Table 2: Prevalence of glaucoma | |||||
Study and location | Age range of subjects, yr | Diagnostic methods* | Prevalence of glaucoma, % | % of subjects with normal IOP | |
Hollows et al, [44] Ferndale, Wales | 55-70 | T,D,VFD | 0.47 | 35 | |
Liebowitz et al, [46] Framingham, Mass. | 52-85 | T,VFD | 1.43 | 53 | |
Stromberg, [47] Skovde, Sweden | > 40 | T,D,VFD | 0.41 | 13 | |
Stromberg, [47] Dalby, Sweden | > 40 | T,D,VFD | 0.86 | 62 | |
Bankes et al, [48] Bedford, England | > 40 | T,D,VFD | 0.76 | 7 | |
Armaly, [49] Des Moines, Iowa | 20-89 | T,D,VFD | 4.08 | 68 |
*T = tonometry, D = inspection of optic disc, VFD = detection of visual field defect by perimetry