Public Health Agency of Canada
Symbol of the Government of Canada

E-mail this page





The Canadian Nosocomial Infection Surveillance Program

Surveillance for Vancomycin Resistant Enterococci (VRE) in Patients Hospitalized in Canadian Acute-Care Hospitals Participating in CNISP
2006 Results  

PDF version (222 KB) PDF version

In 2006, 50 sentinel hospitals from 9 Canadian provinces participated in the CNISP surveillance for VRE and submitted data on ‘newly-identified' VRE cases in hospitalized patients.1

The VRE cases included in this surveillance consist of only the VRE cases that are identified for the first time in one of the CNISP sentinel hospitals. It does not include VRE cases previously identified at other CNISP sentinel hospitals, cases identified in emergency wards, clinics and outpatient settings or previously identified cases that are re-admitted with VRE.
The denominator data for the calculation of the VRE rates, also submitted from each participating hospital, included the number of patient admissions (N=757,269) and the number of patient days (N=5,963,506).
There were a total of 906 newly identified VRE positive cultures during the 2006 VRE surveillance, of which 43 (4.8%) were identified by infection control professionals as infections and 863 (95.3%) as colonizations.
Demographically, 463 (51.1%) of the positive cultures (906) were from men. The following represents the age breakdown of individuals from whom VRE was isolated: 8 (0.9%) were under 18 years of age, 25 (2.8%)18-29 years, 207 (22.8%) 30-59 years, 374 (41.3%) 60-79 years and 292 (32.2%) greater then 80 years of age. Regionally, 270 (29.8%) of the positive cultures were from Western Canada, 590 (65.1%) from Central Canada and 46 (5.1%) from Eastern Canada.
Where VRE was acquired was unknown for 35 (3.9%) of the 906 positive cultures. Where the origin was identified (n=871), 838 (96.2%) were healthcare-associated (formerly nosocomial) including acute care hospitals, dialysis units and long-term care facilities and 33 (3.8%) were reported as community-acquired. Of the healthcare-associated positive cultures (n=838), 707 (84.4%) were associated with CNISP hospitals, 106 (12.6%) to other acute care hospitals, and 25 (3%) to long-term care facilities.

VRE incidence Rates

The 2006 incidence rates for VRE are given in Table 1.

Table 1. VRE incidence rates per 1,000 patient admissions and 10,000 patient days for 2006

 

Rate per 1,000 admissions
 (Number)

Rate per 10,000 days
 (Number)

All*

Infection

Colonization

All*

Infection

Colonization

 

Overall 

1.2
(906)

0.06
 (43)

1.14
 (863)

1.52  
 (906)

0.07
 (43)

1.45
 (863)

* includes all newly identified VRE positive cultures (i.e. infections and colonizations).

Figure 1. VRE incidence rates per 1,000 patient admissions from 1999 to 2006

There was a significant decrease in the overall incidence of VRE per 1,000 patient admissions to 1.2 per 1,000 patient admissions from 1.32 reported in 2005. This rate remains higher than the cumulative rate of 0.76 per 1,000 patient admissions (all positive cultures 1996-2006).

In 2006, the incidence rate of VRE infection per 1,000 patient admissions is 0.06. Overall the incidence rate of VRE infection per 1,000 patient admissions has remained relatively stable, ranging from 0.02 in 1999 to 0.06 in 2002, 2003 and 2006 with a cumulative incidence of  0.04 (all infections 1999-2006). 

The incidence rate of VRE colonization per 1,000 patient admissions in 2006 (1.14) has decreased slightly since 2005 (1.25) however it remains higher than the cumulative incidence rate of 0.71 (all colonizations 1999-2006).

 

VRE per 1,000 patient admissions 1996-2006

Figure 2. VRE incidence rates per 10,000 patient days from 1999 to 2006

The overall incidence rate of VRE per 10,000 patient days in 2006 was 1.52, slightly lower than the
1.55 reported in 2005. The overall incidence rate remains higher than the cumulative incidence of 0.90
per 10,000 patient days (all positive cultures 1996-2006).  

Overall the incidence rate of VRE infection per 10,000 patient days in 2006 has remained relatively stable ranging from a low of  0.03 in 2001 to its current rate of 0.07 in 2006, with a cumulative incidence of  0.06 (all infections 1999-2006). 

The incidence rate of VRE colonization per 10,000 patient days in 2006 (1.45) has decreased slightly since 2005 (1.47) however it remains higher than the cumulative incidence rate of 0.90 (all colonization 1999-2006).

VRE per 10,000 patient days 1999-2006

A trend analysis was conducted to see if the rates of VRE differ significantly over the past 8 years (1999-2006) and the past 2 years (2005 & 2006). The overall number of cases per year and the Chi-square test for trend results are presented in Table 2.

Table 2.

  1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 X2 p- value
Overall 215 263 234 375 430 519 1001 906 1307.57 <.0001
Overall             1001 906 4.73 0.03

 

Table 3. 2006 VRE incidence rates by region2

In 2006, VRE incidence rates (per 1,000 patient admissions & 10,000 patient days) in Central Canada
were higher than the national rate.

 

Rate per 1,000 admissions
 (number)

Rate per 10,000 days
 (Number)

All*

Infection

Colonization

All*

Infection

Colonization

Western

0.87
(270)

.07
 (21)

0.8
 (249)

1.30
(270)

0.10
 (21)

1.20
 (249)

Central 

1.59
 (590)

0.05
 (19)

1.54
 (571)

1.86
 (590)

0.06
 (19)

1.79
 (571)

Eastern

0.61
(46)

0.04
(3)

0.57
 (43)

0.64
 (46)

0.04
 (3)

0.59
 (43)

Overall 

1.20
(906)

0.06
(43)

1.14
 (863)

1.52
 (906)

0.07
 (43)

1.45
(863)

* includes all newly identified VRE positive cultures (i.e. infections and colonizations).

