Chink, chink, Chinaman, |
Wash
my pants; |
Put
them into the boiler, |
And
make them dance. |
Many
Torontonians who have resided in the city since the 1950s would
probably be familiar with this doggerel about the older generation
of Chinese Canadians. On one hand, this dowdy rhyme reflects the
bigoted mind of its author. On the other hand, it characterizes,
to a certain extent, a major facet of the life of the Chinese Canadian
community before the 1960s.
If
gold mining and railroad construction were two important occupations
of Chinese Canadian pioneers in western Canada, then clothes washing
was a common occupation for the earlier Chinese Canadians who chose
Toronto as their new hometown. Indeed, the first Chinese recorded
in the City Directory of Toronto were the owners of two laundries
founded in 1877, Sam Ching & Company at 9 Adelaide Street East and
Wo Kee at 385 Yonge Street. The fact that these two laundries opened
their doors eight years before the completion of the Canadian Pacific
Railroad (CPR) suggests that they were not the result of railway
migration, rather their owners might have moved from the United
States.
In
the late 1870s, there were already close to forty Chinese hand laundries
operating in Chicago. Similarly, many early New York Chinese were
engaged in the laundering business. It would not be too surprising
to find out that Sam Ching and WO Kee were indeed former laundrymen
from the United States, although more definite evidence is needed
to substantiate this claim.
Some
sociologists contend that the Chinese laundry, like the Italian
fruit stand and the Greek ice-cream parlour, in North America is
the product of social invention. However, it is a social invention
by circumstance rather than by choice. In 1879 the Select Committee
on Chinese Labour and Immigration of the House of Commons succinctly
pointed out that, "wash clothes, which white men who can get anything
else to do will not do - this labour is left to the Chinamen.'' As
a matter of fact, many Chinese Canadian laundrymen were peasants
before they emigrated from China.
Laundries
were one of the pioneering businesses for the early Chinese immigrants
in Canada. When the first major wave of Chinese immigration took
place in the late 1850s in British Columbia, the second issue of
the Victoria Gazette (June 30, 1858) said that, "doubtless ere long
the familiar interrogation of 'Wantee washee?' will be added to
our everyday conversation library. " The newspaper further reminded
its English-speaking readers that, "whether their [the new Chinese
immigrants] efforts will be directed to the washing of gold or of
clothing is a point yet to be ascertained, but we shall lay it before
our readers at a moment as early as the grave importance of the
subject demands."
In
1902 when the Dominion government appointed a Royal Commission on
Chinese and Japanese immigration, it paid special attention to Chinese
laundry and received several deputations on this subject. The Commissioner,
Mr. R.C. Clute, was a Torontonian. He took note of the fact that
many Chinese laundrymen learned their trade only after they had
migrated to Canada. The Commissioner faithfully recorded this in
his huge report: "Ming Lee, laundryman (farmer in China)."
Although
there were few Chinese Canadians living in Toronto in the early
1880s, Torontonians did not receive them with open arms. Six years
after Sam Ching and WO Kee opened their laundries in the downtown
core of Toronto, they were condemned as a "curse" by several union
leaders. On December 26, 1883, the Canadian Labour Congress met
in Dufferin Hall, Toronto. Its newly elected president, Charles
March, urged the delegates not to disregard the "Chinese immigration
curse." Next day, the congress discussed the matter at length. One
Mr. M. O'Hallaren asserted, " . . . Christian people in Toronto
would hire Chinese to do their washing" before they would hire "the
poor white woman who had a family to support." Then he blustered
that, "they could starve the Chinese out of Toronto, notwithstanding
the large number of rats and cats in the city."
O'Hallaren's
rousing attack on Chinese Canadians triggered enthusiastic response
among the delegates. Of course, not many union leaders at that time
saw the Chinese worker as a fellow-labourer with a family to support
too. Soon, Chinese laundry became a favourite target for legislators
as well as nativists.
