Carnal Nation: Brave New Sex Fictions
Carellin Brooks & Brett Josef Grubisic, editors
Arsenal Pulp Press, 2000
Reviewed by Aidan Baker
I'm not entirely sure what I was expecting. Brave new sex
fictions.
They are fictions, they are written by new writers. They're about sex.
Sort of. I guess they're kind of brave... The impetus behind Carnal
Nation was a Canadian Studies in America conference in Los Angeles at
which Carnal Nation's editors presented their paper, "Rapacity
and Remorse: In/de-ferring Heteroglossic Homoeroticism in Susanna
Moodie's Roughing it in the Bush." The only paper at the
conference which was to mention SEX.
Their host in LA was unsurprised:
"CanLit, huh? It's got to be the most safe and polite and
complacent writing on the planet: by the book anguish and
paint-by-numbers resolution" (p11). They resolved to prove him
wrong, and put together Carnal Nation, a collection of short fiction
which, to quote, "reflects an impressive variety of approaches to
thematizing and understanding sexuality--and showcases the literary
manuoeuvres of young writers who exhibit no reticence about addressing
the often visceral facts of sex" (p15). Good intentions; someone
should do something about disproving our collective frigidity.
There are
some good stories in Carnal Nation. In "Last Call" Michael
Holmes unflinchingly details the relationship (so to speak) between a
lap-dancer and her customer. Mark Macdonald's "Penis" is a
be/amusingly surrealistic tale, somewhat reminiscent of Gogol's The Nose (or, more appropriately, Philip Roth's
The
Breast). Truman Lee Rich's (aka Michael Turner) "Mass
Production" cleverly teases with post-modernism, porn, and heroin.
Derek McCormack contributes with his typically spare, understated prose
in "The Accessory" and Sonja Ahlers brings her intriguing,
amusing graphics/comics into play with "Let's Erase the Human
Race."
I don't have a problem with the stories themselves in Carnal
Nation; generally speaking they are quite good. I have a
problem with the anthology as a whole. Because I don't think it achieved
what it set out to prove; that Canadians can legitimately write about
sex. Sure, sex plays a part in these stories, but only in a handful is
it actually integral to the narrative. And only in another handful is
there some actual analysis, intelligent exploration of sexuality. What's
even more problematic is that very few of these stories are sex
positive.
The book opens with a quotation from Margaret Atwood's Survival, presumably with the notion that the anthology disproves her
statement: "The question we must ask is why no Canadian writer has
seen fit--or found it imaginable--to produce a Venus in Canada."
Yet none of the writers in this collection does produce a Canadian
Venus. Sex, primarily, is something unpleasant and destructive,
addictive and scarring.
Carnal Nation does prove that contemporary
Canadian literature can be more open about sex and sexuality, but it
does little towards the notion that Canadians like sex. Perhaps these
fictions shouldn't be characterized as brave, but frightened. And none
of them were particularly arousing; in an anthology of brave new sex
fictions, I would have at least expected the writing to be a bit more
titillating.