GO TO CMA Home
GO TO Inside CMA
GO TO Advocacy and Communications
GO TO Member Services
GO TO Publications
GO TO Professional Development
GO TO Clinical Resources

GO TO What's New
GO TO Contact CMA
GO TO Web Site Search
GO TO Web Site Map


CMAJ
CMAJ - May 4, 1999JAMC - le 4 mai 1999

Tuberculosis: 4. Pulmonary disease

Richard Long, MD; Robert Cowie, MD

CMAJ 1999;160:1344-8


Dr. Long is with the Division of Pulmonary Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta., and Dr. Cowie is with the Division of Pulmonary Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.

This article has been peer reviewed.

Series editor: Dr. Anne Fanning, Medical Officer Training, Communicable Disease Prevention and Control, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland

Reprint requests to: Dr. Richard Long, University of Alberta Hospitals, Room 2E4.21, Walter Mackenzie Centre, 8440 B 112 St., Edmonton AB T6G 2B7; fax 780 407-6384; richard.long@health.gov.ab.ca

© 1999 Canadian Medical Association


Contents
Case 1
A 22-year-old aboriginal woman presented with a 12-week history of fever, night sweats, weight loss and productive cough.1 She had no history of lung disease or any condition known to compromise immune function. Plain chest radiography revealed consolidation and moderate volume loss in the left upper lobe of the lung, with at least 2 cavities at the apex, the largest measuring 4­5 cm in diameter (Fig. 1A). This imaging also showed non-cavitary disease in the left lower lobe.

Case 2
An 86-year-old immigrant to Canada from Eastern Europe presented to her family physician with a 3-month history of decreased appetite, weight loss and a mildly productive cough. She was afebrile. There was dullness to percussion and breath sounds were decreased in the right lower lung posteriorly. A chest radiograph revealed bilateral effusions, the right larger than the left, and collapse or consolidation of the right lower lobe (Fig. 1B).

In Canada in 1995, 60% of all cases of tuberculosis (TB) were pulmonary.2 From a public health standpoint the lungs are the most important organ involved with TB.3 Patients with pulmonary TB who have a large number of bacilli in their sputum (i.e., those whose smears are positive for acid-fast bacilli) can spread the organism to the lungs of others by coughing, sneezing, laughing or even talking.4,5 Mycobacterium tuberculosis depends upon human hosts for its survival, and this process of transmission ensures the perpetuation of the organism and the disease. Patients whose sputum smears are negative for acid-fast bacilli and those with TB in organs other than the lung are not likely to infect others.4,5

During the initial infection of immunocompetent people, alveolar macrophages ingest the M. tuberculosis organisms, and process and present mycobacterial antigens to lymphocytes bearing CD4 receptors (T-helper cells).6 CD4 cells secrete lymphokines, in particular interferon-gamma, which enhance the capacity of the macrophages to ingest and kill the mycobacteria. In most people, the infection is contained, and TB does not develop, although small numbers of dormant bacilli may remain in the body. Clinically apparent TB develops in approximately 10% of infected people, either soon after primary infection or years later.6

Until the 1990s the incidence of pulmonary TB was declining in Canada, although the proportion of all pulmonary cases that were infectious (i.e., direct smear positive) remained relatively constant (Fig. 2). As the incidence fell, so did the likelihood that pulmonary TB would be considered in the differential diagnosis.7­10 The closure of sanatoria and the transfer of TB case management from a small group of specialists to mainstream medicine7­10 may have further reduced the likelihood of pulmonary TB being considered as a diagnosis.

A timely diagnosis of pulmonary TB is essential. When the diagnosis is delayed or not made at all, morbidity and mortality rates increase, as does the likelihood that the organism will be transmitted.11 Pulmonary TB is eminently treatable, and the diagnosis must be aggressively pursued in populations at risk.

[Contents]


Characteristics of pulmonary TB

Clinical characteristics

Cases of pulmonary TB are usually found in groups that are at high risk of carrying the tubercle bacillus in a dormant form, notably aboriginal people, foreign-born people from countries with a high prevalence of TB, poor and homeless people from the inner city, and elderly people. Cases may also be found among the close contacts of people known to have TB and those with a history of TB. TB should be considered in patients in these high-risk groups. Members of these groups are at further risk of active disease if, in addition, they have an underlying illness or other factor known to compromise cell-mediated immunity, such as HIV infection, diabetes, alcoholism, end-stage renal disease or use of immunosuppressive drugs. The discussion that follows is limited to HIV-seronegative adults.