Figure 3. VRE incidence rates per 1,000 patient admissions by region and year from 1999-2006

Since 2003, both Central and Eastern Canada show an upward trend in VRE incidence per

1,000 patient admissions.  

 

VRE per 1,000 patient admissions by region & year 1999-2006

Figure 4. VRE incidence rates per 10,000 patient days by region & year from 1999-2006

Since 2003, both Central and Eastern Canada show an upward trend in VRE incidence per 10,000 patient days

VRE per 10,000 patient days by region &year 1999-2006

Figure 5.  VRE infection and colonization 1999-2006

Among all newly identified positive cultures, the proportion identified as representing a VRE infection has ranged from a low of 3.7% (2005) to 8.8% (2002).  In 2006, 4.75% of all positive VRE cultures were identified as coming from an infected site, less than the cumulative percentage of infection of 5.88% (all infections 1999-2006).

Proportion of VRE infection vs colonization by year 1999-2006

Members of the Canadian Hospital Epidemiology Committee who participate in the surveillance for Vancomycin Resistant Enterococciand their affiliated hospitals

Dr. Pamela Kibsey, Victoria, British Columbia

  • Victoria General Hospital
  • Royal Jubilee Hospital

Dr. Elizabeth Bryce, Vancouver, British Columbia

  • Vancouver General Hospital
  • Richmond General Hospital
  • University of British Columbia Hospital
  • Lion's Gate Hospital
  • Powell River Hospital
  • St. Mary's Hospital
  • Squamish Hospital

Dr. Eva Thomas, Vancouver, British Columbia

  • Children's and Women's Health Center
Dr. Elizabeth Henderson and Dr. John Conly, Calgary, Alberta
  • Peter Lougheed Centre
  • Rockyview General Hospital
  • Foothills Hospital
  • Alberta Children's Hospital                                  
Dr. Geoffrey Taylor, Edmonton, Alberta
  • University of Alberta Hospital
Dr. Sarah Forgie, Edmonton, Alberta
  • Stollery Children's Hospital
Dr. Alice Wong, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan
  • Royal University Hospital
Dr. John Embil, Winnipeg, Manitoba
  • Health Sciences Centre,  
Dr. Joanne Embree, Winnipeg, Manitoba
  • University of Manitoba, Pediatric Infectious Diseases
Dr. Michael John, London, Ontario
  • St. Joseph's Health Care, London
  • Children's Hospital of Western Ontario
  • London Health Sciences Centre
Dr. Michael Gardam, Toronto, Ontario
  • University Health Network
  • Toronto General Hospital
  • Toronto Western Hospital
  • Princess Margaret Hospital
Dr. Allison McGeer, Toronto, Ontario
  • Mount Sinai Hospital
Dr. Andrew Simor and Dr. Mary Vearncombe, Toronto, Ontario
  • Sunnybrook Health Science Centre
Dr. Anne Matlow, Toronto, Ontario
  • The Hospital for Sick Children
Dr Mark Loeb, Hamilton, Ontario
  • Hamilton Health Sciences, McMaster Site
  • Hamilton Health Sciences, Chedoke Site
  • St Joseph's Healthcare, Hamilton
  • Hamilton Health Sciences, Henderson Site
  • Hamilton Health Sciences, General Site
Dr. Virginia Roth, Ottawa, Ontario
  • The Ottawa Hospital, Civic Site
  • The Ottawa Hospital, General Site
  • The Ottawa Heart Institute
Dr. Kathryn Suh, Ottawa, Ontario
  • The Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
Dr. Dick Zoutman, Kingston, Ontario
  • Kingston General Hospital
Dr. Mark Miller, Montreal, Quebec
  • SMBD‑Jewish General Hospital, Montreal
Dr. Dorothy Moore, Montreal, Quebec
  • Montreal Children's Hospital, McGill University Health Centre
Dr. Karl Weiss
  • Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital
Dr. Charles Frenette, Longueuil, Québec
  • Hôpital Charles Lemoyne
Dr. Sophie Michaud, Sherbrooke, Québec
  • CHUS -Hôpital Fleurimont
Dr. Nathalie Turgeon, Québec, Québec
  • Hôtel-Dieu de Québec du CHUQ
Dr. William Thompson, Moncton, New Brunswick
  • South East Regional Health Authority: The Moncton Hospital
Dr. Lynn Johnston, Halifax, Nova Scotia
  • QE ll Health Sciences Centre
  • Halifax Infirmary
  • Victoria General Hospital
  • Rehabilitation Centre
  • Veterans Memorial Building
Dr. Joanne Langley, Halifax, Nova Scotia
  • IWK Health Centre
Dr. Jim Hutchinson, St. John's, Newfoundland
  • The General Hospital & Miller Centre Sites
  • Janeway Site
  • St. Clare Site

  1. VRE case definition: All enterococcal isolates with a vancomycin MIC ≥ 8 ug/ml. E. gallinarum or E. casseliflavus are not included in the definition of vancomycin resistant enterocci.
  2. Western includes CNISP hospitals in British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Manitoba; Central includes CNISP hospitals in Ontario and Quebec; and Eastern includes CNISP hospitals in Newfoundland and the Maritimes.