Table 2: Respondents' opinions on what they liked about MSS* | ||||||
Group; no. (and %) of respondents | ||||||
Opinion | Family physicians n = 236 | Obstetricians n = 92 | Midwives n = 21 | |||
Is an alternative to amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling in women > 35 yr; could decrease amniocentesis rate | 54 | (23) | 30 | (33) | 9 | (43) |
Provides reassurance | 37 | (16) | 12 | (13) | 2 | (10) |
Is easy to perform and is noninvasive | 34 | (14) | 10 | (11) | 2 | (10) |
Offers early identification of abnormalities; is a good screening test | 28 | (12) | 13 | (14) | 2 | (10) |
Provides increased choice for women | 16 | (7) | 3 | (3) | 6 | (29) |
Allows detection of Down syndrome for women < 35 yr | 12 | (5) | 11 | (12) | 0 | |
Has good availability | 12 | (5) | 3 | (3) | 2 | (10) |
Other | 34 | (14) | 12 | (13) | 1 | (5) |
There is little or nothing to like | 38 | (16) | 7 | (8) | 1 | (5) |
*Multiple responses were possible.
Includes the following: "patient brochure helpful," "is cost-effective" and "promotes discussion of abnormalities." |