Regulatory Process Guide
Developing a Regulatory
Proposal and Seeking its
Approval
Table of Contents
Introduction
Part A: Essentials of Making Regulations
What is a Regulation?
The Legal Framework for Regulations
The Government of Canada Regulatory Policy
The Regulatory Process
The Regulatory Proposal
Key Participants in the Regulatory Process
Part B: The Regulatory Process: Step-By-Step
STEP 1: Conception and Development of a Regulation
STEP 2: Departmental Drafting of a Regulation, RIAS, and Other Documents
STEP 3: Examination by Justice – RS(J) and preliminary assessment by PCO-RAD
STEP 4: Ministerial Approval for Pre-Publication
STEP 5: Pre-publication Review by the Regulatory Affairs and Orders in Council Secretariat and the Treasury
Board
STEP 6: Pre-publication in the Canada Gazette, Part I, with Comment
Period
STEP 7: Departmental Preparation of Regulatory Proposal for Final Submission to
TB
STEP 8: Final Review by the RAOIC and the Treasury Board
STEP 9: Making, Registering, Publishing in Canada Gazette, Part II, and Distributing
Regulations
STEP 10: Parliamentary Review by the Standing Joint Committee for the Scrutiny of
Regulations
Checklists
Part C: Models
Regulatory Impact Analysis Statement (RIAS)
Letter of Transmittal
Ministerial Recommendation
Order in Council
Resolution
Notice of Pre-publication
Acronyms
References
Web Addresses
Other Resources
National Library of Canada cataloguing in publication data
Introduction
This Guide to the Regulatory Process is intended for persons involved
in developing Governor in Council (GiC) regulations that must be made
or approved by the Treasury Board (TB). For the most part, this
document assumes that a department has decided, after conducting
the requisite analysis and consultations, that regulatory intervention is
the best option.
For a description of the process in the approval of non-regulatory
Orders in Council, please refer to the Guide for Governor in Council
Submissions. The regulatory process set out in this Guide does not
apply to ministerial orders and/or ministerial regulations. However, a
checklist of required documents for the registration and publication of
ministerial orders and regulations is provided on page 33 of this
Guide.
Traditionally, TB has been the Cabinet committee who's
recommendation or approval is required for regulations liable to have
significant financial implications or those that, through their enabling
statute, require TB approval or recommendation (Part A of the TB
Meeting Agenda).
Pursuant to changes in Cabinet committee mandates on December
12, 2003, TB's role was expanded to include approving regulation and
most Orders in Council requiring Governor in Council approval.
Consequently, proposed Orders in Council and Regulations which
previously would have been submitted to the Special Committee of
Council, are now considered by the TB (Part B of the TB Meeting
Agenda).
This Guide was prepared by the Regulatory Affairs Division,
Operations Branch, Privy Council Office. We would like to
acknowledge the comments and input received from the regulators
and policy analysts across government that contributed to the project.
The guide is divided into three parts:
Part A - Essentials of Making Regulation: summarizes the legal,
policy and procedural framework surrounding regulations, highlighting
the key documents of a regulatory proposal and the key players in the
regulatory process.
Part B - The Regulatory Process: Step-by-Step provides detailed
information on the steps to be followed to bring a regulation into force,
once a department/agency decides to regulate. This is known as the
regulatory process and is mandatory for all GiC regulations.
Part C - Models: includes samples of some of the documents used in
the approval process, such as the Regulatory Impact Analysis
Statement (RIAS), Letter of Transmittal, Ministerial Recommendation,
Order in Council, and the Notice of Pre-publication.
Throughout this Guide “department” is often used for departments,
agencies, or other regulation-making entities. We also use “regulatory
proposal” for regulatory package, regulatory submission or regulatory
initiative.
This an updated version of the April 2001 Guide to the Regulatory
Process.
Part A: Essentials of Making Regulations
What is a Regulation?
For the purpose of this guide, the word “regulation” is used in the
sense defined in the Statutory Instruments Act. This is a complex
definition, but in general it includes:
any document made by the authority of an enabling act which
provides the powers to “make” regulations; and
any document that is expressly authorized under an act of
Parliament, lays down rules of conduct relating to rights and
responsibilities, has binding legal effect, and is of general application.
Authority to make regulations must be clearly delegated by an act
(i.e., the enabling act). Consequently, regulations are often referred to
as delegated or subordinate legislation. Nevertheless, regulations are
law and have the same binding legal effect as acts.
An enabling act will set out the framework of a regulatory scheme and
delegate the authority to develop the details and express them in
regulations to the Governor in Council, a minister or an administrative
agency.
The Regulations Section of the Department of Justice, or RS(J), is
responsible for determining whether your document meets the legal
definition of a regulation. If you have any questions on this matter,
contact the RS(J) at (613)957-0099 or (613)957-0004.
The Legal Framework for Regulations
The Constitution Act, 1867, and the Charter of Rights and Freedoms
are the foundation for the legal framework within which regulations are
made.
Enabling Acts are made under the Constitution. They provide legal
authority to make regulations. They specify who may make regulations
and the scope of the regulation-making authority. Regulations must
stay within this scope, adhering to certain limits. For example, a
regulation must not conflict with, restrict or extend the scope of its
application. Departmental legal services can provide legal advice on
authority.
Beyond the enabling act, the Statutory Instruments Act (SI Act) and the Statutory Instruments Regulations
(SI Regulations) provide a framework for regulations. They set out three
basic legal requirements for making regulations:
The Government of Canada Regulatory Policy
The Regulatory Policy is the seven-point Cabinet directive on the use of
regulatory powers that have been delegated to the GiC or minister.
The Policy is designed to ensure that use of the government's regulatory
powers results in the greatest net benefit to Canadian society. It states
that the Government of Canada is committed to working in partnership
with industry, labour, interest groups, professional organisations, other
governments and interested individuals to achieve this objective.
Pursuant to the Policy, before pursuing regulation, departments must
conduct an assessment, which includes identifying the problem,
assessing the need for regulation, analysing and assessing alternative
solutions, demonstrate that the benefits outweigh the costs, and that
Canadians have been consulted.
The Policy describes the principles that govern the development of
regulations, requiring that departments have systems in place to manage
regulatory resources effectively and have the resources for proper
implementation/enforcement. The Policy also recognizes that regulation
making is no longer an exclusively domestic activity and that every
regulation must be reviewed as to whether, and to what extent, it may
impact on Canada's obligations under an international agreement or
treaty. Annex A of the Regulatory Policy sets out the obligations of
regulators with respect to international and intergovernmental
agreements.
The Regulatory Policy also reinforces the requirement for regulators to
follow other directives from Cabinet concerning policy and law-making
such as the Cabinet Directive on Law-making , the Cabinet Directive on
the Environmental Assessment of Policy, Plan and Program Proposals
and the Cost Recovery and Charging Policy.
If you have questions about the Regulatory Policy, contact your analyst
at the Privy Council Office, Regulatory Affairs Division (PCO-RAD). See
link to “Contact Us” in the PCO-PUBLISERVICE web site.
The Regulatory Process
The regulatory process is a set of procedural requirements flowing
from the Regulatory Policy, from statutes — principally the SI Act —
and from Cabinet directives. The process refers to the steps (detailed
in Part B of this Guide) required to make a GiC regulation. Following
the process enables departments to better ensure that ministers have
the appropriate information on which to base decisions regarding
regulations.
The duration of the regulatory process will vary depending on a
number of factors including:
- the regulation is complex,
- the issue is controversial, and
- the magnitude of its potential impact is high.
The Regulatory Process Diagram
Conception and Development of Regulation |
|
1 |
|
|
|
Departmental Drafting of Regulation, RIAS and Other Documents |
|
2 |
|
|
|
Examination by Justice RS(J) and Review by PCO RAD |
|
3 |
|
|
|
Ministerial Approval for Pre-Publication |
|
4 |
|
|
|
Pre-Publication Review by RAOICS and TB |
|
5 |
|
|
|
Pre-Publication in Canada Gazette, Part I with Comment Period |
|
6 |
|
|
|
Departmental Preparation of Regulatory Proposal For Final Submission to TB |
|
7 |
|
|
|
Final Review of RAOICS and TB
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
Making, Registering, Publishing in Canada Gazette Part II, and Distributing
Regulations
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
Parliamentary Review by the Standing Joint Committee for the Scrutiny of
Regulations
|
|
10 |
|
|
It is reasonable to allow six to nine months to develop and bring into
force a regulatory proposal – that is, from the time the draft regulatory
proposal is sent to Justice for legal examination to the regulation
becoming law (referred to as Steps 3 through 9 of the Regulatory
Process).
The Regulatory Proposal
The following documents comprise the heart of the regulatory
proposal. Models of most of the documents can be found in Part C.
The Regulation Itself
A regulation, once made, has the force and effect of law, and is
therefore the key document in the process. The most common type
is known as a Governor in Council (GiC) regulation and is made by
the GiC through the TB (in Part B of its Meeting Agenda), or by
another entity (e.g., the Employment Insurance Commission,
Canada Post Corporation) with the approval of the GiC.
The Regulatory Impact Analysis Statement (RIAS)
The RIAS is a public accounting of each regulation according to the
government's Regulatory Policy. It provides a clear explanation of
the regulation, its purpose, the analysis substantiating it and its
expected impacts. The RIAS is a key decision-making document
for ministers and the public.
Before a department decides to regulate, it will carry out a policy
analysis (e.g., of benefits and costs) to determine whether
regulating is the best way to respond to a certain problem. The
RIAS is written at the end of the policy analysis and development
process and is a summary of the analysis done. A sample RIAS is
provided in Part C, however, for more detailed information, please
consult the RIAS Writer's Guide.
The RIAS is the recommendation of the sponsoring minister(s) to his
or her colleagues on the Treasury Board and provides important
information for their consideration and decision. Pre-publication in the
Canada Gazette, Part I, supplements departmental consultation
mechanisms, and contributes to transparency in the regulatory
process. It offers a further opportunity for public comment and input.
A regulatory submission accompanied by an incomplete RIAS will not
be accepted on TB's agenda.
For guidance on developing a high-quality RIAS, consult your PCO-RAD analyst early in the process. See link to “Contact Us” in the
PCO-PUBLISERVICE web site.
Other Documents
Other important documents that may accompany the proposed
regulation and the RIAS in the development and approval process
include: a Communications Plan, Supplementary Note, Resolution,
Order in Council, Letter of Transmittal, Ministerial
Recommendation, Notice of Pre-publication, and Request for
Insertion in the Canada Gazette. These documents are discussed
further in Part B, Step 2.
Key Participants in the Regulatory Process
Many organizations and individuals contribute to the regulation-making
process. The following are the main participants:
Governor in Council
The Governor in Council (GiC) is the Governor General of Canada
acting on the advice of the Queen's Privy Council for Canada
(i.e., the Cabinet). In practice, it is the TB, acting on behalf of
Cabinet, that is responsible for reviewing and making
recommendations to the Governor General.