The
number of Chinese laundries did not grow drastically until the completion
of the CPR. During
the 1886 civic election, the Vancouver Vintners and the Knights
of Labour called on all candidates to denounce Chinese laundries
as a nuisance. Two months later in February 1887, arsonists burnt
down several laundries in Vancouver during an anti-Chinese riot
in order to drive the Chinese out of town. On top of all these anti-Chinese
sentiments, numerous recently unemployed Chinese railroad navvies
began migrating to eastern Canada along the cross-country railway
line.
This
migration caused the number of Chinese-operated restaurants and
laundries to mushroom over the next several decades in numerous
small towns and cities across the land. By the time the City of
Vancouver passed a by-law to limit the operation of Chinese laundries
to within certain designated areas in 1893, there were at least
twenty-four Chinese wash-houses already set up in Toronto.
Life
was by no means easy for the Chinese laundrymen. Although few records
of the working conditions of early Chinese laundries in Toronto
have survived, one can draw from parallel descriptions of Chinese
laundries in other cities. In
the report of the 1902 Royal Commission on Chinese and Japanese
Immigration, a full chapter was devoted to the Chinese laundry business
in British Columbia. It reported that Chinese wash-houses were usually
set up in "a tenement that is not fit for anything else" and were
regarded "as a nuisance and a menace by those who live in the vicinity."
People were genuinely afraid that the presence of a Chinese laundry
in the neighbourhood would depreciate the value of their property.
In
the beginning, owners of small-sized Chinese laundries did much
of the work themselves. Later, as business picked up and demanded
more help, paid workers were hired. The wages for the hired workers
were comparatively low. At the turn of the century, the average
wage paid to the Chinese laundry worker ranged from $8 to $18 per
month, with room and board. It was said that white laundry workers
got $10 to $18 a week.
The
physical setup of a typical Chinese laundry in North America became
a familiar sight everywhere. Usually it was a small place in a modest
building in the working-class residential area. A red "Hand Laundry"
sign hung outside the premises, or was painted on the window.
Inside,
a wall-to-wall counter divided the shop into a reception area and
a working place. Behind the counter, some brown packages of clean
laundry, with Chinese labels to identify the customers, were tucked
on several shelves, waiting to be picked up by the clients.
top
|
On
the other side of the shelves, which functioned as partitions as
well, was the working and living quarters of the laundry-house.
Washing troughs and machines were aligned near the water supply
and drainage systems.
If
the business of the laundry was large enough, a big stove would
be used to warm up several irons, each weighing about eight pounds
and alternately used by the pressers. In earlier days, however,
Chinese laundry workers "ironed at tables in the front close to
the street, where a curious passerby might watch the operation if
he pleased." They also used a more primitive type of pressing equipment - an ingenious iron saucepan, about half a foot in diameter. An
American writer once described that, ''in this saucepan, he contrived,
by some mysterious agency, to make a charcoal fire, though whence
the draught was obtained would puzzle the Caucasian."
While
Mr. R.C. Clute was receiving anti-Chinese laundry deputations in
Victoria early in 1901, newspapers in Toronto reverberated this
sentiment vigorously. There were ninety-six Chinese laundries in
Toronto then, compared to sixty-six laundries operated by other
ethnic groups.
The
local press urged on health authorities pressing their attack on
"dirty laundries." As a result, the city government passed by-law
No. 41 in June 1902, to "license and regulate laundrymen and laundry
companies and for inspecting and regulating laundries."
Toronto
was not the only city to have such a by-law. Back in 1900 Vancouver
had already passed by-law No. 373 prohibiting Chinese laundrymen
from using mouth water to spray clothing while ironing. In 1903
Kamloops city government declared Chinese laundries a public nuisance
and forced a Chinese laundryman, Ah Mee, to sell his property.
1
Then in the next few years, Calgary, Lethbridge and Hamilton followed
suit and later induced several provinces, such as Ontario, to pass
similar anti-Chinese laundry acts.In May 1914 the Ontario Legislative
Assembly passed "An Act to amend the Factory, Shop and Office Building
Act," stipulating that "no Chinese person shall employ in any capacity
or have under his direction or control any female white person in
factory, restaurant or laundry."
