![]() ![]() ![]()
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
Annual Financial Report 2001-2002: 2 Budgetary RevenuesReflecting much slower growth in 2001 and the tax reductions introduced in the October 2000 Economic Statement and Budget Update, budgetary revenues declined by $6.3 billion, or 3.5 per cent, to $173.3 billion in 2001-02 after advancing by 8.1 per cent in the previous year. Declines were spread throughout most major components, with the exception of personal income tax revenues and excise taxes and duties (see Table 2). Even in these latter two components, the rates of increase were substantially less than those recorded in the previous fiscal year. This primarily reflected the impact of the global economic weakness on the various tax bases and the effect of the tax reduction measures announced in the February 2000 budget and October 2000 Economic Statement and Budget Update. These measures included the reduction in personal income tax rates; the elimination of the 5-per-cent surtax; increases in thresholds; the restoration of full indexation of the personal income tax system; and increases in the Canada Child Tax Benefit. Personal income tax revenues, the largest component of budgetary revenues, were up only $0.5 billion, or 0.6 per cent, in 2001-02 due entirely to prior-year adjustments and the timing of receipts.
Corporate income tax revenues declined $4.2 billion in 2001-02, or 14.9 per cent, following an increase of 21.8 per cent in 2000-01. This decline primarily reflected an estimated 8.9-per-cent decline in corporate profits. In addition, the December 2001 budget announced a six-month deferral of small business corporate income tax instalments for the last quarter of 2001-02 to assist small businesses with the economic slowdown. It is estimated that this measure reduced corporate income tax revenues in 2001-02 by about $600 million. Table 2
Other income tax revenues were down $1.3 billion, or 29.6 per cent, primarily due to a consolidation adjustment relating to refundable taxes withheld from the federal Retirement Compensation Arrangements Account that were previously credited to tax revenues. EI premium revenues were down $0.8 billion, or 4.0 per cent, as prior-year adjustments and the decline in premium rates more than offset the impact of the growth in the number of people employed and therefore paying premiums. The employee premium rate (per $100 of insurable earnings) was reduced from $2.40 for 2000 to $2.25 for 2001 and $2.20 for 2002 (with a corresponding decline in the employer rate). Excise taxes and duties increased $0.5 billion, or 1.4 per cent. However, there were significant variations among the various components.
Non-tax revenues declined $1.1 billion, or 11.8 per cent, in 2001-02, primarily reflecting lower Bank of Canada profits and interest on bank balances due to the decline in interest rates. In addition, "refunds from previous years’ expenditures," which in previous years was included as part of "other non-tax revenues," is now netted against program spending. This has the effect of lowering both budgetary revenues and program spending by an equivalent amount, with no impact on the overall budgetary balance. The revenue ratio – budgetary revenues as a percentage of GDP – represents a comprehensive measure of the overall "tax burden" in that it compares the total of all revenues collected to the size of the economy. The revenue ratio stood at 15.9 per cent in 2001-02, compared to 16.9 per cent in 2000-01. It is now at its lowest level since 1993-94. The decline in the ratio between 2000-01 and 2001-02 reflects the impact of the tax reductions announced in the February 2000 budget and the October 2000 Economic Statement and Budget Update, as well as the impact of the global economic slowdown. It should be noted that some important components of income subject to taxation are excluded from the Statistics Canada measure of GDP, such as capital gains and income from trusteed pension plans. As a result, this ratio overstates the tax burden. In addition, the sharp rise in capital gains and the growth in income from trusteed pension plans due to the aging of the population distort year-to-year changes in the ratio. Therefore, caution should be exercised in interpreting this ratio. The figures in Table 2 are presented on a "net" basis, reflecting the way in which revenues and expenditures are presented to Parliament and in the Government’s annual budget. In this presentation, the Canada Child Tax Benefit, the quarterly GST credit and the repayments of Old Age Security benefits are netted against income tax revenues. Certain departmental revenues, such as the revenues of consolidated Crown corporations and revenues levied by departments for specific services (such as the contract costs of policing services in provinces), are netted against spending. This classification has the effect of reducing both revenues and spending but has no impact on the budgetary balance. Table 3 shows the impact of "grossing up" budgetary revenues for these adjustments. In 2001-02 they amounted to $14.2 billion, of which over half was due to the Canada Child Tax Benefit. As a result, gross budgetary revenues were $187.5 billion in 2001-02, down 3 per cent from 2000-01. Table 3
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|