Review of the screening history of Alberta women with invasive cervical cancer

 

Table 2: Category of screening failure, by histologic type of cancer and age of women
Category*Histologic type;
no. (and %) of women
Age, yr;
no. (and %) of women
Total
Squamous-cell carcinoma Adenocarcinoma<= 49 >= 50
No.

(and %)

95% CI†
Never screened62  (31.8) 12  (23.5)31  (19.4) 43  (50.0)74  (30.1) 24.4­36.2
Underscreened35  (17.9) 3  (5.7)24  (15.0) 14  (16.3)38  (15.4) 11.2­20.6
False-negative result31  (15.9) 11  (21.6)35  (21.9) 7  (8.1)42  (17.1) 12.6­22.4
Unconventional management or follow-up 14  (7.2)6  (11.8) 17  (10.6)3  (3.5) 20  (8.1)5.0­12.3
True-negative result 
  Technically limited smear11  (5.6) 8  (15.7)11  (6.9) 8  (9.3)19  (7.7) 4.7­11.8
  Technically adequate smear4  (2.1) 0  2  (1.2) 2  (2.3)4  (1.6) 0.4­4.1
Unable to classify38 (19.5) 11(21.6)40 (25.0)9 (10.5) 49(19.9)15.1­25.5
Total195  (79.3) 51  (20.7)160  (65.0) 86  (35.0)246  (100.0)  
*See Methods for definitions of categories.
†CI = confidence interval.

[Return to text]


| CMAJ September 1, 1997 (vol 157, no 5) / JAMC le 1er septembre 1997 (vol 157, no 5) |

CMA Webspinners / Les fileurs du Web de l'AMC