When legislative authority is conferred to the GiC, it is exercised by
the government collectively through the TB (in Part B of its Meeting
Agenda) with few exceptions. For example, to streamline the
approval process, TB has been delegated authority to act as the
Committee of the Privy Council (CPC) in certain matters that are
mostly non-regulatory (in Part A of its Meeting Agenda). For more
information on the process of TB acting as CPC, refer to the
Treasury Board Secretariat Regulatory Issues site.
Governor General
All GiC regulations must be approved by the Governor General to
become law. The Governor General formally completes the
“making” of regulations, the day after TB approval. If the Governor
General is not available, the Chief Justice of Canada (in his/her
role as Deputy Governor General) or another Judge of the
Supreme Court of Canada, will approve regulations.
Standing Joint Committee of the Senate and the House
of Commons for the Scrutiny of Regulations (SJC)
The SJC provides parliamentary oversight pursuant to the SI Act. The SJC
reviews the final regulation to ensure it meets a variety of criteria, including
that it is authorised by the enabling statute, does not conflict with the Charter
of Rights and Freedoms, and is not deficient in terms of drafting. For
example, where a regulation made by the GiC is viewed by SJC to be “ultra
vires” (i.e., beyond government powers), and the matter is not corrected by
the regulation-making authority, the SJC may ask Parliament to order that
the regulations be repealed.
Department of Justice
The Department of Justice provides legal advice to the
Government, including advice about the legality of proposed
regulations and the legal requirements of the regulatory process.
The Department of Justice, including the Trade Law Division at the
Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade, advises
regulatory authorities on their legal obligations under the World
Trade Organisation, the North American Free Trade Agreement
and other international agreements. This includes advice on how to
draft technical regulations so as to comply with them. The two
branches of the Department of Justice most involved in providing
advice about proposed regulations are the Departmental Legal
Services Units, or DLSUs, and the Regulations Section, or RS(J).
Departmental Legal Services Units (DLSUs): The DLSUs are
normally the first point of “legal” contact for advice on regulations.
They are thus in a good position to identify and resolve potential
legal issues in regulatory proposals or draft regulations early on in
the process. DLSUs can also help to ensure that the proposed
regulatory approach is consistent with other regulations already in
place elsewhere in the client department or in other parts of
government.
The client department's regulatory program division and the DLSUs
may together prepare drafting instructions or draft regulations. The
DLSUs will review proposals before they are submitted to the
RS(J). The DLSUs may be especially familiar with certain aspects
of a regulatory program's work and can bring this expertise to the
development of regulations.
Regulations Section (RS(J)): Depending on the department or
agency involved, the RS(J) may participate in the drafting of the
regulations. In a number of cases, the RS(J) has established
satellite drafting units that are co-located with departmental DLSUs
or departmental regulatory co-ordination offices. In all cases, the
RS(J) carries out the legal examination of each proposed
regulation under the Statutory Instruments Act to ensure that:
- the regulations are authorised by the enabling statute;
- the regulations do not constitute an unusual or unexpected use of the
authority under which they are to be made;
- the regulations do not trespass unduly on existing rights and freedoms
and are not, in any case, inconsistent with the Charter;
- the form and drafting of the regulations are in accordance with established
standards; and
- the French and English versions of the proposed regulations correspond
to each other.
Once this examination is completed, the RS(J) will return “blue-stamped” (i.e., examined) copies of the proposed regulations to the
sponsoring department or agency.
Sponsoring Departments
For GiC regulations, departments are responsible for:
- drafting the regulations with the DLSU in both official languages1
(or providing drafting instructions to the RS(J) in both official languages),
drafting the RIAS, and other documents (e.g., Supplementary Note);
- submitting the appropriate number of documents2
to the RS(J), the Assistant Clerk of the Privy Council, and to Regulatory
Affairs analysts at PCO (both for pre-publication and final publication);
- analysing comments received during pre-publication, making changes to the
regulations if warranted, and amending the RIAS to respond to
comments; and
- providing for an knowledgeable official to be present at the TB meeting, if
required by PCO.
Sponsoring Ministers
A minister recommends the regulation and the RIAS by signing the
RIAS cover page. When seeking final approval of a regulation and
publication in the Canada Gazette, Part II, a minister formally
communicates his/her support for the regulation to the TB through
a Ministerial Recommendation, also to be signed and dated. This
document states specifically what the sponsoring minister is
requesting of the Governor in Council.
Privy Council Office, Regulatory Affairs and Orders in
Council Secretariat (RAOIC)
The RAOIC is responsible for monitoring, co-ordinating and advising on
regulatory and Orders in Council issues and policies, and ensuring their
consistency with economic, social and federal-provincial policies. The RAOIC
is divided into the Regulatory Affairs Division and the Orders in Council
Division. The Secretariat supports the Prime Minister and Cabinet with
appointment Orders and the TB with regulations and Orders in Council.
Regulatory Affairs Division (PCO-RAD): The prime responsibilities
of RAD include:
RAD reviews each regulatory proposal from an overall policy
perspective. The Division may request additional information or
analyses from the sponsoring department prior to the proposal
being submitted to the TB for consideration.
Order in Council Division (PCO-OiC): This Division's
responsibilities include:
- managing the approval process for all Orders in Council, regulations, and
other statutory instruments;
- providing secretariat services to TB;
- providing advice on the use of Orders in Council;
- producing and distributing Orders in Council;
- registering and publishing regulations in Part II of the Canada Gazette;
and
- maintaining records of approved Orders in Council, the Consolidated
Index of Statutory Instruments, and a number of oath books.
Canada Gazette
The Canada Gazette is the official publication of the Government of Canada.
Published regularly by the Queen's Printer since 1841, the Canada Gazette
serves as public notice of government initiatives with regard to legislation,
regulations, etc.
The Canada Gazette, Part I, contains all formal public notices, official
appointments, miscellaneous notices and proposed regulations from
the government and private sectors that are required to be published
by a statute or regulation. The Canada Gazette Directorate,
Communications Co-ordination Services Branch, Public Works and
Government Services Canada (PWGSC), co-ordinates, edits and
produces Part I.
The Canada Gazette, Part II, contains regulations as defined in the SI
Act, and certain other classes of statutory instruments. The PCO-OiC
co-ordinates and registers all regulations for publication in Part II.
The Canada Gazette, Part III, contains the most recent public Acts of
Parliament and their enactment proclamations. The Canada Gazette
Directorate, PWGSC, produces, publishes and distributes all three
parts of the Canada Gazette on behalf of the Queen's Printer for
Canada and in accordance with the SI Act and the SI Regulations.
Treasury Board Secretariat (TBS)
TBS examines draft regulations that require TB approval or
recommendation in its capacity as the central agency responsible
for the management of the government's financial, personnel and
administrative affairs (Part A of the TB Meeting Agenda). It plays a
challenge role vis-à-vis client departments or agencies to ensure
that it focuses on the most deserving priorities and that program
design and impacts have been fully considered before bringing
proposals before TB. TBS plays a leadership role in issues directly
related to the making of regulations, such as program
management, expenditure management, cost-recovery policy,
performance measurement and reporting.
Treasury Board (TB)
TB is a statutory Cabinet committee whose recommendation or
approval is required for regulations liable to have significant
financial implications or those that, through their enabling statutes,
require TB approval or recommendation (e.g., regulations that
impose new user fees, or raise or lower existing fees under the
Financial Administration Act). This responsibility is set out in Part
A of TB's Meeting Agenda.
Pursuant to changes in Cabinet committee mandates on
December 12, 2003, TB's role was expanded to include approving
regulation and most Orders in Council requiring Governor in
Council approval.
Consequently, proposed Orders in Council and Regulations which
previously would have been submitted to the Special Committee of
Council, are now considered by the TB in Part B of the TB Meeting
Agenda.
Part B
The Regulatory
Process Step-by-Step
Part B: The Regulatory Process: Step-By-Step
The process outlined below is designed to help ensure that a
department's regulations comply with the requirements of the Statutory Instruments Act and the
Regulatory Policy.
Completing the procedures of Step 1 below may reveal that regulation is
not the best instrument to use for policy development. Alternatives
should then be pursued.
STEP 1: Conception and Development of a Regulation
Regulating is not always the best solution to a problem, therefore the Regulatory Policy sets out criteria for determining whether regulation making
is warranted. These criteria include demonstrating that a problem or risk
exists, that intervention is justified and that regulation is the best alternative.
Other Cabinet directives (e.g., the 1999 Cabinet Directive on Environmental
Assessment of Policy, Plan and Program Proposals) must also be followed
in the conception and development of regulations.
In seeking a solution to a defined problem, the department must consider
the potential impacts of the proposed action. Questions to ask include:
- Will the proposed solution have an environmental impact? If so, an
environmental assessment should be done.
- Does it have health and safety implications?
- Will it affect a specific group (e.g., single parents, First Nations, etc.)
or industry sector (e.g., telecommunications, forestry)?
- What are its costs and benefits?
- Who will benefit, and who will pay the cost?
If, after initial policy analysis, the department concludes (either on its
own, or as a result of consultations) to pursue regulation, it must do so
according to a specific process. This includes planning, analysis and
public consultation in accordance with the Regulatory Policy.
If necessary, refer to the following guide books:
- Benefit-Cost Analysis Guide for Regulatory Programs
- A Guide to the Making of Federal Acts and Regulations, Part I
- Assessing Regulatory Alternatives
- Standards Systems: A Guide for Canadian Regulators
Notification
Before drafting a regulatory proposal, it may be necessary to
involve the public in defining the problem and identifying a solution.
Early notice improves the regulatory process, as affected parties
are more likely to accept regulations introduced this way than ones
imposed without early and genuine consultation.
Early notification can be done through a number of official vehicles.
Four of these are:
Report on Plans and Priorities (RPP): Each department and agency
must prepare a one-year RPP to be tabled in Parliament. This
document offers an opportunity to advise Parliamentarians, and
interested groups and individuals, of upcoming regulatory initiatives.
At a minimum, departments should include “major” and “significant”
3
regulations in their RPP.
Departmental Regulatory Plan: Departments should develop a Web site
and/or other information vehicles that outline their regulatory plans
and can provide more complete advance notice than the RPP. The
RPP should refer to these vehicles.
- Notice of Intent: If a department decides that public consultations would be
in the public interest, it can launch the process by publishing a Notice
of Intent in the Canada Gazette, Part I.
- A Notice of Intent can be used to solicit the views of the public in
the early stages of problem definition. Publishing a Notice of Intent
does not preclude the need for pre-publication or for general
consultation with stakeholders, including the public, during the
development of the related policy and regulation.
- The Notice of Intent should be tailored to the situation. Seek input
(data, technical specifications, expert advice and comment, and
any other relevant information) needed to define an issue clearly.
The Notice of Intent may also propose a reasonable and
achievable solution.
Departments may advise their clients and others about upcoming
regulatory initiatives through such vehicles as departmental
publications and Web sites, trade, sectoral or professional
publications, etc.
