Government of CanadaPublic Health Agency of Canada / Agency de la santé publique du Canada
   
Skip all navigation -accesskey z Skip to sidemenu -accesskey x Skip to main menu -accesskey m  
Français Contact Us Help Search Canada Site
PHAC Home Centres Publications Guidelines A-Z Index
Child Health Adult Health Seniors HealthSurveillance Health Canada
   
    Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC)
Canada Communicable Disease Report

[Table of Contents]

 

 

Volume: 23S7 - November 1997

CONTROLLING ANTIMICROBIAL RESISTANCE
An Integrated Action Plan for Canadians


CONFERENCE OBJECTIVES AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Successful control of antimicrobial resistance in Canada will require a multifaceted approach. LCDC and the Canadian Infectious Disease Society, in collaboration with a Planning Committee (Appendix I), brought together stakeholders from across the country (see Appendix II for a list of participants) to attend a national conference, Controlling Antimicrobial Resistance: An Integrated Action Plan for Canadians, in Montreal, from May 28 to 30, 1997.

The goal of the conference was to develop an action plan to limit the development and transmission of antimicrobial-resistant organisms in Canada and to recommend ways to assess the effectiveness of the plan. There were four specific objectives:

  • To report what is known about antimicrobial resistance levels currently present in community settings, health care facilities and animal husbandry in Canada, the United States and the world, and to discuss the factors contributing to increasing levels of resistance.

  • To create the components of an action plan that can be used by the public and professionals in community settings and health care facilities to limit the development and transmission of antimicrobial-resistant organisms. Possible components could be the development of national surveillance systems, professional and public education programs, development of guidelines outlining the appropriate use of antimicrobial agents, and care of and isolation techniques required for individuals infected with antimicrobial-resistant organisms.

  • To determine how to measure the effectiveness of the components of the action plan. Methods of assessment could include surveillance projects, outcome measurements, process measurements and special studies.

  • To anticipate obstacles that could prevent the realization of the action plan and to suggest ways to overcome these obstacles.

A number of working groups were formed (Appendix III) to make recommendations on the following issues:

  1. antimicrobial use in various settings and how to improve such use;

  2. the detection of antibiotic resistance and the role of surveillance;

  3. the partnerships required among industry, governments, health care providers and researchers to limit antimicrobial resistance and to coordinate care; and

  4. strategies for communicating and implementing the action plan resulting from the recommendations.

The following paragraphs provide more detailed information on each of these issues and present the recommendations reached through consensus.

 

[Previous] [Table of Contents] [Next]

Last Updated: 2002-11-08 Top