Pulmonary TB is characterized by its insidious onset and its chronic nature; as in cases 1 and 2, symptoms are often present for weeks or months before the patient seeks medical attention. In contrast to acute bacterial pneumonia, constitutional symptoms of fatigue, anorexia, night sweats and weight loss are common. Weight loss is in fact the second most common symptom, after cough (Table 1).12 In about 30% of patients, pulmonary symptoms are absent, and constitutional symptoms represent the only clue that the patient is ill. Pulmonary symptoms may be even less common in elderly people,13 and the symptoms may be ascribed to pre-existing, non-mycobacterial illness.

Dyspnea is less common than more acute pulmonary conditions such as bacterial pneumonia.14 When present, dyspnea suggests advanced fibrocavitary or miliary disease or TB complicated by pneumothorax. Cough may be nonproductive at first, but it eventually becomes productive in most patients. Hemoptysis occurs in about 20% of patients, and its presence should alert the clinician to the possibility of TB. Chest pain is common and may not always be pleuritic in character. Fever is present in slightly fewer than half of patients at presentation, and its absence does not rule out the diagnosis of TB.

Physical examination is of limited value, although evidence of chronic disease, such as cachexia, absence of significant dyspnea and the patient's "nontoxic" appearance (the patient does not appear acutely ill or in distress) may be helpful. Pulmonary signs are nonspecific. If parenchymal disease is present, there may be crackles, dullness to percussion, decreased breath sounds or bronchial breathing. Dullness, decreased breath sounds and a friction rub may be found with pleural effusion. Often the results of a pulmonary examination are normal.

Most patients in whom pulmonary TB is diagnosed after death are mistakenly thought to have had pneumonia or cancer at the time of death.11

Radiology

The chest radiograph may be particularly helpful in diagnosing pulmonary TB because in a significant proportion of patients symptoms and signs are either nonspecific or absent. The classic description of the chest radiograph of adults with TB is that of "postprimary" TB, with nodular or alveolar infiltrates in the upper lung zones (the apical and posterior segments of the upper lobes and the superior segment of the lower lobes) and evidence of cavitation, as in case 1. This is still a common mode of presentation and, if present, should prompt the physician to consider the diagnosis.15 Surprisingly, several studies have shown that up to one-third of patients with these classic chest radiographic findings are not initially suspected of having TB.8,12

It is important to note that with the decreased incidence of TB in Canada, it is common for people born in Canada to reach adulthood before they encounter the tubercle bacillus, if they ever do. These people may present not with classic "postprimary" TB but instead with features of the "primary" disease, which reflects the fact that they have only recently become infected with the tubercle bacillus.16 Therefore in 30% to 50% of cases, the chest radiograph may show patterns previously thought to be rare in adults and more common in children.

The following are descriptions of these atypical but not uncommon patterns.

Lower and mid-lung zone infiltrates can occur in isolation or in association with intrathoracic adenopathy or, as in case 2, pleural effusion. Physicians should suspect TB when the patient's condition has not improved with antibiotic therapy directed at bacterial pneumonia, and the findings on chest radiography remain unchanged.

Pleural effusion is usually unilateral and of moderate size. As in case 2 the fluid is almost always an exudate with a high percentage of lymphocytes in the cell count. In addition to raising the possibility of malignancy, a lymphocytic exudative effusion should always suggest TB.

Miliary TB represents hematogenous dissemination of the tubercle bacillus. When the bacilli spread to the lungs, the chest radiograph shows discrete nodules 1­5 mm in diameter scattered throughout the lungs.17

Hilar and mediastinal adenopathy is usually unilateral but may be bilateral in 10% of cases. Often there is an adjacent parenchymal infiltrate.

Tuberculoma appears as a solitary coin lesion on the chest radiograph and is often suspected to represent malignancy. Clues that this finding represents TB include evidence of calcification, adjacent smaller "satellite" lesions and a well-defined border. Lesion diameter generally ranges from 0.5 to 4 cm. This type of lesion may represent either active disease or previous TB that has healed; clinical correlation with the patient's history is required. Lesions greater than 3 cm in diameter are more likely to be active.

Normal results on chest radiography are rare but can occur with endobronchial or laryngeal disease.

