



 |
Fruit and Vegetable
Crops
Although peach and apple orchards
had been planted and maintained by the
best methods of husbandry since the
Station was started, investigational work
in horticulture was not started until 1923.
Attractive ornamentals were always a
part of the farm scene. The first serious
testing with apples consisted of a program
of top grafting on old trees. At the
same time an extensive variety testing
program with vegetables was started for
sweet corn, radishes, lettuce, peas,
beans, carrots, beets, celery, onions,
and parsnips. The first reports do not list
tomatoes, but they were soon added to
the tests and in 1925, 24 varieties were
tested and 40 varieties of sweet corn.
Variety tests were also carried out that
year with potatoes and peanuts. In 1927
fertilizer tests with potatoes were started.
The variety testing program soon became
narrowed down to a more concentrated
examination of a smaller number of
commercially important vegetables,
mainly tomatoes, asparagus, sweet corn,
and lima beans. Fruit investigation
included studies of strawberries, raspberries,
grapes, and muskmelon, although
agriculturally the melon is classed as a
vegetable. A limited amount of work was
done on the study of cultural practices
and fertilizer requirements of some of the
vegetable crops, but the whole horticultural
program continued on a rather
modest scale in comparison with
research on other crops until the arrival
of Mr. Brian Harrison in 1937.
At this time peach growing in southwestern Ontario was
becoming more important; one reason was that the climate gave a slight advantage
over that of the Niagara District in terms of earlier maturity. Mr. Harrison
immediately launched into an extensive peach variety testing program and by 1946
there were 80 varieties in the Station orchards. The market demand was for an
attractive yellow-fleshed freestone peach that could be shipped to distant
markets and sold locally on roadside stands or to the canning factories. The
best varieties were also to be early ripening and able to withstand severe frost
and cold. This investigation marked the beginning of a study that eventually
became one of the main research programs of the Station and exerted a major
influence on the peach industry not only in Essex County, but in other parts of
Canada and the United States. It was interrupted for a time during the Second
World War, but was resumed and broadened to include a study of bacterial spot disease, which was causing some concern
in the area. Fortunately
an adequate measure of varietal resistance
was eventually encountered. It came to be
recognized after some time that the peach rootstocks
currently in use were
not providing proper protection from damage
due to low temperature, root aphids, nematodes,
and root toxins. A search was started
for new and better rootstocks and
many sources were tested,
including apricot, which was not considered at
that time to be a commercially profitable fruit
by itself. Another interesting study
was a comparison of chemical and mechanical methods
of peach thinning. Each annual report contained
a wealth of observational data on
all facets of the growing of peaches.
In the summer of 1951 an early-maturing mutation of the
Redhaven peach was located by one of the local fruit growers, Mr. Garnet Bruner,
in his own orchard. The mutating branch was brought to the attention of Mr.
George Whaley of Olinda who suggested that it be shown to Mr. Harrison for guidance as to its
possible use. This was
done in 1954. An examination of the numerous
fruits on the branch indicated that it
was of the sectorial chimera type
with ideal on-type fruit on shoots emerging
from a narrow strip on the branch
and off-type fruits on shoots at the
perimeter. A wide variation in fruit appearance was evident
and was caused by maturity differences
and shape abnormalities. Buds were taken from shoots
associated with on-type fruits differing from the
parent Redhaven only in maturity and a
number of trees were budded at the
Station and elsewhere. The resulting fruits were checked
and selected for further budding. In
1957 two separate times of ripening
were evident representing two possible
strains. The name Garnet was proposed
for one that ripened 10
days in advance of Redhaven. This strain
was propagated in quantity and released for distribution
in 1958, but the name
was changed to Garnet Beauty because
prior use of the name Garnet
had been discovered. This variety
proved to be very useful and
popular and is still being grown in some
areas. Although it did not originate
as the result of a breeding
program at the Station, it was developed
to the point of usefulness by
Mr. Harrison with the assistance of Mr.
Alvin Sellick and became the first
peach variety to originate through the Station efforts.
In 1951 Dr. Koch began a collaborative
study of the peach replant disorder,
which had been recognized for many
years and was beginning to cause widespread
concern in Essex County. For
several years it occupied a major place
in the peach program at the Station.
Although the peach investigations
comprised the largest part of the fruit
research program, work was continued
with grapes until 1939 and with raspberries
for a considerably longer period.
