GO TO CMA Home
GO TO Inside CMA
GO TO Advocacy and Communications
GO TO Member Services
GO TO Publications
GO TO Professional Development
GO TO Clinical Resources

GO TO What's New
GO TO Contact CMA
GO TO Web Site Search
GO TO Web Site Map


CMAJ
CMAJ - January 25, 2000JAMC - le 25 janvier 2000

The diagnosis and management of insomnia in clinical practice: a practical evidence-based approach

Anne M. Holbrook, Renée Crowther, Ann Lotter, Chiachen Cheng, Derek King

CMAJ 2000;162(2):216­20


See also:
Contents
Abstract

Insomnia, or the dissatisfaction with the quantity, quality or timing of sleep, is a common complaint. Because the definition of "normal" sleep is not well established, the estimates of the prevalence and severity of insomnia vary widely. Insomnia is often secondary to underlying psychiatric and medical conditions, and these should be evaluated and treated as a first measure. Nonpharmacological interventions for insomnia including sleep hygiene manoeuvres and exercise are recommended, although the success of these interventions has not been well documented. Benzodiazepines have been the pharmacologic agents of choice for the treatment of insomnia, but there is reason to exercise caution with their use; their overall benefit compared with placebo appears to be minor, and they are often associated with adverse cognitive effects. Unfortunately, no other class of drugs has proven to be superior to the benzodiazepines in terms of benefit:risk ratio. Given the importance of sleep for health and normal daily functioning the diagnosis, prognosis and treatment of insomnia should be a research priority.

[Contents]


Insomnia, as classified in the DSM-IV 1 in the sleep disorders, is associated with complaints about the quantity, quality or timing of sleep at least 3 times a week for at least 1 month. The word complaint should be emphasized here because there are often significant differences between what people perceive and report about their sleep and what is measured objectively (e.g., by EEG monitoring)2 and individuals vary widely in the amount of sleep they require for optimal functioning.3 The sleep disturbance must be of sufficient severity to produce noticeable impairment in daytime function or mood. The frequency, duration and intensity components of the definition attempt to exclude the sleep disturbances that occur in everyday life.4

Insomnia has been classified in at least 3 different ways — by comorbidity, duration and severity (Table 1). Subtypes of extrinsic and intrinsic classifications for insomnia, proposed by the American Association of Sleep Disorders, await validation but some of the subtypes they have proposed, including inadequate sleep hygiene, insufficient sleep, altitude insomnia and environmental insomnia, should also be considered when classifying insomnia.6

[Contents]


Epidemiology and current practices

Patterns of sleep vary with age;3 it is thought that the amount of time spent in deep sleep decreases and the number of awakenings through the night and total time awake increases with age. Studies have reported more complaints regarding insomnia from older respondents,3,7 and sleep apnea may also be more prevalent in the elderly.8 However, a standard definition of what constitutes normal sleep is lacking, and community-based epidemiologic studies of sleep patterns that use similar definitions of insomnia and control for physical health, mental health, age and socioeconomic variables are scarce.7 The insomnia literature is therefore difficult to summarize to formulate precise estimates of the burden of illness.

Insomnia is a subjective complaint, but when validated by sleep laboratory studies many insomniacs have been found to have more sleep difficulties than normal sleepers.9 Population-based estimates of the prevalence of insomnia in adults have varied considerably, from 10.2%4 to 37.8%.10 In one survey of noninstitutionalized adults,11 17% of adults viewed their insomnia as significant (i.e., "had trouble and was bothered a lot in the past year"). The nature of difficulty with sleep in this sample was almost equally divided into 3 groups — difficulty getting to sleep but not maintaining sleep, difficulty maintaining sleep but not getting to sleep, and difficulty both getting to sleep and maintaining sleep. The prevalence of insomnia has also been reported to be higher in women, women in minority groups, people who are unemployed or separated, lower socioeconomic groups and in those with medical or psychiatric (particularly substance abuse) disorders.5,9,10,11,12,13,14,15

