![Budget 2004](../images/budicon.jpg) |
![](../images/clear.gif) |
Main
Menu - Help
Budget 2004 - Budget Plan
- Table of Contents - Previous
- Next -
Annex 3
Canada's Financial Performance in an International Context
Introduction
- This annex reviews Canada’s financial position on a
comparable basis with that of the other Group of Seven (G-7) countries
(United States, United Kingdom, France, Germany, Japan and Italy). The
data relate to the total government sector, on a National Accounts
basis of accounting. For Canada, this includes the federal,
provincial-territorial and local government sectors, as well as the
Canada Pension Plan and the Quebec Pension Plan. In addition, this
annex compares the fiscal situation of the federal government in
Canada and the United States.
- On a total government sector basis:
- Canada was the only G-7 country to record a surplus in 2002 and
2003.
- According to the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and
Development (OECD), Canada is projected to be the only G-7 country
to record a surplus in both 2004 and 2005.
- Canada had the largest improvement in its budgetary situation
among the G-7 countries since 1992, including the sharpest decline
in the debt burden.
- Canada’s total government sector debt burden declined to an
estimated 35 per cent of gross domestic product (GDP) in 2003
and, according to the OECD, it is expected to be the lowest in the
G-7 in 2004.
- Looking at the federal government fiscal positions in Canada and the
U.S.:
- The Canadian federal government posted a surplus of
C$7.0 billion, or 0.6 per cent of GDP, in 2002–03 while
the U.S. federal balance fell further into deficit in 2002–03 to
US$375 billion, or 3.5 per cent of GDP.
- For 2003–04, a surplus of C$1.9 billion is estimated for
Canada, while a deficit of US$521 billion is projected for
the United States.
- As a result of continued surpluses at the federal level in Canada
and the recent deterioration in U.S. federal finances, the federal
market debt-to-GDP ratio in Canada is expected to fall below the
U.S. figure in 2003–04 for the first time since 1977–78.
Comparing Fiscal Results Across Countries
- Two important factors need to be taken into account in making
international comparisons: differences in accounting methods
among countries which affect the comparability of data, and
differences in financial responsibilities among levels of
government within countries.
- For these reasons, the standardized System of National
Accounts definitions and data are used, and the focus is the
total government sector (i.e. the combined national and
subnational levels) when making comparisons across G-7
countries. The OECD produces a complete series of estimates
based on this system. Unless otherwise indicated, the data
presented in this annex are based on the December 2003
OECD Economic Outlook.
|
Comparing Fiscal Results Between the
Canadian and U.S. Federal Governments
It is also important to note that there are certain fundamental
differences in the accounting practices and responsibilities of
the Canadian and U.S. federal governments. The U.S. federal
budgetary balance includes the substantial surpluses in the Social
Security system, whereas surpluses in the CPP are not included in
the Canadian federal figures. |
Canada was the only G-7 country at the total government sector level
to record a surplus in 2003 according to OECD
![Total Government Financial Balances, 2003 (OECD Estimates)](../images/bpa3_1e.gif)
- Canada was the only G-7 country to record a surplus in 2003,
according to OECD estimates of total government sector[1]
financial positions, measured on a National Accounts basis. This was
the second consecutive year in which Canada was the only G-7 country
in surplus.
- Canada’s surplus for 2003 is estimated at 1 per cent of GDP
by the OECD, compared to an average deficit of 4.7 per
cent of GDP in the G-7 countries.
Canada’s financial balance has improved significantly compared to
the G-7 average
![Total Government Financial Balances](../images/bpa3_2e.gif)
- Canada’s total government sector financial balance has improved
substantially since 1992, when it recorded a deficit of 9.1 per
cent of GDP, almost double the G-7 average.
- In 1997, fiscal improvements at all levels of government enabled
Canada’s total government sector to post a surplus. Canada has
consistently recorded surpluses since that time with 2003 being the
seventh consecutive year of surplus.
- Canada has shown the largest budgetary improvement of any of the
other G-7 countries over the past decade. From 1992 to 2003
Canada’s total government financial balance registered a
turnaround of about 10 percentage points.
- In contrast, despite showing improvement in the second half of the
1990s, the financial balance for the G-7 countries, on average, has
almost returned to 1992 levels.
Canada is the only G-7 country expected to maintain a financial
surplus
![Total Government Financial Balances](../images/bpa3_5F3e.gif)
- All of the G-7 countries continue to experience considerable
pressure on their finances.
- However, Canada is expected to continue to be the only G-7 country
to post a total government surplus this year and again next year,
according to OECD.
