|
|
Main
Menu - Help
Budget 2005 - Budget Plan
- Table of Contents - Previous
- Next -
Annex 2
Canada's Financial Performance in an International Context
Introduction
This annex reviews Canada’s financial position on a comparable basis
with those of the other Group of Seven (G-7) countries (United States, United
Kingdom, France, Germany, Japan and Italy). For Canada, this includes the
federal, provincial-territorial and local government sectors, as well as the
Canada Pension Plan and Quebec Pension Plan. This annex also compares the
fiscal situation of the federal government in Canada and the United States.
On a total government, National Accounts basis:
- Canada was the only G-7 country to record a surplus in 2002, 2003 and
2004.
- The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) projects
that Canada will be the only G-7 country to record a surplus in both 2005
and 2006.
- Canada has had the largest improvement in its budgetary situation among
the G-7 countries since 1992, including the sharpest decline in the debt
burden.
- Canada’s total government sector debt burden declined to an estimated
31 per cent of gross domestic product (GDP) in 2004, and has been the
lowest in the G-7 since 2003.
Looking at the fiscal positions of the federal government in Canada and the
United States:
- The federal government in Canada posted a surplus of C$9.1 billion or
0.7 per cent of GDP in 2003–04, while the U.S. on-budget federal
balance fell further into deficit in 2003–04, to US$567 billion or
4.9 per cent of GDP.
- For 2004–05 the federal government in Canada is forecasting a surplus of
C$3 billion, while a deficit of US$589 billion is projected for
the United States.
- As a result of continued surpluses in Canada and the deterioration in the
U.S., the federal market debt-to-GDP ratio in Canada fell below the U.S.
figure in 2003–04 for the first time since 1977–78, with the gap
expected to widen further in 2004–05.
Comparing Fiscal Results Across Countries
- Two important factors need to be taken into account in making
international comparisons: differences in accounting methods among
countries, which affect the comparability of data, and differences in
financial responsibilities among levels of government within countries.
- For these reasons, international comparisons rely on the standardized
System of National Accounts estimates for the total government sector (i.e.
the combined national and subnational levels). The OECD produces a complete
series of estimates based on this system. Unless otherwise indicated, the
data presented in this annex are based on the December 2004 OECD
Economic Outlook.
|
Comparing Fiscal Results Between the Canadian and the
U.S. Federal Governments
- It is important to note that there are certain fundamental differences in
the accounting practices and responsibilities of the Canadian and U.S.
federal governments. The U.S. federal budgetary balance includes the
substantial surpluses in the Social Security system, whereas surpluses in
the Canada Pension Plan are not included in the Canadian federal figures.
For this reason, the Canadian federal balance is more comparable with the
"on-budget" balance in the U.S. (which excludes Social Security),
while U.S. government debt is more comparable with federal market debt in
Canada.
|
Canada is again expected to be the only G-7 country to record a surplus in
2005 and 2006
- Canada was the only G-7 country to record a surplus in 2004, according to
OECD estimates of the total government sector[1]
financial position
on a National Accounts basis. This was the third consecutive year in which
Canada was the only G-7 country in surplus.
- Canada is the only G-7 country to have recorded eight consecutive
surpluses since 1960, the first year for which comparable international
fiscal statistics are available from the OECD.
- Canada’s surplus for 2004 is estimated at 1.1 per cent of GDP,
compared to an average deficit of 4.2 per cent in the G-7 countries.
- Moreover, Canada is expected to continue to be the only G-7 country to
post a total government surplus in 2005 and 2006, according to the OECD.
Canada’s financial balance has improved significantly compared to the G-7
average
- Canada’s total government sector financial balance has improved
substantially since 1992, when it was in deficit equal to 9.1 per cent
of GDP, almost double the G-7 average.
- By 1997, fiscal improvements at all levels of government enabled Canada’s
total government sector to move into surplus. Last year, Canada recorded its
eighth consecutive budgetary surplus.
- Canada has registered the largest budgetary improvement of any G-7 country
since its deficit peaked in 1992, registering a turnaround in its total
government financial balance of more than 10 percentage points from 1992 to
2004.
- In contrast, the average financial balance of the G-7 countries is now
similar to 1992 levels, despite improvements in the second half of the
1990s.
Canada’s program spending as a share of GDP is now below the G-7 average
- The substantial turnaround in Canada’s financial position, as a
percentage of GDP, is attributable in large part to a sharp reduction
in program spending, i.e. all expenditures less public debt charges.
