



 |
RESEARCH PROGRAM AND
ACCOMPLISHMENTS
Tobacco
Tobacco research has been conducted
principally with two of the main types of
tobacco, burley and flue-cured. There
are so many variations of the ubiquitous
tobacco plant under cultivation throughout
the world that classification is based
chiefly upon the curing method used. All
tobacco leaf must be dried or cured
before use and the four main methods
are flue-curing, air-curing, sun-curing,
and fire-curing. Flue-cured tobacco
derives its name from the metal flues
originally used to distribute heat and
carry off the products of combustion in
the curing barn or kiln. Burley tobacco
is an air-cured type. The history of the
industrial development of these two
types in Canada is as divergent as the
techniques employed for their production
or the research programs initiated for
their improvement.
The tobacco grown by many of the
early settlers of Essex County, which
became the tobacco of commerce in the
nineteenth century, was a burley type,
but apparently not the light-bodied burley
favored by smokers in later years. One
early writer characterized it as heavy
rank tobacco for pipe, plug, and snuff.
Mr. Felix Charlan, the first tobacco
specialist to be employed by the Canada
Department of Agriculture in Ottawa,
evidently agreed with this assessment
when he laid the plans for the establishment
of the Station for the purpose of
improving both the quality of the product
and the procedures for handling it. Fluecured
tobacco was first grown in Ontario
in 1906 and in 1913 commercial production
commenced with about 100 ac
grown at Ruthven in Essex County.
The original experiments at the Station
in 1909 included some varietal tests,
fertilizer tests, and some demonstrations
of cultural practices with both burley and
flue-cured types. The first printed record
of research appeared in the minister's
report for 1912 and indicated that work
was continuing with white burley and
yellow Virginia. Larger seedbeds with
better protection were recommended
and a renewal or at least a disinfection
of the "mould." Many fertilizers were on
the market and it was planned to test all
of them. Poisoned bran, which was a
mixture of bran, Paris green, and molasses, was recommended as a control for
cutworms. Rotations under test included
cereal, tobacco, and Indian corn. Clover
sown with the grain was plowed under in
the spring.
In 1913 new flue-cured varieties in the test included
Warne, Virginia, Erzegovine, and Virginia Erzegovine Gigante. The recommended
fertilizer for flue-cured tobacco was 3-8-3 at 500 lb/ac. The burley tests had
14 fertilizer treatments, but a severe hail storm damaged the crop so badly that
it could not be harvested. About this time considerable difficulty began to be
encountered both in the seedbed and in the field in the form of a root rot that
affected the whole tobacco growing area as well as the Station plots. Farmers
spoke of a burleysick soil and one frequently heard the expression -my ground is
burleyed out." Advice on how to deal with this matter included recommendations
never to use the same seedbed soil twice, to disinfect with steam or
formaldehyde, to change fields, to use longer rotations, and even to apply
superphosphate at the rate of 1000 lb/ac. Eventually the root rot was identified
by Mr. James Johnson of the College of Agriculture in Madison, Wis., as a
disease caused by a fungus called Thielavia basicola
. The Station planned
to cooperate with Mr. Johnson in breeding
for a resistant strain of burley
tobacco.
The tone of the experimental program for tobacco had now
been set. The work continued, and became a little more elaborate each year. In
1914 eight varieties of flue-cured and four of burley were tested, numerous
disinfection tests were conducted, and a moveable scaffolding for harvesting
burley was used for the first time. By 1915 the Station was producing a
considerable quantity of tobacco seed, the practice of stalk splitting at
harvest was tested, and artificial heat was tried in the burley curing barn for
the first time. In 1916 the
first occurrence of tobacco mosaic virus was reported
and an extensive soil study was
undertaken. From 1917 to 1922 the
Station produced all the seed necessary for
the total Canadian production. This
seed was cleaned and sampled for
germination testing without charge and
sold to the growers. It was generally considered that
this Canadian-grown seed was superior
to imported seed. Fall plowing and
early transplanting were now recommended, arsenate of
lead was suggested as a control for
cutworms and the tobacco hornworm. The only control for
mosaic virus was roguing the diseased
plants. The variety Burley Resistant offered some
protection from disease The recommended fertilizer
for flue-cured tobacco was 180 lb/ac
of sulfate of ammonia, 400 lb/ac
of superphosphate, and 200 lb/ac of
sulfate of potash. For burley
tobacco the amounts were 400 lb/ac of
sulfate of ammonia, 400
lb/ac of superphosphate, 170 lb/ac of sulfate
of potash together with 12
tons of manure. Experiments were soon
started to compare the effects of applying
fertilizer by drilling and by broadcasting.
