"We are all in the gutter, but some of us..."
Taking Trash Seriously.
"...are looking at the stars."
-- Oscar Wilde
July 29, 2004
Price: Your 2¢

This site is updated Thursday afternoon with a new article about an artistic pursuit generally considered to be beneath consideration. James Schellenberg probes science-fiction, Carol Borden draws out the best in comics, Chris Szego dallies with romance and Ian Driscoll stares deeply into the screen. Click here for their bios and individual takes on the gutter.

While the writers have considerable enthusiasm for their subjects, they don't let it numb their critical faculties. Tossing away the shield of journalistic objectivity and refusing the shovel of fannish boosterism, they write in the hopes of starting honest and intelligent discussions about these oft-enjoyed but rarely examined artforms. Contact us here.


Recent Features


A Matter of Evolution: Monkeys vs. Robots

skunk ape 80.JPGThey've been brought together before in James Kolchalka's Monkey vs. Robot books, by Mecha Kong in King Kong Escapes and Mojo Jojo's mech-suited machinations in The Powerpuff Girls. Primates and robots each imitate and mock humanity in their own way. When the postapocalyptic future finally overtakes us, will we be replaced by the robots we designed to serve us or live in a world reclaimed by nature and ruled from Gorilla City?

Continue reading...


Bits and Pieces, Expertly Assembled

brent_weeks_small.jpgLet's see: there's a kingdom of evil invading from the north, there's a type of thieves' guild in a gritty capital city, plus a mysterious sword, tons of magic, and much more, all stuffed into that stereotypical fantasy container, the trilogy. How the heck could anyone do something interesting with this material? Over to you, newcomer Brent Weeks.

Continue reading...


For the Win!

smmer.JPGCover blurbs can be tricky things. Some authors see them as good publicity tools, and who’s to say they’re wrong? After all, it puts their name on books not their own, right there for eager readers to find. Others see them as favours to pay back to writers who have helped them, or forward to writers they’d like to see succeed. Sometimes they backfire: if I try a book based on an author’s recommendation and hate it, it’s a double blow. Not only to do I not like the book in my hand, but my opinion of the blurbing author’s taste has been seriously tarnished.

Continue reading...


Forgetful?

Perhaps you'd like an e-mail notification of our weekly update.

 
 

One War, Every War

by James Schellenberg

Haldeman wrote about the war he knewYou get drafted in the year 1997, your brain tortured out of its pacifism by hypnotic compulsion to kill. Many of your troopmates die in training on the icy planet of Charon, past Pluto. You spend the next thousand years, fighting a skirmish then sleeping through a trip that takes place at relativistic speeds - on your way to the next battle of course. You can't go home because Earth society has changed too much. And why are humans fighting these alien Taurans anyway?

This is indeed the forever war.

The Forever War is a classic work of science fiction, winner of the Hugo and Nebula Awards for Best Novel after its publication in 1974. Haldeman fought in the Vietnam War, and when he came home, he wrote this book. He had to be persistent to get it published, because no one wanted a science fiction book about Vietnam (whether it's actually about Vietnam or not is another issue). The book was serialized, printed in various versions, and recently, finally, put together in an Author's Preferred Edition by Eos.

The main character is William Mandella, an academic minding his own business. He gets drafted and The Forever War is basically the story of how he survives the war. Training is dangerous, interstellar travel is dangerous, and fighting the Taurans is getting more and more dangerous every encounter. Worse, none of the battles are the same. William has some face-to-face struggles with the aliens; he also wakes up from the sleep tanks at one point to find that half of his ship was blown away by projectiles travelling close to the speed of light. William and a woman named Marygay Potter fall in love, which makes every mission doubly treacherous: the odds are against William himself surviving, never mind the two of them.

William's character is the reason why the book works so well. He's not an action hero, and in fact he resists the notion. For example, he has dreams about becoming a machine but when he wakes he's just a regular guy doing his best to get by, i.e. a real human being. Rather than falling into a downward spiral of dehumanization, William somehow keeps that essential gritty part of himself that will be able to move on if or when the war is ever over. This makes The Forever War a surprisingly optimistic book.

The book's structure is intelligent, which creates its own hopefulness. The book is organized into four longer sections (labelled by William's rank as he moves up in the hierarchy). Military science fiction has a tendency to succumb to war porn, with battles building towards one big blowout of violence and gore; all of Haldeman's grim details work against this grain. The violent encounters usually come first in each section, followed by lots of aftermath and consequences. The book could be boiled down to the typical war-is-hell message, but everything about it is so smartly worked out that it's a joy to read.

Haldeman wrote about the war he knewIs this book about the Vietnam War? Of course it is - a war that never ends, the draft, the same lack of purpose - and it was generally understood that way when it was first published. It's also about every war, the current war in Iraq (more on that in a minute), and the plight of any thinking person caught up in war.

Paradoxically, The Forever War is none of those things, and only what it says it's about: galactic war. For those people who care about such things, The Forever War is a solid work of science fiction. Journeys at relativistic speeds, encounters with aliens, startling sociological changes, and so on: Haldeman has worked these out carefully and they matter to the story. The genius of science fiction is that it can be both, neither, and anything in between, all depending on how much work the reader wants to put into the process.

I've been struck with a strange question recently when I've gone back to pointed works such as this book by Haldeman: can you ever be satirical enough? The Forever War ends with a surprise to the main character--the whole war was based on a mistake. A misunderstanding. This has become somewhat of a staple in such stories (see Timothy Zahn's pulpy but interesting Conqueror series). But as recent events have shown, it's also possible to start a war based on a wilful misunderstanding. What's next? What could be worse? I'm glad that Haldeman was hopeful in his book, and it's sad that a writer's work can suffer for lack of cynicism (another example would be Alfred Bester, who worked in advertising back in the 1950s and 1960s, wrote some brilliant sf about it, but who could hardly conceive of how saturated our culture has become with ads). For a book that is thirty years old, The Forever War has held up reasonably well, and Haldeman has written some sequels that are also worth checking out.

Tags: , ,

Chuck your 2¢ into the Gutter
One War, Every War - The Cultural Gutter
Lost your 2¢? Write us.

Paw through our archives

Of Note Elsewhere
Back off bitches, Fred the Viking is mine.  Love and 1980s technology combine for a new world of romance in this collage of dating videos. (Thanks, Jen!).
~
Where would the internet be without Photoshop? Some surprisingly realistic "photos" about hunting a famous video game enemy that comes out of the sky...
~
Robert E. Howard's Solomon Kane buckles his swash, fights the Devil's Reaper and becomes a puritan swordsman in, well, Solomon Kane--a much better action movie with Christian themes in which the hero is crucified than The Passion of the Christ.
~
Two items where Star Wars runs up against participatory culture: the completely awesome Animals with Lightsabers and the completely logical one-off joke The Hook
~
Bill Harris on Play: "When I meet a grown-up who does not know how to play, I'm not interested in talking to them. I would much rather talk to children, who always understand play and always know how to laugh."
~

View all Notes here.
Seen something shiny? Gutter-talk worth hearing? Let us know!

On a Quest?

Pete Fairhurst made us this Mozilla search plug-in. Neat huh?

Obsessive?

Then you might be interested in knowing you can get an RSS Feed here, find us on facebook there and that the site is autoconstructed by v4.01 of Movable Type and is hosted by No Media Kings.

Thanks To

Canada Council
We acknowledge the support of the Canada Council for the Arts which last year invested $20.3 million in writing and publishing throughout Canada.