The influence of age on the severity of peritonitis

James M. Watters, MD, FRCSC;* James M. Blakslee, MD;§ Roderick J. March, MD;§ Mary L. Redmond, MD, FRCSC§

Canadian Journal of Surgery 1996; 39: 142-146

Résumé


From the Department of Surgery, University of Ottawa, and Division of General Surgery, Ottawa Civic Hospital, Ottawa, Ont.

*Supported by a Career Scientist Award from the Ontario Ministry of Health

§Former resident in general surgery, University of Ottawa


Paper reprints of the full text may be obtained from: Dr. James M. Watters, Division of General Surgery, Ottawa Civic Hospital, 1053 Carling Ave., Ottawa ON K1Y 4E9
See also: Surgery in the elderly patient: a time for reappraisal

Contents


Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the influence of age on the evolution and severity of peritonitis.
Design: A chart review.
Setting: An adult university hospital.
Patients: One hundred and twenty-two patients with acute appendicitis and 100 patients with acute colonic diverticulitis requiring operation or percutaneous drainage.
Main Outcome Measures: Patient age and sex, presence of perforation or gangrene (appendicitis), extent of peritonitis (diverticulitis); duration of symptoms prior to admission; admission leukocyte count; duration of hospitalization before surgery; length of hospital stay; and death rate.
Results: Patients with acute appendicitis who were aged 65 years or older were three times more likely than younger patients to have a gangrenous or perforated appendix (odds ratio 3.1, 95% confidence interval 1.1 to 8.4, p < 0.05); older patients with perforated diverticulitis were three times more likely than younger patients to have generalized peritonitis than localized (pericolic or pelvic) peritonitis (odds ratio 2.9, 95% confidence interval 1.2 to 7.5, p < 0.05).
Conclusion: These findings are consistent with the hypothesis that the biologic features of peritonitis differ in the elderly, who are more likely to present with an advanced or severe process than young patients.

[Table of Contents]

Résumé

Objectif : Évaluer l'influence de l'âge sur l'évolution et la gravité de la péritonite.
Conception : Examen de dossiers.
Contexte : Hôpital universitaire pour adultes.
Patients : Cent vingt-deux patients présentant une appendicite aiguë et 100 patients présentant une diverticulite colique aiguë nécessitant une opération ou un drainage percutané.
Principales mesures de résultats : Âge et sexe du patient, présence de perforation ou de gangrène (appendicite), étendue de la péritonite (diverticulite); durée des symptômes avant l'admission; leucocytose à l'admission; durée de l'hospitalisation avant la chirurgie; durée du séjour à l'hôpital; taux de décès.
Résultats : Les patients de 65 ans ou plus qui présentaient une appendicite aiguë couraient trois fois plus de risques de développer un appendice gangreneux ou perforé que les jeunes patients (taux de probabilité 3,1, intervalle de confiance à 95 %, de 1,1 à 8,4, p < 0,05); les patients âgés présentant une diverticulite perforée couraient trois fois plus de risques que les jeunes patients de développer une péritonite généralisée qu'une péritonite localisée (péricolique ou pelvique) (taux de probabilité de 2,9 %, intervalle de confiance à 95 %, de 1,2 à 7,5, p < 0,05).
Conclusion : Ces conclusions confirment l'hypothèse que les caractéristiques biologiques de la péritonite sont différentes chez les personnes âgées, qui courent plus de risques de développer un état plus avancé ou plus grave que de jeunes patients.

[Table of Contents]

Introduction

The death rate accompanying all forms of surgical illness, including intra-abdominal infections, increases consistently with advancing age.[1-3] In part this is due to an increased prevalence of chronic illnesses in the elderly and a predictable decline in the ability to maintain physiologic homeostasis. Additionally, age-related changes in the host responses to surgical illness have been described[1] and other observations have been made, suggesting that the clinical manifestations of peritonitis, both local and systemic, may be altered in the elderly.[4,5] To evaluate potential age effects on the evolution and severity of peritonitis, we reviewed two series of patients of varying ages admitted to an adult university hospital with appendicitis or perforated diverticulitis.

