|
![](../images/clear.gif) |
Main
Menu - Help
Budget 2005 - Budget Plan
- Table of Contents - Previous
- Next -
Highlights
- Canada has achieved an outstanding fiscal turnaround since the early
1990s. This, combined with low and stable inflation, has enabled the
economy to better weather economic shocks.
- Exceptionally strong employment growth (the highest in the Group of Seven)
and improved productivity growth have given Canada the fastest rate of
increase in living standards among G-7 countries since balancing the budget
in 1997.
- The Canadian economy grew at a solid pace in the first three quarters of
2004, thanks to consistent growth in final domestic demand. Real gross
domestic product (GDP) advanced 2.7 per cent in the first quarter
before strengthening to 3.9 per cent in the second and 3.2 per
cent in the third.
- Since the end of 2002, the Canadian dollar has appreciated more than
25 per cent against the U.S. dollar. On a trade-weighted basis, the
Canadian dollar has risen more than any other major floating currency.
Adjusting to this rapid appreciation is a major challenge for Canadian
exporters.
- Private sector forecasters expect somewhat weaker near-term economic
growth than previously anticipated. When surveyed in December by the
Department of Finance, the forecasters expected growth to be 2.9 per
cent in 2005, down from 3.2 per cent in the November 2004 Economic
and Fiscal Update. For 2006, they expect growth of 3.1 per cent,
unchanged from the November Update.
- Despite the still-encouraging growth outlook for the Canadian and global
economies, there remain significant risks.
- In the near term, the large and persistent U.S. current account deficit
presents a key risk. This imbalance could result in a further depreciation
of the U.S. dollar against all major currencies, including the Canadian
dollar. The speed at which the economy adjusts to an appreciation of the
Canadian dollar and the magnitude of the adjustment are also uncertain.
- Over the medium term, the U.S. budget deficit remains the principal
downside risk. If not corrected, the deficit could put upward pressure on
interest rates, crowd out business investment and dampen growth in both the
U.S. and Canada. Conversely, a serious effort to reduce the budget deficit
could temporarily lower growth in the U.S., which would also negatively
affect Canadian growth.
- While the risks to the outlook are negative on balance, a strong
macroeconomic framework has improved Canada’s ability to deal with these
risks should they materialize.
Introduction
This chapter reviews recent economic developments and prospects. Using the
average of private sector economic forecasts, it establishes the
economic-planning assumptions that underlie the Government’s budget plan and
presents an assessment of risks and uncertainties associated with the economic
outlook.
The Canadian economy recorded solid growth in the first three quarters of
2004, supported by healthy increases in final domestic demand. Strong global
growth in 2004 and rising demand for Canadian commodities contributed to a
mid-year burst of increased export activity. However, the rising Canadian
dollar took its toll on exports in the latter part of the year.
Looking ahead, forecasters expect somewhat weaker near-term economic growth
than estimated at the time of the November 2004 Economic and Fiscal
Update. This reflects the recent appreciation of the Canadian dollar. The
risks to the forecast are mainly external, stemming from uncertainty about
further exchange rate adjustments and their impact on domestic demand.
Before turning to recent developments in the Canadian economy and the
outlook, this chapter will review Canada’s fiscal and monetary framework,
which has contributed to sustained improvements in Canadian living standards
over the past eight years and enhanced the overall resiliency of the economy.
A Review of Canada’s Macroeconomic Framework
A decade of achievement—Canada’s fiscal turnaround is unmatched among
G-7 countries
![Total Government Financial Balances/Total Government Net Financial Liabilities](../images/bpc2_1e.gif)
- Canada’s fiscal performance over the past 10 years is unmatched among
G-7 countries. In 1995 Canada’s total government deficit was well above
the G-7 average. However, significant fiscal improvements at all levels of
government enabled Canada’s total government to post a surplus in 1997.
Since then Canada has recorded a total government surplus every year, while
the average deficit among G-7 countries has deteriorated rapidly since 2000.
