Working Conditions Study


Joint study by CAW-Canada and McMaster University, Labour Studies. The study had two objectives:

McMaster University Labour Studies was asked to join the study to provide methodological expertise and statistical analysis.


STUDY SCOPE:

Text VersionOne of the most extensive working conditions surveys of industrial workers and probably the largest study of auto assembly plant workers.

Text VersionSurveyed workers in 9 assembly plants in Canada operated by GM, Ford, Chrysler & CAMI (late fall 1995).

Text VersionBenchmark study provides a snapshot of working conditions at a plant, company and sectoral level.

Text VersionProvides plant by plant, company by company comparisons.

STUDY METHODOLOGY (see Appendix 1 of Study Report)

46 question survey, confidential individual responses

large sample size with high return rate (57 per cent)

over 2,400 completed surveys from 9 plants

data processing & statistical analysis by McMaster University

STUDY FOCUS:

answers grouped into 6 Working Conditions Indexes:

workload
change in workload
physical risks
stress risks
autonomy/control
relations with management


STUDY RESULTS: Workers Report Inadequate Working Conditions!

Autoworkers are insecure(72 per cent). Too many report that they are working in physically awkward positions (51 per cent) and in pain for too much of the time (55 per cent). They are working either too fast or too overloaded with not enough time or not enough people to do the work (75 per cent). They are tired (69 per cent) and tense (64 per cent). They often have little energy for their families (77 per cent). And they doubt whether they can keep the pace of their work until they are 60, never mind 65 (78 per cent).

Conditions Are Getting Worse!

Compared to a couple of years ago, people are more tired (62 per cent) and more tense (53 per cent). Their workload has increased (73 per cent) and they are monitored more closely by management (63 per cent).

General Motors Tops The List Of Worst Plants:

Out of the six working conditions indexes, General Motors ranks the worst on five -- workload, workload change, physical risks, stress risks, autonomy/control.

On the sixth (relations with management) they are edged out of the worst spot by CAMI (GM-Suzuki joint venture) but on a plant basis, it is GM, Oshawa #1.

CAW
Click on our logo to return
to to the CAW Digital Collections home page!