In a survey of office-based physicians in the United States,10 patients with insomnia had also been diagnosed with comorbid depression (30% of total), other mental diseases (20%) and organic disorders (19%); thus, only 31% of the sample were determined to have primary insomnia. In the National Institute of Mental Health Epidemiologic Catchment Area Study,4 a population-based survey using a structured DSM-III-based diagnostic questionnaire, 811 (10.2%) of the 7954 respondents complained of insomnia, and of those, 328 (40.4%) had a comorbid psychiatric disorder — most met the criteria for either anxiety or depression. For those with insomnia that persisted over a 12-month period, compared with those without insomnia, the risk of developing new major depression (odds ratio [OR] 39.8; 95% confidence interval [CI] 19.8­80.0), anxiety disorder (OR 25.6) or alcohol dependence (OR 3.4) was much higher.

Support for the hypothesis that physical and psychological wellness may be more strongly associated with sleep quality than age alone is provided by a small study on exercise interventions in a sample of healthy older adults (mean age, 57 years) from California.16 Although approximately one-third of the sample reported not feeling well rested, 5% or fewer described frequent problems with sleep latency, total quantity of sleep or awakenings. Many older surveys on the correlation between insomnia and advanced age reported much higher values for the prevalence of insomnia in elderly people but did not control for confounding variables such as comorbidity and use of medications.1,15 More recent studies suggest that insomnia is less correlated with age than conditions such as pain, nocturia, dyspnea, nocturnal myoclonus and psychopathology and their associated treatments.4,15,16,17,18,19,20,21 In evaluating these studies it should also be considered that a general decline in the amount of sleep obtained has been noted over the past 3 to 4 decades; this has been termed voluntary sleep restriction.16,22

Information on the prognosis of insomnia is scant, although complications associated with insomnia are presumed to be limited to impairments related to sleep deprivation, both actual and perceived, and to medications taken to augment sleep or increase alertness.1,23,24,25,26,27,28 The higher prevalence of anxiety and major depression among those suffering with insomnia is well documented, but it may also be that insomnia is an early symptom rather than a cause of anxiety or depression.4,11 Without careful longitudinal cohort studies documenting the course of any comorbid conditions, it will continue to be difficult to judge the prognosis of insomnia itself.

Results from a US-based study29 examining the performance of general practitioners in assessing and managing patients with insomnia suggest there is room for improvement in physicians' history taking when evaluating elderly patients with insomnia; 53% of physicians neglected to elicit any sleep history, and after asking a mean of only 2.5 questions, 46% identified a prescription medication as the best therapy. Research in Canada shows wide regional variation in benzodiazepine prescribing rates,30 disproportionate prescribing to women and elderly patients31 and higher prescribing rates by physicians who spend less time with each patient.32 These data suggest a need for training in treatment alternatives for insomnia.33

[Contents]


Treatment recommendations

An adequate sleep history, including sleep and wakefulness patterns, history from the bed partner, family history of sleep disorders and previous treatments, should be obtained before a diagnosis of insomnia is made and treatment is considered.9 We suggest the following 3-step approach to treatment. These recommendations are intended for primary care settings where the vast majority of treatment decisions are made.

Consider an underlying cause of insomnia

It is recommended that insomnia be considered as a symptom in the initial assessment, rather than a diagnosis. Therefore, psychiatric (depression, anxiety or panic), medical (arthritis, hyperthyroidism, congestive heart failure, obstructive sleep apnea or pulmonary disease) and pharmacological (caffeine, alcohol, hypnotic withdrawal, akathesias secondary to psychotropics or antidepressants) causes should be explored and treated before any other steps are taken to treat insomnia.