Indeed, Canada has been the only G-7 country to record a total government
budget surplus in each of the past three years. This strong overall fiscal
performance, together with sustained economic growth, has given Canada a net
debt-to-GDP ratio of a projected 31 per cent in 2004, the lowest in the
G-7.
- The macroeconomic reforms taken over the last decade have enabled the
Canadian economy to weather economic shocks better than in the past. The
OECD recently acknowledged this benefit, stating: "the Canadian economy
has delivered solid performance for nearly a decade with increased
resilience to economic shocks, demonstrating the benefits of a well designed
macroeconomic framework and the pay off from a range of structural reforms
implemented since the late 1980s."[1]
Improved national saving has put net foreign debt on a firm downward track
![Surces of Saving/Net Foreign Debt](../images/bpc2_2e.gif)
- In 1993 the total government deficit meant that Canada needed foreign
sources of saving of 2.1 per cent of GDP to finance domestic
investment. As a result, net foreign debt as a share of GDP increased,
peaking at more than 43 per cent in 1993.
- However, the shift from deficits to surpluses has reduced Canada’s
reliance on foreign sources of funds and has helped generate sustained
current account surpluses, lowering Canada’s net foreign debt to about
15 per cent of GDP in 2004.
- Reducing net foreign debt benefits Canada by reducing net investment
income flows to foreigners and cutting the economy’s exposure to global
financial market shocks.
- These developments stand in sharp contrast to the United States, where
large current account deficits raised the stock of net foreign debt as
a per cent of GDP to more than 21 per cent by 2003.
Years of low and stable inflation, along with a track record of fiscal
discipline, have led to low interest rates
![Total and Core Inflation/Bond and Mortgage Rates](../images/bpc2_5F3e.gif)
- The credibility of Canada’s monetary policy, achieved through more than
a decade of low and stable inflation, has complemented fiscal reform.
- Since 1993 inflation in Canada has averaged 1.9 per cent, which is
very close to the mid-point of the current inflation-targeting range of 1 to
3 per cent agreed upon by the Bank of Canada and the Government of
Canada.
- Low and stable inflation, together with a strong fiscal position, has
given the Bank of Canada the flexibility to respond quickly and decisively
to negative shocks either from external sources, such as the global slowdown
in 2001, or domestic shocks such as the economic effects of severe acute
respiratory syndrome and bovine spongiform encephalopathy (mad cow disease).
- Furthermore, by eliminating the deficit and moving to sustained fiscal
surpluses in 1997, Canada has improved its international fiscal credibility,
restoring its AAA rating in financial markets. This in turn has led to
reductions in risk premiums and interest rates.
- Lower interest rates and the reduction of public debt have trimmed
debt-servicing costs, freeing up resources to deliver significant tax
reductions to all Canadians and to invest in key strategic areas in support
of economic growth. Lower interest rates have also provided strong support
to interest-sensitive sectors such as housing, consumer spending and
business investment.
Sound fiscal and monetary policies have contributed to increased employment
and sustained improvements in Canadian living standards
![Employment Growth in G-7 countries, 1997-2004/Real GDP Per Capita Growth in G-7 Countries, 1997-2004](../images/bpc2_4e.gif)
- Improved fiscal and monetary policies have created the conditions for
stronger growth in employment and productivity. These two factors have
driven significant gains in Canadian living standards since 1997.
- Canada achieved exceptionally strong employment growth between 1997 and
2004—by far the best in the G-7 and nearly double the pace recorded in the
U.S. In 2003 Canada had the second highest employment rate—the proportion
of Canadians between the ages of 15 and 64 with a job[2]—in the G-7.
- Productivity growth in Canada has also improved, rising on average
1.7 per cent per year over the past eight years, compared with average
growth of 1.1 per cent per year between 1980 and 1996.
- Between 1997 and 2004 Canada ranked first in the G-7 in average real GDP
per capita growth, which is the most commonly used measure of the change in
average living standards. This is the result of stronger employment and
productivity growth. Canada’s real GDP per capita increased more in the
past 8 years than in the previous 18.