- Between 1992 and 2004, Canada’s total government program spending as a
share of GDP is estimated to have been reduced by 9.4 percentage points. In
contrast, the average for the G-7 countries remained virtually unchanged
over this period.
- Canada’s program spending relative to GDP is below the G-7 average and
the third lowest in the G-7, only slightly higher than in the United States
and Japan. The OECD expects that this will continue in both 2005 and 2006.
Canada’s debt burden has declined from the second highest to the lowest
among G-7 countries
- In the mid-1990s, Canada’s ratio of total government net financial
liabilities to GDP was the second highest in the G-7. By 2003 Canada had the
lowest ratio in the G-7.
- Since its peak in 1995, Canada’s ratio of total government net financial
liabilities to GDP is estimated to have been reduced by 38.2 percentage
points to 31.1 per cent of GDP in 2004, which was again the lowest in
the G-7.
- The OECD estimates that this will continue in both 2005 and 2006. In
contrast, the debt burdens of the other G-7 countries, with the exception of
Italy, are projected to continue to increase.
Canada is one of very few countries with a sustainable public pension
system
A Sustainable Public Pension System
In 1997 measures were introduced to:
- Pre-fund the Canada Pension Plan (CPP) and Quebec Pension Plan (QPP).
- Ensure sustainable benefits and contribution rates.
- Improve stewardship and accountability.
As a result of these reforms, on an actuarial basis, Canada’s public
pension system is one of very few that is projected to be sustainable over at
least the next 75 years.
|
- International financial comparisons focus on the total government sector,
which includes the federal, provincial-territorial and local governments as
well as the CPP and QPP.[2]
- Although public pension systems around the world differ greatly, Canada is
one of very few countries with an actuarially balanced public pension
system.
- As a result of reforms in 1997, which increased the degree of pre-funding
of the CPP/QPP and improved stewardship and accountability, the CPP/QPP is
now actuarially sound for at least the next 75 years.
- As a result of improvements to Canada’s pension system and the
substantial turnaround in the fiscal situation at both the federal and
provincial levels, Canada’s ability to meet future fiscal challenges,
including those associated with population aging, has improved significantly
since the early 1990s.
The federal government in Canada has maintained a budgetary surplus since
1997–98, unlike the U.S.
- The improved federal fiscal situation in Canada is in stark contrast to
recent developments in the U.S. Like Canada, the U.S. federal government
achieved a significant turnaround in its budgetary balance in the second
half of the 1990s, moving from large deficits to surpluses. However, since
2000–01 the U.S. has returned to deficits whereas Canada has continued to
record uninterrupted surpluses.
- The Canadian federal government posted a surplus of C$9.1 billion or
0.7 per cent of GDP in 2003–04, while the U.S. government incurred an
"on-budget" deficit[3] of US$567 billion or 4.9 per cent
of GDP. Even when Social Security surpluses are included, the U.S.
"unified budget" deficit was US$412 billion, or 3.6 per
cent of GDP in 2003–04.
- While the Canadian federal government is forecasting a surplus of
C$3 billion in 2004–05, the U.S. on-budget deficit is expected to
deteriorate to US$589 billion or 4.8 per cent of GDP (with a
unified budget deficit of US$427 billion). The Administration does not
project a return to balanced budgets for at least the next five years.[4]
The federal market debt-to-GDP ratio in Canada fell below that of the U.S.
in 2003–04
- As a result of continued surpluses at the federal level in Canada and the
deterioration in U.S. federal finances, the federal market debt-to-GDP ratio
in Canada fell below the U.S. figure in 2003–04 for the first time since
1977–78.
- The Canadian federal market debt-to-GDP ratio fell to 36.1 per cent
in 2003–04, from almost 60 per cent in 1995–96, while the U.S.
figure rose for the third consecutive year last year to 37.2 per cent.
- This gap is expected to widen in 2004–05 as the Canadian ratio is
expected to fall to 34.0 per cent while the U.S. ratio is expected to
rise to 38.6 per cent.
1 Canada’s total government sector includes the federal,
provincial-territorial and local governments, as well as the Canada Pension
Plan and Quebec Pension Plan. [Return]
2 The CPP and QPP are funded through payroll contributions and ensure
a basic level of retirement income for all working Canadians. [Return]
3 The U.S. on-budget balance is more comparable with the Canadian
federal budgetary balance because it excludes the pension surpluses of the
U.S. Social Security system. The balance of the CPP is not included in the
Canadian federal budgetary balance figures. [Return]
4 According to the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), the U.S. government will remain in deficit for at least the next 10 years. [Return]
- Table of Contents - Previous
- Next -
|