Skip all menus (access key: 2)Skip first menu (access key: 1)Indian Claims Commission
Français
Contact Us
Search
Employment Opportunities
Site Map
Home
About the ICC
Media Room
Links
Mailing Lists
Indian Claims Commission
February 3, 2011
/Home /Claimsmap /Saskatchewan /Inquiries /Completed Inquiries – Reports Released
About the ICC
 src=
 src=
 src=
Media Room
 src=
 src=
 src=
Publications
 src=
 src=
 src=
Claimsmap
Alberta
British Columbia
Manitoba
New Brunswick
Newfoundland and Labrador
Nova Scotia
Nunavut
Northwest Territories
Ontario
Prince Edward Island
Quebec
Saskatchewan
Inquiries
Mediation
Yukon
 src=
 src=
 src=
Email Alerts

Printable Version Printable Version
Email This Page Email This Page

Completed Inquiries – Reports Released

05/10/2006

Cowessess First Nation [1907 surrender - Phase II] – July 2006

The Cowessess First Nation submitted a specific claim in 1981, supplemented between 1984 and 1992, in respect of the 1907 surrender of a portion of its reserve, alleging invalidity of the surrender, fiduciary breach, fraud, and unconscionable conduct. The claim was rejected in 1994, and in August 1996, at the request of the First Nation, the ICC agreed to conduct an inquiry into the rejected claim. By agreement of the parties and the Commission, the inquiry was split into two phases.

In Phase I, the Commission held that a valid surrender vote had not been obtained, but Canada did not accept its recommendation to negotiate the claim. Phase II therefore proceeded, in October 2002, to address the fiduciary issue. The new panel, struck for Phase II, did not, at the First Nation’s request, conduct a community session, and legal arguments were heard in September 2004. The inquiry focused on whether the Crown breached its fiduciary duty in the surrender of the southern portion of the Crooked Lake Reserve, IR 73. The southern portion of the reserve, within six miles of the railway, comprising 41 per cent of the reserve, was surrendered.

The Cowessess Band lived, farmed and raised livestock in the north of the reserve and used the southern portion to cut wild hay for its livestock. The First Nation alleged that the Crown breached its fiduciary duty by responding to pressure from settlers, who wanted the land nearest the railway, and that it failed to act in the Band’s best interests.

The majority of the panel held that there was no breach; the band members understood the consequences of the surrender, and government officials did not deceive or unduly influence the Band.

The minority found that the best interests of the Band were not served by government failure to protect the reserve land; the settlers, not the Band, benefited in the long term from the surrender.

The Commission released a report on this inquiry in October 2006.

To download the news release

To download the report - PDF PDF

Link to the summary of Phase I of this inquiry



Last Updated: 2009-03-06 Top of Page Important Notices