T E I R E S I A S Volume 32 (Part 1), 2002 ISSN 1206-5730 BIBLIOGRAPHY Compiled by A. Schachter ----------------------------------------------------------------- SECTION 1: HISTORICAL (See also 021.2.06, 19, 28, 33, 34, 40) ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPORTS 021.1.01 P. Agallopoulou, ADELT 51 B’ (1996 [2001]) 66-67 (Paliios Oropos), 67-69 (Chalkoutsi Oropou). 021.1.02 A. Aravantinos & Others, ADELT 51 B’ (1996 [2001]) 257-286, incl. V. Aravantinos 257-259, 259-267 (Thiva), A. Charami 279-284 (Dilesi), 284 (Neochoraki), A. Gadolou 259 (Thiva), 278-279, 284-285 (Chaironeia), E. Kountouri 267-270 (Thiva), V. Sampetai 272-275 (Akraiphnion), E. Vlachogianni 275-278 (Akraiphnion), 286 (Paradoseis: Thespiai; Peristlloges: Thiva, Thespiai). 021.1.03 G. Touchais, S. Huber, A. Philippa-Touchais, “Chronique des fouilles / 1999”, BCH 124 (2000), 783 (Oropos), 783-784 (Oropos), 861 (Beotie), 862 (Livadia, Haghia Triada Livadias, Haliartos), 863 (Thespies, Eutresis, Platees, Tachi), 863-867 (Thebes), 867 (Tanagra), 867-868 (Dilessi), 868-869 (Akraiphnion), 869-870 (Grotte de Sarakinos), 870 (Medeon de Beotie, Orchomene, Akondio), 871 (Malessina, Theologos, Halai), 871-872 (Proskyna), 872 (Kyrtoni). BOOKS 021.1.04 V. Aravantinos, L. Godart, A. Sacconi, THEBES. FOUILLES DE LA CADMEE. I. LES TABLETTES DE LA ODOS PELOPIDOU = BIBLIOTECA DI “PASIPHAE” 1 (Pisa & Rome 2001) 462pp. [ISBN 88-8147-228-7]. 021.1.05 J. M. Camp, THE ARCHAEOLOGY OF ATHENS (New Haven & London 2001), xii & 340pp., esp. 319-321 (Eleutherai), 322-324 (Oropos [Amphiareion]) [ISBN 0-300-08197-9]. 021.1.06 M. B. Cosmopoulos, THE RURAL HISTORY OF THE GREEK CITY-STATES. THE OROPOS SURVEY PROJECT = BAR INTERNATIONAL SERIES 1001 (Oxford 2001), xiv & 166pp. [ISBN 1-84171-282-5] 021.1.07 H. R. Goette, ATHENS, ATTICA AND THE MEGARID. AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL GUIDE (London & New York 2001), xvi & 400pp., esp. 249-255 (The Amphiareion of Oropos and Avlona), 268 (Skourta Plain), 317-318 (Eleutherai) [ISBN 0-415-24370-X]. 021.1.08 A. Jacquemin, OFFRANDES MONUMENTALES A DELPHES = BEFAR 304 (Paris 1999) xii & 434pp., esp. pp. 308 (no. 008), 317 (099-103), 318 (106-107), 321 (138), 345 (380), 348 (412), 354 (460-464), 355 (465), 356 (474), 361 (543-548) [ISBN 2-86958-170-X]. 021.1.09 J. Knauss, SPAETHELLADISCHE WASSERBAUTEN: WASSERBAU UND WASSERWIRTSCHAFT 90 (Munich-Obernach 2001) vi & 144pp., esp. pp. 26-41 (Boeotische Poljen) [ISSN 1437-3513]. 021.1.10 D. Knoepfler, DECRETS ERETRIENS DE PROXENIE ET DE CITOYENNETE = ERETRIA FOUILLES ET RECHERCHES XI (Lausanne 2001), 490pp., esp. 250-253 (No. XVIII. Decret de proxenie pour des Tanagraiens), 367-369, 407-421 [ISBN 2-601-03270-7; ISSN 0425-1768]. 