[Table of Contents]

Patients and methods

The charts of 100 patients with pathologically proven acute appendicitis were selected by random number table from those of 695 patients with a primary diagnosis of appendicitis during a recent 5-year period. Only 4 of the 100 patients were aged 65 years or older. Therefore we added for review the charts of all other patients aged 65 years or older with the same diagnosis, admitted during the same 5-year period (22 patients). Patient age, sex, duration of symptoms before admission, duration of hospitalization before surgery, leukocyte count on admission to the emergency department, the presence of a gangrenous or perforated appendix according to pathological examination, length of hospital stay and death rate were obtained from the 122 charts.

We also reviewed the charts, covering a recent 12-year period, of 100 consecutive patients with a primary diagnosis of perforated colonic diverticulitis who required nonelective surgical intervention (98 patients) or percutaneous drainage of an abscess (2 patients). The extent of peritonitis was classified as either pericolic or confined to the pelvis or as generalized (purulent or fecal), according to findings at laparotomy (or from imaging studies in the two patients with well-defined abscesses).[6] Other data similar to that in patients with appendicitis were recorded. Data are expressed as means (and standard deviations) and were analysed by independent t-testing, c2 test with Yates' correction and multiple linear regression (SystatFPU 5.2.1, Systat Inc, Evanston, Ill.).

[Table of Contents]

Results

Appendicitis

The patients with appendicitis ranged in age from 14 to 93 years (Fig. 1). Patients aged 65 years or older presented with a longer history and were much more likely to have a gangrenous or perforated appendix than were younger patients (odds ratio 3.1, 95% confidence interval 1.1 to 8.4, p < 0.05) (Table I). The duration of symptoms before admission was longer in patients with a gangrenous or perforated appendix than in those without (48 [29] versus 19 [14] hours, p < 0.001), accounting for the greater likelihood of perforation or gangrene among older patients. The admission leukocyte count and duration of hospitalization before operation were similar in both age groups and were unrelated to a finding of gangrene or perforation. Length of hospital stay increased as functions of both patient age and the presence of a gangrenous or perforated appendix (r2 = 0.30, all p < 0.001). There were no deaths.

Diverticulitis

The patients with perforated diverticulitis ranged in age from 27 to 98 years (Fig. 1). Patients aged 65 years or older were much more likely to have generalized than localized peritonitis (odds ratio 2.9, 95% confidence interval 1.2 to 7.5, p < 0.05) (Table II). The duration of symptoms before admission was shorter in patients with generalized than with localized peritonitis (3 [4] days versus 6 [7] days, p <  0.05), although there was considerable overlap and no relationship to patient age. Similarly, there was substantial variability in the admission leukocyte count and no relationship to age. The duration of hospitalization before operation was considerably longer in patients with localized than with generalized peritonitis (130 [156] and 27 [43] hours, respectively, p <  0.001), but again age was not a determinant. Surgical procedures were similar in the two age groups, sigmoid resection with end colostomy (Hartmann procedure) being the most common. Laparotomy was carried out in all but two patients, both younger than 65 years, who were managed by percutaneous abscess drainage. Older age and generalized peritonitis were weakly related to hospital stay in surviving patients (r2 = 0.18, all p £ 0.05). Eleven of 100 patients died in hospital; 3 were younger than 65 years of age (6% [3 of 53]) and 8 were older (17% [8 of 47]). The difference in death rate between age groups approached but did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.07).

