o
the EastWest Institute
April 16, 2002
New York, New York
It is a very great pleasure for me to be here tonight in such distinguished
company. To be honoured at the same time as David Rockefeller and John Whitehead
is something I will not forget.
By honouring me tonight you are really honouring Canada.
I very much appreciate your kind words about me. But the truth of the matter
is that I have done no more than use my office to put forward on the
international stage values that are profoundly held by all Canadians: tolerance,
democracy, internationalism, peace-building, respect for human rights and the
rule of law.
The EastWest Institute was founded some twenty years ago when the Cold War
was the most important focus of international affairs. When tensions between the
Warsaw Pact and NATO spilled over into the third world. Africa Asia and Latin
America.
The world has changed dramatically in a relatively short period of time. What
we take for granted today was almost inconceivable less than 15 years ago: the
fall of the Berlin Wall, the dissolution of the Warsaw Pact, the dismantling of
the Soviet Union, the reunification of Germany.
Today, the countries of Eastern Europe are democracies. Market-driven
economies preparing for membership in the European Union. NATO expansion is a
non-threatening reality. Russia, despite its problems, is beginning to get its
act together. The conflict in the Balkans may not yet be resolved, but after the
tragedies of the last decade, we can all agree that real progress is being made
in that area of the world. And post September 11, American troops are stationed
and welcome on the soil of the former Soviet Union. Who would have believed all
this would be possible only 15 years ago?
Today, many are focussed rightly on the aftermath of September 11. On the war
on terrorism. On improving intelligence and policing. On defending against the
threat of biological and chemical warfare.
But I submit tonight that we have to focus our resources and our budgets on
more than simply defence against possible attacks. We must not, and cannot
ignore our obligations to the rest of the world. Not only because it is right,
but because it is in our own longer term self-interest.
In June, I will chair the G8 Summit in Canada, the second time I have had the
honour to do so. The first time, 7 years ago in Halifax, we effectively brought
Russia into the meetings. Today, with Russia included, the G8 can speak and act
with authority and influence on important matters that formerly could not be
seriously addressed.
Today, the world is faced with an enormous humanitarian political and
economic challenge. A challenge of leadership and, indeed, of statesmanship. One
that is at least as complicated as that posed by the need to rebuild Europe and
deal with East-West conflict post-1945.
Indeed, the challenge of Africa is in part caused by that conflict.
The last thing Africa needed in the previous century was to be sideswiped by
super power rivalry. Yet it was in Africa where the most destructive East-West
proxy wars were played out. Exacting an appalling toll in human misery and lost
hopes.
Africans paid a huge price as West and East competed for advantage. Buying
influence. Propping up the wrong kind of leadership and selling vast stocks of
weaponry. As a result, East and West helped sow the seeds of enduring armed
conflict and so helped mortgage the future of a generation.
When the Cold War ended, both East and West stopped paying any serious
attention to Africa. But 300 million people in Sub-Saharan Africa live on less
than one U.S. dollar a day. On the continent as a whole, 40% of primary school
age children do not go to school; 40% of the population does not have regular
access to safe water; 25.3 million people suffer from HIV/AIDS. And in about 5
years the number of AIDS orphans will equal about half of the population of
Canada.
It should be clear that the continued marginalization of Africa from the
globalization process, and the social exclusion of the vast majority of its
peoples constitute a serious threat to global security.
Last summer at our summit in Genoa, G8 leaders decided to respond to what is
now called the New Partnership for Africa’s Development, or NEPAD. A visionary
proposal put forward by progressive African leaders.
It lays out in clear terms how Africa, working in partnership with the rest
of the world, can finally begin addressing the immense challenges it faces.
As Chair of this year’s G-8 meeting, I intend to put the development of an
action plan on Africa at the centre of the agenda of the upcoming Summit.
I just returned this past weekend from a six country tour of Africa to plan
for the G8 Summit. I heard enthusiasm and a clear commitment on the part of
African leaders to move forward on a new approach they themselves have developed.
Where countries commit to and take tangible steps to ensure peace and stability
in their regions. Where they foster democratic rule and respect for human rights.
Where they pursue good governance. Where they work to root out corruption. Where
their performance is rated on transparent criteria by peers. And where countries
that are implementing the NEPAD principles are rewarded with enhanced aid and
investment.
The formula is timely. For common sense and our own taxpayers insist that we
can no longer provide massive development assistance to countries that do not
subscribe to the above principles and are not transparent in their dealings.
We will, of course, continue to assist people in need throughout Africa.
My trip to Africa came on the heels of the Monterrey Conference on Financing
for Development, where the United States, the European Union and Canada all
committed to substantial increases in our aid budgets.
But it is well understood that aid alone cannot be the basis of our
relationship with Africa. Aid alone cannot fix Africa. Private investment must
be the engine of African growth, and freer trade the fuel.
Yet, we cannot demand that Africa develop a market-based economy, and at the
same time close our own markets to African products. It is time for the United
States and Europe to reduce agricultural subsidies, just as Canada will
eliminate tariffs on imports from least developed countries.
The annual level of all Official Development Assistance from developed
countries amounts to some $50 billion. Subsidies by these same countries for
their domestic agriculture exceed $350 billion annually. These huge supports put
a strain on treasuries, depress prices and effectively shut out producers from
developing countries. Global agriculture markets will be far healthier, more
efficient and fairer – in short, better for rich countries and poor – if we
collectively reduce our subsidies.
Along with fair and open markets, governments need to do what they can to
encourage their private sectors to look to Africa for investment opportunities
so that it can be part of the global trading network.
The Africans I met with made it clear to me that they see a direct
correlation between addressing domestic challenges and attracting international
investment. They will require help along the way on basic needs, such as health
education as well as assistance with technical advice and capacity-building. But
if they do their part and we do ours I am confident that we can and will make
globalization work for the poor of Africa.
I believe that one real test of statesmanship in the years ahead will be how
the developed world – East and West – works with African leaders to bring
that continent into the mainstream of the global society.
We have seen right here in New York the tragic consequences that can result
from failed states in far away places. Simply put, we can’t afford not to
address these issues.
Helping Africa get on its feet is profoundly in our self-interest from the
point of view of our own security. It is in our interest from the perspective of
creating a more prosperous world with new markets. And finally, for nations like
ours, which believe in the right of citizens to be free, to be able to pursue
their dreams, to contribute to their societies, it is absolutely the right way
to go.
I leave you tonight with the hope and the goal that West and East, working
together, embrace a new partnership with Africa. Not to make up for past
mistakes, but to ground the East-West relationship in a cooperative approach to
global problem-solving.
- 30 -