The Way Back: Sudbury Lakes Recovering from Acid Rain
More than a century of metal mining and smelting took a heavy
toll on the environment around Sudbury, Ontario. Sulphur dioxide
emissions from local smelters acidified an estimated 7 000 lakes
in a zone of about 17 000 square kilometres—much of which was
previously pristine wilderness.
Pollution control measures applied in the 1970s and 1990s reduced
local emissions by about 90 per cent and produced remarkable
improvements in the chemistry of some lakes in the area. Others,
however, remain severely acidified. Researchers from government,
industry, and Laurentian University in Sudbury are working together
to learn more about this recovery and to assist in rehabilitating
damaged aquatic ecosystems.
Environment Canada's National Water Research Institute (NWRI)
is one of the partners in the Aquatic Restoration Group, along
with the mining companies Inco Limited and Falconbridge Limited,
and the Ontario ministries of the Environment and Natural
Resources. Established in 1997 and coordinated by Laurentian’s
Cooperative Freshwater Ecology Unit, the group is tracking the
chemical and biological changes in lakes that have occurred in
response to reduced sulphur and metal emissions. It is also
exploring links between the acidification recovery process and
impacts of other environmental stresses.
Researchers have observed changes in water chemistry, such as
increased pH and decreased concentrations of sulphate, base
cations (e.g., calcium, sodium, potassium, and magnesium) and
aluminum. These improvements in water quality have, in turn,
encouraged a biological recovery for several groups of
organisms—including phytoplankton, zooplankton and fish—in some
of the area's lakes. Scientists worldwide consider the
developing recovery of Sudbury’s lakes one of the most
convincing and best documented case studies of ecosystem
responses to reduced acid rain. The studies have also
highlighted complicating factors that can impede recovery.
In recent decades, extremely clear acidic lakes in the area have
become much clearer, likely due to changes in climate and
increased ultraviolet (UV) radiation. Even though they continue
their slow recovery from acidification, these clear lakes are
more transparent and, therefore, allow the sun's rays to
penetrate deeper. Greater exposure to UV radiation from this
sunlight is potentially harmful to aquatic species and prevents
the restoration of healthy aquatic communities.
Drought, another climatic variation, can also play a role in
stalling the recovery process. When a dry period occurs, the
sulphur stored in lake catchments and sediments from years of
high atmospheric deposition can be released. This can delay
recovery or even cause re-acidification of the lake, with
serious consequences for the biological revival that is still in
its early stages.
The members of the Aquatic Restoration Group are aware that this is a
critical time for environmental assessment research in the Sudbury area.
Their water quality studies will not only assess the effectiveness of emission
reductions to date, but also provide the scientific knowledge on which to base
decisions about the need for greater pollution controls. The group has begun new work
to identify which components of the ecosystem are capable of unassisted recovery and
which require active restoration measures, such as introducing species or modifying habitat.
It will also investigate further the role played by the long-range atmospheric transport of
pollutants—now thought to be the dominant source of acid input to most Sudbury-area lakes—and
continue to explore the impacts of climate fluctuations and the storage of contaminants
in watersheds.
An initiative such as the Aquatic Restoration Group is one way
to share information and join forces in the fight to promote the
recovery of ecosystems from acidification. Although still at an
early stage, results in the Sudbury lakes hold promise that
similar recoveries from acidification can take place elsewhere
in the world.
|