[Table of Contents]

Discussion

Death and other outcomes of acute surgical illness are uniformly worse in the elderly than in younger patients, and the adverse impact of age on outcome from abdominal sepsis in particular is well recognized.[2,3] The higher death rate among the elderly undoubtedly reflects an increased prevalence of pre-existing cardiovascular and other diseases as well as a predictable decline in many physiologic functions. Anecdotal evidence suggests that the clinical manifestations of the acute abdomen may be considerably different in the elderly from those of middle-aged and younger people.[1,7] To address the possibility that the evolution and local severity of peritonitis are influenced by aging, we chose to review the charts of patients with acute appendicitis and perforated diverticulitis, since they are common acute surgical conditions, occur in individuals of widely varying ages and are amenable to grading in terms of their anatomic or pathological severity. In both appendicitis and diverticulitis, older patients were much more likely to have advanced or severe disease than younger patients.

Other reports[8,9] have indicated that appendicitis tends to be more advanced in older patients. The reasons for this may be several. Anatomic changes in the appendix with aging include vascular sclerosis and diminished blood supply, narrowing of the lumen, fibrosis of the muscularis and fatty infiltration.[10] Thus, the progression from simple obstruction of the appendiceal lumen to gangrene and perforation may occur more rapidly and with only small increases in intraluminal pressure.[11] However, the present data indicate that the period between the onset of symptoms and operation is prolonged in older patients and not that the rate of evolution of appendicitis is altered. A delay in the presentation of elderly patients to hospital has also been observed by others and may result from difficulties in leaving home, fear of hospitalization, alterations in usual symptoms and diminished perception of them, or diminished ability to express them effectively.[12-16] Absence of the expected localization of pain to the right lower quadrant was noted in almost one-half of older patients with appendicitis in one series,[14] and variability in the manifestations of appendicitis in the elderly is well described.[14,16] The perception of pain after abdominal surgery is known to be diminished in the elderly.[17] In this retrospective review we could not determine reliably whether a decreased severity of symptoms or other factors contributed to the delayed presentation of older patients with appendicitis.

We observed that older patients with perforated diverticulitis requiring operation were much more likely to have generalized peritonitis than were younger patients. This finding is consistent with the hypothesis that the elderly are predisposed to more severe peritonitis. An alternative explanation is that older patients with localized peritonitis were more responsive to nonoperative treatment and that those who underwent surgery (and thus were identified for review) were thereby selected to have advanced disease. Unfortunately the number of patients with diverticulitis who do not require intervention is not reliably known since investigations such as water-soluble contrast enemas and computed tomography were used infrequently, and the data are hospital- rather than population-based. Biased selection of patients may also have arisen from the admission or transfer of the oldest and most ill patients to this tertiary hospital. The period of hospitalization before operation was significantly related to the extent of peritonitis and was not a function of age among the patients reviewed, as might have been expected if responses to nonoperative treatment differed in the elderly. We chose to study only patients in whom the diagnosis was proven, for simplicity and to avoid additional difficulties in interpretation.

A predisposition of older patients to free perforation rather than a contained abscess or phlegmon was noted in another study[18] of patients hospitalized with symptomatic diverticular disease. Interestingly, a higher proportion of young (under age 40 years) than older patients underwent surgical intervention, which, together with the suggestion that many young patients require surgery at the time of their first episode of diverticulitis, was interpreted as indicating that diverticulitis is more severe in the young patient. In contrast, in a recent prospective study,[19] more patients older than 50 years required emergency laparotomy (apparently on the basis of generalized peritonitis) or surgical treatment during their first hospitalization than did younger patients. Grading with computed tomography or water-soluble contrast enema, or both, suggested that diverticulitis was more severe in young patients, but the patients investigated in this way were a subset of the larger group and presumably tended to exclude those who had generalized peritonitis (i.e., the most severe disease).