Canada’s program spending as a share of GDP is now below the G-7
average
![Total Government Program Spending](../images/bpa3_4e.gif)
- The substantial turnaround in Canada’s financial position, as a
percentage of GDP, is attributable in large part to a sharp
reduction in program spending, i.e. all expenditures less public debt
charges.
- Between 1992 and 2003 Canada’s total government program spending
as a share of GDP is estimated to have been reduced by 9.2 percentage
points, a far greater reduction than in any other G-7 country.
- As a result, Canada’s program spending relative to GDP is now
below the G-7 average, whereas in 1992 it was well above the G-7
average.
Canada has achieved the largest decline in the debt burden among the
G-7 countries
![Total Government Net Financial Liabilities](../images/bpa3_5e.gif)
- Canada had the second highest government debt burden in the
mid-1990s. Since then Canada’s total government sector has achieved
the largest decline in the debt burden of the G-7 countries.
Between 1995 and 2003 the net debt-to-GDP ratio was reduced by
34.3 percentage points.
- As a result, Canada’s total government debt burden moved below
the G-7 average in 2001, and is projected by the OECD to be the
lowest of the G-7 countries by the end of 2004.
Canada is one of very few countries with a sustainable public pension
system
A Sustainable Public Pension System
In 1997 measures were introduced to:
- Pre-fund the Canada Pension Plan (CPP) and Quebec Pension Plan
(QPP)
- Ensure sustainable benefits and contribution rates.
- Improve stewardship and accountability.
As a result of these reforms, on an actuarial basis, Canada’s
public pension system is one of the very few that is projected to be
sustainable over the next 50 years or more.
|
- International financial comparisons focus on the total government
sector, which includes the federal, provincial-territorial and local
governments as well as the CPP and QPP.[2]
- Although public pension systems around the world differ greatly,
Canada is one of very few countries with an actuarially balanced
public pension system.
- As a result of reforms in 1997, which increased the degree of
pre-funding of the CPP/QPP and improved stewardship and
accountability, the CPP/QPP is now actuarially sound for at least the
next 75 years.
- As a result of improvements to Canada’s pension system and the
substantial turnaround in the fiscal situation at both the federal and
provincial levels of government, Canada’s ability to meet future
fiscal challenges, including those associated with population aging,
has improved significantly since the mid-1990s.
Unlike the U.S., the federal government in Canada has maintained a
budgetary surplus since 1997–98
![Federal Government Budgetary Balances](../images/bpa3_6e.gif)
- The Canadian and U.S. federal governments achieved significant
turnarounds in their budgetary balances over the last decade, moving
from large deficits in the first half of the 1990s to surplus
positions in the latter half of the 1990s. However, since 2001–02
Canada has remained in surplus while the U.S. has returned to
deficits.
- The Canadian federal government posted a surplus of
C$7.0 billion, or 0.6 per cent of GDP, in 2002–03, while
the U.S. government recorded a deficit of US$375 billion, or
3.5 per cent of GDP. It is worth noting that the U.S. government’s
on-budget deficit, which excludes the Social Security account’s
surplus, was US$536 billion. Pension surpluses generated by the
CPP in Canada are not included in the federal balance.
- While the Canadian budgetary balance is expected to be in a
$1.9 billion surplus in 2003–04, the U.S. budget deficit
is expected to worsen to a record level of US$521 billion,
or 4.5 per cent of GDP (the on-budget deficit is projected
to be US$675 billion).
The federal market debt-to-GDP ratio in Canada is expected to fall
below that of the U.S. in 2003–04
![Federal Government Market Debt](../images/bpa3_7e.gif)
- Both countries achieved a significant decline in the market
debt-to-GDP ratio in the second half of the 1990s.
- As a result of continued surpluses at the federal level in Canada
and the recent deterioration in U.S. federal finances, the federal
market debt-to-GDP ratio in Canada is expected to fall below the U.S.
figure in 2003–04 for the first time since 1977–78. The Canadian
federal market debt-to-GDP ratio is expected to fall to 36.8 per
cent in 2003–04, while the U.S. figure is expected to rise to
38.6 per cent.
1 Includes federal,
provincial-territorial and local governments as well as the Canada Pension
Plan and Quebec Pension Plan. The OECD uses the term "financial
balance" to mean "budgetary balance". [Return]
2 The CPP and QPP are funded through
payroll contributions and ensure a basic level of retirement income for
all working Canadians. [Return]
- Table of Contents - Previous
- Next - |