Again,
the Trades and Labour Congress of Canada took the lead in the anti-Chinese
laundry attack. At its 22nd annual convention, held in Victoria
in September 1906, Gus Francq, a delegate of the Jacques Cartier
Typographical Union of Montreal, stated "in the name of the Shirt,
Waist and Laundry Workers" that, "the actual tax imposed upon Chinese
immigration does not prevent the great overflowing of yellow workers
to injure especially the laundry workers of our country." The congress
urged the government to increase the Chinese Head Tax from $500
to $1,000.
The
union leaders at the time either did not realise, or were too prejudiced
to see that many of the Chinese workers could have been drawn into
the Canadian labour movement. They ignored two significant events
which happened among the Chinese laundry workers in that same year.
Sixty employees of the Chinese laundries in New Westminster, British
Columbia, struck that fall. They demanded to have their wages increased,
and their employers acceded to their demands on the same day. Half
a year earlier in 1906, a Chinese Laundry Workers' Union (the Sai
Wah Tong) was formed in Vancouver. Its 120 members advocated fighting
the laundry proprietors for better working conditions.
Soon,
labour unions pushed for prohibiting Chinese laundries from employing
white female workers. In 1912 when the Trades and Labour Congress
of Canada held its 28th annual convention in Guelph delegates reported
at length on how they successfully persuaded the Manitoba, Saskatchewan
and Alberta governments to pass legislation, "prohibiting the employment
of white girls or females by Orientals in restaurants, laundries,
etc."
The
reactions against Chinese laundrymen was part of a general white
counterattack against Asian competition. As Tom Maclnnes - a Vancouver
lawyer and at one time an advisor to the federal government - lucidly
stated in 1927, "it is clear that economically we can not compete
with the Oriental in this community, industrially, commercially
or professionally, except if we handicap him, hamper him, restrict
him and as far as possible put him out of the industrial and commercial
running."
Remarkably,
the Chinese laundry business in Toronto kept growing apace between
1900-25 in the face of restrictions and bigotry. The number increased
from 96 in 1901 to 374 in 1921 - more than fourfold in a matter
of two decades. According to the 1921 census, the population of
Chinese Canadians in Toronto was 2,134. Assuming an average Chinese
laundry employed four persons, including the owner himself, then
over 50 per cent of the Chinese Canadian population in Toronto was
related to the laundry business in the early 1920s.
2
After the Dominion passed Bill No. 45, later known as the Chinese
Exclusion Act, prohibiting Chinese immigration in 1923, the growth
of Chinese laundries in Toronto stopped and actually began to decline
in the 1930s. When the Exclusion Act was repealed in 1947, the number
of Chinese laundries in Toronto had shrunk to 258. With the introduction
of coin laundries and permapress fabrics, Chinese hand laundries
as an institution have become something of the past. However, there
is still at least one Chinese hand laundry on Spadina Avenue just
north of Harbord Street, and another in the Kensington Market area
on St. Andrew Street.
The
era of Chinese laundrymen who made the pants dance is definitely
gone. However, the lingering tendency to stereotype early Chinese
Canadians as laundrymen has caused some mixed feelings among the
younger generation of Chinese Canadians. At times, the question
"Is your father a laundryman?" to some Canadian-born Chinese is
looked upon as demeaning. They certainly are not familiar with a
famous Chinese poet Wen I-to, who studied in North America in the
1920s. After observing and being shocked by the contempt of Americans
for the Chinese laundrymen, he wrote a poem called ''Song of the
Laundry." Wen lauded the Chinese laundrymen with the following ode:
You
say that the trade of laundrymen is too base,
|
Only
the Chinese are willing to descend so low,
|
Your
pastor informs me, saying
|
Jesus'
father was a carpenter by trade,
|
Do
you believe it, do you believe it?
|
NOTES
1.
Leslie Moffs, "Ah Mee," mimeograph (Kamloops Museum Association,
Kamloops, B.C., n.d.), pp. 2-3.
2.
According to the 1902 report of the Royal Commission on Chinese
and Japanese Immigration, there were 40 Chinese laundries, employing
197 Chinese in Victoria; 35 in Vancouver, employing 192; 9 in New
Westminster, employing 38; 20 in Rossland, employing 60 Chinese.
Therefore, an average Chinese laundry at that time employed 4 workers.
|