021.1.11 C. Loehr, GRIECHISCHE FAMILIENWEIHUNGEN. UNTERSUCHUNGEN EINER REPRAESENTATIONSFORM VON IHREN ANFAENGEN BIS ZUM ENDE DES 4. JHS.V.CHR. = INTERNATIONALE ARCHAEOLOGIE 54 (Rahden/Westf. 2000), xviii & 271, esp. pp. 18-19 (no. 13), 105-106 (no. 125), 107-108 (no. 128), 123-124 (no. 141) [ISBN 3-89646-326-8; ISSN 0939-0561X]. 021.1.12 D. G. Ogden, GREEK AND ROMAN NECROMANCY (Princeton & Oxford 2001) xi & 313pp., see Index svv. Amphiaraus, Trophonius [ISBN 0-691-00904-X]. 021.1.13 C. Perles, THE EARLY NEOLITHIC IN GREECE (Cambridge 2001) xiv & 356, see Index sv. Boeotia & passim [ISBN 0521-80181-8 (hb) / 00037-0 (pb)]. 021.1.14 R. Wachter, NON-ATTIC GREEK VASE INSCRIPTIONS (Oxford 2001), xxi + 398pp., esp. 9-25 (Boiotia), 253, & passim [ISBN 0-19-814093-2]. ARTICLES 021.1.15 V. Aravantinos, “Contenu, contexte et fonction du ‘tresor’ du palais mycenien de Thebes (Beotie): une approche economique et administrative”, KTEMA 26 (2001) 87-99. 021.1.16 V. Aravantinos, A. Konecny, I. K. Whitbread, “Plataiai: Die Kampagne 1999”, OEST.JAHRESH. 69 (2000) 9-15. 021.1.17 V. Aravantinos, A. Konecny, R. Marchese, “Plataiai: Die Kampagne 2000”, OEST.JAHRESH. 70 (2001) 9-19. 021.1.18 P. Bonnechere, “Prairie et jardins grecs de la Grece de Platon a l’Angleterre d’Alexander Pope”, in E. Delruelle & V. Pirenne-Delforge, edd., KEPOI. DE LA RELIGION A LA PHILOSOPHIE. MELANGES OFFERTS A ANDRE MOTTE = KERNOS SUPPLEMENT 11 (Liege 2001) [ISSN 0776-3824] 29-50, esp. 41-44 (Lebadee). 021.1.19 A. Dakouri-Hild, “The House of Kadmos in Mycenaean Thebes reconsidered: architecture, chronology, and context”, BSA 96 (2001) 81-122. 021.1.20 J. M. Fossey, “Theophoric Names in Central Greece and a Particular Case”, ANCIENT WORLD 32 (2001) 139-146. 021.1.21 L. Godart, “La Terre Mere et le monde Egeen”, in R. Laffineur & R. Haegg, edd., POTNIA = AEGAEUM 22 (Liege & Austin 2001) 463-466. 021.1.22 D. R. Jordan, “New Greek Curse Tablets (1985-2000), GRBS 41 (2000) 5-46, esp. 11-12 (Oropos). 021.1.23 S. Larson, “Boiotia, Athens, the Peisistratids, and the ODYSSEY’s Catalogue of Heroines”, GRBS 41 (2000) 193-222. 021.1.24 A. Sacconi, “Les repas sacres dans les textes myceniens”, in R. Laffineur & R. Haegg, edd., POTNIA = AEGAEUM 22 (Liege & Austin 2001) 467-470. 021.1.25 J. D. Sosin, “A Missing Woman; the Hellenistic Leases from Thespiae Revisited”, GRBS 41 (2000) 47-58. 021.1.26 E. Vlachogianni, “’THESAUROS’ ROMAIKON SESTERTION APO TI THIVA”. ARCHAIOGNOSIA 11 (2001/2002) 57-73 (German summary p. 71): 65-72 Catalogue, esp. nos. 1 (Titus), 2-12 (Trajan), 13 (Plotina), 14-22 (Hadrian), 23 (Antoninus Pius), 24-25 (Faustina I). 021.1.27 I. Worthington, “Tod II 198 (Athenian Honours for Eudemus of Plataea): Which War?” ZPE 137 (2001) 109-112. PAPERS READ 021.1.28 A. Dakouri-Hild, “The Production and Consumption of Prestige Artifacts in Mycenaean Thebes, Greece”, Annual Meeting, Archaeological Institute of America, Philadelphia, January 2002: AJA 106 (2002) 292 (summary). 