A considerable volume of experimental
data had been accumulated and by 1922
recommendations for improvements in
seedbed construction and use were
based on the results of 6 years of effort.
Similarly a 6-yr experiment had demonstrated
the advantage of crop rotation by
showing a consistent yield reduction
from plots under continuous tobacco.
Flue-cured varieties grown were Warne,
Hickory Prior, and Gold Leaf. Eleven
burley varieties were under test.
Researchers were beginning to experiment
with the flue-curing process by
checking the effects of varying relative
humidity and the heat distribution in the
kiln. Steam was used experimentally for
flue-curing and a large 30 hp boiler was
purchased. In 1923 three varieties of the
Green River type were introduced; fertilizer
tests were greatly expanded to
include more than 60 treatments. For 2
or 3 years exceptionally good crops were
grown and the effects of root rot were
considerably diminished, probably due to
a coincidental combination of climatic
factors. For a number of years cooperative
fertilizer tests were conducted with
growers located at points as widely
separated as Leamington, Rodney, and
Pelee Island, Conclusions as to the
amounts of fertilizer required for optimum
production of the various types of
tobacco coincided closely with the
amounts quoted from the Station
experiments. Two interesting comments
were that sulfate of ammonia was the
best source of nitrogen, and many
growers felt that home-mixed fertilizers
were more economical and effective than
the ready-mixed products.
When Mr. Digges left in 1928, he
prepared a summary of the 10-yr progress
of research during his tenure as
superintendent. He stated his assessment
thus, "Although marked improvement
has been noted during the past 10
years in the cultural methods of a large
portion of the tobacco growers, and
although there has been a resultant
improvement in quality, it is felt that we
are not yet producing, on the average,
either as high a quality or as large a yield
of tobacco per acre as our natural
advantages warrant. Further improvement
in quality is greatly desired and
would undoubtedly result in an increased
demand from our home market and
would strengthen our hold on our fast-developing
export tobacco market." The
report gives a detailed summary of the
results of all experimental work and a set
of recommendations covering every
operation in the production process
including plant-bed construction, seedling
production, rotations, soil preparation,
transplanting, fertilizing, cultivation
and topping, insect and disease control,
harvesting, curing, seed production, and
variety selection.
The arrival of Mr. Murwin as superintendent
occurred during the period when
the tobacco industry was undergoing
extensive change. Flue-cured production
was becoming relocated in the "new
belt" in Norfolk and Oxford counties.
The burley business was booming. Production
reached a peak of 22 million
pounds in 1927, resulting in a glutted
market because of a promised export
trade that did not materialize. Expansion
of the industry was too rapid and overproduction
and lower prices resulted.
From this time on production declined
although the burley acreage in Essex
and Kent counties increased by at least
4000 ac in 1930.
A complete reorganization of the fertilizer
studies was effected in 1929. A very
extensive series of tests was inaugurated
for flue-cured, burley, and dark-fired
tobacco. A standing committee on
tobacco fertilizers was appointed in
January 1930 to consider the results of
experimental work and to formulate
fertilizer recommendations for the various
types of tobacco grown in Ontario. The
committee was eventually integrated with
the Ontario Fertilizer Board and has
continued to function to the present
time.