Nonpharmacological therapy

Sleep hygiene manoeuvres have considerable face validity but have not been extensively tested for efficacy in alleviating insomnia. Common recommendations include: regular daytime exercise; avoiding large meals at night; avoiding caffeine, tobacco and alcohol; reducing evening fluid intake; limiting the use of the bedroom to sleep and sex; maintaining a consistent wake-up time; avoiding or limiting daytime napping and avoiding bright lights (including television), noise and temperature extremes.5,7,9,23,34,35

These items can be variously grouped into 3 main forms of intervention23 — stimulus control, temporal control and sleep restriction. Stimulus control refers to the attempt to associate the bedroom with sleep rather than wakefulness.23,36,37 Temporal control measures recommend a constant time of waking with minimal daytime napping, and sleep restriction curtails slightly the time spent in bed and then gradually increases it as long as most of the time is spent sleeping.38,39 These behavioural therapies have been shown to be superior to placebo.40 Additional nonpharmacological interventions such as progressive muscle relaxation, biofeedback and cognitive-behavioural therapy may be of benefit as well but require additional expertise on the part of the provider.41,42,43 Many patients with insomnia do not recognize the important role that stress may play in their symptoms and, therefore, lose the opportunity to benefit from psychotherapy or behavioural therapy.3,12

Exercise deserves special mention here; a recent small randomized controlled trial44 demonstrated that moderate intensity exercise improved self-rated sleep quality, sleep-onset latency and sleep duration for older adults. This study provides evidence that is consistent with other trials that have reported the benefits of exercise for other chronic conditions such as arthritis.45 Because the majority of elderly people, particularly women, report low levels of physical activity,45,46 exercise may be one of the most cost-effective health interventions for people with insomnia.47

Pharmacological therapy

The principles of pharmacological therapy for insomnia are straightforward.

  • Use only medications known to be efficacious and safe; efficacy and safety beyond that of placebo should be proven.
  • Use the lowest effective dose for the shortest period of time (less than 2 weeks), and aim for intermittent dosing.
  • If use is prolonged or the dose is high, the discontinuation of sedatives should be gradual unless the patient can be observed for withdrawal reactions.

    Commonly used sedative medications that fail our first criterion of proven risk:benefit superiority when compared with placebo include over-the-counter sedatives and antihistamines, alcohol, chloral hydrate, tryptophan and barbiturates.3,23,48,49 Evidence is still weak for the efficacy of melatonin.50

    In the accompanying meta-analysis51 in this issue of CMAJ, randomized controlled trials of benzodiazepine use compared with placebo or alternative sedative medications for the treatment of insomnia were surveyed. Summary comparisons with placebo suggested only approximately a 11.7-minute reduction in patient estimates of sleep latency and a 48.4-minute increase in total sleep duration. Although statistically significant, the increase was of uncertain clinical importance. An estimate of clinical importance would require that placebo-controlled studies include outcomes such as patient quality of life, functional status and satisfaction with sleep. Notably, the improvement in sleep with exercise42 was virtually identical to the summary estimates for improvements noted with benzodiazepine use. There are currently few well-studied pharmacological alternatives to benzodiazepines; one such alternative is zopiclone (Imovane), often touted as a safer sedative, but our meta-analysis does not suggest any superiority of this agent.

    The rational use of benzodiazepines has been controversial for years.52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61 Although their overall usage has declined in this decade,30,62 benzodiazepines are still frequently prescribed for the elderly and are often used for long periods of time.63,64,65,66,67 There appears to be virtually no evidence to support the chronic use of benzodiazepines for insomnia. Various studies have reported a higher risk for motor vehicle accidents,68,69,70,71 falls and fractures72,73,74 and fatal poisonings,75 a general decline in functional status76 and cognitive impairment63,64,65,66,67,77 associated with the use of benzodiazepines. Concern regarding the adverse effects of benzodiazepines was raised with reports of confusion, bizarre behaviour and amnesia associated with the use of triazolam;53 it was eventually withdrawn from the market in countries such as Norway, Denmark, Brazil and the United Kingdom.

    Dependence on these medications is an important consideration and may explain the finding in our meta-analysis of a lower discontinuation rate among patients taking benzodiazepines than among those on placebo, despite a lack of evidence of clear-cut benefits. Unfortunately, studies that have demonstrated adverse effects generally employed a different design (cohort, case-control) and sampled different patient groups (older, often with comorbidity) than those in smaller controlled trials. These differences, plus a lack of any global measure of benefit:risk in any of these studies, make it very difficult to either condemn or endorse the use of benzodiazepines with any confidence.