The finding of more advanced disease in patients with diverticulitis in this study was associated with a shorter period of symptoms before admission to hospital, suggesting that the severity of the process is determined early on, and primarily by factors other than the passage of time (as in appendicitis). Whether peritoneal mechanisms for containing the initial inflammatory process and perforation are more frequently ineffective in older patients or whether perforation and widespread soiling occur more rapidly, without opportunity for confinement, are speculative. Observations that the localization of pain and peritoneal signs to the right lower quadrant may be delayed or absent in elderly patients with appendicitis tend to support the concept that peritoneal responses are altered in the elderly.[11,14] Moreover, the absence of typical mani- festations of peritonitis in the elderly, specifically abdominal pain and signs of peritoneal irritation, has been associated with a poor outcome.[5]

In summary, we observed that the likelihood of an advanced or severe process was substantially increased in older patients with appendicitis and diverticulitis, consistent with the hypothesis that the biologic features of peritonitis differ in the elderly. Impaired local peritoneal responses could, for example, result in less localized, severe abdominal pain and a delay in the presentation of older patients with appendicitis or a failure to contain contamination after perforation of a colonic diverticulum, leading to the development of generalized peritonitis. If these retrospective clinical observations reflect a generalizable, age-related change in the biologic features of peritonitis, then an understanding of the basis for such a change may allow improvements in the care of elderly surgical patients with abdominal infections.

[Table of Contents]

References

  1. Watters JM, McClaran JC: The elderly surgical patient. In Wilmore DW, Brennan MF, Harken AH et al (eds): Scientific American Surgery, Scientific American, New York, 1990: sec VII, ch 13: 1-94
  2. Meakins JL, Solomkin JS, Allo MD et al: A proposed classification of intra-abdominal infections. Arch Surg 1984; 119: 1372-1378
  3. McLauchlan GJ, Anderson ID, Grant IS et al: Outcome of patients with abdominal sepsis treated in an intensive care unit. Br J Surg 1995; 82: 524-529
  4. Cooper GS, Shlaes DM, Salata RA: Intraabdominal infection: differences in presentation and outcome between younger patients and the elderly. Clin Infect Dis 1994; 19: 146-148
  5. Wroblewski M, Mikulowski P: Peritonitis in geriatric inpatients. Age Ageing 1991; 20: 90-94
  6. Hinchey EJ, Schaal PGH, Richards GK: Treatment of perforated diverticular disease of the colon. Adv Surg 1978; 12: 85-109
  7. Samiy AH: Clinical manifestations of disease in the elderly. Med Clin North Am 1983; 67: 333-344
  8. Lau WY, Fan ST, Yiu TF et al: Acute appendicitis in the elderly. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1985; 161: 157-160
  9. Norman DC, Yoshikawa TT: Acute appendicitis in the elderly. In Meakins JL, McClaran JC (eds): Surgical Care of the Elderly, Year Book Medical Publishers, Chicago, 1988: 386-391
  10. Thorbjarnarson B, Loehn WJ: Acute appendicitis in patients over the age of sixty. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1967; 125: 1277-1280
  11. Burns RP, Cochran JL, Russell WL et al: Appendicitis in mature patients. Ann Surg 1985; 201: 695-702
  12. Wolff WI, Hindman R: Acute appendicitis in the aged. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1952; 94: 239-247
  13. Reeves MM, Meredith D, Lewis FJ: Appendicitis in the older patient. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1958; 106: 610-612
  14. Albano WA, Zielinski CM, Organ CH: Is appendicitis in the aged really different? Geriatrics 1975; 30: 81-88
  15. Frymark WB, Jonasson O: Acute appendicitis in the elderly. Illinois Med J 1986; 169: 159-161
  16. Horattas MC, Guyton DP, Wu D: A reappraisal of appendicitis in the elderly. Am J Surg 1990; 160: 291-293
  17. Watters JM, Clancey SM, Moulton SB et al: Impaired recovery of strength in older patients after major abdominal surgery. Ann Surg 1993; 218: 380-393
  18. Freischlag J, Bennion RS, Thompson JE Jr: Complications of diverticular disease of the colon in young people. Dis Colon Rectum 1986; 29: 639-643
  19. Ambrosetti P, Robert JH, Witzig J-A et al: Acute left colonic diverticulitis in young patients. J Am Coll Surg 1994; 179: 156-160

CJS: Apr. 1996 / JCC : avr. 1996Surgery and orthopedics /  Chirurgie et orthopédie |

CMA webspinners / >