CMAJ Readers' Forum

Safe haven for addicted mothers

Online posting: July 25, 1997
Published in print: November 1, 1997 (CMAJ 1997;157:1201)
Re: Bioethics for clinicians: 12. Ethical dilemmas that arise in the care of pregnant women: rethinking "maternal–fetal conflicts", by Elizabeth Flagler, Françoise Baylis and Sanda Rodgers, CMAJ 1997;156:1729-32 [full text / résumé]

See response from: E. Flagler


Flagler and associates outline several dilemmas in pregnancy and an approach to working out what is right in such instances. They conclude that "coercion of the woman is not permissible no matter what appears to be in the best interest of the fetus." I have no disagreement with this statement. Personal autonomy needs to be vigorously protected. However, we have not been given clear insight into the right thing to do when a medical intervention can benefit both the fetus and the mother, as in the case of a mother addicted to or abusing drugs.

In which situations may autonomy and consent be superseded by other considerations? A mother may not be able make a decision because of mental incompetence. Or a mother may be addicted to a substance and may be slowly destroying her own health and that of her fetus, contributing enormous costs to the community for the long-term care of the damaged child. In these situations, medical intervention can benefit all, even if the woman's autonomy is temporarily removed. This is not coercion. To leave women in these desperate situations without therapeutic intervention is, in effect, abandonment. To what end? A downward spiral into the early death of the mother, the lifelong disability of the child, and millions of dollars spent for minimal return?

Treatment needs to be made readily available and desirable to such women so that a court order is required only rarely. These women are already imprisoned by their addiction; they need a safe, therapeutic haven.

I was disappointed to see a lack of balance in the ethical analysis. It is not enlightening to suggest that the term "maternal" be discarded because the pregnant woman is yet to become a mother. It is acceptable in the English language, and in medical practice, to use the term "mother" for a pregnant woman, as denoting a mother-to-be.

Clearly the debate needs to continue, and fair and just principles for each of the situations have to be established. Let us not think the analysis is complete or universally acceptable. This particular issue is growing; as a society we need to dedicate more resources to treatment and prevention programs for women who find themselves addicted and pregnant.

Albert E. Chudley, MD
Professor of Pediatrics and Human Genetics
University of Manitoba
Winnipeg, Man.
chudley@cc.umanitoba.ca


CMAJ CMAJ email    GO TO CMAJ Readers' Forum    GO TO CMAJ home page