In addition to the features suggesting active disease, the chest radiograph also provides valuable clues about past infection. These may include calcified hilar and mediastinal nodes, a calcified focus in the lung parenchyma, pleural thickening and calcification (especially if apical) and scarring in the upper lung zone. If any of these findings are present in association with a new pulmonary process, active TB should be suspected, given that one of the risk factors for active TB is previous disease.

TB cannot be diagnosed with certainty from the chest radiograph alone; a CT scan of the thorax may help.18 It is true that an open cavity or an enlarging alveolar infiltrate suggests that the disease is active, and it is also true that cavities tend to be associated with a high sputum load of acid-fast bacilli and a high degree of infectivity. However, when the physician ordering the chest radiograph receives a report of "old healed TB" from the radiologist, this interpretation must be accepted with caution — active disease cannot be absolutely excluded on the basis of the chest radiograph alone. If any suspicion exists, active TB must be ruled out by bacteriologic means.

Laboratory

Ease of performance, widespread availability, low cost and a considerable diagnostic yield make examination of sputum by microscopy an essential component of any diagnostic evaluation of pulmonary TB. Most studies report a sensitivity of 40% to 60% and a specificity of 99%, with some of the variability explained by different presentations.19 For example, positive smear results have been reported in 52% of patients with cavitary disease but in only 32% of those with local infiltrates.20 In Canada in 1995, 46% of pulmonary cases were smear positive (Table 2). Canadian-born patients were significantly more likely to have positive smear results than foreign-born people. Most smear-positive cases occurred in adults. The importance of ordering sputum cultures as well as smears is underscored by the fact that 30% to 40% of all cases in 1995 were smear negative but culture positive. A recent review found that the sensitivity and specificity of sputum cultures were 82% and 98% respectively.19

Specimens of sputum should be collected first thing in the morning on each of 3 consecutive days (for both smear examination and culture, 95% of the positive results are obtained by examining 3 samples).19 A separate sterile container with a wide mouth and a screw cap should be used for each specimen. Specimens should be transported to the laboratory as soon as possible after collection. If for any reason transport is delayed, the specimens should be refrigerated at 4°C to reduce overgrowth of contaminants.

In any laboratory that performs a substantial number of mycobacterial sputum cultures, an enhanced, broth-based culture detection and identification system should be in place. The most widely used of these is the BACTEC 460TB system (Becton-Dickinson Diagnostic Instruments Systems, Maryland).21 This system employs a metabolic substrate, palmitic acid, labelled with carbon-14, which in the presence of viable mycobacteria is metabolized to 14CO2. The amount of radioactive CO2 released in the culture vial can be quantified and used to detect mycobacterial growth well before conventional cultures would show positive results. Distinguishing M. tuberculosis from other mycobacterial species is accomplished presumptively by selective growth in the presence of para-nitro-alpha-acetylamino- ß-hydroxypropiophenane (the NAP test). Definitive rapid identification of mycobacteria is possible with species-specific probes (e.g., AccuPROBE, Gen-Probe Inc., San Diego). Using systems such as BACTEC, the time to identification of a positive culture can be shortened to as little as 2 weeks. By combining systems such as BACTEC with specific probes for nucleic acids, a substantial proportion of cultures can be identified more quickly.

For patients in whom the clinical and radiographic findings suggest a diagnosis of pulmonary TB and the sputum smear is positive for acid-fast bacilli, a working diagnosis can be made and antituberculous drug therapy commenced. The drug therapy should include 4 drugs (isoniazid, rifampin, pyrazinamide and either ethambutol or streptomycin) to allow for the possibility of drug resistance (more likely in people from countries with a high prevalence of TB,22,23 those with a history of antituberculous drug use and those with known exposure to a drug-resistant case). Ideally, sputum-smear-positive patients should be isolated for 2 weeks in a room with adequate ventilation to prevent nosocomial spread of infection.

For patients in whom TB is suspected but whose smear results are negative, one alternative is to begin therapy and wait for culture results. A recent investigation of presumptive therapy of patients with negative smear results indicated that about half of such patients actually had active TB.24 Although physicians with substantial clinical background in TB may recommend presumptive treatment for many patients, establishing a definitive diagnosis as early as possible is generally preferred.