Recent Canadian Economic Developments
Final domestic demand supported Canadian economic growth in the first three
quarters of 2004
![Growth in Canadian Real GDP and Final Domestic Demand](../images/bpc2_5e.gif)
- The Canadian economy grew at a solid pace in the first three quarters of
2004, thanks in large part to consistent growth in final domestic demand.
- Strong export growth also supported GDP from late 2003 to mid-2004, partly
as a result of robust global demand.
- Exports have weakened since mid-2004 in part because of the appreciation
of the Canadian dollar.
Employment growth has remained strong …
![Employment and the Unemployment Rate/Employment Growth by Region](../images/bpc2_6e.gif)
- Between January 2003 and January 2005, the economy created more
than 500,000 new jobs, nearly all of which were full-time. The employment
rate reached a record high of 62.8 per cent in May 2004 and remained
close to that level for the rest of the year and into 2005. Both the
employment rate and the participation rate—the total labour force
expressed as a percentage of the working-age population—remain higher in
Canada than in the U.S.
- With strong job creation in Canada, the unemployment rate fell from nearly
8.0 per cent in August 2003 to a low of 7.0 per cent in
January 2005, despite near record rates of participation in the labour
market.
- Employment increased throughout Canada, with British Columbia and Prince
Edward Island recording the largest percentage increases.
… which has contributed to disposable income growth
![Growth in Real Personal Disposable Income Per Capita](../images/bpc2_7e.gif)
- Strong job gains, particularly in full-time positions, have contributed to
growing real personal disposable income per capita.
- In the third quarter of 2004, real personal disposable income per capita
was 1.3 per cent higher than the level of a year earlier, and it has
grown 14 per cent since its trough in the second quarter of 1996.
Employment gains and disposable income growth have supported consumer
confidence and growth in consumer spending
![Index of Consumer Attitudes/Growth in Real Consumer Spending on Goods and Services](../images/bpc2_8e.gif)
- Canadian consumers were upbeat in 2004 as a result of solid full-time job
growth and rising incomes. Surveys show that nearly 60 per cent of
Canadians felt that it was a good time to make a major purchase and over
30 per cent expected further income gains.
- This confidence, along with income growth, supported consumer spending.
Consumption growth rebounded at the beginning of 2004 following slow growth
at the end of 2003 and remained healthy in the second and third quarters.
Housing market activity remains strong, aided by continued low interest
rates
![Housing Affordability and One-Year Mortgage Rate/Housing Starts](../images/bpc2_9e.gif)
- Low interest rates and higher incomes have contributed to sustained
improvements in housing affordability, which stood near its best level on
record in 2004. This has supported a very high level of housing activity.
- Housing starts reached an average of over 230,000 units in 2004, the
highest annual level in 17 years, and 6.9 per cent above the previous
year’s level.
Low borrowing costs, healthy profits and strong business confidence …
![Debt as a Share of Net Worth and Corporate Profits as a Share of GDP/Index of Business Confidence](../images/bpc2_10e.gif)
- In the third quarter of 2004, corporate profits were 22.1 per cent
higher than in the third quarter of 2003. At 13.9 per cent, profits as
a share of GDP reached a 30-year high and were well above the average of the
last 40 years. In particular, mining firms saw profits jump sharply in the
third quarter due to strong global demand. As well, oil and gas firms
benefited during 2004 from higher prices and strong international demand. In
general, strong levels of profitability have allowed firms to strengthen
their balance sheets, resulting in low debt levels as a share of corporate
net worth.
- Reflecting in part the strength in profits, business confidence has
remained high. About half of the firms surveyed by the Conference Board of
Canada in the fourth quarter of 2004 believed that their financial position
and profitability will improve over the next six months. Furthermore, the
Canadian Federation of Independent Businesses’ survey of small and
mid-sized enterprises, released in December 2004, showed that
businesses were more confident about their prospects than they had been
earlier in the year.
