Hockey injuries of the spine in Canada, 1966–1996

Charles H. Tator, James D. Carson, Robert Cushman

CMAJ 2000;162:787-8

In 1981 the initial questionnaire was sent to all neurosurgeons, orthopedic surgeons, and physical medicine and rehabilitation specialists in Canada. The latest questionnaire, distributed to 1965 physicians in 1997, adds to the registry cases from 1994 through 1996. Sport medicine physicians were added to the most recent physician sample. Additional cases were obtained from a study of catastrophic recreational injury in Ontario and from player insurance reports at the Canadian Hockey Association.

For the purposes of this registry, our definition of a spinal injury includes any fracture or dislocation of the spine sustained by a person playing hockey, with or without injury to the spinal cord or nerve roots. In addition, cases of transient paralysis or transient sensory loss (or both) have been collected since March 1987.

In Canada, 243 spinal injuries were reported for the period 1966–1996 (Table 1). Only 12 (19%) of the 63 major spinal injuries occurred before 1982. The mean number of cases reported annually from 1981 to 1996 was 14, and the maximum number (18) was reported in both 1990 and 1992. The increase in injuries must be interpreted cautiously because of possible reporting bias. Six players are known to have died as a result of their injuries. Table 1 shows that the percentage of severe injuries declined over the two most recent 3-year periods. Burst fractures and fracture–dislocations were the most frequent injuries recorded. We had adequate documentation to assess the level of injury for 216 (89%) of the 243 cases: most (184 [85%]) of these were at the cervical level.

A push or check from behind accounted for 74 (40%) of the 184 cases of injury for which there was adequate documentation to determine the mechanism of injury. An impact with the boards accounted for 157 (77%) of the 204 cases of injury for which there was adequate documentation of the object impacted. Impact between players (32/204 or 16%) was also a frequent mechanism of injury, whereas impacts with the ice or a goal post were less frequent.

Organized games accounted for 166 injuries, whereas 10 occurred during practice and 4 occurred during shinny games; for the remainder the circumstances were unknown. In our case series, the median age was 17 (range 11 to 47) years, and only 6 of the injured players were females. Ontario accounted for 126 (52%) of the injuries, whereas only 22 (9%) came from Quebec, a value comparable to those of individual western provinces. In our view, it is unlikely that this regional variation is attributable to differences in reporting between provinces.

The possibility of incomplete reporting and the absence of a rate per 100 000 hockey players, 2 methodological problems in this study, impair our understanding of hockey injuries. We found that about 50% of spinal cord injuries occurred in the 16–20 year age group and that most occurred in games at the competitive level (data not shown). These problems speak of the need for a surveillance system for hockey injuries for all age groups and all levels of competition.

Competing interests: None declared.

Send a letter to the editor Envoyez une lettre à la rédaction

Reprint requests to: Dr. Charles H. Tator, Division of Neurosurgery, Toronto Western Hospital, 399 Bathurst St., MP 2-435, Toronto ON M5T 2S8

1. Carson JD, Reesor D. A survey of hockey injuries in an emergency department. Mod Med Can 1988;43(2):145-50.
2. Pashby TJ, Pashby RC, Chisholm LDJ, Crawford JS. Eye injuries in Canadian hockey. CMAJ 1975;113:663-6,674.
3. Watson RC, Singer CD, Sproule JR. Checking from behind in ice hockey: a study of injury and penalty data in the Ontario University Athletic Association Hockey League. Clin J Sport Med 1996;6(2):108-11. [MEDLINE]
4. Tator CH, Edmonds VE. National survey of spinal injuries in hockey players. CMAJ 1984;130:875-80.

© 2000 Canadian Medical Association or its licensors