Induction of sputum, bronchoscopy, gastric aspiration and needle aspiration are available to aid in rapid diagnosis in the smear-negative patient. Techniques of molecular biology such as polymerase chain reaction offer promise, but their exact clinical role has not yet been determined.21 Sputum induction is performed with hypertonic saline delivered by an ultrasonic nebulizer. The patient is seated in a cubicle or small room with adequate ventilation to prevent nosocomial spread of infection. In a recent study, sputum induction was found to be well tolerated and inexpensive, and its diagnostic yield was the same as, if not better than, that of bronchoscopy.25 When sputum induction is not possible, bronchoscopy may be performed. If the latter procedure includes transbronchial biopsy, there is the opportunity for an immediate tissue diagnosis. Again, precautions to prevention nosocomial spread of infection are necessary. In uncooperative patients, who are not candidates for sputum induction or bronchoscopy, early morning gastric aspiration is an alternative.26 Mass lesions or nodules may be sampled by needle aspiration. Physicians who are uncertain as to how to proceed should consult a respirologist or infectious disease specialist.

The tuberculin test may be helpful in confirming that a patient is at risk, particularly when pulmonary TB is suspected but the results of a sputum smear are negative. However, the results of a tuberculin test must always be interpreted with caution. In many patients with active TB, including immunosuppressed and elderly people, false-negative results are common because of impaired cell-mediated immunity and anergy. Other patients may have a positive tuberculin test result but not active TB. They may simply be harbouring dormant tubercle bacilli and, depending on age and other factors, may be candidates for prophylaxis.

Routine laboratory tests are rarely helpful in establishing or suggesting the diagnosis. Mild normochromic normocytic anemia may be present. The leucocyte count is often normal, and counts over 20 000/µL suggest another infectious process, although a leukemoid reaction may occasionally occur in miliary TB. A "left shift" in the leucocyte count or an elevated sedimentation rate may occur, but these findings are nonspecific. Physiologic data, such as those in case 1, support the concept that pulmonary TB causes parallel reductions of ventilation and perfusion.1,18 The resulting preservation of gas exchange may actually extend the life of the patient within the community, thereby allowing dissemination of the organism and survival of the species.18

[Contents]


Conclusion

The lung is the organ most commonly affected by the tubercle bacillus. Identification of patients with active pulmonary disease is important to the health of both the affected individuals and the public at large. Early diagnosis and treatment will cure the patient and interrupt the spread and persistence of TB.

Case resolutions

Case 1

Examination of a sputum smear revealed large numbers of acid-fast bacilli. Cultures were positive for M. tuberculosis susceptible to all first-line antituberculous drugs. The patient was successfully treated with directly observed therapy. Contact follow-up identified 1 secondary case and 4 tuberculin converters.

Case 2

Sputum was collected for routine and acid-fast bacilli smear and culture. A diagnostic tap of the right pleural effusion was performed, and the patient was given a broad-spectrum antibiotic. Routine cultures of sputum and pleural fluid were negative for respiratory pathogens, as was acid-fast bacilli smear. The effusion was an exudate with 92% lymphocytes. Three weeks later, after no clinical or radiographic improvement, cultures of sputum were positive for M. tuberculosis resistant to isoniazid but susceptible to all other first-line antituberculous drugs. Although a closed pleural biopsy might have been helpful, the fact that the family physician considered the diagnosis of TB and submitted a sputum specimen as well as the specimen from a pleural tap was commendable, given the nonspecific radiograph abnormalities.

We acknowledge the participation of the provincial and territorial tuberculosis directors and their teams for their contribution to the Canadian Tuberculosis Reporting System. We also acknowledge the patient and superb assistance of Penny Nault, Tuberculosis Database Manager, Laboratory Centre for Disease Control, Health Canada, for preparing Fig. 2 and Table 2, Dr. Jure Manfreda for his presubmission review and Susan Falconer for preparing the manuscript.

Competing interests: None declared.