… continue to support business investment, particularly in machinery and
equipment—a key driver of productivity growth
![Real Business Non-Residential Investment Growth](../images/bpc2_11e.gif)
- Business investment spending grew strongly in the first three quarters of
2004, particularly in machinery and equipment. Rapid gains occurred in
investment in computers, while growth in software investment and industrial
machinery investment rebounded in the third quarter.
- Business investment was supported by above average levels of capacity
utilization in the third quarter. In the fourth quarter of 2004, more than
half of firms surveyed felt that it was a good time to make capital
investments. Business investment has also been helped by the appreciation of
the Canadian dollar, which lowers the price of imported machinery and
equipment.
However, exports and imports have been affected by the strength of the
Canadian dollar, especially in the latter half of 2004
![Growth in Canadian Real Exports and U.S. Final Domestic Demand/Growth in Canadian Real Imports and Final Domestic Demands](../images/bpc2_12e.gif)
- The rapid appreciation of the Canadian dollar appears to have affected
exports throughout much of 2003. While exports rebounded faster than
expected between late 2003 and mid-2004, they resumed their decline in the
third quarter in spite of continued growth in U.S. demand. The renewed
weakness likely reflects the effects of both the 2003 and recent further
appreciation of the dollar, with much of the adjustment to the recent
appreciation still ahead. Adjusting to this appreciation will be a key
challenge for exporting firms.
- On the import side, the stronger Canadian dollar, along with continued
strength in Canadian domestic demand, contributed to sustained growth in
imports over much of 2003 and 2004.
- The speed at which dollar movements affect trade depends on a number of
factors. An appreciation of the Canadian dollar initially reduces the
profits of exporting firms as sales in foreign currency generate lower
revenue when converted to Canadian dollars. Some firms can delay the impact
on profits through hedging instruments. Firms that have no control over the
U.S. dollar price they can charge will see no change in U.S. demand for
their products, but will gradually adjust their costs and output in response
to lower profits.
- Some exporters will take advantage of cheaper imported goods to boost
their investment spending, which in turn raises productivity. Companies that
can offset some of the appreciation by raising the U.S. dollar price they
charge their customers may experience a smaller profit decline but will face
a direct, and relatively fast, drop in U.S. demand. While large swings in
the dollar can affect export and import growth quite quickly, the full
adjustment can be protracted. The speed of adjustment is quite uncertain.
The Canadian Dollar
The Canadian dollar appreciated further against the U.S. dollar in 2004
![The Canadian Dollar](../images/bpc2_13e.gif)
- The Canadian dollar made rapid gains against the U.S. dollar in 2003,
appreciating 22 per cent during the year.
- After falling back somewhat in early 2004, the Canadian dollar resumed its
ascent against the U.S. dollar, gaining 13 per cent between the end of
May and the end of December.
- Stronger global growth and increased demand for commodities has driven
part of the rise in the value of the Canadian dollar over the past two
years. Since Canada is a net exporter of commodities, our currency often
rises against the U.S. dollar when global commodity prices increase.
- However, the appreciation of the Canadian dollar also reflects global
portfolio adjustments in response to persistent U.S. current account
imbalances. All major floating currencies have climbed sharply against the
U.S. dollar over the past two years.
While many major currencies have appreciated against the U.S. dollar, the
Canadian economy is more exposed to U.S. currency fluctuations
![Exports as a Share of GDP in 2003](../images/bpc2_14e.gif)
- While some major currencies have appreciated more than the Canadian dollar
over the past two years, on a trade-weighted basis the Canadian dollar has
risen more than any other major currency.
- In Canada, total trade, and in particular exports to the U.S., represents
a higher proportion of GDP than in many other countries. As a result, the
depreciation of the U.S. dollar has been a more significant economic
development for Canada than for other major economies.
Strong global demand for commodities has contributed to the appreciation of
the Canadian dollar …
![Commodity Prices](../images/bpc2-15.gif)
- Between January 2003 and August 2004, demand for non-energy
commodities surged, pushing the non-energy commodity price index up nearly
40 per cent. A boom in North American residential construction led to
strong gains in the price of forestry products. Base metal prices rose to a
15-year high in the fourth quarter of 2004, reflecting very strong global
demand, and in particular a solid rebound in U.S. manufacturing output.
