;49:1039-44.

CMAJ CMAJ email    GO TO CMAJ Readers' Forum    GO TO CMAJ home page