Annex 2:
The Government’s Response to the Auditor General’s Observations on the 2004–05 Financial Statements
The Auditor General of Canada expressed a "clean" opinion on the Government’s financial statements
for 2004–05. This means that the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial
position of the Government of Canada.
The Auditor General raised one issue for Parliament’s attention in her "Observations" on the
financial statements for 2004–05. This annex reviews this Observation and reports on the status of an issue
raised by the Auditor General in previous reports.
Government Reporting Entity
The Public Sector Accounting Board of the Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants has issued a revised
accounting standard that provides guidance as to the organizations that should be included within a government’s
reporting entity, for purposes of financial reporting. The revised standard comes into effect in 2005–06. The
overriding criterion for inclusion is whether the government controls an entity. Control is defined as "the
power to govern the financial and operating policies of another organization." The Auditor General notes that
this is a particularly challenging standard to apply because government must consider the preponderance of
evidence to judge whether it controls an organization—there is no single rule or criterion to establish control.
The Government has determined that, starting in 2005–06, a number of organizations will be consolidated
within the government reporting entity, including, from a budgetary perspective, the following key entities:
- Canada Foundation for Innovation.
- Canada Millennium Scholarship Foundation.
- Sustainable Development Technology Canada.
- Aboriginal Healing Foundation.
The financial statements of the Government of Canada will now reflect the assets, liabilities, expenses and
revenues of these organizations. Transfers to these organizations will not be treated as expenses until the
organizations make payments to the ultimate recipients of the funds. As this represents a change in accounting
policy, the Government’s financial statements of prior periods will be restated to give retroactive effect to
this change in accounting treatment, resulting in an estimated cumulative $5.5-billion decrease in the size of the
federal debt as at March 31, 2005. This decrease largely represents government transfers provided to these
organizations that had not yet been paid out to third parties as at March 31, 2005. This change will also
result in an estimated $0.7-billion decrease in the budgetary balance in 2005–06 and 2006–07 and an estimated
$0.8-billion decrease in 2007–08.
A complete description of the impact of this accounting policy change and a restatement of financial data for
the period 1996–97 to 2004–05 will be presented in the 2006 Public Accounts of Canada to be tabled in
Parliament in the fall.
Netting
In numerous Observations on the Public Accounts of Canada, the Auditor General expressed concerns
regarding the Government’s practice of presenting financial information in the budget and the monthly Fiscal
Monitor on a net basis, whereby certain disbursements are netted against budgetary revenues and certain
revenues are netted against expenses. This practice has the effect of reducing both revenues and expenses by an
equal amount, thereby having no impact on the budgetary balance. In contrast, the Government’s summary financial
statements, as well as the financial statement discussion and analysis contained in the Public Accounts of
Canada, are presented on a gross basis. The Auditor General has argued that presenting the financial
statements on a gross basis more properly reflects the nature and size of the Government’s revenues and
expenses.
The Government has taken action to address this issue and improve the comparability and transparency of its
financial information by presenting its Budget 2006 forecast on a gross basis. The Annual Financial Report of
the Government of Canada and The Fiscal Monitor results will also be presented on a gross basis.
As shown in Table A2.1, there are three major components that are affected by the move to the gross basis
of presentation:
- The Canada Child Tax Benefit, which was previously netted against personal income tax revenues.
- Departmental revenues that are levied for specific services, such as the contract costs of policing services
in provinces, which were netted against expenses.
- Revenues of consolidated Crown corporations, which were netted against their total expenses.
Table A2.1
Differences Between Net and Gross Reporting
|
|
Actual
2004–05 |
2005–06 |
2006–07 |
2007–08 |
|
|
(billions of dollars, unless otherwise indicated) |
Net revenues |
198.7 |
207.1 |
213.1 |
221.6 |
Percentage of GDP (per cent) |
15.4 |
15.1 |
14.7 |
14.6 |
Less: Adjustments |
|
|
|
|
Canada Child Tax Benefit |
8.7 |
9.1 |
9.3 |
9.3 |
Revenues netted against
program expenses |
3.0 |
3.2 |
3.2 |
3.3 |
Revenues of consolidated
Crown corporations |
1.5 |
1.5 |
1.5 |
1.5 |
Net adjustment |
13.2 |
13.8 |
14.0 |
14.1 |
Gross revenues |
211.9 |
220.9 |
227.1 |
235.8 |
Percentage of GDP (per cent) |
16.4 |
16.1 |
15.7 |
15.5 |
Net program expenses |
163.1 |
165.4 |
174.8 |
182.4 |
Percentage of GDP (per cent) |
12.6 |
12.1 |
12.0 |
12.0 |
Add: Adjustments |
|
|
|
|
Canada Child Tax Benefit |
8.7 |
9.1 |
9.3 |
9.3 |
Revenues netted against
program expenses |
3.0 |
3.2 |
3.2 |
3.3 |
Revenues of consolidated
Crown corporations |
1.5 |
1.5 |
1.5 |
1.5 |
Net adjustment |
13.2 |
13.8 |
14.0 |
14.1 |
Gross program expenses |
176.3 |
179.2 |
188.8 |
196.5 |
Percentage of GDP (per cent) |
13.7 |
13.1 |
13.0 |
13.0 |
|
Presenting results on a gross basis pushes up revenues and program expenses in 2005–06 by an estimated
$13.8 billion each. Thus, there is no impact on the budgetary balance. As a share of gross domestic product
(GDP), moving to a gross basis increases revenues and program expenses by approximately 1 percentage point each.
|