    A further difficulty in evaluating the appropriateness of benzodiazepine use is its indication for use. Insomnia is a symptom rather than a disease, is highly prevalent in society and may be related to an underlying condition.23 Without better tools, such as sleep-related quality-of-life scales and objective measures of sleep deprivation, it is difficult to judge the impact of insomnia on people's everyday lives. Even if those with insomnia judge their lives to be significantly impacted by their condition, the differentiation between age-related physiologic change and treatable pathology can be difficult.7

    The paucity of nonpharmacological comparison trials is disappointing given the concern about the adverse effects of benzodiazepines, the potential for tolerance, and the potential for rebound insomnia when the drugs are taken irregularly. There is a clear need for further research in the area of nonpharmacological interventions.9,35,37 The research that is available does indicate that cognitive behavioural therapies should be preferred over benzodiazepines.40,43,78This will require an educational effort with physicians.

    The difficulty in making strong evidence-based recommendations is heightened by the lack of a safe and superior drug alternative to treat insomnia. The current "common sense plus evidence" approach, which will be presented in the Canadian guideline on the use and safety of benzodiazepines in the treatment of anxiety and insomnia in an upcoming issue of CMAJ, highlights the lack of strong evidence of major benefits and the existing evidence for potential harm. Benzodiazepines should only be tried after sleep hygiene and nonpharmacological manoeuvres have been considered. For physicians faced with the rare patient where other treatments have been exhausted and they feel they must prescribe a benzodiazepine, the drug should be discontinued within 2 to 4 weeks because it is unlikely to remain effective in the long-term.

    This study was funded in part by the Canadian Pharmaceutical Association (CPhA) and the Canadian Medical Association (CMA). The overview was prepared for a CPhA­CMA clinical practice guideline initiative on benzodiazepines. Dr. Holbrook is a recipient of an Ontario Ministry of Health Research Personnel Award (no. 04698).

    Competing interests: None declared.

    Comments Send a letter to the editor
    Envoyez une lettre à la rédaction

    [Contents]


    From the Centre for Evaluation of Medicines, St. Joseph's Hospital and McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.

    This article has been peer reviewed.

    Correspondence to: Dr. Anne M. Holbrook, Centre for Evaluation of Medicines, St. Joseph's Hospital and McMaster University, 50 Charlton Ave. E, Hamilton ON L8N 4A6; fax 905 521-6136; holbrook@mcmaster.ca Reprints will not be available.