[Contents]

Comments Send a letter to the editor
Envoyez une lettre à la rédaction


References
  1. Long R, Maycher B. Check-valve pneumatocele following fully treated tuberculosis. Can Assoc Radiol J 1998;49:197-88.
  2. Laboratory Centre for Disease Control. Tuberculosis in Canada 1995 annual report. Ottawa: Health Canada; 1995.
  3. Styblo K. Epidemiology of tuberculosis. Bull Int Union Tuberc 1978;53:141-8.
  4. Rouillon A, Perdrizet S, Parrot R. Transmission of tubercle bacilli: the effects of chemotherapy. Tubercle 1976;57:275-99.
  5. Mitchison DA. Infectivity of patients with pulmonary tuberculosis during chemotherapy. Eur Respir J 1990;3:385-6.
  6. Nardell EA. Pathogenesis of tuberculosis. In: Reichman LB, Hershfield ES, editors. Tuberculosis: a comprehensive international approach. New York: Marcel Dekker; 1993. p. 103-22.
  7. Garay SM. Pulmonary tuberculosis. In: Rom WN, Garay SM, editors. Tuberculosis. New York: Little, Brown and Company; 1996. p. 373-412.
  8. Counsell SR, Tan JS, Dittus RS. Unsuspected pulmonary tuberculosis in a community teaching hospital. Arch Intern Med 1989;149:1274-8.
  9. MacGregor RR. A year's experience with tuberculosis in a private urban teaching hospital in the post sanitorium era. Am J Med 1975;58:221-8.
  10. Mathur P, Sacks L, Auten G, Sall R, Levy C, Gordin F. Delayed diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis in city hospitals. Arch Intern Med 1994;154:306-10.
  11. Enarson DA, Gryzbowski S, Dorken E. Failure of diagnosis as a factor in tuberculosis mortality. CMAJ 1978;118:1520-2.
  12. Barnes PF, Verdegem TD, Vachon LA, Leedom JM, Overturf GD. Chest roentgenogram in pulmonary tuberculosis. Chest 1988;94:316-20.
  13. Korzeniewska-Kosela M, Krysl J, Müller N, Black W, Allen E, FitzGerald JM. Tuberculosis in young adults and the elderly. Chest 1994;106:28-32.
  14. Penner CG, Roberts D, Kunimoto D, Manfreda J, Long R. Tuberculosis as a primary cause of respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1995;151:867-72.
  15. Krysl J, Korzeniewska-Kosela M, Müller N, FitzGerald JM. Radiologic features of pulmonary tuberculosis: an assessment of 188 cases. Can Assoc Radiol J 1994;45:101-7.
  16. Stead WW, Kerby GR, Schlueter DP, Jordahl CW. The clinical spectrum of primary tuberculosis in adults. Confusion with reinfection in the pathogenesis of chronic tuberculosis. Ann Intern Med 1968;68:731-44.
  17. Long R, O'Connor R, Palayew M, Hershfield E, Manfreda J. Disseminated tuberculosis with and without a miliary pattern on chest radiograph. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 1997;1:52-8.
  18. Long R, Maycher B, Dhar A, Manfreda J, Hershfield E, Anthonisen N. Pulmonary tuberculosis treated with directly observed therapy: serial changes in lung structure and function. Chest 1998;113:933-43.
  19. Levy H, Feldman C, Sacho H, Van Der Meulen H, Kallenbach J, Koornhof H. A re-evaluation of sputum microscopy and culture in the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis. Chest 1989;95:1193-7.
  20. Greenbaum M, Beyt BE, Murray PR. The accuracy of diagnosing pulmonary tuberculosis at a teaching hospital. Am Rev Respir Dis 1980;121:477-81.
  21. Schluger NW, Rom WN. Current approaches to the diagnosis of active pulmonary tuberculosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1994;149:264-7.
  22. Long R, Fanning A, Cowie R, Hoeppner V, FitzGerald M, the Western Canada Tuberculosis Group. Antituberculous drug resistance in western Canada (1993­94). Can Respir J 1997;4:71-5.
  23. Manns BJ, Fanning EA, Cowie RL. Antituberculous drug resistance in immigrants to Alberta, Canada, with tuberculosis, (1982­94). Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 1997;1:255-30.
  24. Gordin FM, Slutkin G, Schecter G, Goodman PC, Hopewell PC. Presumptive diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis based on radiographic findings. Am Rev Respir Dis 1989;139:1090-3.
  25. Anderson C, Inhaber N, Menzies D. Comparison of sputum induction with fibre-optic bronchoscopy in the diagnosis of tuberculosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1995;152:1570-4.
  26. Bahamman A, Choudhri S, Long R. The validity of acid-fast smears of gastric aspirates as an indicator of pulmonary tuberculosis. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 1999;3:62-7.

| Tuberculosis series / Clinical basics |
Série sur la tuberculose / Principes cliniques |