A new type of plant bed was introduced
at this time, the greenhouse
A-shaped bed. Investigation soon showed
that more seedlings of larger size could
be produced in a shorter period in this
house than was possible in the semihot
bed or the cold frame, which were in
general use. An ambitious experiment
was undertaken with a view to classifying
all commercial strains and varieties as to
type, botanical differences, and cropping
potential in Canada. There was no
breeding program, but the researchers
had a cooperative understanding with
certain plant breeders in the United
States and continued to examine
numerous varieties and strains from
various sources particularly for resistance
to black root rot. The change in the
method of harvesting from stalk cutting
to priming eliminated the old flue-cured
varieties such as Warne, Hickory Pryor,
and Gold Leaf. The flue-cured varieties
introduced from the United States that
were particularly adapted for priming
under Ontario conditions were White
Mammoth, White Stern Orinoco, Bonanza,
Yellow Mammoth, Gold Dollar, and
Duquesne. The priming method of harvesting
flue-cured tobacco had resulted
in higher yields and improved leaf quality
and had reduced the risk of total crop
loss due to an early fall frost.
A distinct change had also taken place
in varieties of burley tobacco due to a
demand by the domestic trade for a
thinner, brighter, cigarette burley. The
old varieties such as Broadleaf, Broadleaf
Resistant, Station Standup, and
Standup Resistant were no longer
acceptable except for the export market.
The continued search for new and better
varieties finally paid off with the selection
in 1929 of a resistant burley plant that
led to the naming and release in 1932 of
the variety Harrow Velvet. It was very
resistant to black root rot and had many
other desirable characteristics that soon
led to its becoming the leading burley
variety in Canada. Thus began a breeding
program that continued for many
years and produced a number of outstanding
varieties largely through the
efforts of Mr. Bob Haslam.
The Substation at Delhi was established
in 1933 and although it was
administered from the Station, it assumed
full responsibility for all research with
flue-cured tobacco. All programs were
transferred there except variety testing.
However, in 1938 the testing of flue-cured varieties was discontinued at the
Station except the breeding and testing
program for resistance to black root rot.
With this exception the program was
now directed toward burley and a small
effort with dark tobacco.
Fertilizer tests continued to occupy a
large place in the tobacco research
program. By 1936 recommendations
were being made to suit the wide variety
of soils used in burley production, and
great attention was being paid to individual
nutrients as well as the chemical
source of each nutrient. For example, it
was recommended that one-quarter of
the applied nitrogen be from organic
sources, one-quarter from nitrate of
soda, and the remainder from other
standard materials. It was preferable to
have a part of the potash derived from
muriate because chlorine improves the
moisture-holding capacity of the leaf and
helps to avoid shattering. The amount
must be limited to protect the burning
qualities of the leaf and critical percentages
of chlorine were recommended for
each type of tobacco.
An intensive study of crop rotations
was carried on for many years. Recommended
rotations depended on the type
of tobacco to be grown and the type of
soil. It was demonstrated that the proper
rotation had an important influence on
the maximum yield. Plant spacing, plowing,
and cultivation methods were also
studied to find the right combination of
techniques to get the most benefit from
the light sandy soils.
The story of tobacco production in
Canada has been one of constantly
changing varieties. To meet the demand
of a steadily increasing cigarette trade,
the trend in tobacco production in
southern Ontario, particularly during the
years of the Second World War, was
toward milder brighter leaf tobaccos.
Although large stocks of pipe and chewing
tobacco were used during this
period, the production of heavy-bodied
tobacco was not stimulated to the same
extent as cigarette tobacco. This
increasing demand for bright tobaccos
stimulated the production of the fluecured
type. With burley there was a shift
from the heavy varieties formerly used
for pipe and chewing to lighter standup
varieties for manufacturing blended
cigarettes and mild pipe tobaccos.
Harrow Velvet may be considered the
leader of the cigarette group of burley
varieties because with its introduction in
1932 a new class of burley tobacco came
into existence. It was one of the first
varieties to have an erect growing habit
in contrast to the drooping types, which
were formerly grown. It had high resistance
to black root rot and was a useful
variety in the breeding program. Haronova
was introduced in 1941 and Harmony in
1945. Both had high resistance to black
root rot, high-quality cigarette leaf, and
slightly higher yield under average
conditions. Resistance to brown root rot
had not yet been achieved, but this
disease was controlled to some degree
by following a proper rotation schedule.