STEP 2: Departmental Drafting of a Regulation,
RIAS, and Other Documents
In developing the regulatory proposal, keep in mind the Regulatory Policy requirements and the analysis that must be undertaken to
achieve an effective regulation.
Although some regulations are straightforward, many are complex and
require much time to develop. Expect delays, and develop a plan for
timely management of your process, especially if a number of parties are
to provide input.
The Draft Regulation
The information gathered in Step 1 should provide the necessary
viewpoints and direction for formulating an appropriate regulatory
scheme. The objective is to draft the best possible regulatory tool in
accordance with the law and the Regulatory Policy.
The DLSU will work on the legal aspects of your regulations and
regulatory package before the regulations go the RS(J).
A department or agency may either draft a regulation itself in both
official languages, or provide the RS(J) with drafting instructions in
both official languages.
When a department submits drafting instructions:
- These instructions should explain the policy that the department or
agency intends to implement through the proposed regulations. The
instructions should deal with who, when, where, and how the issue is
being dealt with.
- The policy should be as well developed as possible before drafting
instructions are submitted. Using this information, a team of RS(J)
drafters advises on the legal authority for the regulatory proposals,
assists in the process of developing the regulations and produces
drafts that conform to the criteria of the SI Act. The client then verifies
these drafts to ensure consistency with the policy.
- Along with drafting instructions, departments must also submit a draft
RIAS. The RS(J) will review the regulation at the same time as
drafting them. Before a regulation is blue-stamped
4, the department will review the draft regulation, make changes, if
necessary, and submit to the RS(J) a final RIAS as well as the other
documents required in the regulatory proposal.
When a department submits draft regulations:
- In this case, a team of RS(J) drafters advises on the legal authorities and
re-drafts provisions that do not meet accepted standards. The team
will draw legal and drafting problems to the instructing officer's
attention and suggest solutions. The client then verifies these drafts.
- The RS(J) may rewrite some provisions of the regulations. To ensure that
these revisions result in regulations that are enforceable and that
respect the policy, departments and agencies should review and
comment on both English and French versions of the draft before they
are blue-stamped.
- Your legal advisors should be involved in the regulation-making process
early.
The Regulatory Impact Analysis Statement (RIAS)
The sponsoring department(s) must prepare a RIAS to accompany
each regulatory proposal. Each section of the RIAS addresses one
or more elements of the Regulatory Policy. Regulatory
submissions will not be scheduled unless they are accompanied by
a RIAS. A detailed explanation of each section's requirements can
be found in Part C.
The Communications Assessment
Normally, a department's communications directorate will perform a
Communications Assessment and develop a Communications
Plan, if needed. The Plan:
- details what is to be achieved by each communications activity;
- identifies how the department has encouraged public participation while
developing the proposal;
- states who the affected parties are;
- states what reaction has been so far;
- identifies who is to be the target audience for communication initiatives;
- states how these will be carried out; and
- identifies opportunities for publishing the benefits of the regulation or
responding to possible negative reactions.
The Supplementary Note
Use the Supplementary Note to inform ministers of confidential
(e.g., trade secrets) or sensitive matters not found in the RIAS. For
example, you could use the Supplementary Note to acquaint
ministers with the objectives, nature and consequences of the
proposal. Supplementary Notes are not part of the Regulations.
They are Cabinet confidences and, as such, are not released to the
public. Because they contain confidential and/or sensitive
information, they should not be sent electronically to PCO.
How to prepare a Supplementary Note:
- Title the Supplementary Note as such.
- Indicate any security classification in the top right-hand corner.
- Indicate “NOT FOR PUBLICATION” in the top right-hand corner
(immediately below any security classification).
- Provide briefing information in a format and at a level of detail appropriate
to the case.
- List by name groups opposed to the regulation, and provide an
assessment of their views and how these have been addressed.
- Do not attach the Supplementary Note to any document.
- The Supplementary Note is to be submitted on standard size paper 8½" x
11", in both French and English.
Notice of Pre-publication
This indicates to interested parties the government's intent to
regulate. It specifies how many days the regulation will be pre-published and to whom to send comments.
The draft Order in Council
This is a short legal document (like a covering letter) that gives
effect to the decision of the GiC to make or approve the regulation.
The Letter of Transmittal
Regulations sent to the RS(J) for legal examination must be
accompanied by a Letter of Transmittal signed by the departmental
manager responsible for the project.
The Draft Ministerial Recommendation
The recommendation is a ministerial communication which states
specifically what the sponsoring minister is requesting of the
Governor in Council.
It is also helpful to PCO-RAD analysts to include in the regulatory
proposal a copy of the briefing memo to the sponsoring minister.
STEP 3: Examination by Justice – RS(J) and
preliminary assessment by PCO-RAD
Pursuant to the SI Act, regulations are required to be examined by the
Clerk of the Privy Council in consultation with the Deputy Minister of
Justice. This function is managed by the Deputy Chief Legislative
Counsel (Regulations), Justice. This legal examination is to ensure
that the proposed regulations:
- are authorised by the enabling statute;
- do not constitute an unusual or unexpected use of the authority under
which they are to be made;
- do not trespass unduly on existing rights and freedoms and are not,
in any case, inconsistent with the Charter of Rights and Freedoms; and
- are in the form and drafted in accordance with established standards.
The Checklist at the end of this section provides details on how many
copies to send and to whom. Part C provides detailed information and
models of most documents. Once all the documents have been
prepared, forward the regulatory proposal to the RS(J) and PCO-RAD.
The RS(J) Role
If a department submitted drafting instructions to the RS(J), its
review will be done concurrently with the drafting. Once the client
department approves the draft regulation, the RS(J) will blue-stamp
it.
If a department itself drafts the proposed regulation, the RS(J) will
examine it and provide the sender with a file number. The RS(J)
will review the documents provided and, once completed, will send
blue-stamped copies of the proposed regulations to the DLSU for
further processing.
The time required for the RS(J) to complete the examination of
proposed regulations will vary from case to case, depending on a
number of factors. These include the length and complexity of the
proposed regulations, the number of legal and drafting issues to be
addressed, the workload of the Regulations Section at the time,
and the priority assigned to the regulations by the sponsoring
department or by the government as a whole. Departments are
encouraged to consult the Regulations Section in order to obtain an
estimate of the time needed to complete the examination in any
given case.
The PCO Role
This is a useful point at which to obtain preliminary feedback from
PCO-RAD on your draft submission. It is recommended at this
point that you provide a copy of the submission package to your
PCO, Regulatory Affairs analyst. Your PCO-RAD analyst will
review the draft RIAS for consistency with the Regulatory Policy,
requests for exemption from pre-publication, and for clarity and
completeness of information. PCO will discuss any concerns with
the department, dealing usually with the contact person whose
name appears on the RIAS.
Requests for exemption from pre-publication are considered on a
case-by-case basis and therefore the list of examples found below
is not exhaustive. The PCO-RAD advises ministers and
departments on the appropriateness of a proposed exemption and
may recommend that it be challenged.
Examples of regulations that may be considered for exemption
from pre-publication include, but are not limited to, those that:
- respond to emergencies which pose major risks to health, safety, the
environment or security;
- are sensitive, where pre-publication would cause demonstrable adverse
effects or undermine the intent of the regulations, such as regulations
affecting subsidy changes and interest-rate changes;
- need renumbering, corrections to ensure consistency between English
and French versions, or corrections of grammatical or typographical
errors (miscellaneous amendments);
- are enabling regulations, such as remission orders and authorising orders
(e.g., regulations permitting the growing of hemp to be used for
medicinal purposes);
- are repetitive regulations duplicated in the same form regularly (e.g.,
Energy Supply Allocation Board Regulations, which must be amended
every two years to name board members);
- are being repealed and have not been enforced for a considerable period
of time;
- are exempt from pre-publication pursuant to the statute
(e.g., Canada Business Corporations Act, section 261, subsection (3)).
It is recommended that you obtain PCO-RAD advice prior to
submitting your proposal to your Minister for signature.
Step 4: Ministerial Approval for Pre-Publication
Departments have varying internal management and approval systems
for regulations. Your regulatory co-ordination personnel can advise you
on the system that exists in your department.
On receipt of blue-stamped copies of the regulatory proposal from the
RS(J), you will usually seek your minister's approval of the proposal
(and that of other ministers if more than one is sponsoring the
proposal). If approval is granted the department will prepare a
regulatory package for submission to the TB.
A minister grants his/her approval of the proposed regulation and the
RIAS, by signing on the RIAS cover page. This signals that the
minister is recommending the regulation to the TB.
By approving the documentation, a minister formally recommends to
the GiC that the proposed regulations be pre-published. The TB will
make its decision on the regulation, taking into account both the
justification contained in your regulatory package and broader
government priorities and issues.
The sponsoring department(s) must fill in a Request for Insertion in the Canada Gazette form in order to have their
regulatory proposal published (Form PWGSC-TPSGC 3105-1) or available
at http://publiservice.gc.ca/services/gazette e.html. This is to be included
in the regulatory package along with the documents drafted in the previous
step. All documents required for pre-publication in the Canada Gazette, Part
I, are listed in the Checklist at the end of this section. If a regulatory proposal
does not have direct financial implications, it is now ready to be forwarded
to the Assistant Clerk of the Privy Council Office.
GiC regulations that have direct financial implications (e.g., regulations
that impose new user fees, or raise or lower existing fees under the
Financial Administration Act) require TB approval in Part A of its Meeting
Agenda in addition to TB's approval for pre-publication in Part B of its
Meeting Agenda. Departments must submit the TB submission only to
TBS, who will then forward a copy to the Assistant Clerk of the Privy
Council5 . Once pre-publication is completed, you need not obtain the
recommendation of Treasury Board for the final approval stage, unless
substantive changes have been made to the regulation following pre-publication.
STEP 5: Pre-publication review by the RAOIC
Secretariat and the TB
Upon receipt of a regulatory proposal, the OiC Division will verify that:
- the regulation is required to be submitted to the OiC Division, as
ministerial regulations do not come before the TB for pre-publication;
- all the required documents have been submitted;
- the regulations have been blue-stamped6 ;
- the RIAS and Request for Insertion in the Canada Gazette have been
signed by the correct official; and
- there are no discrepancies between the regulation and the draft Order
(if there are discrepancies, the regulation will be sent back to Justice to
be revised and blue-stamped again).
The OiC Division will then forward a copy of the submission to the
RAD.
PCO-RAD analysts will review the RIAS and write a briefing note for
the ministers of the TB. If any questions or concerns arise, they will
contact the official named in the RIAS. If a department has requested
an exemption from publication, PCO-RAD analysts will provide advice
to the TB as to whether or not it should be granted.
Approval by the TB in Part B of its Meeting Agenda is required for
Canada Gazette, Part I, pre-publication (or exemption) of both GiC
regulations and GiC regulations with financial implications that are
recommended by the TB.
Unlike the final approval stage, pre-publication in the Canada Gazette does not require the signature of the
Governor General; the signature of the Assistant Clerk of the Privy Council
is adequate.