- Strong growth in world demand for oil, notably from China and other
non-OECD Asian countries, along with instability in the Middle East, has
kept oil prices high by historical standards. Oil prices spiked sharply in
the fall of 2004, peaking at more than US$55 per barrel in late October.
After falling in November and December, oil prices edged back up to
US$45 per barrel by early February, 2005.
- Looking ahead, both energy and non-energy commodity prices are expected to
soften, reflecting expectations of a moderation in world economic growth.
… but global current account imbalances have led to a depreciation of the
U.S. dollar against many currencies
![U.S. Current Account and Real Trade-Weighted Exchange Rate](../images/bpc2-16.gif)
- During the first half of the 1980s, the U.S. current account deficit
steadily widened to more than 3 per cent of GDP. A significant
depreciation of the inflation-adjusted U.S. dollar against the currencies of
its major trading partners eventually reduced the current account deficit,
but this turnaround took some time.
- Between 1995 and the first quarter of 2002, the U.S. dollar rose about
30 per cent, contributing to a sustained deterioration in the current
account balance. Since then the U.S. dollar has depreciated nearly
15 per cent. However, the U.S. current account deficit has continued to
grow, reaching 5.6 per cent of GDP in the third quarter of 2004.
Further depreciation of the U.S. dollar is likely needed if the current
account deficit is to be significantly reduced.
Employment in the manufacturing sector has been negatively affected by the
appreciation of the Canadian dollar
![Employment by Industry](../images/bpc2-17.gif)
- The appreciation of the Canadian dollar presents a challenge to Canadian
firms that are highly exposed to international trade.
- During 2003, employment in the Canadian manufacturing sector, which tends
to be sensitive to movements in the value of the Canadian dollar, fell more
than 55,000 while employment in all other industries increased by more than
337,000.
- Manufacturing sector employment recovered somewhat in the first half of
2004, with about 26,000 jobs created between December 2003 and
June 2004, an increase of 1.1 per cent. During this period
employment in all other industries grew 0.7 per cent.
- In the second half of 2004, manufacturing sector employment weakened
again; however, manufacturing sector employment increased 14,000 in
January 2005, the largest monthly increase in more than a year.
The Bank of Canada held its key policy rate steady in December and
January
![Bank of Canada Policy Rate](../images/bpc2-18.gif)
- In January 2004 the Bank of Canada lowered its key policy rate by 25
basis points to 2.5 per cent. The decision reflected the Bank’s view
that "the rapid appreciation of the Canadian dollar against the U.S.
currency [had] cut into the overall growth of aggregate demand for Canadian
goods and services through weaker exports and increased imports."
- In both March and April the Bank lowered its policy rate by 25
basis points to "provide some additional monetary stimulus" in
order to support the Canadian economy as it adjusted to higher commodity
prices, the realignment of world currencies and intensifying competition
from emerging-market economies.
- However, solid economic growth in the second and third quarters reduced
excess capacity as the Canadian economy adjusted well to global economic
developments. Reflecting its view that the "economy [was then]
operating close to its production capacity," the Bank suggested that
"monetary stimulus [needed to] be reduced" and lifted its policy
rate in two stages, to 2.5 per cent by mid-October.
- Citing more moderate prospects for global growth and a further
appreciation of the Canadian dollar, the Bank held its policy rate steady at
2.5 per cent in December. In late January 2005, the Bank again
held rates constant as recent data indicated the economy was experiencing
"a somewhat more pronounced adjustment to the past appreciation of the
Canadian dollar."
Private Sector Economic Forecasts
The Department of Finance surveys about 20 private sector economic
forecasters on a quarterly basis regarding their outlook for the Canadian
economy. The Department also regularly reviews forecasts for the U.S. and major
overseas economies from private sector forecasters and international
organizations such as the OECD and the International Monetary Fund.