    References

    1. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-IV). 4th rev ed. Washington: The Association; 1994.
    2. Hindmarch I, Ott H, Roth T. Sleep, benzodiazepines and performances: issues and comments. Psychopharmacology Suppl 1984;1:194-202. [MEDLINE]
    3. Hauri PJ, Esther MS. Insomnia. Mayo Clin Proc 1990;65:869-82. [MEDLINE]
    4. Ford DE, Kamerow DB. Epidemiology study of sleep disturbances and psychiatric disorders. An opportunity for prevention? JAMA 1989;262:1479-84. [MEDLINE]
    5. Maczaj M. Pharmacological treatment of insomnia. Drugs 1993;45:44-55. [MEDLINE]
    6. Diagnostic Classification Steering Committee. International classification of sleep disorders: diagnostic and coding manual. Rochester (MN): American Association of Sleep Disorders; 1990.
    7. National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Consensus Statement: the treatment of sleep disorders of older people. Sleep 1991;14 (2):169-77. [MEDLINE]
    8. Ancoli-Israel S, Kripke DF. Prevalent sleep problems in the aged. Biofeedback Self Regul 1991;16:349-59. [MEDLINE]
    9. Kales A, Soldatos R, Kales J. Sleep disorders: insomnia, sleepwalking, night terrors, nightmares and enuresis. Ann Intern Med 1987;106:582-92. [MEDLINE]
    10. Radecki SE, Brunton A. Management of insomnia in office-based practice. Arch Fam Med 1993;2:1129-34. [MEDLINE]
    11. Mellinger GD, Balter MB, Uhlenhuth EH. Insomnia and its treatment. Prevalence and correlates. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1985;42:225-32. [MEDLINE]
    12. Gillin JC, Byerley WF. The diagnosis and management of insomnia. N Engl J Med 1990;322:239-48. [MEDLINE]
    13. Greenblatt DJ, Harmatz JS, Shader RI. Pharmacokinetic determinants of dynamic differences among three benzodiazepine hypnotics. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1989;46:326-32. [MEDLINE]
    14. Consensus Conference. Drugs and insomnia. The use of medications to promote sleep. JAMA 1984;251:2410-4. [MEDLINE]
    15. Bixler EO, Kales A, Soldatos CR. Prevalence of sleep disorders in the Los Angeles metropolitan area. Am J Psychiatry 1979;136:1257-62. [MEDLINE]
    16. Bliwise DL, King A, Harris R, Hakell W. Prevalence of self-reported poor sleep in a healthy population aged 50­65. Soc Sci Med 1992;31(1):49-55.
    17. DeGraff W, Poelstra P, Visser P. The relations between the sleep quality and the patients morbidity history. Sleep Res 1998;12:306.
    18. Morgan K, Healey DW, Healey PJ. Factors influencing persistent subjective insomnia in old age: a follow-up study of good and poor sleepers aged 65 to 74. Age Ageing 1989;18:117-22. [MEDLINE]
    19. Liljenberg B, Almqvist M, Hetta J. Age and the prevalence of insomnia in adulthood. Eur J Psychiatry 1989;3:5-12.
    20. Prinz P, Williams DE, Vitiello MV. Prevalence of sleep complaints in aged populations with and without health screens. Gerontologist 1990;30:50A.
    21. Hetta J, Almqvist M, Liljenberg B. Epidemiological aspects on relations between psychiatric and somatic symptoms and sleep disturbance. Sleep Res 1987;16:357.
    22. Webb WB. Sleep in industrialized settings in the northern hemisphere. Psychol Rep 1985;57:591-8. [MEDLINE]
    23. Kupfer DJ, Reynolds CF. Management of insomnia. N Engl J Med 1997; 336(5):341-6. [MEDLINE]
    24. Dotto L. Sleep stages, memory and learning. CMAJ 1996;154(8):1193-6. [MEDLINE]
    25. Kripke D, Simons RN, Garfinkel L. Short and long sleep and sleeping pills: Is increased mortality associated? Arch Gen Psychiatry 1979;36:103-16. [MEDLINE]
    26. Appels A, de Vos Y, van Diest R. Are sleep complaints predictive of future myocardial infarction? Activ Nerv Super (Praha) 1987;29:147-51.
