Fluid resuscitation of the trauma patient: How much is enough?

Stewart M. Hamilton, MD, FRCSC; Pat Breakey, RN, BScN*

Canadian Journal of Surgery 1996; 39: 11-16

From the Department of Surgery, University of Alberta Hospitals, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta. *Trauma coordinator, University of Alberta Hospitals, Edmonton, Alta.

Paper reprints of the full text may be obtained from: Dr. Stewart M. Hamilton, Department of Surgery, 2D2 Mackenzie Health Sciences Centre, University of Alberta, 8440-112th St., Edmonton AB T6G 2B7

Abstract

Patient management in the prehospital resuscitative phase after trauma is vitally important to the outcome. Early definitive care remains the essential element in improving morbidity and mortality. In Canada, where a large proportion of trauma occurs at sites distant from a trauma centre, the prehospital resuscitative phase is long and has even greater potential to affect outcome. Conventional teaching about the end points of resuscitation has promoted the concept of normalization of hemodynamic parameters with maintenance of end-organ perfusion, as measured by the hourly urine output. Recent work in patients with a closed head injury and in patients with penetrating torso trauma challenge the notion that trauma patients are homogeneous with respect to these end points. In the Canadian setting of blunt injury, where a closed head injury is usually suspected and often present, the evidence from clinical studies suggests that an aggressive approach to maintaining blood pressure is warranted. In penetrating torso injury in an urban setting, there is evidence to suggest that delaying resuscitation until hemorrhage is controlled is beneficial. More Canadian clinical trials are required in this area. In the meantime, the priorities of resuscitation must be carefully assessed for each patient and pattern of injury.
GO TO CJS: Feb. 1996 - GO TO Surgery and orthopedics
CMA webspinners