2010
Volume 5:100-116
 
Table of Contents
Past Volumes
button
Instructions to Authors
Editorial Board
Copyright Information
 
 
 

Cross-species Assessment of the Linguistic Origins
of Color Categories

Jules Davidoff
University of London

Joël Fagot
CNRS-Université de Provence


This article considers the relation between language and categorical perception (CP) of color. Two opposite theories are reviewed, the universalist position arguing that categories are universal with an essentially biological origin, and the relativist position that holds that color categories are essentially arbitrary and derive from color terms of the speaker’s language. A review of the human literature presents developmental, neuropsychological, cross-cultural, neuro-imaging and computer simulation evidence that CP of colors has at least partly linguistic origins. As animal studies also contribute to this debate, we then review evidence of CP in the visual and auditory domains, and pinpoint the inconsistencies of the literature. To make a direct comparison between humans and monkeys, experimental studies compared humans and baboons for their color thresholds and in a recognition memory task designed to assess CP of colors. Only humans showed better betweencategory than within-category discrimination performance, suggesting species differences in the processing of a color continuum. That study along with some of our previous research supports the theory of a linguistic origin for color categories in humans.

  Full-text PDF

Published by the Comparative Cognition Society

How to reference this article:

Davidoff, J., Fagot, J. (2010). Cross-species Assessment of the Linguistic Origins of Color Categories. Comparative Cognition & Behavior Reviews, 5, 100-116. Retrieved from http://psyc.queensu.ca/ccbr/index.html