021.1.29 A. Konecny & R. T. Marchese, :The Third Season of Excavations at Plataiai, Greece: An Analysis”, Annual Meeting, Archaeological Institute of America, Philadelphia, January 2002: AJA 106 (2002) 279 (summary). REVIEWS 021.1.30 P. A. Bernardini, ed., PRESENZA E FUNZIONE DELLA CITTA DI TEBE NELLA CULTURA GRECA (011.1.09) -[r] F. Souto Delibez, EMERITA 69 (2001) 385-386. 021.1.31 L. Darmezin, LES AFFRANCHISSMENTS PAR CONSECRATION EN BEOTIE ET DANS LE MONDE GREC HELLENISTIQUE (001.1.10) -[r] P. Cabanes, REA 103 (2001) 588-589. 021.1.32 M. Daumas, CABIRIACA (99.1.06) -[r] F. Queyrel, RA (2001) 396-397. 021.1.33 -[r] M.-C. Villanueva Puig, REA 103 (2001) 614-617. 021.1.34 J. M. Fossey, ed., BOEOTIA ANTIQUA vol. 6 (abstracted in TEIRESIAS 29 [1999]). -[r] D. W. Roller, AJA 106 (2002) 130-131. 021.1.35 D. G. Ogden, GREEK AND ROMAN NECROMANCY (021.1.12) -[r] S. I. Johnston, BMCR 2002.06.19. 021.1.36 C. Peege, DIE TERRAKOTTEN AUS BOEOTIEN DER ARCHAEOLOGISCHEN SAMMLUNG DER UNIVERSITAET ZURICH (011.1.12) -[r] E. Peppa-Papaioannou, ARCHAIOGNOSIA 10 (1999/2000) 243-244. 021.1.37 -[r] V. Jeammet, RA (2001) 391-392. ----------------------------------------------------------------- SECTION 2: LITERARY (See also 021.1.23) BOOKS 021.2.01 U. Berner, R. Feldmeier, B. Heininger, R. Hirsch-Luipold, PLUTARCH, IST ‘LEBE IM VERBORGENEN’ EINE GUTE LEBENSREGEL? (Darmstadt 2000) 176pp. [ISBN 3-534-14944-0]. 021.2.02 A. Perez Jimenez, J. Garcia Lopez, R. M. Agular, edd., PLUTARCO, PLATON Y ARISTOTELE. ACTAS DES V CONGRESO INTERNACIONAL DE AL I.P.S. (Madrid 1999) 696pp. ARTICLES 021.2.03 N. Bernard, “Der Dichter und sein Gegenstand - Zu Pindars siebentem Nemeischen Lied”, WUJBB 21 (1996/1997) 101-127. 021.2.04 B. J. J. M. Bongers, “Euripides BACCHAE 1064-9: Dionysus, the Wheel and the Lathe”, MNEMOSYNE 55 (2002) 83-86. 021.2.05 M. Clarke, “Thrice-ploughed woe (Sophocles ANTIGONE 859), CQ 51 (2001) 368-373. 021.2.06 J. Davidson, “A Puzzle in Antoninus Liberalis 23”, ACTA CLASSICA 43 (2000) 157-160. 021.2.07 F. Decreus, “Some aspects of methodological blindness in interpreting Sophocles’ OEDIPUS”, EUPHROSYNE 30 (2002) 325-333. 021.2.08 P. Draeger, “’Abbruchsformel’ und Jona-Motiv in Pindars vierter Pythischer Ode”, WUJBB 21 (1996/1997) 93-99. 021.2.09 N. C. Duehrsen, “PEIRASIN EN MEGALOIS (HES. TH. 335)”, WUJBB 20 (1994/1995) 87-90. 021.2.10 C. Eucken, “Das Drama zwischen Kreon und dem Chor in der ‘Antigone’”, WUJBB 18 (1992) 77-87. 021.2.11 F. Ferrari, “Sul prosodio pindarico per gli Egineti (= ‘PEANA’ 6, 123-183)”, STUDI CLASSICI E ORIENTALI 47 (1999) 149-158. 021.2.12 B. Gentili, “Communicazione sulla mia replica alla recensione di Carlo Odo Pavese a PINDARO, LE PITICHE”, QUCC 68 (2001) 167. 