Apple orchards were maintained and
several studies of lesser importance were
conducted including a study of a form of
winter damage known as southwest
injury or sunscald.
The vegetable research program was
taken over by Mr. L. F. Ounsworth in
1942. He started a program of tomato
breeding, which was interrupted for 4
years by war service but continued with
great vigor later. The commonly grown
early tomato was a variety named
Bounty, which had many fine characteristics.
The object of the breeding
program was to produce disease-resistant
varieties or hybrids more suitable
to the district. This program resulted
in the production of a superior tomato,
which was named Harrow and released
in 1951. It was a consistently high yielding
early tomato that was conspicuously
free from cracking, a disorder that
reduced the quality of many common
varieties. Les Ounsworth pursued this
tomato breeding program along with
variety testing as long as he remained.
This was an extremely varied study
because different types and varieties are
required for the different uses. Processing
tomatoes are different from the early
market or the late market tomatoes and
all of these are quite distinct from
greenhouse tomatoes. Numerous
characteristics of this interesting fruit
were examined including earliness, size,
firmness, freedom from cracking, vitamin
C content, color, and resistance to
diseases such as verticillium wilt, fusarium
wilt, mosaic virus, and bacterial canker.
Insect control, nutrition, and nematode
damage were also studied. An inbred
selection derived from hybridization was
named Harbon and released in 1966. It
was an excellent tomato in many
respects, but it could not compete in
yield with several other commonly used
varieties when grown on a clay soil. The
tomato breeding program was discontinued
when Les Ounsworth left the
Station in 1969 and has not been
resumed. In the meantime some of the
larger processing companies have
assumed a share of the responsibility for
producing new varieties of processing
tomatoes.
Mr. Ounsworth was also involved in a
melon breeding program, which was
started in 1942 with the aim of introducing
resistance to wilt and increasing
earliness. This was accomplished by
1954 with the introduction and naming of
the Harper hybrid. This hybrid was
resistant to fusarium wilt, produced a
good yield of relatively early fruit, was a
good shipper, and had high quality with
excellent flavor. However, it was subject
to, powdery mildew. It quickly became
very popular and has remained a favorite
with growers ever since, particularly on
account of its ability to withstand
damage during handling and shipping.
Many more selections were made over
the next 15 years of breeding, but none
could equal the Harper hybrid. Fusarium
wilt continued to be one of the most
serious problems facing melon growers
in Essex County. An intensive study of
the etiology of the melon wilt disease
and a search for practical measures to
control it was carried on for many years
in a series of meticulous researches by
Dr. Ralph Wensley.
With the formation of the Research Branch in 1959, the
horticultural research program began to take on a new appearance. Dr. G. M.
Weaver replaced Mr. Harrison as head of the horticulture section. He undertook a
peach breeding program to incorporate resistance to peach canker and to
bacterial leaf spot into commercially acceptable varieties and to increase the
level of winterhardiness. A search was made for desirable breeding parents and
the program soon gathered momentum. Two plastic greenhouses were erected for the
production of seedlings and 15,000 of these were set out annually in nurseries
for three successive years. The amount of land devoted to peach orchards was
greatly increased and the research developed many new facets. Variety and
thinning trials were carried out. A survey of peach canker in the orchards of
the district was made. Insect problems were under continuous study. The peach replant problem continued to receive
attention. 1963 was a bad year
for peaches in Essex County. Winter temperatures as
low as -17°F resulted in severe
damage to many orchards. This spurred
on the search for new winterhardy
varieties with both bud hardiness
and root hardiness. Methods for identifying and
testing this characteristic were
developed. Electrical resistance of woody stem tissue
seemed to provide a useful
index. Artificial freezing at controlled temperatures
with subsequent inspection for
mortality rates was carried out also
and this became a standard technique.
At a later date exotherm analysis was
also used along with this procedure.
In conjunction with the breeding program
an intensive study of several insect
and disease problems was conducted.
The peach tree borer, the lesser peach
tree borer, and the oriental fruit moth
were the three leading orchard pests that
received much attention from Mr. Boyce
and Dr. Foott. The life histories and
habits of these insects were studied and
many methods of control were tested.
Peach canker, also called perennial
canker, was intensively studied and
some attention was given to crown gall.
Many of the pest control studies included
annual surveys of the commercial
orchards in the surrounding district.
|  |