Renal autotransplantation

Canadian Journal of Surgery 1996; 39: 253-254

[Correspondence]

In response to Taguchi's editorial (Can J Surg 1996; 39: 93 [full text]), concerning the paper on renal autotransplantation (Can J Surg 1996; 39: 121-125 [abstract / résumé]), his scepticism is understandable and mirrors my own when first asked to consider autotransplantation for loin pain-hematuria syndrome. Experience with renal autotransplantation is limited; up to 1993, only 40 patients had reportedly been treated with this procedure for intractable pain. Pain is, of course, a subjective complaint, but the patients considered for surgery had failed other options and were disabled by their pain.

Until I was presented with my first case in 1990, I, too, had never knowingly seen a case of loin pain-hematuria syndrome nor had such a case been discussed at university rounds. However, loin pain-hematuria syndrome obviously exists, although it represents only a very small fraction in individuals presenting with flank pain. Autotransplantation is used as a last resort and only after symptoms have been present for some years. Approximately 30% of patients in one series[1] had spontaneous resolution of their symptoms over a mean period of 3.5 years. Whereas relief of pain is thought to be the result of denervation, in-situ denervation by pedicle stripping does not appear to be of benefit. Would orthotopic autotransplantation help? Perhaps, but there may be benefit in moving the kidney to a new location, partly from a psychological perspective and possibly from the effect of reinnervation. As Taguchi pointed out, the decision to perform this procedure is made as a last resort, the alternative for these patients being nephrectomy.

Ernest W. Ramsey, MD, FRCSC
Department of Surgery (Urology)
University of Manitoba
Winnipeg, Man.


Reference

  1. Aber GM, Higgins PM: The natural history and management of the loin pain/haematuria syndrome. Br J Urol 1982; 54: 613-615

CJS: June 1996  |

CMA webspinners