Once signed by the sponsoring minister(s), the letter of transmittal
accompanying the regulatory package should be sent to the Assistant
Clerk of the Privy Council, under the signature of the Assistant Deputy
Minister (ADM) or of the Director General if the ADM is not available. If
the regulation is submitted by an Agency, the signature of the President
is required.
The Checklist at the end of this section provides information on what
documents must be submitted at this stage. The RAOIC then starts the
process of seeking TB consideration of the regulatory proposal.
Deadlines
PCO sends departmental regulatory co-ordinators semi-annual
bulletins with TB meeting dates.
The deadline for receipt in the Privy Council Office, Orders in
Council Division (PCO) of complete signed submissions is
10 working days (2 weeks) prior to the TB Cabinet committee
meeting. However, the Regulatory Impact Analysis Statement
(RIAS) must now be provided in draft form at least 15 working
days (three weeks) prior to the TB meeting. As submission
deadlines are based on a fixed number of working days prior to
TB meetings, deadline dates are adjusted to account for holidays
during the period.
Submissions received after the deadline will be scheduled for the
following meeting. Requests to have TB consider urgent
submissions which are received after the deadline, require a letter
from your Minister to the President of the Treasury Board justifying
urgent consideration of the late submission. The signed letter
should be inserted in an envelope addressed to the Assistant Clerk
of the Privy Council and must be delivered by secure messenger,
or by secure fax (613) 957-5773. If sent by secure fax, the original
letter must follow by secure messenger. Please advise the
Assistant Clerk of the Privy Council of the urgency as soon as
possible at (613) 957-5430. Consistent with established TB
practice, urgent submissions will be scheduled for consideration by
the Board at the discretion of the President.
To be accepted, submissions must be complete; they must include
the signed Ministerial Recommendation and all required
documents.
Treasury Board (TB) Meeting
The TB considers regulatory proposals on their own merits. The
sponsoring department may be asked to provide for an knowledgeable
official to be present at the TB meeting, if required by PCO.
For each submission, the Committee may make any of the following
decisions:
- approve the recommendation for pre-publication;
- approve or reject requests for exemptions to pre-publication;
- approve the regulatory proposal in final form;
- send the item to Cabinet, or one of its other committees (including TB in
its financial capacity – Part A of its agenda), for consideration;
- refer the matter back to the responsible minister for further consideration
and information.
STEP 6: Pre-publication in the Canada Gazette, Part
I, with Comment Period
If approved by the TB, the PCO-OiC forwards the draft regulations and
the accompanying RIAS to the Canada Gazette Directorate (PWGSC).
The draft regulations and the RIAS will be pre-published in the Canada
Gazette, Part I. The publication requirements, publication deadline
schedule, insertion rates and Request for Insertion in the Canada Gazette are available at:
http://canadagazette.gc.ca/index-e.html
Pre-publication gives various interested groups and individuals, and
Canadians in general, a final opportunity to review and comment on a
regulatory proposal at the last stages of the regulation-making process.
Pre-publication also gives interested parties the opportunity to see how
the final draft proposal is in keeping with previous consultation drafts.
When draft regulations are pre-published, interested persons are allowed
a period of time to express their views. The standard period is usually 30
days in the case of regulations pre-published under the Cabinet policy.
In other cases, the length of pre-publication may be specified in the
enabling act.
Cabinet policy states that technical regulations affecting trade should be
pre-published for at least 75 days in the Canada Gazette, Part I. This is
in order to allow Canada to fulfil its obligation of notification under various
trade agreements, such as the World Trade Organization's Agreement
on Technical Barriers to Trade and the Agreement on the Application of
Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures. In general, regulators should
verify Canada's notification obligations under international and
intergovernmental agreements.
If a department decides to extend the pre-publication period after the TB
has authorized pre-publication, it should place a notice in the Canada
Gazette explaining the extension. The final RIAS (as it appears in the
Canada Gazette, Part II) should also explain the extension.
The TB can approve an exemption from pre-publication. However, pre-publication is an important part of the regulatory process, therefore the
Committee does not grant exemptions lightly. In some cases, a
shortened pre-publication period (e.g., 15 days instead of at least
30 days) may be approved instead of an exemption. In the case of a
shorter pre-publication period, the sponsoring department is required to
provide a Notice of pre-publication to PCO as soon as possible. The
RIAS does not require to be re-signed by the Minister.
Notice of Withdrawal
If after pre-publication it is decided not to proceed with the regulatory
proposal, a department/agency should publish a Notice of Withdrawal
in the Canada Gazette, Part I.
STEP 7: Departmental Preparation of Regulatory
Proposal for Final Submission to the TB
In preparing the regulatory proposal for final submission to the TB, the
department must update it by including the following:
- an updated RIAS which reflects information relating to the comments
received during the pre-publication period, any actions taken to
address those comments and the rationale for the department's
response. The document should also indicate the initial date of pre-publication under the “Communication” heading and on its cover page;
- a formal Ministerial Recommendation to the Governor in Council
signed by the sponsoring minister;
- blue-stamped copies of the Order in Council;
- a Request for Insertion in the Canada Gazette form must be filled out by the
sponsoring department (Form PWGSC-TPSGC 3105-1);
- a Resolution. This is only required if the body making the regulation
(e.g., the Pacific Pilotage Authority) is different from the body approving
it (e.g., the TB).
No change to the regulation
At a minimum, the RIAS should contain a summary of any
comments received and how they were handled. If there were no
comments, the RIAS should include the phrase, “This regulation
was pre-published in Canada Gazette, Part I, on [date] and no
comments were received.”
Although there is no change to the regulation as a result of pre-publication, it is required that it be re-submitted to the RS(J) to be
blue-stamped again. In part, this is to ensure that the authorities
pursuant to which the regulation are being made have not been
modified by Parliament7 .
Changed regulations
If the proposed regulations are modified as a result of comments,
they will have to be re-submitted to the RS(J) for examination and
blue-stamping. The revised RIAS should fully reflect the
background and rationale for the change. International aspects
should be taken into account in the reformulation of a proposed
regulation to consider any changes that may have occurred on the
international scene in the ensuing period. PCO-RAD should also
receive a copy of the revised RIAS, at the same time that it is sent
to RS(J), for review and comment.
The decision to proceed directly with final approval and publication
(Part II of the Canada Gazette), or to pre-publish again, will depend
on how substantive the changes to the regulation were. The
department should discuss this with PCO and its DLSU. A second
round of pre-publication ensures that the communities that may be
affected are aware that the original proposal was altered
significantly.
Delayed regulations
If 18 months have passed since pre-publication, the regulation may
need to be pre-published again. This is to inform interested
Canadians that even though the regulation has been delayed, it will
still proceed. An explanation for the delay should be included in
the revised RIAS.
STEP 8: Final review by the RAOIC and the Treasury
Board
Once you have obtained the minister's approval for the final proposal,
it should be sent to the Assistant Clerk of the Privy Council. The
Checklist at the end of this part provides information on documents to
be submitted. As in Step 5, the OiC Division will again verify that all the
documents have been submitted, are blue-stamped, have the correct
signatures, and that there are no discrepancies between the draft
regulation and the Order in Council. The OiC Division will forward a
copy of the submission to the PCO-RAD, where analysts will update
the briefing note to reflect the results of pre-publication.
At this stage, the TB will consider the results of pre-publication along
with the rest of the information in the regulatory package and will
decide whether to grant final approval, request a second pre-publication, postpone the item pending further information, or reject
the item.
STEP 9: Making, Registering, Publishing in Canada
Gazette, Part II, and Distributing Regulations
Making or Approving Regulations
A regulation is made when the Governor in Council approves the
Order in Council attached to the Regulation (also called Executive
Order).
Sometimes an enabling act not only authorises someone to make
regulations, it also indicates that some other person or body must
approve them. For example, the enabling provision may include
the phrase, “The Commission may, with the approval of the
Governor in Council, make regulations…”. Such an approval is
given through an Order in Council.
Registration
For regulations, the Clerk of the Privy Council records the title of
the regulation, the title of the regulation-making authority, the
source of the power to make the regulation, the date of making and
the date of registration, and assigns it a number, preceded by
“SOR” (Statutory Orders and Regulations). In practice, the Clerk's
responsibilities are fulfilled by the Orders in Council Division of the
Privy Council Office.
Coming into Force
Registration is a crucial step in the regulatory process because it
determines when the regulations take effect. Regulations that must
be registered come into force on the day of registration, unless the
enabling statute or the regulations themselves specify another
effective date. Regulations that are not required to be registered
are effective on the day they are made, unless another effective
date is specified in the regulations.
When an effective date for a statute or regulation must be
specified, please ensure this date is at least two working days
subsequent to the TB meeting to allow time for the Governor
General to sign. If the effective date need not be specified, the
sentence “These Regulations come into force on the day on which
they are registered”, can be used.
In practice, this means that Orders in Council are signed by the
Governor General and usually come into force the day after
receiving approval by the TB.
The coming into force dates before the making of a regulation or
other document can only be specified if there is authority to do so
in the enabling act. Such an effective date makes a regulation or
document retroactive, and clear statutory authority is required for
this.
Public announcement of the government's decision to make a
regulation by Order in Council must not be made until the approval
of the Governor General is obtained.
Publication
The Statutory Instruments Act and Statutory Instruments Regulations provide for
the publication of most regulations in Part II of the Canada Gazette within 23
days after their registration. Section 15 of the Statutory Instruments
Regulations identifies, as a class, certain types of regulations that are
exempted from publication. The regulations can also be found on the
Canada Gazette Web site.
The Canada Gazette is published by the Queen's Printer, whose
responsibilities in this regard are carried out by the Canada Gazette
Directorate of PWGSC.
Failure to publish a regulation does not make it invalid, but does
prevent the punishment of offences for contravening the regulation.
The reason is the constitutional principle of the rule of law: the terms
of the law must be knowable and not kept secret. If a regulation is not
published, people cannot be presumed to have had any way of finding
out what their rights and responsibilities under it were.
There is one exception. Someone contravening to an unpublished
regulation can be punished if the regulation is exempt from publication
or if it expressly provides that it applies according to its terms before
it is published in the Canada Gazette. However, in such cases it must
also be proved that reasonable steps were taken to bring the
substance of the regulation to the notice of those likely to be affected
by it.
Distribution
Copies of Orders in Council passed by TB on Monday, and signed
by the Governor General on Tuesday, are normally mailed to
sponsoring departments or agencies on or before the following
Friday. One copy is addressed to the sponsoring Minister and the
other copy is addressed to the Deputy Minister or agency head.