021.2.13 B. Gentili & L. Lomiento, “Corinna, LE ASOPIDI (PMG 654 col. III 12-51)”, QUCC 68 (2001) 7-20. 021.2.14 J. F. Gaertner, [Mosch.] 3.88 und Pindars Geburtsort”, ACTA ANTIQUA (BUDAPEST) 41 (2001) 263-266. 021.2.15 R. Hannah, “From Oral to Literary? The Case of the Parapegma”, in J. Watson, ed., SPEAKING VOLUMES (Leiden 2001) 139-159, esp. 139-142 (Homer and Hesiod). 021.2.16 J. Horvath, “Le silence d’Eteocle”, ACTA ANTIQUA (BUDAPEST) 41 (2001) 9-12. 021.2.17 P. Hummel, “Polysyntaxe et polysemie dans la poesie de Pindare”, QUCC 68 (2001) 41-48. 021.2.18 D. J. Jakob, “Wer spricht die Verse 585 und 594-5 der euripideischen Bakchen?” PHILOLOGUS 145 (2001) 348-351. 021.2.19 C. Jones, “Nero Speaking”, HARV.ST.CLASS.PHIL. 100 (2000) 453-462, esp. 458-460 (re IG 7.2713). 021.2.20 E. Lefevre, “Die Unfaehigkeit, sich zu erkennen: Sophokles’ ANTIGONE”, WUJBB 18 (1992) 89-123. 021.2.21 W. Luppe, “Hesiods Erzaehlung ueber die Nachkommen der Medusa sowie des Typhon und der Echidna bei Philodem”, WUJBB 20 (1994/1995) 79-85. 021.2.22 C. Mueller-Goldingen, “Politische Theorie und Praxis bei Plutarch”, WUJBB 19 (1993) 201-213. 021.2.23 G. Nagy, “’Dream of a Shade’: Refractions of Epic Vision in Pindar’s PYTHIAN 8 and Aeschylus’ SEVEN AGAINST THEBES”, HARV.ST.CLASS.PHIL. 100 (2000) 97-118. 021.2.24 M. Negri, “L’oschophorikon di POxy 2451 B fr. 17.6 e la sua posizione nell’edizione di Pindaro”, ZPE 138 (2002) 31-39. 021.2.25 I. Petrovic, “Die Bedeutung des Verses 523 in der ANTIGONE des Sophokles OUTOI SYNECHTHEIS, ALLA SYMPHILEIN EPHYN. Ein neuer Deutungsversuch”, ACTA ANTIQUA (BUDAPEST) 41 (2001) 359-362. 021.2.26 V. Pirenne-Delforge, “Prairie d’Aphrodite et jardin de Pandore. Le ‘feminin’ dans la THEOGONIE”, in 021.1.18: 83-99. 021.2.27 C. Preiser, “Die Opferung der Iphigenie - ein Motiv in Euripides’ TELEPHOS?” WUJBB 24 (2000) 29-35. 021.2.28 R. Preston, “Roman questions, Greek answers: Plutarch and the construction of identity”, in S. Goldhill, ed., BEING GREEK UNDER ROME (Cambridge 2001), 86-119. 021.2.29 D. S. Richter, “Plutarch on Isis and Osiris: Text, Cult, and Cultural Appropriation”, TAPA 131 (2001) 191-216. 021.2.30 J. M. Rist, “Plutarch’s AMATORIUS: a commentary on Plato’s theories of love?” CQ 51 (2001) 557-575. 021.2.31 F. Rodriguez Adrados, “La Composicion de los Poemas Hesiodicos”, EMERITA 69 (2001) 197-223. 021.2.32 G. Roskam, “A Gordian Knot in Plutarch (PRAEC. GER. REIP. 820D)”, PHILOLOGUS 145 (2001) 354-356. 021.2.33 G. Schepens, “Plutarch’s Viewing of Ancient Rome. Some Remarks on the LIFE OF PYRRHUS”, in L. Mooren, ed., POLITICS, ADMINISTRATION AND SOCIETY IN THE HELLENISTIC AND ROMAN WORLD = STUDIA HELLENISTICA 36 (Leuven 2000) 349-364. 021.2.34 U. Schmitzer, “Sieben Thebaner gegen Theben - Bemerkungen zur Darstellungsform in Xenophon, hell. 5,4,1-12”, WUJBB 22 (1998) 123-139. 