Department officials also meet with a group of private sector economists to
discuss Canada’s economic outlook and the risks and uncertainties associated
with that outlook. The Department’s survey of private sector forecasters is
the basis for the economic assumptions that underlie the fiscal projections for
the budget.
The economic forecasts reported here reflect the survey of private sector
forecasters conducted by the Department in December following the release
of the third-quarter National Accounts by Statistics Canada on
November 30, along with the most recent forecasts by private sector
economists in the U.S. and by the OECD.
World Economic Conditions
U.S. growth is expected to be strong in 2005, although growth will be
somewhat slower than in 2004
![U.S. Real GDP Growth](../images/bpc2-19.gif)
- Despite significant increases in oil prices in 2004, U.S. real GDP grew
4.4 per cent, matching the pace of growth observed in the boom years of
1997 and 1999. This strong growth performance reflected support from large
tax cuts in 2003 and a depreciating American dollar.
- Growth is expected to ease in 2005 as fiscal stimulus ends and interest
rates gradually rise. The strong U.S. housing market is expected to slow.
However, rising incomes and healthy corporate profits should continue to
support consumer spending and business investment and help to sustain growth
in domestic demand. The depreciation of the American dollar will also
provide support to the U.S. export sector. Overall, according to the latest
Blue Chip survey, private sector forecasters expect U.S. growth to average
3.6 per cent this year, similar to expectations at the time of the
November 2004 Economic and Fiscal Update, and 3.4 per cent
in 2006.
The global expansion remains on track
![Real GDP Growth Outlook](../images/bpc2-20.gif)
- After renewed strength in 2004, global growth is expected to decline
somewhat in 2005, as demand from the United States weakens and higher oil
prices continue to affect oil-importing economies. Nevertheless, the
expansion remains on track and should pick up in 2006 as real GDP growth in
OECD countries is expected to increase to 3.1 per cent from
2.9 per cent in 2005.
- Real GDP in the euro area is expected to grow by 1.8 per cent in 2005
as higher oil prices and a recent renewed appreciation of the euro offsets
solid global growth.
- In Japan, where the economy is still struggling with deflation, growth is
expected to fall to 1.8 per cent in 2005 from 4.1 per cent in 2004
due to slower growth in global demand and the continued appreciation of the
yen against the U.S. dollar.
- Growth is also expected to slow in China in 2005, partly in response to
the authorities’ efforts to curb over-investment and ease growth to more
sustainable levels. Looking forward, China will likely remain an important
contributor to growth in Asia as consumer demand strengthens and exports
continue to increase despite slower growth in global demand.
The Canadian Economic Outlook
Private sector forecasters expect Canadian growth to pick up gradually in
2005 and 2006
![Outlook for Canadian Economic Growth](../images/bpc2-21.gif)
- Private sector forecasters expect somewhat weaker near-term economic
growth for Canada than previously anticipated. Forecasters have lowered
their outlook for real GDP growth in 2004 largely as a result of downward
revisions by Statistics Canada to real GDP growth in the first half of 2004.
The weaker growth outlook for 2005 mainly reflects a more pessimistic
assessment by forecasters of the impact of the recent appreciation of the
Canadian dollar.
- Forecasters now expect the economy to grow by 2.7 per cent in 2004,
down from 3.0 per cent at the time of the November 2004 Economic
and Fiscal Update. For 2005, forecasters expect growth of 2.9 per
cent, moderately lower than in November and at the time of the
March 2004 budget. The growth outlook for 2006 is 3.1 per cent,
unchanged from the Update although slightly lower than the March 2004
budget.
- Forecasters have also trimmed their outlook for GDP inflation in 2005, in
line with expectations of falling commodity prices. As a result, they expect
nominal GDP to grow 4.9 per cent in 2005, down from 5.3 per cent
at the time of the Update. Nominal GDP is expected to grow 5 per cent
in 2006, unchanged from expectations in November.
