|
Guidelines not always an easy answer CMAJ 1999;160:984 In response to: T. Vandor; J. Goertzen Tom Vandor makes the interesting point that we frequently blame the user (the physician) when a clinical practice guideline is not "unanimously" followed, yet there is little research examining the deficiencies of guidelines. As outlined in our editorial, we believe that there are many other factors that affect the adoption of guidelines: physician and patient characteristics, social influences and practice characteristics. James Goertzen addresses what we believe is an important factor in guideline adoption, the issue of conflicting guideline recommendations from different agencies. He drives this point home by directing our attention to the article on prostate cancer [full text]1 that appears in the same issue as our editorial. It seems almost impossible not to step into the quagmire of conflicting guidelines when examining the recommendations for a common cancer, such as cancer of the prostate. We agree with Goertzen's conclusions: that many clinicians face almost daily difficulties as they discuss with their patients which guidelines to follow. It is for these reasons that our group is now working on a project, funded by the Medical Research Council of Canada, to determine how family physicians make decisions about cancer screening when the guideline is uncertain or when the guidelines from different agencies conflict.
Fred Tudiver, MD
Carol Herbert, MD
Reference
|