The Final Report on Early Case Consideration of the Steering Committee on Justice Efficiencies and Access to the Justice System

Appendix A

Literature Reviewed

  • Adult Criminal Court Statistics, Canadian Centre for Justice Statistics, Juristat, Vol. 12 no. 12, p. 10.

  • "A 30 Year Analysis Of Police Service Delivery And Costing: “E” Division, Research Summary", School of Criminology and Criminal Justice University College of the Fraser Valley and the Institute for Canadian Urban Research Studies, August 2005.

  • Bail and Remand Working Group Report, Ontario Justice Summit, April 2003.

  • Case Processing In Criminal Courts, 1999/00, Canadian Centre for Justice Statistics, Juristat, Vol. 22 no. 1

  • Custody Remand In Canada, 1986/87 to 200/01, Canadian Centre for Justice Statistics, Juristat, Vol 23 no. 7.

  • Criminal Case Management Protocol, September 9, 2004, prepared by the Effective Scheduling Working Group of the Criminal Justice Steering Committee for presentation to the Ontario Justice Summit 2004.

  • Manitoba Pre-Trial Coordination Pilot Project Protocol, August 11, 2004.

  • Provincial Court of Alberta, Early Case Resolution Committee Report, May 2001

  • Everything in its Own Time: A Preliminary Examination of Case Processing Time in Canadian Criminal Courts, Cheryl Marie Webster and Anthony N. Doob, 22 April 2004.

  • Winnipeg Domestic Violence Front-End Project, Performance Indicators, October 4, 2004.

  • Brownlee, Ian D., The Statutory Charging Scheme in England and Wales: Towards a Unified Prosecution System? [2004] Crim. L. R. 896.

  • The Provincial Court of British Columbia Criminal Caseflow Management Rules and Best Practices Guidebook, October 1999.

  • The Report of the Criminal Justice Review Committee (February, 1999)

  • “Reducing Court Delays: Five Lessons From The United States” The World Bank (December 1999)

  • “Efficient Criminal Procedure” in Expeditious Justice: Papers of the Canadian Institute for the Administration of Justice (Toronto: Carswell, 1979)

  • Mahoney, B. Changing Times In Trial Courts (National Center of State Courts, 1988)

  • Law Reform Commission of Canada, Trial Within A Reasonable Time: A Working Paper, (Ottawa, 1994)

  • The Report Of The Criminal Justice Review Committee (February, 1999)

  • The Royal Commission On Criminal Procedure (the “Philips Report”)(1981)

  • The Royal Commission on Criminal Justice (the “Runciman Report”) (1993)

  • The Review of the Crown Prosecution Service (the “Glidewell Report”) (1998)

  • A Review of the Criminal Courts of England and Wales (the “Auld Report”) (2001).

  • Narey Review of Delay in the Criminal Justice System (1997)

  • Feltes, T., Causes For Delays In The Criminal Justice System, Report to the Ninth Criminological Colloquium on “Delays in the Criminal Justice System” Council of Europe, Strasbourg, Nov. 28-30, 1989

  • Ipp, D.A. “Adversarial Justice In Transition”Criminal Trial Reform Conference (Melbourne, 2000)

  • “Efficiency, Timeliness, and Quality: A New Perspective From Nine State Criminal Trial Courts ”National Institute of Justice Research in Brief, U.S. Department of Justice (June 2000)

  • A selective bibliography on caseflow management and delay reduction can be accessed at www.ncsc.dni.us/clrhouse/cfbib99.htm.

  • “Improving Your Jurisdiction's Felony Caseflow Process: A Primer on Conducting an Assessment and Developing an Action Plan” prepared by the Justice Management Institute for the Bureau of Justice Assistance, Criminal Courts Technical Assistance Project, American University (April 2000).