Interest rates are expected to remain steady until mid-2005
![3-Month Treasury Bill Rate/10-Year Government Bond Rate](../images/bpc2-22.gif)
- The somewhat weaker-than-expected economic growth and more pessimistic
assessment of the impact of the recent appreciation in the value of the
Canadian dollar have led private sector forecasters to lower their
projections for short- and long-term interest rates.
- Forecasters expect short-term interest rates to average 2.7 per cent
this year and 3.5 per cent in 2006, down 50 and 90 basis points,
respectively, from expectations at the time of the November 2004 Economic
and Fiscal Update.
- Similarly, forecasters expect long-term rates to average 4.6 per cent
in 2005 and 5.1 per cent in 2006, approximately one-half of one
percentage point lower than levels expected at the time of the Update.
Risks and Uncertainties
A key risk to the outlook is posed by the large and persistent U.S. current
account deficit …
![U.S. Current Account Balance - Regional Components](../images/bpc2-23.gif)
- While Canadian final domestic demand, particularly consumer spending and
business investment, has held up well in the face of declining exports and
weaker employment growth in export-related industries, there is a near-term
risk that the appreciation of the Canadian dollar will begin to affect
domestic demand. This could result in labour market weakness on a broader
scale, which would dampen consumer confidence and spending.
- The large and persistent U.S. current account deficit presents a key risk
to the outlook. This deficit has steadily widened, particularly against
emerging Asian nations and Japan. By 2003 the trade deficit with China had
increased to US$124 billion, reflecting China’s increasing role as an
exporter of manufactured goods to developed countries and its pegged
exchange rate regime. Japan’s management of the yen also led to a widening
of its current account surplus with the United States.
- Relatively weak growth in the euro zone has contributed to a widening in
the U.S. current account deficit with Europe.
- Although Canada is the United States’ largest trading partner, its
current account surplus with the U.S., at 0.3 per cent of U.S. GDP, is
a small contributor to the total U.S. current account deficit.
… which could be resolved by a combination of stronger overseas growth,
adjustment of Asian currencies, and further U.S. dollar depreciation against
floating currencies like the Canadian dollar
![U.S. Capital Account Balance-Regional Components](../images/bpc2-24.gif)
- The other side of the U.S. current account deficit is a capital account
surplus. Capital inflows into the United States keep the U.S. dollar
elevated with respect to other currencies, which in turn contributes to
ongoing U.S. trade and current account deficits.
- Net capital flows from Europe to the United States fell sharply after the
bursting of the U.S. high-tech bubble in 2000 and 2001. However, these flows
were replaced by greater flows from Japan and, in particular, China. China’s
pegged exchange rate means that it is accumulating significant U.S. dollar
foreign exchange reserves. These reserves reached US$515 billion in
September 2004, with total East Asian reserves standing at close to
US$2 trillion. The increase in net inflows from Latin America since
2000 reflects a sharp drop in U.S. investment flows to that region. The
large increase in U.S. budget deficits after 2001 has also lowered national
saving and increased U.S. reliance on foreign sources of funds.
- The large U.S. current account deficit (and capital account surplus) has
meant that U.S. net foreign indebtedness has steadily risen as a share of
GDP. The current account deficit must fall from its current high level if
further substantial increases in net foreign debt as a share of GDP are to
be avoided.
- This could occur in a number of ways, each with differing implications for
Canada. Higher, sustained euro area and Japanese growth would reduce their
current account surpluses with the United States, while raising global
demand and reducing the required broad U.S. dollar adjustment.
- Appreciation of Asian currencies against the U.S. dollar would reduce
their accumulation of U.S. dollar reserves and lessen the downward pressure
on the U.S. dollar against currencies like the Canadian dollar and the euro.
- A scenario in which all of the adjustment occurs through the exchange rate
and against currencies like the euro and the Canadian dollar would pose the
greatest challenge for Canada because it could mean significant further
Canadian dollar appreciation. Furthermore, the more rapidly the adjustment
occurs, the greater the challenge to Canadian firms.