    27. Pollak C, Perlick D, Linser JP. Sleep problems in the community elderly as predictors of death and nursing home placement. J Community Health 1990; 15:123-35. [MEDLINE]
    28. Wingard DL, Berkman LF. Mortality risk associated with sleeping patterns among adults. Sleep 1983;6:102-7. [MEDLINE]
    29. Everitt DE, Avorn J. Clinical decision making in the evaluation and treatment of insomnia. Am J Med 1990;89:357-62. [MEDLINE]
    30. Borgono C, Busto UE, Sellers EM. Patterns of benzodiazepine (B) use and dependence in Canada [abstract]. Clin Pharm Ther 1999;65:142.
    31. Ohayon MM, Caulet M. Psychotropic medication and insomnia complaints in two epidemiological studies. Can J Psychiatry 1996;41:457-64. [MEDLINE]
    32. Davidson W, Molloy DW, Somers G, Bedard M. Relation between physician characteristics and prescribing for elderly people in New Brunswick. CMAJ 1994;150(6):917-21. [MEDLINE]
    33. Baillargeon L, Demers M, Gregoire JP, Pepin M. Study on insomnia treatment by family physicians [in French]. Can Fam Physician 1996;42:426-32. [MEDLINE]
    34. Reynolds CF, Kupfer DJ, Buysse DJ, Coble PA, Yeager A. Sub-typing DSM-III-R primary insomnia: A literature review by the DSM-IV Work Group on Sleep Disorders. Am J Psychiatry 1991;148:432-8. [MEDLINE]
    35. Chilcott LA, Shapiro CM. Behavioural strategies for sleep disorders. Med N Amer 1996;19:35-48.
    36. Bootzin RR, Perlis ML. Nonpharmacologic treatments of insomnia. J Clin Psychiatry 1992;53(Suppl):37-41. [MEDLINE]
    37. Baillargeon L. Traitements cognitifs et comportementaux de l'insomnie. Can Fam Physician 1997;43:290-6. [MEDLINE]
    38. Spielman AJ, Saskin P, Thorpy MJ. Treatment of chronic insomnia by restriction of time in bed. Sleep 1987;10:45-56. [MEDLINE]
    39. Friedman L, Bliwise DL, Yesavage JA, Salom SR. A preliminary study comparing sleep restriction and relaxation treatments for insomnia in older adults. J Gerontol 1991;46:P1-8. [MEDLINE]
    40. Murtagh DRR, Greenwood KM. Identifying effective psychological treatments for insomnia: a meta-analysis. J Consult Clin Psychol 1995;63:79-89. [MEDLINE]
    41. Hauri P. Treating psychophysiologic insomnia with biofeedback. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1981;38:752-8. [MEDLINE]
    42. Morin CM, Culbert JP, Schwartz SM. Nonpharmacological interventions for insomnia: a meta-analysis of treatment efficacy. Am J Psychiatry 1994;151: 1172-80. [MEDLINE]
    43. Morin CM, Colecchi C, Stone J, Sood R, Brink D. Behavioural and pharmacological therapies for late-life insomnia: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 1999;281:991-9. [MEDLINE]
    44. King AC, Oman RF, Brassington GS, Bliwise DL, Haskell WL. Moderate-intensity exercise and self-rated quality of sleep in older adults: a randomised controlled trial. JAMA 1997:277:32-7.
    45. Ettinger WH, Burns R, Messier SP, Applegate W, Rejeski WJ, Morgan T, et al. A randomized trial comparing aerobic exercise and resistence to a health education program on physical disability in older adults with knee osteoarthritis. The Fitness Arthritis and Seniors Trial (FAST). JAMA 1997; 277:25-31. [MEDLINE]
    46. McGinnis JM, Foege WH. Actual cases of death in the United States. JAMA 1993;270:2207-12. [MEDLINE]
    47. Millar WJ. A trend to a healthier lifestyle. Health Rep 1991;3:363-70. [MEDLINE]
    48. Steinberg AD. Should chloral hydrate be banned? Pediatrics 1993;92(3):442-6. [MEDLINE]
    49. Lasagna L. Over-the-counter hypnotics and chronic insomnia in the elderly. J Clin Psychopharmacol 1995;15:383-6. [MEDLINE]
    50. Brzezinski A. Melatonin in humans. N Engl J Med 1997;336(3):186-95. [MEDLINE]
    51. Holbrook AM, Crowther R, Lotter A, Cheng C, King D. Meta-analysis of benzodiazepine use in the treatment of insomnia. CMAJ 2000;162(2):225-33.
