The Polysyllabic
Spree
by Nick Hornby
McSweeney's, Believer Books, 2004
Reviewed by Alex Boyd
Nobody can accuse Nick Hornby of failing
to be himself. A collection of fourteen months of his essays from Believer
magazine, The Polysyllabic Spree is honest, smart, and down to
earth. Every month he lists what he bought, what he read, and every
month the list of what he bought outgrows his reading despite steady
efforts, occasionally thrown off when he’s caught up in football
matches, or his children. Readers knows there’s always a crowded
bookshelf waiting, even as books we loved start to fade from memory and
cry out to be read again ("But when I tried to recall anything
about it other than its excellence, I failed. Maybe there was something
about a peculiar stepfather?"). It’s an ongoing struggle. And as
Hornby acknowledges later "Boredom and, very occasionally, despair
are part of the reading life." So why do we bother, and why do we
do the work?
The answers are pretty straightforward,
I think. The books we’ve forgotten still made an impression on us,
settled somewhere in the corners of our minds. And why do we do the
work? We do the work for the rewards, and Hornby knows that too. He puts
a logical, personal weight into these mini-reviews. A book of stories
strikes a good balance for being "literary in the sense that they’re
serious, and will probably be nominated for prizes, but they’re
unliterary in the sense that they could end up mattering to
people." Or, "We are never allowed to forget that some books
are badly written; we should remember that sometimes they’re badly
read, too." It’s as unpretentious and straightforward as a friend’s
advice in a pub, so it gathers a little of that trustworthiness as well.
Hornby reads widely, so fiction,
non-fiction and poetry are all covered here, and I was pleased to see
poetry included. Tony Hoagland is "the sort of poet you dream of
finding but almost never do. His work is relaxed, deceptively easy on
the eye and ear, and it has jokes and unexpected little burst of
melancholic resonance. Plus, I pretty much understand all of it, and yet
it’s clever – as you almost certainly know, contemporary poetry is a
kind of Reykjavik, a place where accessibility and intelligence have
been fighting a Cold War by proxy for the last half-century. If
something doesn’t give you a shot at comprehension in the first couple
of readings, then my motto is ‘Fuck it.’" I think I might only
add that accessibility and intelligence needn’t exclude each other,
and ideally both are married. In any case, Hornby implies this. He feels
distanced from overly literary novels where a character opens the door
to discover their home has been newly trashed and immediately drops into
reverie, thinking about another character for a page or so. His point is
that he can’t imagine a character of his creation doing anything other
than opening the door and saying, "Shit! Some bastard has trashed
the house!" Is it possible novels need balance, that the overly
serious literary novel can be its own worst enemy? I agree they can feel
suffocating. Hornby’s no snob, and I can see him enjoying John LeCarre
for the engaging plot as much as the "soggy chatter" of a
motorbike. I also don’t think he’d march into a bookstore and insist
LeCarre be bumped out of a genre section and into general fiction (as a
well known Canadian author allegedly did) given that a truly talented
writer should be allowed to elevate the genre, rather than graduate from
it.
There are a few well-placed shots
reserved for critics here too, and Hornby wisely declines the
opportunity to take on his own: "Reviewers "complain that [Roddy]
Doyle used to write short books, and now they’ve gone fat; another
that he used to write books set in Dublin, and he should have kept them
there; another that he used to write with a child’s-eye view, and now
he’s writing for adults… you’re half expecting someone to point
out that back in the day he used to write books that sold for a tenner,
and now they’ve gone up to seventeen quid."
It also has to be said that Hornby is
flat out funny. Here’s his description of the author fantasy colliding
with reality:
You imagine spending your days
under a parasol watching, transfixed and humbled, as a beautiful and
intelligent young man or woman, almost certainly a future best
friend, maybe even a spouse, weeps and guffaws through three hundred
pages of your brilliant prose… I was cured of this particular
fantasy a couple of years ago, when I spent a week watching a woman
on the other side of the pool reading my first novel, High
Fidelity. Unfortunately, however, I was on holiday with my
sister and brother-in-law, and my brother-in-law provided a gleeful
and frankly unfraternal running commentary. "Look! Her lips are
moving!" "Ha! She’s fallen asleep! Again!" "I
talked to her in the bar last night, not a bright woman, I’m
afraid." At one point, alarmingly, she dropped the book and ran
off. "She’s gone to put out her eyes!" my brother-in-law
yelled triumphantly. I was glad when she’d finished it and moved
on to Harry Potter or Dr Seuss or whatever else it was she’d
packed.
Hornby is amusingly blunt when writing
about a biography: "Please, biographers. Please, please, please.
Have mercy. Select for us. We have jobs, kids, DVD players, season
tickets. But that doesn’t mean we don’t want to know about
stuff." So, if you’re pushing through something right now and not
enjoying it, and will want something light, fresh and intelligent as a
slight break when you’re done, consider this one. Not only did I end
up with a list of titles I wanted to read, I was able to relate to the
struggles of another reader. It’s also a good gift for someone trying
to get back into reading – a kind of easy to swallow, literary
vitamin.
Alex Boyd
is co-editor of Northern Poetry Review.
|