CMAJ/JAMC Letters
Correspondance

 

Thrombolytic therapy: time to treatment

CMAJ 1997;157:251
In response to: K. Markel
Dr. Markel highlights some of the advances that have been made in emergency departments across Canada to achieve more rapid administration of thrombolytic drugs to patients with an AMI.

Our article addressed the issue of treatment times within the context of the GUSTO-I study. We did not state that door-to-needle times remained uniformly and unacceptably long "now," nor did we "discredit" the advances achieved by some Canadian emergency medicine practitioners. On the contrary, we specifically stated, "Since GUSTO-I was completed, many hospitals in Canada have embarked on quality improvement programs that include attention to prompt use of thrombolytic therapy."

We would like to share Markel's belief that further progress on this front is neither possible nor necessary, and we could add to his list of positive examples. But the hospitals that are measuring, improving and reporting their door-to-needle times are unlikely to be those where delays are occurring. We accordingly urge continuing surveillance by all centres to ensure that this area of practice is optimized.

We agree with Markel that it is important to administer these drugs in the emergency department, and that waiting for an internist or cardiologist to review the case contributes to delays. However, the data show that median door-to-needle times in GUSTO-I were longer than ideal for all participating countries. We have no evidence that administration of thrombolytic agents from 1990 to 1993 was any more "under the guidance and control" of specialists in Canada than in other participating countries.

Our study reaffirmed the troubling findings of others that subgroups of patients, including elderly patients, tend to be relatively more affected. It remains incumbent on all of us who manage patients with AMI to ensure that any improvements in the process of care are applied to all eligible patients.

Jafna L. Cox, MD
Assistant Professor of Medicine
Dalhousie University
Halifax, NS
C. David Naylor, MD, DPhil
Professor of Medicine
University of Toronto
Chief Executive Officer
Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences in Ontario
Toronto, Ont.
Paul W. Armstrong, MD
Chair
Department of Medicine
University of Alberta
Edmonton, Alta.

Comments Send a letter to the editor responding to this letter
Envoyez une lettre à la rédaction au sujet de cette lettre

| CMAJ August 1, 1997 (vol 157, no 3) / JAMC le 1er août 1997 (vol 157, no 3) |