Home


Instructions

Copyright

Editorial Board

Peer Review

Review Login


Contents

Correspondence

Mailing List

Contact Us

About Us

[Abstract]  [Full Text]  [PDF]


Display
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
PDF
Search in Pubmed
Author: Malloff, C
Author: Lam, W
Related works

Methods Article

Two-dimensional DNA displays for comparisons of bacterial genomes

Chad Malloff1, Edie Dullaghan2, Alice Li3, Richard Stokes4, Rachel Fernandez5* and Wan Lam1

1 Departments of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine. British Columbia Cancer Research Center. Vancouver, BC. Canada.
2 Department of Pediatrics and the Division of Infectious and Immunological Diseases. British Columbia Children's Hospital. Vancouver, BC. Canada.
3 Departments of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine. The Division of Infectious and Immunological Diseases. British Columbia Children's Hospital. Vancouver, BC. Canada.
4 Departments of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Pediatrics, Microbiology and Immunology. University of British Columbia. The Division of Infectious and Immunological Diseases. British Columbia Children's Hospital. Vancouver, BC. Canada.
5 Microbiology and Immunology. University of British Columbia. Vancouver, BC. Canada.

* To whom correspondence should be addressed: Rachel Fernandez, Department of Microbiology & Immunology University of British Columbia. Vancouver, BC. Canada. Phone: (604) 822-6824. Fax: (604) 822-6041. Email: rachelf@interchange.ubc.ca

Biol. Proced. Online 2003;5:143-152. doi:10.1251/bpo56
Submitted: March 16, 2003; Accepted: April 01, 2003; Published: June 15, 2003.

Indexing terms: Genomics; DNA fingerprinting.

Join the BPO Mailing List

Fig. 4 Enlarged

Fig. 4:

Identification of acquired DNA using BCGH (17). (a) 9 X 10 cm area of the blot hybridized with the H846 probe is shown. The orange box represents the region displayed in ((b), (c), (d)). (b) An image from hybridization with the H103 probe was coded green. (c) An image from the H846 probe was coded red. (d) An overlay of the two displays ((b), (c)) is shown. Arrows in (c) and (d) indicate a spot that is unique to strain H846. (e), Close-up of the spot (red box) that was excised and cloned from a radiolabelled parallel gel run. Ten micrograms of radiolabeled Hinf I digested H846 DNA was resolved using 2DDE and the resulting gel was dried and exposed to film. Using the autoradiogram as a reference, the spot of interest was excised from the dried gel. Re-exposure of the gel post-excision verified that the correct spot was retrieved. The gel spot was hydrated, boiled, crushed and centrifuged. The eluted DNA was precipitated with ethanol in the presence of 10 μg of glycogen as a carrier. Adaptors were ligated to the recovered DNA in a 10 μl reaction volume [containing 20% of the eluted DNA, 200 units T4 DNA ligase (New England Biolabs) and 100 pmoles each of oligonucleotide 5’-CAGGCACCCGGGAGATCTGAATTC-3’ and 5’-ANTGAATTCAGATC-3’] for 12 hours at 16°C, and purified with the Qiaquick PCR purification kit (Qiagen, Mississauga, Ontario). One-fifth volume of the purified DNA was amplified by PCR using the longer oligonucleotide listed above [denaturation at 94° for 4 minutes followed by 35 cycles (94° 1 minute, 52° 1 minute, 72° 1 minute)]. Gel purified PCR product was digested with EcoR I and cloned into pBlueScriptKS+ vector (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) for sequence analysis. (f), Sequence derived from this spot. Reprinted from Journal of Molecular Biology, Volume 312, Malloff CA, Fernandez RC, Lam WL. Bacterial Comparative Genomic Hybridization: A Method for Directly Identifying Lateral Gene Transfer. Pages 1-5. Copyright (2001) with permission from Elsevier Science.

Disclaimer/Legal Copyright Privacy Policy

ISSN: 1480-9222
Article © by the author(s). Published in Biological Procedures Online under license from the author(s). Copying, printing, storage and redistribution permitted. Journal © 1997-2004 Biological Procedures Online.