021.2.35 H. Schwabl, “MISEO MNAMONA SYMPOTAN und das Gegenteil davon. Zum Eingang von Plutarchs Symposiaka”, WIENER STUDIEN 114 (2001) 95-104. 021.2.36 R. Scodel, “Poetic Authority and Oral Tradition in Hesiod and Pindar”, in J. Watson, ed., SPEAKING VOLUMES (Leiden 2001) 109-137. 021.2.37 D. R. Shackleton Bailey, “On Statius’ THEBAID”, HARV.ST.CLASS.PHIL. 100 (2000) 463-476. 021.2.38 W. J. Slater, “Pindar, NEMEAN 7.102 - past and present”, CQ 51 (2001) 360-367. 021.2.39 S. D. Sullivan, “NOOS in Pindar, PYTHIAN 6.47 and 51”, EUPHROSYNE 30 (2002) 367-370. 021.2.40 C. Watkins, “A Distant Anatolian Echo in Pindar: the Origin of the Aegis Again”, HARV.ST.CLASS.PHIL. 100 (2000) 1-14. PAPERS READ 021.2.41 L. Bowman, “The Audience of Euripides’ HERAKLES”, Annual Meeting, Classical Association of Canada, Vancouver, B.C., May 2002. 021.2.42 P. Calkin, “Gaia in Hesiod’s THEOGONY”, Annual Meeting, Classical Association of Canada, Vancouver, B.C., May 2002. 021.2.43 J. S. Carnes, “The Persistence of Myth: Archaic Modes of Expression in Pindar and Herodotus”, Annual Meeting, Classical Association of Canada, Vancouver, B.C., May 2002. 021.2.44 H. R. Marshall, “Reconstructing Plutarch’s EIS EMPEDOKLEIA”, Annual Meeting, Classical Association of Canada, Vancouver, B.C., May 2002. 021.2.45 J. R. Porter, “Just How in the Dark are these Girls? The Prologue to Sophocles’ ANTIGONE”, Annual Meeting, Classical Association of Canada, Vancouver, B.C., May 2002. 021.2.46 A. Teffeteller, “The Neoptolemos Ring in the Seventh Nemean”, Annual Meeting, Classical Association of Canada, Vancouver, B.C., May 2002. REVIEWS 021.2.47 U. Berner & others, PLUTARCH, IST ‘LEBE IM VERBORGENEN’ EINE GUTE LEBENSREGEL? (021.2.01) -[r] J. M. Lawless, BMCR 2002.06.39. 021.2.48 T. Duff, PLUTARCH’S LIVES (001.2.01) -[r] F. B. Titchener, AJPHIL 122 (2001) 586-589. 021.2.49 Esiodo, OPERE (G. Arrighetti)(99.2.05) -[r] O. Poltera, MUS.HELVET. 50 (2001) 223-224. 021.2.50 A. Perez Jimenez, J. Garcia Lopez, R. M. Agular, edd., PLUTARCO, PLATON Y ARISTOTELE (021.2.02) -[r] L. Gil, CUADERNOS DE FILOLOGIA CLASICA 11 (2001) 328-337. 021.2.51 J. Sirinelli, PLUTARQUE (002.2.10) -[r] T. Schmidt, PLOUTARCHOS 18 (2001) 20-23. 021.2.52 M. Sotiriou, PINDARUS HOMERICUS (99.2.17) -[r] B. K. Braswell, GNOMON 74 (2001) 1-4. ----------------------------------------------------------------- TEIRESIAS is distributed by Electronic Mail and is available on request from jaschachter@compuserve.com. TEIRESIAS (from 1991 on) is also available at the World-wide Web site of the National Library of Canada: http://collection.nlc-bnc.ca/100/201/300/teiresias/index.html ----------------------------------------------------------------- DEPOT LEGAL 2e trimestre 2002/LEGAL DEPOSIT 2nd quarter 2002 Bibliotheque national du Quebec Bibliotheque national du Canada/National Library of Canada