All Orders in Council, including regulations, are made available to
the public three working days after they have been approved by the
Governor General. They can be found at the following two PCO
locations:
- PCO Reading Room, 4th Floor, 85 Sparks Street, Ottawa (where readers
will be able to obtain a short précis list of Orders and Regulations,
together with the name of the sponsoring department, the Privy
Council number and the legal authority);
- PCO Orders in Council Division, Statutory Instruments, 4th Floor, 85
Sparks Street, Ottawa – for review and purchase of certified copies of
regulations; and
STEP 10: Parliamentary Review by the Standing Joint
Committee For the Scrutiny of Regulations
The Standing Joint Committee for the Scrutiny of Regulations monitors the
exercise of regulatory power on behalf of Parliament. Its mandate, set out in
section 19 of the SI Act, is to review regulations and other statutory
instruments after they are made.
The Committee checks the instruments against the criteria approved by
the Senate and the House of Commons at the beginning of each session
of Parliament.
When the Committee finds a problem with a statutory instrument, it tells
the regulation-making authority and suggests solutions. If the Committee
and the regulation-making authority are unable to agree on a solution, the
Committee may draw the matter to the attention of both Houses of
Parliament. If the instrument was made by the Governor in Council or a
minister, the Committee is also authorised, under subsection 123(1) of
the Standing Orders of the House of Commons, to propose the
disallowance of the instrument to the House of Commons. A
disallowance resolution, if not rejected, becomes an Order of the House
enjoining the Governor in Council or minister to revoke the statutory
instrument.
Checklist – Governor in Council Regulation
|
SUBMISSION FOR LEGAL EXAMINATION |
SUBMISSION TO TB
FOR PRE-PUB.
APPROVAL5 |
SUBMISSION TO TB FOR
FINAL APPROVAL5 |
DOCUMENTS1
|
Deputy Chief Legislative
Counsel (Regulations),
Justice |
Regulatory Affairs
Division (RAD)
Privy Council Office2
|
Assistant Clerk
PCO-OiC
|
Assistant Clerk
PCO-OiC
|
Letter of Transmittal to the Assistant Clerk
of the Privy Council
|
original signed by
departmental manager
|
1 copy or e-mail or diskette |
original signed by
Assistant Deputy Minister
+ 1 copy
|
original signed by
Assistant Deputy Minister
+ 1 copy
|
Ministerial Recommendation
|
Draft (unsigned)
|
Draft (unsigned)
|
Draft (unsigned)
|
original signed by Minister
+ 1 copy
|
Notice of Pre-publication |
diskette |
1 copy or e-mail or diskette
|
4 copies3 |
|
Order in Council
|
diskette |
1 copy or e-mail or diskette
|
|
2 original blue-stamped |
Regulations |
diskette
|
1 copy or e-mail or diskette |
4 copies of blue-stamped3 |
2 original blue-stamped
+ 5 copies |
RIAS |
diskette |
1 copy or e-mail or diskette |
original signed by Minister
4 copies + diskette |
original signed by Minister
+ 5 copies + diskette
|
Supplementary Note, if any4 |
1 copy |
1 copy or diskette |
3 copies |
3 copies |
Communications Plan4 |
diskette |
1 copy or diskette |
3 copies |
3 copies |
Request for insertion in the Canada Gazette |
|
|
original signed by
departmental official |
original signed by
departmental official |
Artwork, if any |
diskette
|
1 copy or e-mail or diskette |
Original
|
original |
On each diskette label, indicate your department, contact name, phone number, and software used (Microsoft Word up to version 97 or Corel WordPerfect up to version
8).
1. All documents must be prepared in English and French, except the Request for Insertion in the Canada Gazette and the Letter of Transmittal, which can be submitted
in either language.
2. Send to the Director of Operations, PCO-RAD or to the appropriate PCO-RAD analyst. The analyst will review the draft submission and may provide comments to
departmental officials.
3. Do not need to be “certified true copies”, but if pre-publication is a statutory requirement, one of these four copies must be blue-stamped.
4. Do not send Communications Plan and Supplementary Notes by e-mail.
5. The number of copies indicated include a second complete copy for PCO-RAD. This should be provided in a separate envelope.
Checklist – Ministerial Regulation
|
SUBMISSION FOR LEGAL EXAMINATION |
MINISTERIAL CONCURRENCE
|
FINAL APPROVAL |
DOCUMENTS1
|
Deputy Chief Legislative
Counsel (Regulations),
Justice |
Regulatory Affairs
Division (RAD)
Privy Council Office2
|
Canada Gazette
(for Part I)
|
PCO-RAD |
Assistant Clerk
(Orders in Council)
|
PCO-RAD
|
Letter of Transmittal
|
original signed by
departmental manager
|
e-mail or diskette |
original signed by
departmental official
|
e-mail or
diskette |
original signed by
departmental official |
e-mail or diskette |
Regulations |
Diskette
|
e-mail or diskette |
One stamped copy
one attested true
copy5 |
e-mail or
diskette
|
One stamped copy one
attested true copy4 |
e-mail or diskette
|
Ministerial Order/Resolution |
diskette |
e-mail or diskette
|
|
|
One original signed
stamped - one attested
true copy |
|
RIAS |
Diskette |
e-mail or diskette |
two photocopies
diskette |
e-mail or
diskette
|
two photocopies diskette |
e-mail or diskette |
Communications Plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notice of prepublication |
diskette
|
|
two photocopies3 |
|
|
|
Supplementary Note, if any |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Request for insertion in the Canada Gazette |
|
|
original signed by
departmental official |
|
original signed by
departmental official |
|
Artwork, if any |
diskette |
e-mail or diskette |
Original or diskette |
|
Original or diskette |
|
On each diskette label, indicate your department, contact name, phone number, and software used (Microsoft Word up to version 97 or Corel
WordPerfect up to version 8).
1. All documents must be prepared in English and French, except the Request for Insertion in the Canada Gazette and the Letter of Transmittal,
which can be submitted in either language.
2. Send to the Director of Operations, PCO-RAD or to the appropriate PCO-RAD analyst. The analyst will review the draft submission and may
provide comments to departmental officials.
3. If the prepublication is a statutory requirement, you must send a stamped copy an attested true copy of the Notice of prepublication to the
Canada Gazette (Part I). An attested true copy is a photocopy of an original blue-tamped document.
4. If the examination is done by the department, you must send a diskette to
PCO-OIC.
5. An attested true copy is a photocopy of an original blue-tamped document.
Part C - Models
Information and samples are provided for the following documents:
Regulatory Impact Analysis Statement (RIAS)
Letter of Transmittal
- when submitting regulatory proposal to Justice for legal examination
- when submitting regulatory proposal to the TB for pre-publication or final approval
Ministerial Recommendation
Order in Council
- making new regulations and repealing old regulations
- amending regulations affecting several regulations
- order with conditions precedent
Resolution
Notice of Pre-publication
- new regulations or amendment of a regulation (made by the Governor in Council)
- new regulations or amendment of a regulation (made by the Governor in Council),
where pre-publication is required by statute
Regulatory Impact Analysis Statement (RIAS)
This section provides:
- a Regulatory Impact Analysis Statement (RIAS) cover page (Figure A1)
- information on preparing a RIAS (Figure A2)
A Regulatory Impact Analysis Statement:
- accompanies each proposed regulation;
- summarises the information ministers require to decide on proposed regulations; and
- describes what the government will deliver, the consultation that has taken place and the opinions
Canadians expressed during that consultation, and the benefits and costs of the
proposal.
A diskette containing the final version of the RIAS must be sent along with the
submission. It should be clearly identified and placed in a disk mailer envelope.
The nature and amount of analysis appropriate for a regulatory proposal and the
description of the findings in a RIAS vary according to the significance and likely
impact of the proposal.
The department or agency sponsoring the regulations is responsible for the content
of the RIAS. Ultimate accountability rests with the minister or head of the agency.
The RIAS has six required sections:
- Compliance and Enforcement
A description of the content of each section follows. The information on the cover
page is not published in the Canada Gazette.
For detailed guidelines on writing a RIAS, consult the RIAS Writer's Guide.
Figure A1: RIAS cover page
REGULATORY IMPACT ANALYSIS STATEMENT
RÉSUMÉ DE L'ÉTUDE D'IMPACT DE LA RÉGLEMENTATION
(This statement is not part of the Regulations1)
(Ce résumé ne fait pas partie du règlement2)
|
|
Department or agency
XXXXXXXX
|
Ministère ou organisme
XXXXXXXX |
|
Title of proposal
Give the title or the proposed title.
|
Titre du projet
Indiquer le titre ou le titre
proposé. |
|
Statutory authority
Give the statute under which you are making the proposed Regulations. |
Fondement législatif
Indiquer la Loi en vertu de
laquelle le projet de règlement doit être pris. |
|
|
Submitted for consideration for
Pre-publication OR
|
Soumis en vue de
Publication préalable OU |
|
Final approval following
pre-publication on dd/mm/yy OR |
Approbation finale à la suite
d'une publication préalable le
(date) OU |
|
|
Exemption from pre-publication
and final approval OR |
Exemption de publication
préalable
et approbation finale OU |
|
|
Exemption from a second pre-publication and final approval. |
Exemption d'une deuxième
publication
préalable et approbation
finale. |
|
|
Provide a detailed justification
for the proposed exemption here. |
Indiquez ici, de manière
détaillée vos raisons
pour l'exemption proposée. |
|
|
signature
Minister of XXXXXXXX/ Ministre de XXXXXXXX
|
|
1.
Use the appropriate term, such as Regulation, Order, or Rule.
2. Utilisez le terme approprié, p. ex., du règlement, du décret, des règles.
Figure A2: RIAS
REGULATORY IMPACT ANALYSIS STATEMENT
(This statement is not part of the Regulations.1)
Description
The description section outlines the purpose of the regulations, as well as
the current situation or conditions creating the problem, and explains why action is
necessary.
For a cost-recovery proposal, ensure that the rationale given for the
cost-recovery initiative is appropriate – that is, that those who benefit from
government services should pay, rather than the general public.
Alternatives
This section outlines the other options you could use to achieve the
proposal's objectives. A convincing case must be made that the regulatory
approach is superior to non-regulatory alternatives.
Examples of options are:
- doing nothing (status quo)
- taxation
- direct expenditure
- consensus standards
- voluntary standards
- marketable permits
- a lighter/more stringent form of regulatory control
You must explain why these alternatives provide a lesser net benefit than
the proposed solution, and why, therefore, you did not select any of them to solve the
problem.
For a cost-recovery proposal, this section should answer questions
such as:
- Are there really no cheaper alternatives to the present way of
providing the service?
- If a straightforward non-mandatory user fee is
being proposed, why not impose it through the minister's common-law contracting authority instead of the more time-consuming
process of regulation?
The effort you spend in analysing alternatives should be
proportional to the potential impact of the initiative.
|
1.
Use the appropriate term, such as Regulation, Order, or Rule.
Figure A2: RIAS (continued)
Benefits and costs
It must be demonstrated that the regulatory proposal maximises the net
benefit for Canadian society. This entails a demonstration that:
- the benefits of the regulation outweigh the costs to Canadians;
- the regulatory program is structured in such a way that the
difference between the benefits and costs is the greatest possible; and
- the net benefits of the chosen regulatory action are greater
than the net benefits accruing from any other regulatory or non-regulatory
alternative.