    52. Gerson M. The final episode of the triazolam saga? Prescr Int 1992;1:31-4.
    53. Wysowski DK, Barash D. Adverse behavioural reactions attributed to triazolam in the Food and Drug Administration's Spontaneous Reporting System. Arch Intern Med 1991;151:2003-8. [MEDLINE]
    54. Health Protection Branch. Health Canada statement on triazolam (Halcion). Dear Doctor Bulletin 1992; No. 39.
    55. Kales A. Triazolam in the elderly. N Engl J Med 1991;325:1742-3. [MEDLINE]
    56. Rosser WW. Anxiety over benzodiazepines. Can Fam Physician 1995;41:760-5. [MEDLINE]
    57. Lexchin J. Debating benzodiazepine use. Can Fam Physician 1995;41:1293-5. [MEDLINE]
    58. O'Donovan MC, McGuffin P. Short acting benzodiazepines. Dream drugs or nightmare? BMJ 1993;306:945-6. [MEDLINE]
    59. Glass R. Benzodiazepine prescription regulation. Autonomy and outcome. JAMA 1991;266(17):2431-3. [MEDLINE]
    60. Shader R, Greenblatt DJ, Balter MB. Appropriate use and regulatory control of benzodiazepines. J Clin Pharmacol 1991;31:781-4. [MEDLINE]
    61. Medawar C, Rassaby E, Guthrie B, editors. Power and dependence. London: Bath Press; 1992.
    62. Busto U, Lanctot KL, Isaac P, Adrian M. Benzodiazepine use and abuse in Canada. CMAJ 1989;141:917-21. [MEDLINE]
    63. Reinken J, Sparrow M, Campbell AJ. The giving and taking of psychotropic drugs in New Zealand. N Z Med J 1982;95:489-92. [MEDLINE]
    64. Thompson TL, Moran MG, Nies AS. Psychotropic drug use in the elderly (first of two parts). N Engl J Med 1983;308(3):134-8. [MEDLINE]
    65. Kruse WH. Problems and pitfalls in the use of benzodiazepines in the elderly. Drug Saf 1990;5:328-44. [MEDLINE]
    66. Tamblyn RM, McLeod PJ, Abrahamowicz M, Monette J, Gayton DC, Berkson L, et al. Questionable prescribing for elderly patients in Quebec. CMAJ 1994;150(11):1801-9. [MEDLINE]
    67. McIsaac W, Naylor CD, Anderson GM, O'Brien BJ. Reflections on a month in the life of the Ontario Drug Benefit Plan. CMAJ 1994;150(4):473-7. [MEDLINE]
    68. Neutel CI. Risk of traffic accident injury after a prescription for a benzodiazepine. Ann Epidemiol 1995;5(3):239-44. [MEDLINE]
    69. Ray WA, Fought RL, Decker MD. Psychoactive drugs and the risk of injurious motor vehicle crashes in elderly drivers. Am J Epidemiol 1992;136:873-83. [MEDLINE]
    70. Hemmelgarn B, Suissa S, Huang A, Boivin JF, Pinard G. Benzodiazepine use and the risk of motor vehicle crash in the elderly. JAMA 1997;278:27-31. [MEDLINE]
    71. Thomas RE. Benzodiazepine use and motor vehicle accidents. Can Fam Physician 1998;44:799-808. [MEDLINE]
    72. Tinetti ME, Speechly M, Ginter SF. Risk factors for falls among elderly persons living in the community. N Engl J Med 1988;319(26):1701-7. [MEDLINE]
    73. Ray WA, Griffin MR, Schaffner W, Baugh D, Melton LJ. Psychotropic drug use and the risk of hip fracture. N Engl J Med 1987;316(7):363-70. [MEDLINE]
    74. Ray WA, Griffin MR, Downey W. Benzodiazepines of long and short elimination half-life and the risk of hip fracture. JAMA 1989;262(23):3303-7. [MEDLINE]
    75. Serfaty M, Masterton G. Fatal poisonings attributed to benzodiazepines in Britain during the 1980's. Br J Psychiatry 1993;163:386-93. [MEDLINE]
    76. Ried LD, Johnson RE, Gettman DA. Benzodiazepine exposure and functional status in older people. J Am Geriatr Soc 1998;46:71-6. [MEDLINE]
    77. Greenblatt DJ, Shader RI, Abernethy DR. Drug therapy: current status of benzodiazepines. N Engl J Med 1983;309:354-416. [MEDLINE]
    78. Bell L, Tousignant P. The treatment of insomnia in the elderly: a cost-utility analysis [abstract]. Med Decis Making 1999;18:487.

    © 2000 Canadian Medical Association or its licensors