2013
Volume 8:78-97
 
Table of Contents
Past Volumes
button
Instructions to Authors
Editorial Board
Copyright Information
 
 
 

Two Fields Are Better Than One: Developmental and Comparative Perspectives On Understanding Spatial Reorientation

Alexandra D. Twyman
University of Western Ontario

Daniele Nardi
Sapienza University

Nora S. Newcombe
Temple University


Occasionally, we lose track of our position in the world, and must re-establish where we are located in order to function. This process has been termed the ability to reorient and was first studied by Ken Cheng in 1986. Reorientation research has revealed some powerful cross-species commonalities. It has also engaged the question of human uniqueness because it has been claimed that human adults reorient differently from other species, or from young human children, in a fashion grounded in the distinctive combinatorial power of human language. In this chapter, we consider the phenomenon of reorientation in comparative perspective, both to evaluate specific claims regarding commonalities and differences in spatial navigation, and also to illustrate, more generally, how comparative cognition research and research in human cognitive development have deep mutual relevance.

  Full-text PDF

Published by the Comparative Cognition Society

How to reference this article:

Twyman, A.D., Nardi, D., Newcombe, N.S. (2013). Two Fields Are Better Than One: Developmental and Comparative Perspectives On Understanding Spatial Reorientation. Comparative Cognition & Behavior Reviews, 8, 78-97. Retrieved from http://comparative-cognition-and-behavior-reviews.org/index.html doi:10.3819/ccbr.2013.80005