All regulatory proposals must undergo a cost/benefit analysis. This is
used to assess the gains and losses resulting from a set of alternative
regulatory and non-regulatory actions to help decide whether any of the
actions should be undertaken. In carrying out the analysis, four questions
must be addressed:
1.What will change as the result of the introduction and
operation of each proposed action?
2.What is the estimated value of the benefits that will come
about as a result of each proposed action, and who will obtain them?
3.What are the estimated costs of each proposed action, and
who will pay them?
4.Given the estimated benefits and costs, should any of the
proposed actions be undertaken and, if so, which one?
While the first three questions may appear to be largely technical in
nature, inevitably some judgement will be required. Often, it will not prove
possible to quantify all the effects of all proposed actions. Generally
speaking, you should take a broad view of both benefits and costs.
Addressing question 4 will normally require even more judgement. If the
department or agency responsible for the analysis decides to proceed with a
regulatory proposal, it must make the case in the RIAS that the benefits of the
recommended option outweigh (or justify) the costs, and also that the
recommended option is the best one. This argument must be based on the
analysis presented in the document, and it must be made transparent.
The impact assessment should clearly assess:
- the economic, social, environmental and health impacts of the
proposal on Canadian society;
- distributional impacts (fairness and equity implications) of the
proposal. For example, will the proposal have a disproportionate impact
on an industrial sector, area or identifiable social group (e.g., First
Nations)?
- impacts that may affect a region, business and trade, and
competitiveness. For example, will a proposal impede competition or
promote it? One way to determine a proposal's impact on business is to
perform a Business Impact Test.
|
Figure A2: RIAS (continued)
For cost-recovery proposals, make sure the following issues are covered:
- total expected revenues and, if this initiative will increase
existing fees, the total increase in revenues;
- the percentage of increase in fees, if the fees are not new;
- what proportion of the department's costs you are aiming to
recover;
the expected impact on the industry overall, and on some
representative members (to give some idea of how the fee-paying
parties will be affected);
- the net benefit or real added value that this government service will
provide;
- how the department will improve the provision of the service; and
- how the department will reduce the cost of the service.
The objective of a cost/benefit analysis is not “quantification of
everything” in order to arrive at a single number that will dictate one
solution. Rather, it is to present all relevant information, both
qualitative and quantitative, to ministers and the public. Nevertheless,
some issues, particularly those that relate to cost, lend themselves
more easily to quantitative analysis. The anticipated costs of proposed
actions are especially important to ministers because the resources
used to achieve one goal cannot be used elsewhere.
A professional cost-benefit analysis should be undertaken for all
proposals with a major impact (one whose estimated direct cost will be
$10 million or more, in present value terms), including quantitative
estimates of costs and benefits. Summarise this analysis in the RIAS.
To the extent possible, a quantitative analysis of both benefits and
costs should also be undertaken for proposals of moderate impact.
You can support minor regulations that will have little or no impact with
more qualitative, but systematic, analysis.
Quantitative measures are desirable for assessing direct and
indirect economic impacts, such as on employment, operating costs,
international trade, global competitiveness, and distribution of income.
Many social impacts, such as effects on mortality, morbidity reductions,
reductions in property loss due to accidents, or measures of effects on
wildlife populations, may also warrant quantitative assessment.
Environmental impact
The environmental impact of a proposal is of special concern because it
can affect the quality of life indefinitely. The 1999 Cabinet Directive on the
Environmental Assessment of Policy, Plan and Program Proposals requires
that all initiatives forwarded to Cabinet for consideration that are likely to have
important environmental effects, either positive or negative, must be subject
to a strategic environmental assessment. The Directive and guidelines for its
implementation are available from the Canadian Environmental Assessment
Agency. In terms of regulatory initiatives, environmental implications can be
accounted for in one of two ways. The benefits and costs section of the RIAS
should include either:
- a statement that you have considered the environmental
implications of the proposal.
|
Figure A2: RIAS (continued)
In either case, indicate that you will make the environmental
assessment statement available when the regulations are published.
Regulatory burden
This section demonstrates that the proposal complies with the
requirement of the Regulatory Policy to minimise regulatory burden on
Canadians through such methods as co-operating with other
governments. Show how the activities of other governments affect the
same sector being burdened by this federal proposal. Identify both the
actions you have taken to ensure that the proposed intervention will not
result in a conflicting or an excessive requirement and the real, related
savings in costs.
Consultation
The Regulatory Policy requires you to demonstrate that you have
consulted Canadians and that they have had an opportunity to
participate in developing or modifying regulations and regulatory
programs. Encourage the public to criticise proposals for ineffective or
inefficient regulations and to offer suggestions for better ways to solve
the problem while meeting social and economic goals.
The significance and anticipated impact of the proposed regulation
determines the degree and nature of consultation. Reporting on the
consultation should be straightforward unless the consultation has
been inadequate. You may need to delay developing the proposal
further until you have resolved the consultation issue.
It is ideal to consult early in the process, and necessary to do so
before pre-publishing the proposal in the Canada Gazette, Part I. Pre-publication is not a substitute for consultation, and consultation is not a
substitute for pre-publication. The two activities achieve different
objectives. Consultation with those known to be affected increases the
likelihood that the proposal will be accepted as the best alternative.
Pre-publication is meant as a final opportunity for interested parties to
hear about the government's plan of action, and ensures that all parties
have a chance to comment.
If recent consultations have been carried out for a legislative change that
requires regulatory change, such as a tax measure or trade agreement, then
it is not necessary to undertake a second round of consultations. Also, if only
a few major groups are affected by a regulation, make them the focus of your
consultation, while putting a more general notice in the Canada Gazette, Part
I.
This section summarises the consultation, describing who you consulted,
and how the consultation took place (i.e., what mechanisms you used, such
as the Business Impact Test). It details the results and states whether you
changed the proposal because of the consultation. It indicates the degree of
support for the proposal and identifies who continues to oppose it, as well as
the reasons for that opposition.
|
Figure A2: RIAS (continued)
Highly sensitive/confidential information (e.g., proprietary information)may
not be appropriate for publication and therefore should not appear in the
RIAS. In such cases, cover this information in a supplementary note to
ministers, which should be clearly marked “NOT FOR PUBLICATION.”
When consultation has been extensive and it would be impracticable to
list all the names in the RIAS, name a representative number of the major
groups who participated and specify where the complete list of names of
those consulted may be obtained. Make such information easily accessible.
For cost-recovery proposals, indicate which groups were consulted, including
the extent to which they helped design and carry out analytical studies.
After publishing the proposal in the Canada Gazette, Part I, and before
submitting it for ministerial approval and publication in the Canada Gazette,
Part II, revise the “Consultation” section to reflect and respond to comments
received during the pre-publication period. Provide details of the changes
made to the proposal in response to those comments. If you receive no
comments, or make no changes because of comments, state this when
revising this section. The revision may be introduced with this statement:
"This regulation was pre-published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on
dd/mm/yy and no comments were received."
Compliance and enforcement
This section explains the strategy you are adopting to ensure compliance
and describes the enforcement mechanism in place or anticipated. If no
mechanism is necessary, explain why.
If your situation is such that it might be difficult to collect fees for cost-recovery proposals, explain your compliance strategy and what extra
resources may be required.
Examples of enforcement mechanisms include:
- prohibitive and corrective action orders
- registration or other approval requirements
Also indicate how the department will monitor compliance. Monitoring
mechanisms include:
- review of periodic reports from the regulated parties
Where appropriate, describe innovative mechanisms that:
- lessen federal reliance on the criminal power to prevent regulatory
offences;
- use new behavioural science insights to improve the rate of
compliance; or
- reduce the cost of achieving high levels of compliance.
|
Figure A2: RIAS (continued)
Contact
Provide the name, title, address, telephone and fax numbers (including
area code), and e-mail address of a departmental or agency contact for further enquiries,
as follows:
(Name of Contact)
Director of xxx
Department of xxx
201 First Street
City, Province
Postal Code
Telephone: xxx-xxx-xxxx
Facsimile: xxx-xxx-xxxx
E-mail: xxxxx
|
Letter of Transmittal
Regulatory proposals being submitted for legal examination should be sent to the
Deputy Chief Legislative Counsel (Regulations), Legislative Services Branch,
Justice. A copy of the proposal should also be sent to the Director of
Operations, Regulatory Affairs Division, Regulatory Affairs and Orders in Council
Secretariat, Privy Council Office. The regulatory proposal must be accompanied
by a Letter of Transmittal signed by the departmental manager responsible for
the project.
The Letter of Transmittal must include the following:
- the name of the proposed regulation;
- any deadline for stamped copies;
- a statement indicating whether you will request an exemption from pre-publication and, if you ask for an exemption, an explanation of the reasons;
- the name of the department's RIAS contact;
- the name and telephone number of the department's legal contact;
- the department's file number; and
- a list of the Government of Canada departments that must be consulted about
the proposed regulation, along with a statement of the outcome of
interdepartmental consultations to date.
Figure A3: Letter of Transmittal
BY HAND
[Date]
Deputy Chief Legislative Counsel (Regulations)
Legislative Services Branch
Department of Justice
222 Queen Street, Room 601
Ottawa, Ontario
K1A 0H8
Subject: (Title of the regulations)
Dear (name):
Please find attached, in both official languages, (list required documents).
Interdepartmental consultations on these regulations were held with (list
department[s]) and, as a result of these discussions, (explain whether there
was agreement and what was agreed to, or why there was no agreement).
An exemption from pre-publication will not/will be requested (state the rationale
if you will be requesting an exemption).
The departmental legal contact is ______, who can be reached at xxx-xxx-xxxx
(telephone).
The departmental RIAS contact is ______, who can be reached at xxx-xxx-xxxx
(telephone).
Yours truly,
signature
Manager, Regulatory Authority
Attachments
c.c.: Director of Operations, Regulatory Affairs Division, Regulatory Affairs and
Orders in Council Secretariat, Privy Council Office, 155 Queen Street,
Suite 1100, Ottawa, Ontario, K1P 6L1
|
Submissions to the TB for pre-publication or final approval require a Letter of
Transmittal to the Assistant Clerk of the Privy Council. The letter should:
- be dated at the time of sending and signed by an assistant deputy minister (or
director general if the assistant deputy minister is not available, or the President in
the case of an Agency);
- state the subject matter, the contents of the package, a short explanation of the
submission, and if it's being submitted for publication in Part I or II of the Canada Gazette;
- specify any special requests relating to the timing of approval by the Governor in
Council;
- state whether the submission has financial implications, and whether Treasury
Board approval is required, citing the Treasury Board decision number where it does
exist and date of approval;
- indicate the name, title and telephone number of the official that can be contacted
for additional information about the submission.
Figure A3: Letter of Transmittal (Con't)
BY HAND
[Date]
Assistant Clerk of the Privy Council
Privy Council Office
Langevin Block, Room 105
80 Wellington Street
Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0A3
Dear (name):
Please find attached, in both official languages, (subject) accompanied by
(list required documents).
