Home
Français
Introduction
History
Annual Index
Author &
Subject
Credits
Contact |
The Place of "Composition 12 with Small
Blue Square" in the Art of Piet Mondrian
by Robert Welsh
Pages 1
| 2
| 3
| 4
| 5
| 6
| 7
| 8
| 9 | 10
| 11
Notes
23 For a fuller discussion of this point, see R. P. Welsh, "Landscape
into Music, Mondrian's New York Period," Arts Magazine
XL:4 (February,
1966), pp. 33-39.
24 In this letter (at the De Stijl archive, estate of the late
Nelly van Doesburg), Mondrian wrote, "I much sympathize
with your
idea that 'the negative' should comprise the fourth dimension, but I cannot
write about this." Possibly Van Doesburg's "negative" was the usage in
certain works of a black ground which he adopted from Bart van der Leck in 1917; see
R. P. Welsh, "Theo van Doesburg and Geometric Abstraction," Nijhoff,
Van Ostaijen,
"De Stijl"
ed. F. Bulhof (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1976).
25 In a letter of August 1, 1919, apparently his first to Van
Doesburg after returning to Paris, Mondrian suggested shortly placing
in De Stijl
a reproduction of the last painting (i.e., "laatste ding")
that he had shown Van Doesburg, "among other reasons just because
a starry sky provided the first inspiration for making it." Indeed, that
very month (De Stijl
II: 10, 1919, as "Illustration XIX") a coloured variant
of Lozenge with Gray Lines
(namely, S:cc 299) was reproduced.
26 By M. L. Teuber, "Introduction," ex. cat. Paul Klee: The
Bauhaus Years
(Des Moines: Art Centre, 1973), pp. 6-17.
27 See F. Schumann, "Beiträge zur Analyse der Gesichtswahrnehmungen,"
Zeitschrift für Psychologie
XXIII (1900), pp. 1-32.
28 Yet the question remains moot. Of the several volumes dedicated
to such topics as the fourth dimension which were listed by Van Doesburg
in the April 1919, issue of De Stijl
(Il: 6, pp. 70-72), as available on request
via mail to the periodical's subscribers, none of those consulted
(alas, J. B. Ubink, De Vierde Dimensie, which promised to be the most rewarding of the listed titles, because
it apparently was of a popularized character, proved unavailable in major
Dutch libraries), contained diagrams or discussions relevant to this issue.
It even remains uncertain whether Mondrian read such a favourite author
of Van Doesburg as the distinguished mathematician, Henri Poincaré,
since the name does not appear in Mondrian's known writings.
29 See The Analysis of Sensations
(New York: Dover Paperback,
1959), p. 106 (original German edition, 1886); also Schumann, op.cit.,
pp. 17-19.
30 As documented in ex. cat. Piet Mondrian 1872-1944, p. 198; ill'd in colour in H. L. C. Jaffé, Piet Mondrian (New
York: Harry N. Abrams, 1970), p. 147. The Gestalt principle of closure,
which denotes, among other things, a human tendency to read interrupted
geometric configurations as if completed, was codified by Max Wertheimer
in 1923 ("Untersuchungen zur Lehre von der Gestalt," Psychologische
Forschung
IV: pp. 301-350), having been anticipated by Schumann in
1900 (op.cit., pp. 12-15). However, apart from the unlikelihood
that Mondrian knew any such scientific source text, his Composition
with Yellow Lines
is far more complex in structure than a reading merely
as an illustration of closure would purport.
For example, one may also explore the formal transmutations
the painting undergoes if one focuses alternatively upon (1) the individual lines
as dividers of space rather than edges of an imagined square; (2) the lines
read in perspective (since, if the 45 degree angles of termination at the picture
edge are imagined as receding in space, the line surfaces will seem to
tilt outward); (3) the tensions and visual adjustments which occur among
any two or more of the, in fact. disproportionate lines, opposite or adjacent,
whether viewed simultaneously or successively; (4) the "containing" figure,
read as an octagon (i.e.,
four yellow lines and connecting picture-edge
segments); and even (5) the unstable double image which occurs if one
slightly "crosses" one's eyes. While all such readings of course do violence
to the final sense of equilibrium sought by the artist, it is difficult
to believe that he was himself totally unaware of these possibilities,
or of the dynamic, kinetic visual experiences which they induce.
31 The only exceptions to this rule are three paintings conceived
in the mid-1930s, and proportioned with the height twice as great as the
width (i.e., S:cc 385-387). However, in all three, the gap between
two dominating and unbisected vertical lines is too broad to allow for
their categorization as illustrative of the double-line concept.
32 This evolution is treated more fully by the present writer in
ex. cat. Piet Mondrian
1872-1944, pp. 196 ff.
33 For Mondrian 's art theory and view of the "tragic" in the
1920s and early 1930s, see Seuphor, Piet Mondrian, pp. 166-168,
and H. L. C. Jaffé, De Stijl 1917-31, The Dutch Contribution
to Modern Art
(London: Tiranti, 1956), pp. 209- 258. Regarding the
meaning of the double line, A. H. Nijhoff ("Introduction," ex. cat. Marlow
Moss, Amsterdam: Stedelijk Museum, 1962, n. p.), a close personal friend
of Moss, relates how upon first publicly exhibiting a double-line painting, circa
1930-1931, the artist received a written request for an explanation
from Mondrian. Her illustrated reply cited three basic reasons: (1) single
lines produce an impression of planar surfaces; (2) single lines render
the composition static; and (3), double, or multiple, lines have a dynamic
effect by ensuring "a continuity of related and interrelated
rhythm in space." Such reasoning certainly would have appealed to Mondrian,
whether or not one considers Moss the principal stimulus for Mondrian's
adoption in 1932 of the double-line convention (i.e., with S: cc 368);
although Composition with Yellow Lines
is dated 1933, according
to documentation kindly supplied by H. Henkels, of the Hague Gemeentemuseum,
it was commissioned and presumably begun the previous year, which
allows it to be considered the final major "single-line" painting.
Next Page | Notes
34 to 36
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 | 10
| 11
Top of this page
Home
| Français | Introduction
| History
Annual
Index | Author
& Subject | Credits | Contact
This digital collection
was produced under contract to Canada's Digital Collections program,
Industry Canada.
"Digital
Collections Program, Copyright
© National Gallery of
Canada 2001"
|