CMAJ Readers' Forum

Standards for polysomnography

Online posting: February 27, 1997
Published in print: June 15, 1997 (CMAJ 1997;156:1698)
Re: Polysomnography: addressing the needs for standards, by Drs. William A. Whitelaw and W. Ward Flemons, CMAJ 1996;155:1693-4 [full text / résumé]
In their editorial, Drs. William A. Whitelaw and W. Ward Flemons support the standards for polysomnography of the Canadian Sleep Society and the Canadian Thoracic Society (CSS/CTS). As they indicate, the field of sleep disorders medicine cannot achieve widespread recognition or credibility without appropriate standards. However, some of their statements require clarification.

Whitelaw and Flemons point out that there is no funding for sleep studies or nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in Alberta. In Ontario, although funding for diagnosis and therapy is readily available, it is neither comprehensive nor open ended. The stated cost of approximately $1000 per patient is just about double what is paid for full, overnight polysomnography with physician supervision and reporting (including both technical and professional fees and allowing for government clawbacks). Moreover, the Assistive Devices Program of the Ontario Ministry of Health provides 75% of the cost of CPAP (up to a maximum) one time only. Continuing costs are not covered. Compared with the coverage in Alberta, this may seem "comprehensive and open ended." And indeed, such a fee schedule has invited abuse, which is all the more reason to establish standards.

The CSS/CTS standards have already been used as a template for provincial standards in Alberta and Ontario. In 1994, the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario (CPSO) established a task force to develop clinical practice parameters and facility standards for sleep medicine. This document has recently been completed. Under the direction of Dr. Gerry Gold of CPSO, and task force cochairs Drs. Harvey Moldofsky and Murray Moffat, this work extends the facility and test standards of the CSS/CTS standards by including details on indications for sleep studies, type of sleep studies, follow-up, post-sleep-study interventions and medicolegal issues. (The document is available through Ms. Corinne Berinstein, CPSO, tel. 416 967-2600.)

Sleep apnea is an extremely common sleep disorder that causes significant rate of injury and death. Patients with sleep apnea may consume more health care resources before diagnosis and treatment than after.[1] Whitelaw and Flemons are correct in stating that we need research on better and cheaper methods of diagnosis and treatment. We must not, however, lose sight of the fact that sleep apnea is but one of more than 75 sleep disorders, each with its own associated problems. These cannot be addressed without adequate training and appropriate application of the diagnostic tools available.

Charles F.P. George, MD
Chair
Standards Committee
Canadian Sleep Society
Associate Professor of Medicine
University of Western Ontario
London, Ont.
cgeorge@julian.uwo.ca

Reference

  1. Kryger MH, Roos L, Delaive K, Walld R, Horrocks J. Utilization of health care services in patients with severe obstructive sleep apnea. Sleep 1996;19(9):S111-6.

CMAJ CMAJ email    GO TO CMAJ Readers' Forum    GO TO CMAJ home page