TDR
Interview: Michael Holmes
Michael Holmes is not on steroids. His
writing doesn’t put you to sleep with its suffocating grip. No, the
author of Watermelon Row
and 21 Hotels
is feeling just fine ... and right now, on these very pages, The
Danforth Review is calling him out! Ladies and gentlemen, from the
hipster district of Can-Lit, will you please shut the hell up long
enough for us to introduce, from Toronto, Canada, the centre of the
universe, the reigning and defending, author of Parts Unknown,
Canada’s Writer-in-Ring-Resident, Mr. Michael Holmes.
Nathaniel G. Moore conducted this
interview in early 2004.
*
TDR: What was the first wrestling match
you remember watching televised or live?
It's almost impossible to pinpoint
where or when my fascination with pro wrestling began. I remember
watching with my father when I was very young--I can still hear the
canvas snapping, an inflexible Pop-O-Matic Trouble kind of sound, in a
studio auditorium of the early 70s, as Jerry Blackwell, Nick Bockwinkle,
or Mad Dog Vachon slammed some poor forgotten jobber. Superstar Billy
Graham, Jesse Ventura, the Crusher and a young Ric Flair: I remember
them all, pre-WWF. In reality, my earliest memories are probably a
Saturday and Sunday afternoon mix that misremembers four different
territories: Vern Gagne's AWA out of Minnesota, Stu Hart's Stampede
Wrestling, Grand Prix out of Montreal, and the Tunney's Maple Leaf
Wrestling, broadcast on CHCH out of Hamilton, with Billy Red Lyons as
the host.
TDR: I too recall CHCH wrestling with
Billy Red Lyons on Saturday nights. Discovering new language and witness
seamless physical exhaustion seem to be two major results of watching
wrestling. What does watching wrestling do to your brain and if you were
a wrestler, what would your gimmick be?
Like many fans of the grappler’s art,
I’m an inveterate booker—for years now, after every Raw, Smackdown
and WWE PPV, and more recently after every NWA-TNA show, my imagination
has played havoc with history and possibility, let loose amongst all
those wildly improbable and deliciously limitless story lines. The
narratives fire me up, and I admit I probably spend too much time trying
to anticipate where the writers are going next. And yes, like so many
fans, I bitch and moan (even if it’s just with myself) about wasted
opportunities and redundancies, about guys getting pushed while other,
perhaps more deserving, talents are overlooked. In wrestling, the booker
is a kind of God—the guy or committee responsible for all the big
decisions—who wins and loses, who gets the title shot and who doesn’t.
So, watching wrestling my brain becomes the owner/booker of all
wrestling everywhere. Every week I write a new world for WWE—one
better and more entertaining than what I watch on TV the following
Monday and Thursday. Of course, I’m wrong. Every wrestling fan worth
their salt believes they can "fix" wrestling, that they could
make it better. Few have any idea how complicated the writing process
gets, how many stresses and pitfalls the booker has to negotiate.
But if I was a wrestler? I think I’d
develop a gimmick that was as carefree and hardcore as both Sandman and
RVD, and as ruthlessly aggressive as Stone Cold Steve Austin, and then
modify all three with Mick Foley’s unlimited flexibility of character.
It would definitely be a character as vicious on the mic as in the ring.
You can’t underestimate how important that is—the ability to cut a
good promo takes you a hell of a lot further than the most impressive
hat trick of gut wrench suplexes or the most deadly submission move.
Great technical wrestlers, like Edmonton’s Chris Benoit, are punished
for not being as dominant in interview situations as they are in the
ring. Again, it’s exactly the same in the literary world. If you give
good sound bite, you go over—Rolodexes everywhere are filled with the
contact info for glib hacks.
TDR:
For those at home who are
reading this and realizing we are two grown men discussing millionaire
fake sports heroes and this site is funded by Canada Council, etc. how
can we appease them by perhaps alluding to the fact that most of their
lives are scripted and fake. For example, the streetcars on Queen St.,
they always stop at the same stops and always move east and west. We
know how the ride will end. I mean, poetry itself is staged as well
isn't it?
Holmes:
Every government subsidized theatrical performance--from Sophocles to
that Lloyd Webber slapnuts--has a blood relative in pro-wrestling. Jason
Sherman and his plays get nominated for Doras and Chalmers awards--Edge
and Christian have been 8-time tag champs, and Chris Jericho was the
first undisputed heavyweight champion (in the English-speaking world,
anyway) in almost a century. There's very little difference. The writing
on Raw and Smackdown is often as good as the stuff that gets published
here--not that that's anything to celebrate, it's just, as Stone Cold
would say, the bottom line.
And yes, of course, good poetry is just
as staged as wrestling. Always.
Ultimately, what’s "fake"
about wrestling may in fact elevate it above most other "real"
professional sporting events—more than a simplistic contest, it’s
art. Anyway, its physical challenges are very, very real.
