|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Volume 29-01
|
INTERNATIONAL NOTESIMMUNIZATION REGISTRY PROGRESS -UNITED STATES, 2002 Immunization registries are confidential, population-based,
computerized information systems that collect vaccination data about all
children within a geographic area(1). By providing complete
and accurate information on which to base vaccination decisions, registries
are key tools to increase and sustain high vaccination coverage. Registries
consolidate vaccination records of children from multiple health care
providers, identify children who are due or late for vaccinations, generate
reminder and recall notices to ensure that children are vaccinated appropriately,
and identify provider sites and geographic areas with low vaccination
coverage. One of the national health objectives for 2010 is to increase
to 95% the proportion of children aged < 6 years who participate in
fully operational, population-based immunization registries (objective
14.26)(2). This report summarizes data from the calendar year
2001 Immunization Registry Annual Report (CY 2001 IRAR), a survey of registry
activity among immunization programs in the 50 states and the District
of Columbia (DC) that receive grant funding under Public Health Service
Act § 317b. Although these data indicate that approximately half
of U.S. children aged < 6 years are participating in a registry, achieving
the national health objective will require increased immunization provider
participation. The CY 2001 IRAR, a self-administered questionnaire, was distributed to immunization program managers as part of the annual reporting requirement for grantees. Information included the percentage of children participating in a registry that reside in the catchment area and the progress in implementing the 12 functional standards considered essential for immunization registry operation(3). Responses were received from all 50 states and DC. Of the 51 respondents, 44 (86%) reported operating registries that targeted their entire catchment areas. The remaining seven (14%) respondents (California, Colorado, Georgia, Indiana, Minnesota, New Mexico, and New York) reported operating registries that targeted regions or counties within their catchment areas. On the basis of 2001 U.S. census estimates, approximately 44% of U.S. children aged < 6 years had two or more vaccinations recorded in a grantee registry. All 51 respondents reported efforts to meet the key elements of the 12 functional standards established for immunization registries (Table 1). A total of seven (14%) registries accept immunization information for children aged < 6 years only, 30 (59%) for all ages in their registries, and 14 (27%) for persons in their registry aged 17-25 years. A total of 14 (27%) reported using their registries to identify children eligible for the Vaccines for Children Program (VCF). |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
MMWR Editorial note The findings in this report indicate the continuation of a trend identified previously in IRAR surveys(4,5). An increasing percentage of children are participating in registries each year, and registries are increasing their usefulness to public health programs nationwide. Beginning in 2001, diphtheria, tetanus toxoid, and pertussis
(DTaP) vaccine; pneumococcal conjugate (PCV7) vaccine; measles, mumps,
and rubella (MMR) vaccine; and varicella vaccines were in short supply(6-8).
During the shortage, registries were used to track children who missed
vaccines because of the shortage and to recall them when vaccines became
available. During the 2001-2002 school year, immunization program staff
and school nurses used the DC registry to ensure that local schools were
in compliance with school entry vaccination requirements. Daily, weekly,
and monthly reports were generated to track compliance, monitor vaccine
inventory needs, and identify pockets of low vaccination within DC for
further outreach efforts. The registry was used to identify approximately
20,000 children who were not vaccinated properly according to school vaccination
requirements (CDC, unpublished data, 2002). Although this report indicates a substantial increase in
participation rates compared with previous years(4,5), at least
part of this improvement can be attributed to differences in how participation
was measured. Previous estimates counted only participants from population-based
registries. Because CY 2001 IRAR data indicated that some encounter-based
registries are approaching or have reached the 95% participation goal,
participants from all 51 grantee registries, both population-based and
encounter-based, were included in participation rate estimates. The findings in this report are subject to at least three limitations. First, because the CY 2001 IRAR relied on self-reported information, bias in reporting might have occurred. However, onsite verification through record reviews and observation of registry operations during 12 site visits conducted in 2001 indicated that 97% of the CY 2001 IRAR's self-reported answers from these sites were accurate (CDC, unpublished data, 2002). Second, this report includes only information from 51 immunization survey respondents; any registry development performed by other entities (e.g. U.S. commonwealth or territory immunization grantees, hospitals, local health departments, or managed care plans) was not reflected. Finally, the CY 2001 IRAR did not collect information about the completeness or accuracy of immunization data recorded in a registry. CDC is developing tools to assist with registry data quality assessment. As immunization grantees continue to make progress in achieving the national health objectives for 2010, registry target age groups are expanding to include adolescents and adults. Registries also are becoming part of broader child health information systems (e.g., hearing, lead, newborn metabolic, and nutrition screening). In addition, they are being used to improve the efficacy and accountability of vaccine administration in VFC. Additional information about immunization registries is available from CDC at http://www.cdc.gov/nip/registry; telephone, 800-799-7062; or e-mail, siisclear@cdc.gov. References 1. National Vaccine Advisory Committee. Development of community and state-based immunization registries. Atlanta, Georgia: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, CDC, 1999. URL: <http://www.cdc.gov/nip/registry/nvac.htm>. 2. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Healthy people 2010, 2nd ed. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2000. 3. CDC. Immunization registry minimum functional standards. URL: <http://www.cdc.gov/nip/registry/mfs2001.pdf>. 4. CDC. Immunization registry use and progress - United States, 2001. MMWR 2002;51:53-6. 5. CDC. Progress in development of immunization registries - United States, 2000. MMWR 2001;50:3-7. 6. CDC. Update on the supply of tetanus and diphtheria toxoids and of diphtheria and tetanus toxoids and acellular pertussis vaccine. MMWR 2001;50:189-90. 7. CDC. Updated recommendations on the use of pneumococcal conjugate vaccine in a setting of vaccine shortage - Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices. MMWR 2001;50:1140-42. 8. CDC. Shortage of varicella and measles, mumps and rubella vaccines and interim recommendations from the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices. MMWR 2002;51:190-97. Source: Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, Vol 51, No 34, 2002. [Previous] [Table of Contents] [Next] |
Last Updated: 2003-01-01 |