In the years following the Second
World War the demand for burley
tobacco began to decline and the area
in production decreased from 13,200 ac
in 1947 to 1096 ac in 1953. However, the
research program at the Station was
continued in an effort to improve quality
and to meet the changing demands of
the industry. Fertilizer studies, cultural
practices, rotations, and disease investigations
were a part of the program.
Three new varieties were named and
released: Harrow Broadleaf, Haronic,
and Briarvet. All three were examples of
the heavy-bodied type of burley designed
for the export market and each had high
resistance to black root rot. But their
usefulness to the industry in its current
state was limited and they were never
widely used.
The only part of the flue-cured research
investigation remaining at the Station
was the breeding program, and in 1948
it made a significant contribution to the
industry with the naming and release of
the variety Delcrest, which had been
developed by Mr. Bob Haslam. This
variety was resistant to black root rot
but was susceptible to brown root rot. It
produced a consistently high-quality
bright leaf and outyielded any flue-cured
variety then in use. Delcrest remained
the most popular variety for many years
and its characteristics were bred into
succeeding varieties.
The trend toward thin bright cigarette
burley made it necessary to change
some of the cultural practices that had
been in use for many years. There was
now more need than ever to control the
rate of water loss during air curing so
that it would be neither too slow during
wet weather nor too fast during dry
windy weather. Mr. Walter Scott started a
series of experiments that continued for a
number of years using a variety of
ingenious techniques to achieve this
control. A specially designed calcium
chloride dehydrator was built and tested
and proved to be very effective. Later,
heaters with automatic temperature and
humidity controls were used and did an
even better job. Subsequently, an automatic,
forced, warm-air system with plywood
and polyethylene ducts was tested.
Each new improvement in the system
resulted in higher-quality cured leaf and
an increased dollar value for the product.
It was observed that on the rare occasions
when weather conditions remained
favorable throughout the whole curing
season, it was possible through judicious
control of ventilation to obtain a high-quality
leaf product.
Some consideration was given to the
method of harvesting burley tobacco. A
new method of stalk cutting was tried
and found to be advantageous. The
tobacco was speared onto the lath and
then left to wilt on the standing stick in
an inverted position until it was ready to
be taken to the curing barn. This procedure
caused less bruising of the
tender leaves by eliminating much of the
handling required in the conventional
method. It kept the tobacco cleaner,
allowed it to wilt under ideal conditions,
and resulted in less damage from sunburn.
This technique of harvesting burley
has been almost universally adopted.
Priming of burley was also tested and
was shown to produce a superior quality
of leaf, an increased yield, and much
higher returns. However, the industry
has never seen fit to adopt this method
of harvesting even though it would be
greatly to its advantage to do so.
During the 1950s a disease called
tobacco etch virus caused serious losses
in burley tobacco in Ontario and it
became the subject of intensive study. It
was found to have two insect vectors,
the green peach aphid and the potato
aphid, and the intensity of the disease
fluctuated with the seasonal prevalence
of these insects. Numerous burley
varieties and lines were screened for
resistance to the virus. None was found
to be immune, but eventually the Station
released a variety that had some
measure of tolerance.
In 1963 a new burley variety called
Harwin was licensed and released for
commercial production. Under test on a
range of sandy loam, gravelly loam, and
clay soils the yield was 5-10% higher
and the quality slightly better than the
standard commercial variety of that
period, Burley 1. Harwin showed more
tolerance for etch virus than Burl,
and good resistance to black root rot
and brown root rot. It had a lower alkaloid
content than other cigarette burley
varieties. This represented Bob Haslam's
final contribution at the end of a long
career in tobacco research and it came
a year before his retirement. Harwin
possessed many of the desirable features
that breeders had been attempting to
build into burley tobacco for many years.
It was also an answer to a more recent
challenge to find a lower nicotine
tobacco after it was shown that smoking
is a health hazard.
The story of the changing aspect of
the burley tobacco industry in Ontario as
well as the research at the Station is well
illustrated in the following list:
|  |