Large U.S. fiscal deficits also present a risk to Canadian growth
![U.S. Federal Budgetary Balance](../images/bpc2-25.gif)
- The U.S. budget deficit poses an additional medium-term downside risk. If
not corrected, the deficit could put upward pressure on interest rates,
crowd out investment and dampen growth in both the U.S. and Canada.
Conversely, a serious effort to reduce the budget deficit would temporarily
lower growth in the U.S., which would also have negative implications for
Canadian growth.
- While the risks to the outlook are negative on balance, Canada’s strong
monetary, fiscal and structural policy framework has improved our ability to
deal with these potential difficulties if they materialize.
Private Sector Forecasts for 2004–2006
|
|
2004 |
2005 |
2006 |
Average
2007–2009 |
|
|
(per cent) |
|
|
Real GDP growth |
|
|
|
|
March 2004 budget |
2.7 |
3.3 |
3.2 |
3.1 |
November 2004 Economic and Fiscal
Update |
3.0 |
3.2 |
3.1 |
2.9 |
February 2005 budget |
2.7 |
2.9 |
3.1 |
2.9 |
GDP inflation |
|
|
|
|
March 2004 budget |
1.4 |
1.7 |
1.9 |
1.8 |
November 2004 Economic and Fiscal
Update |
3.1 |
2.1 |
1.8 |
1.7 |
February 2005 budget |
3.3 |
2.0 |
1.9 |
1.9 |
Nominal GDP growth |
|
|
|
|
March 2004 budget |
4.1 |
5.1 |
5.2 |
5.0 |
November 2004 Economic and Fiscal
Update |
6.2 |
5.3 |
5.0 |
4.7 |
February 2005 budget |
6.1 |
4.9 |
5.0 |
4.8 |
3-month Treasury bill rate |
|
|
|
|
March 2004 budget |
2.2 |
3.1 |
4.0 |
4.5 |
November 2004 Economic and Fiscal
Update |
2.1 |
3.2 |
4.4 |
4.7 |
February 2005 budget |
2.2 |
2.7 |
3.5 |
4.6 |
10-year government bond rate |
|
|
|
|
March 2004 budget |
4.8 |
5.4 |
5.7 |
5.7 |
November 2004 Economic and Fiscal
Update |
4.7 |
5.0 |
5.7 |
6.0 |
February 2005 budget |
4.6 |
4.6 |
5.1 |
5.6 |
Unemployment rate |
|
|
|
|
March 2004 budget |
7.5 |
7.2 |
7.0 |
6.8 |
November 2004 Economic and Fiscal
Update |
7.3 |
7.0 |
7.0 |
6.8 |
February 2005 budget |
7.2 |
7.2 |
7.0 |
6.7 |
Employment growth |
|
|
|
|
March 2004 budget |
1.6 |
1.5 |
1.5 |
1.3 |
November 2004 Economic and Fiscal
Update |
1.7 |
1.6 |
1.5 |
1.2 |
February 2005 budget |
1.7 |
1.4 |
1.5 |
1.4 |
Addendum: |
|
|
|
|
U.S. real GDP growth |
|
|
|
|
March 2004 budget |
4.7 |
3.8 |
n/a |
n/a |
November 2004 Economic and Fiscal
Update |
4.4 |
3.5 |
n/a |
n/a |
February 2005 budget |
4.4 |
3.6 |
3.4 |
n/a |
|
Sources: March 2004,
September 2004 and December 2004 Department of Finance surveys
of private sector forecasters; November 2004 consultations with
private sector forecasters; March 2004, October 2004 and
January 2005 Blue Chip Economic Indicators. |
Note: This chapter incorporates data available up to February 7,
2005. Figures in this chapter are at annual rates unless otherwise noted.
1 OECD, Economic and Development Review
Committee, Economic Survey of Canada (October 2004). [Return]
2 The official definition of the employment
rate in Canada is the number of employed persons as a share of the population
15 years of age and older. [Return]
- Table of Contents - Previous
- Next -
|