TDR: The vernacular of pro wrestling is
like a weird language one can
suddenly engage in if one runs into a like-minded smart-fan or mark. And
their names don't have to be Mark. So, what are some of your more
favourite wrestling terms?
Holmes:
Winnipeg's own Chris Jericho coined my favourite wrestling neologism,
the an all-purpose insult, "assclown." Pretty much
self-defining, but here it is in a sentence: Carmine Starnino is an
assclown. Many things can earn you the assclown's mantle, in this
case its self-aggrandizing ad hominem attacks on other, more
accomplished writers and thinkers; a Palaeozoic allegiance to the most
parochial, chauvinistic tenets of high modernism; and the unmitigated
gall to attack the poetics of Al Purdy as a way of making his bones when
Al was gallantly living out his life's course.
As far as real, old-school insider
wrestling lingo goes, I'm fond of "Kayfabe." It's a term that
refers to the protection of industry secrets, or inside info about the
business, from the fans. The word itself originated in carnival slang,
as a kind of pig-Latin for "be fake."
You mentioned "mark" and
that's another fave. A mark is someone who believes that pro-wrestling's
gimmicks, angles and matches are real. To "mark out," though,
is to be so into something that happens in a match or storyline, or with
a character, that a fan "smart" or wise to the business
responds as if they were a "mark." I "mark out" all
the time.
I'm also fond of the term
"over"--which is wrestling lingo for popular, or for something
that works with the fans. As far as Parts Unknown goes, however,
the wrestling term most important to the poetry might be
"work."
"Work" is both the ability to
wrestle well, and the deception that underpins, that is essentially at
the heart of wrestling itself--it's the predetermined outcome that all
matches and wrestlers strive towards. A wrestler, therefore, is a
"worker." So, in effect, is a poet.
TDR: The Canadian content in pro
wrestling is one that many people won't know about until this very
moment when we tell them. Can you go into some detail about ECW's (the
press not the former Paul Heymen company) affinity with wrestling?
Holmes:
Per capita, wrestling's biggest and best audiences in North America
are Toronto and Montreal. The WWE folks know this (that's why two of the 20
Wrestlemanias--and two of the best attended--were held in Toronto). All
those big American towns vying for those huge revenues and 1/10 of the
events have happened here. Pound for pound, we've also produced some of the
most beloved and loathed talents in the game: Killer Kowalski, Gene Kiniski,
Whipper Billy Watson, Yvon Robert, Stu and Bret and Owen Hart, Archie "the
Stomper" Gouldie, Abdullah the Butcher, Rowdy Roddy Piper, Chris Benoit--the
list goes on and on.
ECW Press was one of the first in North
America to realize the unexplored wealth of material wrestling had to
offer. The truth is, until Mick Foley's Have a Nice Day became an
unexpected NY Times bestseller, most book publishers dismissed
the wrestling market, believing in the old, lowbrow prejudices:
wrestling fans don't (can't) read. How wrong they were. They not only
can and do read--they also have disposable incomes and, more
importantly, buy books. And they're appreciative of good books, books
that actually have historical relevance or are well-written. Foley's
memoirs are just that: well-written.
ECW got into the ring early--partly
because of my enthusiasm, partly because Jack David, our owner and
publisher, is such a student of the publishing game. He saw, before
almost anyone else in the industry, the wrestling book market as
something ECW could step into and make work. I knew I was into a good
thing--in terms of my obsessions--the day I walked into the office to
find Jack wearing a Goldberg T-shirt.
My favourite ECW wrestling title, to
date, is probably Greg Oliver's The Pro Wrestling Hall of Fame: The
Canadians. It's a phenomenal resource, an exhaustive look at
Canada's contributions to the squared circle. Wrestlecrap (the
story of the worst gimmicks of pro wrestling history), another recent
book, has sold very well. As did our first wrestling title, Slammin'.
Missy Hyatt's bio was our initial foray into books written by actual
vets of the business.
TDR: Any new wrestling titles coming
from ECW?
We've got a memoir by Jimmy "The
Mouth of the South" Hart that's coming later this year--it's a book
I'm really excited about because it’s given me the opportunity to work
with a childhood hero. Yeah, I've marked out all over the place because
of Jimmy.
TDR: Just to be ironical, were many ECW
poetry collections or fiction books subsidized by non-fiction titles
such as the Missy Hyatt book?
This is tough to answer. Sorta. Kinda.
But not really. I firmly believe that the success of our trade titles
allows ECW to keep doing CanLit. Of course, like everyone else we're
funded by the various government granting agencies to do our literary
titles. But when distributors go bankrupt and you're on the brink of
going out of business yourself, it's not the revenues from a bunch of
short stories that's going to save the company. It's what you collect on
Wrestlecrap that will put you back into the printers' good books
and allow you to reprint a few hundred copies of Jennifer
LoveGrove's wonderful debut collection of poetry, or give you the
cash flow you need to properly promote the most important Canadian
poetry title of the last decade, Gil Adamson’s breathtaking sophomore
effort Ashland.