I am requesting that the proposed amendments be submitted for
consideration at the next meeting of the Treasury Board for publication in (Part
I or Part II) of the Canada Gazette.
This submission contains financial implications requiring Treasury Board
approval. Treasury Board gave its approval (decision number if there is one) at
their meeting on (date).
Should you have any questions, please contact (name and title), who can
be reached at xxx-xxx-xxxx (telephone).
Yours truly,
Signature,
Assistant Deputy Minister
Attachments
|
Ministerial Recommendation
The recommendation is a ministerial communication and states specifically what
the sponsoring minister is requesting of the Governor in Council. The
recommendation accompanies the regulatory proposal when it is submitted to
the Treasury Board for approval, registration, and publication in the Canada
Gazette, Part II. It clarifies the nature of the proposal.
Only a minister may make a recommendation. This is one of the ways in which
the principle of ministerial accountability for regulations is honoured.
When the authorising statute dictates that a regulatory proposal must be
sponsored by more than one minister, all references to documents signed by the
minister are intended to mean all ministers named in the statute. In practical
terms, this means that all ministers sign the RIAS and the recommendation to
the Governor in Council.
These documents adhere to a standard format and wording in the interests of
accuracy, completeness and efficiency. The recommendation must be drafted in
both official languages, dated, signed and prepared on departmental or
ministerial letterhead. The recommendation could appear on one page, with the
French and English versions side by side. When the document consists of more
than one page, these must be numbered. The samples that follow in Figure A4
cover most situations, i.e.:
- making new regulations and repealing old regulations;
- amending regulations; and
Figure A4: Ministerial Recommendation
1.Making new regulations
(departmental or ministerial letterhead)
(Date)
To His/Her Excellency the Governor General
in Council:
The undersigned has the honour to
recommend that Your Excellency in Council,
pursuant to section .... (subsection 0(1)) of the
XYZ Act, make the annexed ABC Regulations.
Respectfully submitted,
Signature
Minister of .................
|
1.Nouveau règlement
(en-tête du ministère ou du/de la ministre)
(Date)
À Son Excellence le/la Gouverneur(e)
général(e) en conseil :
Le/La soussigné(e) a l'honneur de
recommander que, en vertu de l'article ...
(paragraphe 0(1)) de la Loi ......., Votre
Excellence en conseil prenne le Règlement
sur ..., ci-après.
Respectueusement soumis,
Le/La ministre .........................,
signature
|
2.Amending regulations
(departmental or ministerial letterhead)
(Date)
To His/Her Excellency the Governor General
in Council:
The undersigned has the honour to
recommend that Your Excellency in Council,
pursuant to section .... (subsection 0(1)) of the
XYZ Act, make the annexed Regulations
Amending the ABC Regulations.
Respectfully submitted,
Signature
Minister of .................
|
2.Modification d'un règlement
(en-tête du ministère ou du/de la ministre)
(Date)
À Son Excellence le/la Gouverneur(e)
général(e) en conseil :
Le/La soussigné(e) a l'honneur de
recommander que, en vertu de l'article ...
(paragraphe 0(1)) de la Loi ......., Votre
Excellence en conseil prenne le Règlement
modifiant le Règlement sur ..., ci-après.
Respectueusement soumis,
Le/La ministre .........................,
signature
|
Figure A4: Ministerial Recommendation (continued)
3.Repealing regulations
(departmental or ministerial letterhead)
(Date)
To His/Her Excellency the Governor General in
Council:
The undersigned has the honour to recommend
that Your Excellency in Council, pursuant to
section .... (subsection 0(1)) of the XYZ Act,
make the annexed Regulations Repealing the
ABC Regulations.
Respectfully submitted,
Signature
Minister of ...................
|
3.Abrogation d'un règlement
(en-tête du ministère ou du/de la ministre)
(Date)
À Son Excellence le/la Gouverneur(e)
général(e) en conseil :
Le/La soussigné(e) a l'honneur de
recommander que, en vertu de l'article ...
(paragraphe 0(1)) de la Loi ......., Votre
Excellence en conseil prenne le Règlement
abrogeant le Règlement sur ..., ci-après.
Respectueusement soumis,
Le/La ministre..…….................,
signature
|
Order in Council
The Order in Council records a decision made by the Governor in Council. The
document is a short statement of the nature of the decision and it names the
minister(s) on whose recommendation the decision was made.
An Order in Council is required for a decision whenever the authority to regulate
rests with the Governor in Council.
The information in these Orders follows a standard sequence, with the wording
varying to fit the situation. The samples that follow in Figure A5 cover most
situations, i.e.:
- making new regulations and repealing old regulations;
- amending regulations affecting several regulations;
- making a remission order; and
- making an order with conditions precedent.
Figure A5: Orders in Council
1. Making new regulations and repealing old
regulations
His/Her Excellency the Governor General in
Council, on the recommendation of the Minister
of ........., pursuant to section .... of the XYZ Act,
hereby makes the annexed XYZ Regulations.
|
1. Prise d'un règlement et abrogation de
l'ancien règlement
Sur recommandation du [de la] ministre de
........... et en vertu de l'article ... de la Loi sur
................, Son Excellence le/la Gouverneur(e)
général(e) en conseil prend le Règlement sur ...,
ci-après.
|
2. Amending regulations
His/Her Excellency the Governor General in
Council, on the recommendation of the Minister
of ..., pursuant to section .... of the XYZ Act,
hereby makes the annexed Regulations
Amending the XYZ Regulations.
|
2. Modification d'un règlement
Sur recommandation du [de la] ministre de
........... et en vertu de l'article ... de la Loi sur
................, Son Excellence le/la Gouverneur(e)
général(e) en conseil prend le Règlement
modifiant le Règlement sur ..., ci-après.
|
3. Amending regulations affecting several
regulations
His/Her Excellency the Governor General in
Council, on the recommendation of the Minister
of ..., pursuant to section .... of the XYZ Act,
hereby makes the annexed Regulations
Amending the XYZ Regulations and the ABC
Regulations (alternative: Grain Shipment and
Elevator Fees Amending Regulations).
|
3. Modification de plusieurs règlements
Sur recommandation du [de la] ministre de
........... et en vertu de l'article ... de la Loi sur
................, Son Excellence le/la Gouverneur(e)
général(e) en conseil prend le Règlement
modifiant le Règlement sur ... et le Règlement
sur ... (autre option : Règlement modifiant des
règlements visant le transport du grain),
ci-après.
|
Figure A5: Orders in Council (continued)
4. Repealing regulations
His/Her Excellency the Governor General in
Council, on the recommendation of the Minister
of ..., pursuant to section ........... of the XYZ Act,
hereby makes the annexed Regulations
Repealing the XYZ Regulations.
|
4. Abrogation d'un règlement
Sur recommandation du [de la] ministre de
........... et en vertu de l'article ... de la Loi sur
................, Son Excellence le/la Gouverneur(e)
général(e) en conseil prend le Règlement
abrogeant le Règlement sur ..., ci-après.
|
5. Making a remission order
His/Her Excellency the Governor General in
Council, considering that it is in the public
interest to make the annexed remission order,
hereby, on the recommendation of the Minister
of ..., the Minister of ... and the Treasury Board,
pursuant to section ... of the ABC Act, makes
the annexed Order respecting ...........................
|
5. Décret de remise
Sur recommandation du [de la] ministre ..., du
[de la] ministre ... et du Conseil du Trésor et en
vertu de l'article ... de la Loi sur ..., Son
Excellence le/la Gouverneur(e) général(e) en
conseil, estimant que l'intérêt public le justifie,
prend le Décret concernant ..., ci-après.
|
6. Making an order with conditions
precedent
Whereas the ..., pursuant to section ... of the
XYZ Act, published in the Canada Gazette,
Part I, on (date) the proposed Regulations
Amending the ABC Regulations;
And Whereas more than ... days have expired
from the date of publication and no notices of
objection to the proposed Regulations were filed
with the Minister of ................. pursuant to
section ... of the XYZ Act;
Therefore, His/Her Excellency the Governor
General in Council, on the recommendation of
the Minister of ..............., pursuant to section ...
of the XYZ Act, hereby approves the annexed
Regulations Amending the ABC Regulations.
|
6. Décret assorti de conditions préalables
Attendu que, conformément à l'article ... de la
Loi sur ..., .... a publié dans la Gazette du
Canada Partie I le (date) le Règlement modifiant
le Règlement sur ...;
Attendu que plus de ... jours se sont écoulés
depuis la publication des modifications
proposées et qu'aucun avis d'opposition n'a été
déposé auprès de ... en application de l'article ...
de cette loi,
À ces causes, sur recommandation du [de la]
ministre de .......... et en vertu de l'article ... de la
Loi sur ..............., Son Excellence le/la
Gouverneur(e) général(e) en conseil prend le
Règlement modifiant le Règlement sur ..., ci-après.
|
Resolution
When a regulation requires Governor in Council (GiC) approval, it must be
accompanied by a Resolution so that the GiC knows the regulation has been
made.
For example, the Pacific Pilotage Authority, can make regulations, but they must
be approved by the Treasury Board. The Pilotage Authority would therefore
include in its regulatory package a Resolution stating that a regulation has been
made.
Figure A6: Resolution
7. Making a Resolution
|
7. Résolution
|
RESOLUTION OF THE MEMBERS OF [THE
PACIFIC PILOTAGE AUTHORITY] MADE ON
(DATE)
|
RÉSOLUTION DES MEMBRES DE
[L'ADMINISTRATION DE PILOTAGE DU
PACIFIQUE] PRISE LE (DATE) |
THE PACIFIC PILOTAGE AUTHORITY
HEREBY AMENDS THE PACIFIC PILOTAGE
TARIFF REGULATIONS (SOR/85-583) IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE ANNEXED
SCHEDULE DATED (DATE) |
L'ADMINISTRATION DE PILOTAGE DU
PACIFIQUE MODIFIE LE RÈGLEMENT SUR
LES TARIFS DE L'ADMINISTRATION DE
PILOTAGE DU PACIFIQUE (DORS/85-583)
CONFORMÉMENT À L'ANNEXE CI-APRÈS DU
(DATE)
|
CERTIFICATE
I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true copy
of the Resolution made by the Pacific Pilotage
Authority on (date).
|
CERTIFICATION
Je certifie que le texte ci-dessus est la copie
conforme du texte de la résolution adoptée par
l'Administration de pilotage du Pacifique le
(date)
|
____________________________
SIGNATURE
____________________________
TITLE/TITRE
____________________________
DATE
|
|
Notice of Pre-publication
The following are examples of Notices
of Pre-publication for the Canada
Gazette, Part I:
- new regulations or amendment of a
regulation (made by the Governor in
Council); and
- new regulations or amendment of a
regulation (made by the Governor in
Council), where pre-publication is
required by statute.
- For convenience, the English and
French versions are shown side-by-side in Figure A7. Actual documents
must be prepared on separate pages.
