CMAJ Readers' Forum

Of fads and editorials

Online posting: Oct. 14, 1997
Published in print: November 15, 1997 (CMAJ 1997;157:1353)
Re: The times they are confusing: what lies ahead for the new health minister and physicians in Canada?, John Hoey and Kenneth M. Flegel, CMAJ 1997;157(1):39-41 [full text / résumé]

See response from: J. Hoey, K. Flegel


I find it regrettable that Drs. Hoey and Flegel use the term "fad" to describe the proposal to make prescription drug coverage universal.

This proposal has been given careful consideration by politicians in at least 2 of the major parties, as well as by the National Forum on Health.

The lack of universal drug coverage in Canada is incongruous: legislation assures free universal coverage of physicians' services but fails to guarantee the treatment prescribed. Prescription drugs are included in the universal health coverage of other industrialized countries ù which, incidentally, have lower overall costs for health care as a percentage of GDP.

The writers might let us know what else they and the CMA (if they are speaking for that organization) consider "fads." Votes for women and ending child labour, perhaps?

Bob Frankford, MB, BS
Toronto, Ont.
hbrf@inforamp.net


CMAJ CMAJ email    GO TO CMAJ Readers' Forum    GO TO CMAJ home page