Over the years ECW has tried to strike
the right balance--between literary and commercial efforts--for both
endeavours to flourish. I think we've been successful.
TDR: I enjoyed the piece in Parts
Unknown on Trish Stratus, I’ve seen her so many times in the exact
same way I never imagined she came from somewhere, like York University
of all places. There a lot of detail in this book. How did you find
these really great little insights into these lives?
When I was a kid just getting into punk
rock in Brampton there was no place to hang out—so the 8 or 10 of us
with like minds and uniformly bad haircuts gravitated, naturally, to the
mall’s food court. One day a bunch of us saw one of our mowhawked
forefathers, maybe the first real punk in town, a guy by the name of
Sean Gorman, walking through the mall happily talking with two very
straight laced, older folks. I guess somebody shot him a funny look. He
just shook his head, obviously disappointed in his minions.
"Parents," he said, "everybody’s got two." It’s
still one of the most important lessons I’ve ever learned—we all
come from somewhere, and there’s always something to be learned from
that place, those people and those experiences. A big part of the
challenge Parts Unknown sets for me has nothing to do with
wrestling—it’s imagining the aspects of these characters’ lives
that never make it into storylines, that never show up in the ring.
Sure, some of it—like Trish Stratus attending York or the plane crash
that nearly killed Ric Flair on my 9th birthday—is "true."
Having Scotty Too Hotty read Coleridge, however, is my bad.
Ultimately, I wonder if folks will
be surprised by the detail in this book. I’ve researched everything I’ve
written, and I’ve probably done more work for this project than for
anything else I’ve ever attempted. But then I remember: it’s
wrestling. Now, that’s not a complaint, it’s just a fact: CanLit
folks who’ve got certain expectations for poetry aren’t going to
recognize the research. Fine. So what, who cares? What’s more
important to me, what I’m truly concerned with, and somewhat
apprehensive about, is the quality of what I’ve done in the eyes of
the wrestling fan. Is the research good enough to pass the test of
someone who’s watched every RAW, someone who cares more about Lanny
Poffo’s Frisbee quatrains than who was nominated for the Griffin or
the GG? Is the poetry compelling enough to interest the wrestling fan
who has had little or no experience—bless them—with CanLit?
TDR: Wrestling With Shadows
(directed by Paul Jay) is the NFB sponsored film about Bret Hart’s
struggle with the business as it boomed in the late 1990’s. One of the
themes of this film is the curious Canadian-American which gets to near
David and Goliath heights. Despite the subjective nature of the
narration through Bret Hart’s eyes, it would make a pretty good
Canadian novel don’t you think?
It’s a great movie, rivaled only by Beyond
the Mat, and it’s great because it’s more than just a wrestling
flick, more than a documentary about Bret Hart the wrestler. I’m a
nationalist, unabashedly; I’m damn proud, Don Cherry-like, of our
in-ring heritage, but I’m not sure if the movie works as a Canadian
David and American Goliath thing. It’s more classically tragic. Almost
Oedipal. I really think the film’s importance lies in its exploration
of Bret’s relationship with his father, the legendary wrestler,
trainer and promoter Stu Hart. The ostensible "point" of the
flick, Bret’s problems with WWE owner Vince McMahon, and the whole
story of the how he was screwed in front of his family and
"country" at the Montreal Survivor Series, may actually be
more interesting as an eerily true bit of metaphoric transference.
But Lord, yes, the Harts—they are
the great Canadian novel. Stu and Bret, the senseless tragedy of Owen’s
death, the dungeon dojo in the Calgary mansion basement—walk-ons by
characters as magical as Andre the Giant, Gorgeous George, the Dynamite
Kid and Terry Funk? Daughters that married the Anvil and Davey-Boy
Smith? Stu doing the cooking and cleaning and Helen taking care of the
wrestling promotion’s books? The real stories are so good that
if you put them in a novel folks might actually find them too far
fetched.
TDR: I know he mentioned wanting to
write a big wrestling history book when he retired on Off The Record
in 2001. Have you talked with Bret Hart about his next book?
Bret’s been hinting at publishing his
memoirs for a couple of years now, and as far as I’m concerned they’re
the Holy Grail of Canadian non-fiction. There’s a contract with his
name on it at ECW if he’s serious—because any time he’s ready, so
are we.
Like Bret "Hitman"
Hart, Nathaniel G. Moore is a July Cancerian with familial issues. Mr.
Moore wrote a four-page-tell-all-memoir about his life as a teenage
wrestler in Career Suicide! (DC Books, 2003) and is represented
online courtesy of Notho Entertainment www.criticalcrushes.blogspot.com.
He has never lost a steel cage match. |