Figure A7: Notice of pre-publication
1. New regulations or amendment of a
regulation (made by Governor in Council)
DEPARTMENT OF XXX
XXX ACT
Notice is hereby given that the Governor in
Council, pursuant to section ... of the XYZ Act,
proposes to make the annexed ABC
Regulations.
Interested persons may make representations
with respect to the proposed Regulations
within 30, 60, etc. days after the date of
publication of this notice. All such
representations must cite the Canada Gazette,
Part I, and the date of this notice and be
addressed to (name and address of the
person).
signature
Assistant Clerk of the Privy Council
|
1. Nouveau règlement ou modification
(pris par le gouverneur en conseil)
MINISTÈRE DE XXX
LOI SUR XXX
Avis est donné que la gouverneure en conseil,
en vertu de l'article ... de la Loi sur ... se
propose de prendre le Règlement sur ...,
ci-après.
Les intéressés peuvent présenter leurs
observations au sujet du projet de règlement,
dans les trente, soixante, etc. jours suivant la
date de publication du présent avis. Ils sont
priés d'y citer la Gazette du Canada Partie I,
ainsi que la date de publication, et d'envoyer
le tout, à\au [nom et adresse de la personne].
Le/La greffier(ère) adjoint(e) du Conseil
privé
signature
|
2. New regulations or amendment of a regulation
(approved by Governor in Council), where pre-publication is required by statute
DEPARTMENT OF XXX
XXX ACT
Notice is hereby given, pursuant to subsection ... of
the XYZ Act, that the (Canada Post Corporation),
pursuant to section ... of that Act, proposes to make
the annexed ABC Regulations.
Interested persons may make representations with
respect to the proposed Regulations within (30, 60,
etc.) days after the date of publication of this notice.
All such representations must cite the Canada
Gazette, Part I, and the date of this notice and be
addressed to name, address, telephone, fax, E-mail
of the person, Minister responsible for the (Canada
Post Corporation) .
signature
Assistant Clerk of the Privy Council
|
2. Nouveau règlement ou modification
(approuvé(e) par le/la gouverneur(e) en
conseil) (dans le cas d'une publication
préalable exigée par la loi)
MINISTÈRE DE XXX
LOI SUR XXX
Avis est donné, conformément à l'article ... de la Loi
sur ..., que (la Société canadienne des postes), en
vertu de l'article ... de cette loi, se propose de
prendre le Règlement sur ..., ci-après.
Les intéressés peuvent présenter leurs
observations au sujet du projet de règlement, dans
les trente, soixante, etc. jours suivant la date de
publication. Ils sont priés d'y citer la Gazette du
Canada Partie I ainsi que la date de publication et
d'envoyer le tout au ministre responsable de (la
Société canadienne des postes) nom, adresse,
téléphone, télécopieur et courriel de la personne.
Le/La greffier(ère) adjoint(e) du Conseil privé,
Signature
|
Acronyms
DLSU Departmental Legal Services Unit
GiC Governor in Council
OiC Order in Council
PCO Privy Council Office
OiC Division Orders in Council Division of the Privy Council Office
PCO-RAD Privy Council Office-Regulatory Affairs Division
PWGSC Public Works and Government Services Canada
RAD Regulatory Affairs Division (of PCO)
RAOIC Regulatory Affairs and Orders in Council Secretariat of PCO
RIAS Regulatory Impact Analysis Statement
RPMS Regulatory Process Management Standards
RPP Report on Plans and Priorities
RS(J) Regulatory Section (Justice)
SI Statutory Instrument
SI Act Statutory Instruments Act
SI Regulations Statutory Instruments Regulations
SJC Standing Joint Committee of the Senate and the House of Commons
for the Scrutiny of Regulations
SOR Statutory Orders and Regulations
TB Treasury Board
TBS Treasury Board Secretariat
References
Questions, comments, concerns, or information about this Guide can be directed
to:
Regulatory Affairs Division
Regulatory Affairs and Orders in Council Secretariat
Privy Council Office
Suite 1100 – 155 Queen Street
Ottawa, Ontario
K1P 6L1
Telephone: (613) 943-5076
FAX: (613) 943-5071
RIAS Writer Guide (1999):
Consulting and Audit Canada
Telephone: (613) 947-2425
Benefit-Cost Analysis Guide for Regulatory Programs (1995)
Consulting and Audit Canada
Telephone: (613) 947-2425
Federal Regulations Manual (Part 5) (1998)
Regulations Section
Legislative Services Branch
Department of Justice
Telephone: (613) 957-0099
For printed copies of the:
Government of Canada Regulatory Policy (1999);
Consultation Guidelines for Managers in the Federal Public Service (1992); and
Assessing Regulatory Alternatives (1994) are available at:
Information and Research Centre
Privy Council Office
85 Sparks Street, Room 1000
Ottawa, Ontario
K1A 0A3
Telephone: (613) 957-5153
FAX: (613) 957-5043
Standards Systems: A Guide for Canadian Regulators (1998):
Information Distribution Centre
Communications Branch, Industry Canada
Room 205D, West Tower
235 Queen Street, C.D. Howe Building
Ottawa, Ontario,
K1A 0H5
Telephone: (613) 947-7466
FAX: (613) 954-6436
Voluntary Codes Guide (1999):
Office of Consumer Affairs, Industry Canada
235 Queen Street, C.D. Howe Building
9th Floor, East Tower
Ottawa, Ontario
K1A 0H5
Telephone: (613) 952-9449
Web addresses
Statutory Instruments Regulations
http://laws.justice.gc.ca/en/s-22/index.html
Government of Canada Regulatory Policy, 1999
http://www.pco-bcp.gc.ca/raoics-srdc/docs/publications/regulatory_policy_e.pdf
Government of Canada Regulatory Policy, 1999. Annex A - International and
Intergovernmental Agreements: Obligations of Regulators
http://www.pco-bcp.gc.ca/raoics-srdc/default.asp?Language=E&page=publications&sub=governmentofcanadaregula#a
Cabinet Directive on Environmental Assessment
http://www.ceaa-acee.gc.ca/016/directive_e.htm
RIAS Writer's Guide
http://www.pco-bcp.gc.ca/raoics-srdc/docs/publications/rias_e.pdf
Standing Joint Committee for the Scrutiny of Regulations
http://www.parl.gc.ca/InfoCom/CommitteeMain.asp?Language=E&CommitteeID=8801&Joint=1
RPMS Compliance Guide
http://www.pco-bcp.gc.ca/raoics-srdc/docs/publications/rpms_e.pdf
Cabinet Directive on Law-making
http://www.pco-bcp.gc.ca/default.asp?Page=Publications&Language=E&doc=legislation/lmgcabinetdirective_e.htm
Regulatory Affairs and Orders in Council Secretariat
http://www.pco-bcp.gc.ca/raoics-srdc/
Canada Gazette Information
http://canadagazette.gc.ca/index-e.html
Treasury Board Submissions Guidelines
http://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/Pubs_pol/opepubs/TBM_162/siglist_e.html
Benefit-Cost Analysis Guide for Regulatory Programs
http://www.pco-bcp.gc.ca/raoics-srdc/docs/publications/CostBenefitGuideforRegul/CostBenefitGuideforRegul_e.pdf
A Guide to the Making of Federal Acts and Regulations
http://www.pco-bcp.gc.ca/docs/Publications/legislation/lmg_e.pdf
Assessing Regulatory Alternatives
http://www.pco-bcp.gc.ca/raoics-srdc/docs/publications/assessing_reg_alternatives_e.pdf
Standards Systems: A Guide for Canadian Regulators
http://strategis.ic.gc.ca/sc_mrksv/regaff/stdguide/engdoc/Index.html
Voluntary Codes Guide
http://strategis.ic.gc.ca/epic/internet/inoca-bc.nsf/en/ca00880e.html
Requirements for Publication in Canada Gazette, Part I
http://canadagazette.gc.ca/requirements-e.html
Request for Insertion in the Canada Gazette Form
http://canadagazette.gc.ca/insertion.pdf
Orders in Council
http://www.pco-bcp.gc.ca/oic-ddc/
Business Impact Test
http://strategis.ic.gc.ca/
Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency (from this page you can link to the
Cabinet Directive on Environmental Assessment and the guidelines for
implementing the Directive) http://www.ceaa-acee.gc.ca
Other Resources
RAD Publications Site
http://www.pco-bcp.gc.ca/raoics-srdc/default.asp?Language=E&Page=Publications
Consultation Guidelines for Managers in the Federal Public Service
http://www.pco-bcp.gc.ca/raoics-srdc/docs/publications/consultation_guidelines_e.pdf
Cost Recovery and Charging Policy
www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/Pubs_pol/opepubs/TB_H/CRP_e.html
1 See Cabinet Directive on Law-Making
2 See Checklist at the end of Part B, p. 32
3 A "major" regulation is considered one that costs more than $50M,
or costs between $100K and $50M and has a low degree of public acceptance. A
"significant" regulation has an annual impact on the economy of $10M
or more; or may adversely affects a sector of the economy, productivity,
competition, jobs, the environment, public health or safety, provincial, local
or Aboriginal governments; or creates a serious inconsistency or otherwise
interferes with an action taken or planned by another federal department or
agency; or materially alters the authorised levels of departments or budgetary
impact of entitlements, grants, user fees, loans programs or the rights and
obligations of recipients thereof; or raises novel legal or policy issues
arising out of legal mandates or the governments' priorities.
4 Blue-stamping is the method the RS(J) uses to show that it has examined the
regulations and orders. The stamped version is submitted to ministers of the TB
for approval to publish in the Canada Gazette, Part I, and Part II.
5 For more detailed information, contact the Regulatory Issues Unit of the
Treasury Board Secretariat.
6 Draft regulations that go before TB are considered Cabinet confidences for
the purposes of the Access to Information Act, the Privacy Act and the Canada
Evidence Act.
7 If a regulation is stale-dated (i.e., it has been blue-stamped
more than two years before the pre-publication submission), the sponsoring
department should consult its legal services to ensure that there has been no
changes to its enabling legislation during that timeframe.
National
Library of Canada cataloguing in publication data
Canada. Privy Council
Office. Regulatory Affairs Division
Regulatory process
guide [electronic resource] : developing a
regulatory proposal and seekings its approval
Rev. ed.
"This Guide was prepared by the Regulatory Affairs Division, Operations
Branch , Privy Council Office".-Introd.
Electronic monograph in HTML format.
Mode of access: Privy Council Office website (www.pco-bcp.gc.ca)
Issued also in French under title: Guide du processus réglementaire:
élaboration et approbation d'une soumission réglementaire.
ISBN 0-662-36431-7
Cat. no. CP22-75/2004E-HTML
1. Administrative
procedure - Canada - Handbooks, manuals, etc.
2. Executive orders - Canada - Handbooks, manuals, etc.
3. Administrative regulation drafting - Canada - Handbooks, manuals, etc.
4. Legislation - Canada
I. Title.
JL87.C36 2004
342.71'066
C2004-980103-1
|